Intrafamilial medically assisted reproduction
For different motives, couples in need of third party assisted reproduction sometimes prefer the help of a family member over an unrelated collaborator. Quantitative (frequency) and qualitative (experience) data about this practice are lacking or scarce. Forms of intrafamilial medically assisted rep...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Human reproduction (Oxford) 2011-03, Vol.26 (3), p.504-509 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 509 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 504 |
| container_title | Human reproduction (Oxford) |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | de Wert, G. Dondorp, W. Pennings, G. Shenfield, F. Devroey, P. Tarlatzis, B. Barri, P. Diedrich, K. |
| description | For different motives, couples in need of third party assisted reproduction sometimes prefer the help of a family member over an unrelated collaborator. Quantitative (frequency) and qualitative (experience) data about this practice are lacking or scarce. Forms of intrafamilial medically assisted reproduction (IMAR) are different with respect to (i) familial closeness between the collaborator and the person whose reproductive contribution he or she replaces and whether assistance would be intra- or intergenerational, (ii) the relationship between the collaborator and the fertile partner (this relationship may or may not be consanguineous) and (iii) with regard to the material (sperm and oocytes) that is donated and the services (surrogacy) that are offered. This document aims at providing guidance to the professional handling of requests for IMAR. It briefly sketches the background of this practice and discusses a variety of relevant normative aspects. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/humrep/deq383 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851749661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humrep/deq383</oup_id><sourcerecordid>851749661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ed9eb3455281027727ad5537d4c6a1508d415528e684ecdfecf1d98d1e2e0f7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQQC0EoqUwsqJusJj6bMd2RlTxUakSC8yWa19EUNK0djL03-MqhZXJJ_npne4RcgvsEVgpFl9DG3G3CLgXRpyRKUjFKBcFOydTxpWhAAom5Cqlb8byaNQlmXDgUpecTQldbfvoKtfWTe2aeYuh9q5pDnOXUp16DPNsj10YfF9322tyUbkm4c3pnZHPl-eP5Rtdv7-ulk9r6oWSPcVQ4kbIouAGGNeaaxeKQuggvXJQMBMkHD9RGYk-VOgrCKUJgBxZpVHMyP3ozav3A6betnXy2DRui92QrClAy1IpyCQdSR-7lCJWdhfr1sWDBWaPgewYyI6BMn93Mg-bfOwf_VskAw8j0A27f1w_V1dxEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>851749661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intrafamilial medically assisted reproduction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>de Wert, G. ; Dondorp, W. ; Pennings, G. ; Shenfield, F. ; Devroey, P. ; Tarlatzis, B. ; Barri, P. ; Diedrich, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Wert, G. ; Dondorp, W. ; Pennings, G. ; Shenfield, F. ; Devroey, P. ; Tarlatzis, B. ; Barri, P. ; Diedrich, K. ; ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law ; ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law including</creatorcontrib><description>For different motives, couples in need of third party assisted reproduction sometimes prefer the help of a family member over an unrelated collaborator. Quantitative (frequency) and qualitative (experience) data about this practice are lacking or scarce. Forms of intrafamilial medically assisted reproduction (IMAR) are different with respect to (i) familial closeness between the collaborator and the person whose reproductive contribution he or she replaces and whether assistance would be intra- or intergenerational, (ii) the relationship between the collaborator and the fertile partner (this relationship may or may not be consanguineous) and (iii) with regard to the material (sperm and oocytes) that is donated and the services (surrogacy) that are offered. This document aims at providing guidance to the professional handling of requests for IMAR. It briefly sketches the background of this practice and discusses a variety of relevant normative aspects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq383</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21247920</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Consanguinity ; Donor Selection ; Family ; Family Relations ; Female ; Humans ; Infertility - psychology ; Infertility - therapy ; Male ; Professional Role ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - psychology ; Surrogate Mothers - psychology ; Tissue Donors - psychology</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 2011-03, Vol.26 (3), p.504-509</ispartof><rights>The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ed9eb3455281027727ad5537d4c6a1508d415528e684ecdfecf1d98d1e2e0f7e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21247920$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Wert, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dondorp, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennings, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenfield, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devroey, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarlatzis, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barri, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diedrich, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law including</creatorcontrib><title>Intrafamilial medically assisted reproduction</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>For different motives, couples in need of third party assisted reproduction sometimes prefer the help of a family member over an unrelated collaborator. Quantitative (frequency) and qualitative (experience) data about this practice are lacking or scarce. Forms of intrafamilial medically assisted reproduction (IMAR) are different with respect to (i) familial closeness between the collaborator and the person whose reproductive contribution he or she replaces and whether assistance would be intra- or intergenerational, (ii) the relationship between the collaborator and the fertile partner (this relationship may or may not be consanguineous) and (iii) with regard to the material (sperm and oocytes) that is donated and the services (surrogacy) that are offered. This document aims at providing guidance to the professional handling of requests for IMAR. It briefly sketches the background of this practice and discusses a variety of relevant normative aspects.</description><subject>Consanguinity</subject><subject>Donor Selection</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family Relations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility - psychology</subject><subject>Infertility - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Professional Role</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - psychology</subject><subject>Surrogate Mothers - psychology</subject><subject>Tissue Donors - psychology</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQQC0EoqUwsqJusJj6bMd2RlTxUakSC8yWa19EUNK0djL03-MqhZXJJ_npne4RcgvsEVgpFl9DG3G3CLgXRpyRKUjFKBcFOydTxpWhAAom5Cqlb8byaNQlmXDgUpecTQldbfvoKtfWTe2aeYuh9q5pDnOXUp16DPNsj10YfF9322tyUbkm4c3pnZHPl-eP5Rtdv7-ulk9r6oWSPcVQ4kbIouAGGNeaaxeKQuggvXJQMBMkHD9RGYk-VOgrCKUJgBxZpVHMyP3ozav3A6betnXy2DRui92QrClAy1IpyCQdSR-7lCJWdhfr1sWDBWaPgewYyI6BMn93Mg-bfOwf_VskAw8j0A27f1w_V1dxEw</recordid><startdate>20110301</startdate><enddate>20110301</enddate><creator>de Wert, G.</creator><creator>Dondorp, W.</creator><creator>Pennings, G.</creator><creator>Shenfield, F.</creator><creator>Devroey, P.</creator><creator>Tarlatzis, B.</creator><creator>Barri, P.</creator><creator>Diedrich, K.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110301</creationdate><title>Intrafamilial medically assisted reproduction</title><author>de Wert, G. ; Dondorp, W. ; Pennings, G. ; Shenfield, F. ; Devroey, P. ; Tarlatzis, B. ; Barri, P. ; Diedrich, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ed9eb3455281027727ad5537d4c6a1508d415528e684ecdfecf1d98d1e2e0f7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Consanguinity</topic><topic>Donor Selection</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family Relations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility - psychology</topic><topic>Infertility - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Professional Role</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - psychology</topic><topic>Surrogate Mothers - psychology</topic><topic>Tissue Donors - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Wert, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dondorp, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennings, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenfield, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devroey, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarlatzis, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barri, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diedrich, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law including</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Wert, G.</au><au>Dondorp, W.</au><au>Pennings, G.</au><au>Shenfield, F.</au><au>Devroey, P.</au><au>Tarlatzis, B.</au><au>Barri, P.</au><au>Diedrich, K.</au><aucorp>ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law</aucorp><aucorp>ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law including</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intrafamilial medically assisted reproduction</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>2011-03-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>504</spage><epage>509</epage><pages>504-509</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><abstract>For different motives, couples in need of third party assisted reproduction sometimes prefer the help of a family member over an unrelated collaborator. Quantitative (frequency) and qualitative (experience) data about this practice are lacking or scarce. Forms of intrafamilial medically assisted reproduction (IMAR) are different with respect to (i) familial closeness between the collaborator and the person whose reproductive contribution he or she replaces and whether assistance would be intra- or intergenerational, (ii) the relationship between the collaborator and the fertile partner (this relationship may or may not be consanguineous) and (iii) with regard to the material (sperm and oocytes) that is donated and the services (surrogacy) that are offered. This document aims at providing guidance to the professional handling of requests for IMAR. It briefly sketches the background of this practice and discusses a variety of relevant normative aspects.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>21247920</pmid><doi>10.1093/humrep/deq383</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0268-1161 |
| ispartof | Human reproduction (Oxford), 2011-03, Vol.26 (3), p.504-509 |
| issn | 0268-1161 1460-2350 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851749661 |
| source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Consanguinity Donor Selection Family Family Relations Female Humans Infertility - psychology Infertility - therapy Male Professional Role Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - psychology Surrogate Mothers - psychology Tissue Donors - psychology |
| title | Intrafamilial medically assisted reproduction |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A37%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intrafamilial%20medically%20assisted%20reproduction&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=de%20Wert,%20G.&rft.aucorp=ESHRE%20Task%20Force%20on%20Ethics%20and%20Law&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=504&rft.epage=509&rft.pages=504-509&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humrep/deq383&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E851749661%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=851749661&rft_id=info:pmid/21247920&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humrep/deq383&rfr_iscdi=true |