Coagulation/flocculation-based removal of algal–bacterial biomass from piggery wastewater treatment

Two conventional chemical coagulants (FeCl 3 and Fe 2(SO 4) 3) and five commercial polymeric flocculants (Drewfloc 447, Flocudex CS/5000, Flocusol CM/78, Chemifloc CV/300 and Chitosan) were comparatively evaluated for their ability to remove algal–bacterial biomass from the effluent of a photosynthe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioresource technology 2011, Vol.102 (2), p.923-927
Hauptverfasser: de Godos, Ignacio, Guzman, Héctor O., Soto, Roberto, García-Encina, Pedro A., Becares, Eloy, Muñoz, Raúl, Vargas, Virginia A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 927
container_issue 2
container_start_page 923
container_title Bioresource technology
container_volume 102
creator de Godos, Ignacio
Guzman, Héctor O.
Soto, Roberto
García-Encina, Pedro A.
Becares, Eloy
Muñoz, Raúl
Vargas, Virginia A.
description Two conventional chemical coagulants (FeCl 3 and Fe 2(SO 4) 3) and five commercial polymeric flocculants (Drewfloc 447, Flocudex CS/5000, Flocusol CM/78, Chemifloc CV/300 and Chitosan) were comparatively evaluated for their ability to remove algal–bacterial biomass from the effluent of a photosynthetically oxygenated piggery wastewater biodegradation process. Chlorella sorokiniana, Scenedesmus obliquus, Chlorococcum sp. and a wild type Chlorella, in symbiosis with a bacterial consortium, were used as model algal–bacterial consortia. While the highest biomass removals (66–98%) for the ferric salts were achieved at concentrations of 150–250 mg L −1, dosages of 25–50 mg L −1 were required for the polymer flocculants to support comparable removal efficiencies. Process efficiency declined when the polymer flocculant was overdosed. Biomass concentration did not show a significant impact on flocculation within the concentration range tested. The high flocculant requirements herein recorded might be due to the competition of colloidal organic for the flocculants and the stationary phase conditions of biomass.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.036
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851471111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S096085241001549X</els_id><sourcerecordid>822359757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-5301db7549ff2a281c027325e4323162f3d47e082fd15603bd6a20e221f232f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1u1DAQB_AIgehSeIWSC4JLtvY4jpMbaMWXVIkD9GxNnHHwKokX29uqN96BN-RJ8Gq3cKO-WB79xl__orjgbM0Zby636975kMh8XwPLRdatmWgeFSveKlFBp5rHxYp1DataCfVZ8SzGLWNMcAVPizNgnRCia1cFbTyO-wmT88ulnbwxp0XVY6ShDDT7G5xKb0ucRpx-__zVo0kUXC7mK8wYY2mDn8udG0cKd-UtxkS3mEmZAmGaaUnPiycWp0gvTvN5cf3h_bfNp-rqy8fPm3dXlZESUiUF40OvZN1ZCwgtNwyUAEm1AMEbsGKoFbEW7MBlw0Q_NAiMALgFAbYV58Xr47674H_sKSY9u2homnAhv4-6lbxWPI-HJYCQnZIqyzf_lVwpxUEKwTJtjtQEH2Mgq3fBzRjuNGf6EJve6vvY9CE2zTqdY8uNF6cz9v1Mw9-2-5wyeHUCGA1ONuBiXPznhGo4cJndy6Oz6DWOIZvrr_mk_LEd1HV7eM7bo6Ccw42joKNxtBgaXCCT9ODdQ7f9Awggw1M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777125330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coagulation/flocculation-based removal of algal–bacterial biomass from piggery wastewater treatment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>de Godos, Ignacio ; Guzman, Héctor O. ; Soto, Roberto ; García-Encina, Pedro A. ; Becares, Eloy ; Muñoz, Raúl ; Vargas, Virginia A.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Godos, Ignacio ; Guzman, Héctor O. ; Soto, Roberto ; García-Encina, Pedro A. ; Becares, Eloy ; Muñoz, Raúl ; Vargas, Virginia A.</creatorcontrib><description>Two conventional chemical coagulants (FeCl 3 and Fe 2(SO 4) 3) and five commercial polymeric flocculants (Drewfloc 447, Flocudex CS/5000, Flocusol CM/78, Chemifloc CV/300 and Chitosan) were comparatively evaluated for their ability to remove algal–bacterial biomass from the effluent of a photosynthetically oxygenated piggery wastewater biodegradation process. Chlorella sorokiniana, Scenedesmus obliquus, Chlorococcum sp. and a wild type Chlorella, in symbiosis with a bacterial consortium, were used as model algal–bacterial consortia. While the highest biomass removals (66–98%) for the ferric salts were achieved at concentrations of 150–250 mg L −1, dosages of 25–50 mg L −1 were required for the polymer flocculants to support comparable removal efficiencies. Process efficiency declined when the polymer flocculant was overdosed. Biomass concentration did not show a significant impact on flocculation within the concentration range tested. The high flocculant requirements herein recorded might be due to the competition of colloidal organic for the flocculants and the stationary phase conditions of biomass.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8524</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20933398</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal Husbandry ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Applied sciences ; Bacteria ; Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Bioreactors - microbiology ; Chitosan ; Chlorella ; Chlorella - isolation &amp; purification ; Chlorella sorokiniana ; Chlorococcum ; Coagulation ; Exact sciences and technology ; Flocculating ; Flocculation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Harvesting ; Microalgae ; Oxygenated ; Piggery wastewater ; Pollution ; Scenedesmus - isolation &amp; purification ; Scenedesmus obliquus ; Sus scrofa ; Symbiosis ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Waste water ; Wastewaters ; Water Purification - methods ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Bioresource technology, 2011, Vol.102 (2), p.923-927</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-5301db7549ff2a281c027325e4323162f3d47e082fd15603bd6a20e221f232f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-5301db7549ff2a281c027325e4323162f3d47e082fd15603bd6a20e221f232f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.036$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23761215$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20933398$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Godos, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Héctor O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soto, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Encina, Pedro A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becares, Eloy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Raúl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Virginia A.</creatorcontrib><title>Coagulation/flocculation-based removal of algal–bacterial biomass from piggery wastewater treatment</title><title>Bioresource technology</title><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><description>Two conventional chemical coagulants (FeCl 3 and Fe 2(SO 4) 3) and five commercial polymeric flocculants (Drewfloc 447, Flocudex CS/5000, Flocusol CM/78, Chemifloc CV/300 and Chitosan) were comparatively evaluated for their ability to remove algal–bacterial biomass from the effluent of a photosynthetically oxygenated piggery wastewater biodegradation process. Chlorella sorokiniana, Scenedesmus obliquus, Chlorococcum sp. and a wild type Chlorella, in symbiosis with a bacterial consortium, were used as model algal–bacterial consortia. While the highest biomass removals (66–98%) for the ferric salts were achieved at concentrations of 150–250 mg L −1, dosages of 25–50 mg L −1 were required for the polymer flocculants to support comparable removal efficiencies. Process efficiency declined when the polymer flocculant was overdosed. Biomass concentration did not show a significant impact on flocculation within the concentration range tested. The high flocculant requirements herein recorded might be due to the competition of colloidal organic for the flocculants and the stationary phase conditions of biomass.</description><subject>Animal Husbandry</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Bioreactors - microbiology</subject><subject>Chitosan</subject><subject>Chlorella</subject><subject>Chlorella - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Chlorella sorokiniana</subject><subject>Chlorococcum</subject><subject>Coagulation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Flocculating</subject><subject>Flocculation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Microalgae</subject><subject>Oxygenated</subject><subject>Piggery wastewater</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Scenedesmus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Scenedesmus obliquus</subject><subject>Sus scrofa</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Waste water</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0960-8524</issn><issn>1873-2976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1u1DAQB_AIgehSeIWSC4JLtvY4jpMbaMWXVIkD9GxNnHHwKokX29uqN96BN-RJ8Gq3cKO-WB79xl__orjgbM0Zby636975kMh8XwPLRdatmWgeFSveKlFBp5rHxYp1DataCfVZ8SzGLWNMcAVPizNgnRCia1cFbTyO-wmT88ulnbwxp0XVY6ShDDT7G5xKb0ucRpx-__zVo0kUXC7mK8wYY2mDn8udG0cKd-UtxkS3mEmZAmGaaUnPiycWp0gvTvN5cf3h_bfNp-rqy8fPm3dXlZESUiUF40OvZN1ZCwgtNwyUAEm1AMEbsGKoFbEW7MBlw0Q_NAiMALgFAbYV58Xr47674H_sKSY9u2homnAhv4-6lbxWPI-HJYCQnZIqyzf_lVwpxUEKwTJtjtQEH2Mgq3fBzRjuNGf6EJve6vvY9CE2zTqdY8uNF6cz9v1Mw9-2-5wyeHUCGA1ONuBiXPznhGo4cJndy6Oz6DWOIZvrr_mk_LEd1HV7eM7bo6Ccw42joKNxtBgaXCCT9ODdQ7f9Awggw1M</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>de Godos, Ignacio</creator><creator>Guzman, Héctor O.</creator><creator>Soto, Roberto</creator><creator>García-Encina, Pedro A.</creator><creator>Becares, Eloy</creator><creator>Muñoz, Raúl</creator><creator>Vargas, Virginia A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>[New York, NY]: Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Coagulation/flocculation-based removal of algal–bacterial biomass from piggery wastewater treatment</title><author>de Godos, Ignacio ; Guzman, Héctor O. ; Soto, Roberto ; García-Encina, Pedro A. ; Becares, Eloy ; Muñoz, Raúl ; Vargas, Virginia A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-5301db7549ff2a281c027325e4323162f3d47e082fd15603bd6a20e221f232f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animal Husbandry</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Bioreactors - microbiology</topic><topic>Chitosan</topic><topic>Chlorella</topic><topic>Chlorella - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Chlorella sorokiniana</topic><topic>Chlorococcum</topic><topic>Coagulation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Flocculating</topic><topic>Flocculation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Microalgae</topic><topic>Oxygenated</topic><topic>Piggery wastewater</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Scenedesmus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Scenedesmus obliquus</topic><topic>Sus scrofa</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Waste water</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Godos, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Héctor O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soto, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Encina, Pedro A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becares, Eloy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Raúl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Virginia A.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bioresource technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Godos, Ignacio</au><au>Guzman, Héctor O.</au><au>Soto, Roberto</au><au>García-Encina, Pedro A.</au><au>Becares, Eloy</au><au>Muñoz, Raúl</au><au>Vargas, Virginia A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coagulation/flocculation-based removal of algal–bacterial biomass from piggery wastewater treatment</atitle><jtitle>Bioresource technology</jtitle><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>923</spage><epage>927</epage><pages>923-927</pages><issn>0960-8524</issn><eissn>1873-2976</eissn><abstract>Two conventional chemical coagulants (FeCl 3 and Fe 2(SO 4) 3) and five commercial polymeric flocculants (Drewfloc 447, Flocudex CS/5000, Flocusol CM/78, Chemifloc CV/300 and Chitosan) were comparatively evaluated for their ability to remove algal–bacterial biomass from the effluent of a photosynthetically oxygenated piggery wastewater biodegradation process. Chlorella sorokiniana, Scenedesmus obliquus, Chlorococcum sp. and a wild type Chlorella, in symbiosis with a bacterial consortium, were used as model algal–bacterial consortia. While the highest biomass removals (66–98%) for the ferric salts were achieved at concentrations of 150–250 mg L −1, dosages of 25–50 mg L −1 were required for the polymer flocculants to support comparable removal efficiencies. Process efficiency declined when the polymer flocculant was overdosed. Biomass concentration did not show a significant impact on flocculation within the concentration range tested. The high flocculant requirements herein recorded might be due to the competition of colloidal organic for the flocculants and the stationary phase conditions of biomass.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20933398</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.036</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-8524
ispartof Bioresource technology, 2011, Vol.102 (2), p.923-927
issn 0960-8524
1873-2976
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851471111
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animal Husbandry
Animal productions
Animals
Applied sciences
Bacteria
Bacteria - isolation & purification
Biodegradation, Environmental
Biological and medical sciences
Biomass
Bioreactors - microbiology
Chitosan
Chlorella
Chlorella - isolation & purification
Chlorella sorokiniana
Chlorococcum
Coagulation
Exact sciences and technology
Flocculating
Flocculation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Harvesting
Microalgae
Oxygenated
Piggery wastewater
Pollution
Scenedesmus - isolation & purification
Scenedesmus obliquus
Sus scrofa
Symbiosis
Terrestrial animal productions
Vertebrates
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
Waste water
Wastewaters
Water Purification - methods
Water treatment and pollution
title Coagulation/flocculation-based removal of algal–bacterial biomass from piggery wastewater treatment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A15%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coagulation/flocculation-based%20removal%20of%20algal%E2%80%93bacterial%20biomass%20from%20piggery%20wastewater%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Bioresource%20technology&rft.au=de%20Godos,%20Ignacio&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=923&rft.epage=927&rft.pages=923-927&rft.issn=0960-8524&rft.eissn=1873-2976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E822359757%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777125330&rft_id=info:pmid/20933398&rft_els_id=S096085241001549X&rfr_iscdi=true