Coagulation/flocculation-based removal of algal–bacterial biomass from piggery wastewater treatment
Two conventional chemical coagulants (FeCl 3 and Fe 2(SO 4) 3) and five commercial polymeric flocculants (Drewfloc 447, Flocudex CS/5000, Flocusol CM/78, Chemifloc CV/300 and Chitosan) were comparatively evaluated for their ability to remove algal–bacterial biomass from the effluent of a photosynthe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bioresource technology 2011, Vol.102 (2), p.923-927 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 927 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 923 |
container_title | Bioresource technology |
container_volume | 102 |
creator | de Godos, Ignacio Guzman, Héctor O. Soto, Roberto García-Encina, Pedro A. Becares, Eloy Muñoz, Raúl Vargas, Virginia A. |
description | Two conventional chemical coagulants (FeCl
3 and Fe
2(SO
4)
3) and five commercial polymeric flocculants (Drewfloc 447, Flocudex CS/5000, Flocusol CM/78, Chemifloc CV/300 and Chitosan) were comparatively evaluated for their ability to remove algal–bacterial biomass from the effluent of a photosynthetically oxygenated piggery wastewater biodegradation process.
Chlorella sorokiniana,
Scenedesmus obliquus, Chlorococcum sp. and a wild type
Chlorella, in symbiosis with a bacterial consortium, were used as model algal–bacterial consortia. While the highest biomass removals (66–98%) for the ferric salts were achieved at concentrations of 150–250
mg
L
−1, dosages of 25–50
mg
L
−1 were required for the polymer flocculants to support comparable removal efficiencies. Process efficiency declined when the polymer flocculant was overdosed. Biomass concentration did not show a significant impact on flocculation within the concentration range tested. The high flocculant requirements herein recorded might be due to the competition of colloidal organic for the flocculants and the stationary phase conditions of biomass. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.036 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851471111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S096085241001549X</els_id><sourcerecordid>822359757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-5301db7549ff2a281c027325e4323162f3d47e082fd15603bd6a20e221f232f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1u1DAQB_AIgehSeIWSC4JLtvY4jpMbaMWXVIkD9GxNnHHwKokX29uqN96BN-RJ8Gq3cKO-WB79xl__orjgbM0Zby636975kMh8XwPLRdatmWgeFSveKlFBp5rHxYp1DataCfVZ8SzGLWNMcAVPizNgnRCia1cFbTyO-wmT88ulnbwxp0XVY6ShDDT7G5xKb0ucRpx-__zVo0kUXC7mK8wYY2mDn8udG0cKd-UtxkS3mEmZAmGaaUnPiycWp0gvTvN5cf3h_bfNp-rqy8fPm3dXlZESUiUF40OvZN1ZCwgtNwyUAEm1AMEbsGKoFbEW7MBlw0Q_NAiMALgFAbYV58Xr47674H_sKSY9u2homnAhv4-6lbxWPI-HJYCQnZIqyzf_lVwpxUEKwTJtjtQEH2Mgq3fBzRjuNGf6EJve6vvY9CE2zTqdY8uNF6cz9v1Mw9-2-5wyeHUCGA1ONuBiXPznhGo4cJndy6Oz6DWOIZvrr_mk_LEd1HV7eM7bo6Ccw42joKNxtBgaXCCT9ODdQ7f9Awggw1M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777125330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coagulation/flocculation-based removal of algal–bacterial biomass from piggery wastewater treatment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>de Godos, Ignacio ; Guzman, Héctor O. ; Soto, Roberto ; García-Encina, Pedro A. ; Becares, Eloy ; Muñoz, Raúl ; Vargas, Virginia A.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Godos, Ignacio ; Guzman, Héctor O. ; Soto, Roberto ; García-Encina, Pedro A. ; Becares, Eloy ; Muñoz, Raúl ; Vargas, Virginia A.</creatorcontrib><description>Two conventional chemical coagulants (FeCl
3 and Fe
2(SO
4)
3) and five commercial polymeric flocculants (Drewfloc 447, Flocudex CS/5000, Flocusol CM/78, Chemifloc CV/300 and Chitosan) were comparatively evaluated for their ability to remove algal–bacterial biomass from the effluent of a photosynthetically oxygenated piggery wastewater biodegradation process.
Chlorella sorokiniana,
Scenedesmus obliquus, Chlorococcum sp. and a wild type
Chlorella, in symbiosis with a bacterial consortium, were used as model algal–bacterial consortia. While the highest biomass removals (66–98%) for the ferric salts were achieved at concentrations of 150–250
mg
L
−1, dosages of 25–50
mg
L
−1 were required for the polymer flocculants to support comparable removal efficiencies. Process efficiency declined when the polymer flocculant was overdosed. Biomass concentration did not show a significant impact on flocculation within the concentration range tested. The high flocculant requirements herein recorded might be due to the competition of colloidal organic for the flocculants and the stationary phase conditions of biomass.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8524</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20933398</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal Husbandry ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Applied sciences ; Bacteria ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Bioreactors - microbiology ; Chitosan ; Chlorella ; Chlorella - isolation & purification ; Chlorella sorokiniana ; Chlorococcum ; Coagulation ; Exact sciences and technology ; Flocculating ; Flocculation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Harvesting ; Microalgae ; Oxygenated ; Piggery wastewater ; Pollution ; Scenedesmus - isolation & purification ; Scenedesmus obliquus ; Sus scrofa ; Symbiosis ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Waste water ; Wastewaters ; Water Purification - methods ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Bioresource technology, 2011, Vol.102 (2), p.923-927</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-5301db7549ff2a281c027325e4323162f3d47e082fd15603bd6a20e221f232f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-5301db7549ff2a281c027325e4323162f3d47e082fd15603bd6a20e221f232f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.036$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23761215$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20933398$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Godos, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Héctor O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soto, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Encina, Pedro A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becares, Eloy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Raúl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Virginia A.</creatorcontrib><title>Coagulation/flocculation-based removal of algal–bacterial biomass from piggery wastewater treatment</title><title>Bioresource technology</title><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><description>Two conventional chemical coagulants (FeCl
3 and Fe
2(SO
4)
3) and five commercial polymeric flocculants (Drewfloc 447, Flocudex CS/5000, Flocusol CM/78, Chemifloc CV/300 and Chitosan) were comparatively evaluated for their ability to remove algal–bacterial biomass from the effluent of a photosynthetically oxygenated piggery wastewater biodegradation process.
Chlorella sorokiniana,
Scenedesmus obliquus, Chlorococcum sp. and a wild type
Chlorella, in symbiosis with a bacterial consortium, were used as model algal–bacterial consortia. While the highest biomass removals (66–98%) for the ferric salts were achieved at concentrations of 150–250
mg
L
−1, dosages of 25–50
mg
L
−1 were required for the polymer flocculants to support comparable removal efficiencies. Process efficiency declined when the polymer flocculant was overdosed. Biomass concentration did not show a significant impact on flocculation within the concentration range tested. The high flocculant requirements herein recorded might be due to the competition of colloidal organic for the flocculants and the stationary phase conditions of biomass.</description><subject>Animal Husbandry</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Bioreactors - microbiology</subject><subject>Chitosan</subject><subject>Chlorella</subject><subject>Chlorella - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Chlorella sorokiniana</subject><subject>Chlorococcum</subject><subject>Coagulation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Flocculating</subject><subject>Flocculation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Microalgae</subject><subject>Oxygenated</subject><subject>Piggery wastewater</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Scenedesmus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Scenedesmus obliquus</subject><subject>Sus scrofa</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Waste water</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0960-8524</issn><issn>1873-2976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1u1DAQB_AIgehSeIWSC4JLtvY4jpMbaMWXVIkD9GxNnHHwKokX29uqN96BN-RJ8Gq3cKO-WB79xl__orjgbM0Zby636975kMh8XwPLRdatmWgeFSveKlFBp5rHxYp1DataCfVZ8SzGLWNMcAVPizNgnRCia1cFbTyO-wmT88ulnbwxp0XVY6ShDDT7G5xKb0ucRpx-__zVo0kUXC7mK8wYY2mDn8udG0cKd-UtxkS3mEmZAmGaaUnPiycWp0gvTvN5cf3h_bfNp-rqy8fPm3dXlZESUiUF40OvZN1ZCwgtNwyUAEm1AMEbsGKoFbEW7MBlw0Q_NAiMALgFAbYV58Xr47674H_sKSY9u2homnAhv4-6lbxWPI-HJYCQnZIqyzf_lVwpxUEKwTJtjtQEH2Mgq3fBzRjuNGf6EJve6vvY9CE2zTqdY8uNF6cz9v1Mw9-2-5wyeHUCGA1ONuBiXPznhGo4cJndy6Oz6DWOIZvrr_mk_LEd1HV7eM7bo6Ccw42joKNxtBgaXCCT9ODdQ7f9Awggw1M</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>de Godos, Ignacio</creator><creator>Guzman, Héctor O.</creator><creator>Soto, Roberto</creator><creator>García-Encina, Pedro A.</creator><creator>Becares, Eloy</creator><creator>Muñoz, Raúl</creator><creator>Vargas, Virginia A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>[New York, NY]: Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Coagulation/flocculation-based removal of algal–bacterial biomass from piggery wastewater treatment</title><author>de Godos, Ignacio ; Guzman, Héctor O. ; Soto, Roberto ; García-Encina, Pedro A. ; Becares, Eloy ; Muñoz, Raúl ; Vargas, Virginia A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-5301db7549ff2a281c027325e4323162f3d47e082fd15603bd6a20e221f232f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animal Husbandry</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Bioreactors - microbiology</topic><topic>Chitosan</topic><topic>Chlorella</topic><topic>Chlorella - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Chlorella sorokiniana</topic><topic>Chlorococcum</topic><topic>Coagulation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Flocculating</topic><topic>Flocculation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Microalgae</topic><topic>Oxygenated</topic><topic>Piggery wastewater</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Scenedesmus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Scenedesmus obliquus</topic><topic>Sus scrofa</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Waste water</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Godos, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Héctor O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soto, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Encina, Pedro A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becares, Eloy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Raúl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Virginia A.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bioresource technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Godos, Ignacio</au><au>Guzman, Héctor O.</au><au>Soto, Roberto</au><au>García-Encina, Pedro A.</au><au>Becares, Eloy</au><au>Muñoz, Raúl</au><au>Vargas, Virginia A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coagulation/flocculation-based removal of algal–bacterial biomass from piggery wastewater treatment</atitle><jtitle>Bioresource technology</jtitle><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>923</spage><epage>927</epage><pages>923-927</pages><issn>0960-8524</issn><eissn>1873-2976</eissn><abstract>Two conventional chemical coagulants (FeCl
3 and Fe
2(SO
4)
3) and five commercial polymeric flocculants (Drewfloc 447, Flocudex CS/5000, Flocusol CM/78, Chemifloc CV/300 and Chitosan) were comparatively evaluated for their ability to remove algal–bacterial biomass from the effluent of a photosynthetically oxygenated piggery wastewater biodegradation process.
Chlorella sorokiniana,
Scenedesmus obliquus, Chlorococcum sp. and a wild type
Chlorella, in symbiosis with a bacterial consortium, were used as model algal–bacterial consortia. While the highest biomass removals (66–98%) for the ferric salts were achieved at concentrations of 150–250
mg
L
−1, dosages of 25–50
mg
L
−1 were required for the polymer flocculants to support comparable removal efficiencies. Process efficiency declined when the polymer flocculant was overdosed. Biomass concentration did not show a significant impact on flocculation within the concentration range tested. The high flocculant requirements herein recorded might be due to the competition of colloidal organic for the flocculants and the stationary phase conditions of biomass.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20933398</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.036</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-8524 |
ispartof | Bioresource technology, 2011, Vol.102 (2), p.923-927 |
issn | 0960-8524 1873-2976 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851471111 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Animal Husbandry Animal productions Animals Applied sciences Bacteria Bacteria - isolation & purification Biodegradation, Environmental Biological and medical sciences Biomass Bioreactors - microbiology Chitosan Chlorella Chlorella - isolation & purification Chlorella sorokiniana Chlorococcum Coagulation Exact sciences and technology Flocculating Flocculation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Harvesting Microalgae Oxygenated Piggery wastewater Pollution Scenedesmus - isolation & purification Scenedesmus obliquus Sus scrofa Symbiosis Terrestrial animal productions Vertebrates Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods Waste water Wastewaters Water Purification - methods Water treatment and pollution |
title | Coagulation/flocculation-based removal of algal–bacterial biomass from piggery wastewater treatment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A15%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coagulation/flocculation-based%20removal%20of%20algal%E2%80%93bacterial%20biomass%20from%20piggery%20wastewater%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Bioresource%20technology&rft.au=de%20Godos,%20Ignacio&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=923&rft.epage=927&rft.pages=923-927&rft.issn=0960-8524&rft.eissn=1873-2976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E822359757%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777125330&rft_id=info:pmid/20933398&rft_els_id=S096085241001549X&rfr_iscdi=true |