Comparison of energy inputs in glasshouse double crop (fall and summer crops) tomato production
The study examines energy use patterns and the relationship between energy inputs and yield for double crop (fall and summer) glasshouse tomato production in Antalya province, where is one of the most important greenhouse centres in Turkey. The data of the study was retrieved from 37 fall and 25 sum...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Renewable energy 2011-05, Vol.36 (5), p.1639-1644 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1644 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1639 |
container_title | Renewable energy |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Ozkan, Burhan Ceylan, R. Figen Kizilay, Hatice |
description | The study examines energy use patterns and the relationship between energy inputs and yield for double crop (fall and summer) glasshouse tomato production in Antalya province, where is one of the most important greenhouse centres in Turkey. The data of the study was retrieved from 37 fall and 25 summer glasshouse tomato producers via face to face survey in 2007. The research findings revealed energy use values for inputs such as manure, electricity, chemical fertilizer and fuel. While the average yield per hectare is 25025.4 kg for enterprises involved in tomato production in fall, it is 22392.9 kg for summer production. The overall energy consumption is higher in fall production with 81362.2 MJ ha−1 in comparison to summer production 63023.2 MJ ha−1. In addition, the specific energy requirement is 3521.2 MJ t−1 and 2814.4 MJ t−1 for fall and summer production in order and the energy efficiency was found out to be 0.31 kg MJ−1 and 0.36 kg MJ−1 respectively. Finally, the energy relationship was tested using the production relationship. The findings indicated that direct energy sources are effective in tomato yield for both of the two seasons. More clearly, the most significant energy input was electrical energy for summer production and a combination of electrical energy, human power and machinery for fall production. Yet, excess and unconscious use of chemical ingredients in glasshouse tomato production was confirmed as energy derived from chemical drugs leaded a declination in the yield for fall season. Therefore, the paper revealed energy relationship for double crop glasshouse tomato production in Antalya, being a reference for similar production methodologies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.renene.2010.11.022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851468593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960148110005355</els_id><sourcerecordid>851468593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-7c9d835d215e10c0a43980fd21c0ee2ac69a2e9f08df1fe20052d94c17204a993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE2LFDEQhoMoOO76DwRzEXcPPValv5KLIMO6Lix40D2HmFTGDN2dNukW9t-bsRePkkOR4qmql4exNwh7BOw-nPaJpvL2As4t3IMQz9gOZa8q6KR4znagOqiwkfiSvcr5BICt7Jsd04c4ziaFHCcePS9L0vGRh2lel1wKPw4m559xzcRdXH8MxG2KM7_yZhi4mRzP6zhS-tvN13yJo1kin1N0q11CnC7Zi4Jmev1UL9jD55vvhy_V_dfbu8On-8o2rVyq3ion69YJbAnBgmlqJcGXvwUiYWynjCDlQTqPngRAK5xqLPYCGqNUfcHeb3vL6V8r5UWPIVsaBjNRSa9li00nW1UXstnIEjnnRF7PKYwmPWoEfdapT3rTqc86NaIuOsvYu6cDJlsz-GQmG_K_WVFLlKruC_d247yJ2hyLWf3wrSxqi_JO1igL8XEjqPj4HSjpbANNllxIZBftYvh_lD8NEZbO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>851468593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of energy inputs in glasshouse double crop (fall and summer crops) tomato production</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ozkan, Burhan ; Ceylan, R. Figen ; Kizilay, Hatice</creator><creatorcontrib>Ozkan, Burhan ; Ceylan, R. Figen ; Kizilay, Hatice</creatorcontrib><description>The study examines energy use patterns and the relationship between energy inputs and yield for double crop (fall and summer) glasshouse tomato production in Antalya province, where is one of the most important greenhouse centres in Turkey. The data of the study was retrieved from 37 fall and 25 summer glasshouse tomato producers via face to face survey in 2007. The research findings revealed energy use values for inputs such as manure, electricity, chemical fertilizer and fuel. While the average yield per hectare is 25025.4 kg for enterprises involved in tomato production in fall, it is 22392.9 kg for summer production. The overall energy consumption is higher in fall production with 81362.2 MJ ha−1 in comparison to summer production 63023.2 MJ ha−1. In addition, the specific energy requirement is 3521.2 MJ t−1 and 2814.4 MJ t−1 for fall and summer production in order and the energy efficiency was found out to be 0.31 kg MJ−1 and 0.36 kg MJ−1 respectively. Finally, the energy relationship was tested using the production relationship. The findings indicated that direct energy sources are effective in tomato yield for both of the two seasons. More clearly, the most significant energy input was electrical energy for summer production and a combination of electrical energy, human power and machinery for fall production. Yet, excess and unconscious use of chemical ingredients in glasshouse tomato production was confirmed as energy derived from chemical drugs leaded a declination in the yield for fall season. Therefore, the paper revealed energy relationship for double crop glasshouse tomato production in Antalya, being a reference for similar production methodologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-1481</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.11.022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal wastes ; Antalya ; Applied sciences ; autumn ; Biological and medical sciences ; business enterprises ; crop yield ; crops ; double cropping ; drugs ; Economic data ; electricity ; Energy ; Energy analysis ; Energy economics ; energy efficiency ; Exact sciences and technology ; fertilizers ; Food industries ; Fruit and vegetable industries ; fuels ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General, economic and professional studies ; Glasshouse tomato ; greenhouses ; ingredients ; Lycopersicon esculentum ; Output–input ratio ; specific energy ; summer ; surveys ; tomatoes</subject><ispartof>Renewable energy, 2011-05, Vol.36 (5), p.1639-1644</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-7c9d835d215e10c0a43980fd21c0ee2ac69a2e9f08df1fe20052d94c17204a993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-7c9d835d215e10c0a43980fd21c0ee2ac69a2e9f08df1fe20052d94c17204a993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.11.022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23818937$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ozkan, Burhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceylan, R. Figen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kizilay, Hatice</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of energy inputs in glasshouse double crop (fall and summer crops) tomato production</title><title>Renewable energy</title><description>The study examines energy use patterns and the relationship between energy inputs and yield for double crop (fall and summer) glasshouse tomato production in Antalya province, where is one of the most important greenhouse centres in Turkey. The data of the study was retrieved from 37 fall and 25 summer glasshouse tomato producers via face to face survey in 2007. The research findings revealed energy use values for inputs such as manure, electricity, chemical fertilizer and fuel. While the average yield per hectare is 25025.4 kg for enterprises involved in tomato production in fall, it is 22392.9 kg for summer production. The overall energy consumption is higher in fall production with 81362.2 MJ ha−1 in comparison to summer production 63023.2 MJ ha−1. In addition, the specific energy requirement is 3521.2 MJ t−1 and 2814.4 MJ t−1 for fall and summer production in order and the energy efficiency was found out to be 0.31 kg MJ−1 and 0.36 kg MJ−1 respectively. Finally, the energy relationship was tested using the production relationship. The findings indicated that direct energy sources are effective in tomato yield for both of the two seasons. More clearly, the most significant energy input was electrical energy for summer production and a combination of electrical energy, human power and machinery for fall production. Yet, excess and unconscious use of chemical ingredients in glasshouse tomato production was confirmed as energy derived from chemical drugs leaded a declination in the yield for fall season. Therefore, the paper revealed energy relationship for double crop glasshouse tomato production in Antalya, being a reference for similar production methodologies.</description><subject>Animal wastes</subject><subject>Antalya</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>autumn</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>business enterprises</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>crops</subject><subject>double cropping</subject><subject>drugs</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>electricity</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy analysis</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>energy efficiency</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>fertilizers</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fruit and vegetable industries</subject><subject>fuels</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Glasshouse tomato</subject><subject>greenhouses</subject><subject>ingredients</subject><subject>Lycopersicon esculentum</subject><subject>Output–input ratio</subject><subject>specific energy</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>tomatoes</subject><issn>0960-1481</issn><issn>1879-0682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE2LFDEQhoMoOO76DwRzEXcPPValv5KLIMO6Lix40D2HmFTGDN2dNukW9t-bsRePkkOR4qmql4exNwh7BOw-nPaJpvL2As4t3IMQz9gOZa8q6KR4znagOqiwkfiSvcr5BICt7Jsd04c4ziaFHCcePS9L0vGRh2lel1wKPw4m559xzcRdXH8MxG2KM7_yZhi4mRzP6zhS-tvN13yJo1kin1N0q11CnC7Zi4Jmev1UL9jD55vvhy_V_dfbu8On-8o2rVyq3ion69YJbAnBgmlqJcGXvwUiYWynjCDlQTqPngRAK5xqLPYCGqNUfcHeb3vL6V8r5UWPIVsaBjNRSa9li00nW1UXstnIEjnnRF7PKYwmPWoEfdapT3rTqc86NaIuOsvYu6cDJlsz-GQmG_K_WVFLlKruC_d247yJ2hyLWf3wrSxqi_JO1igL8XEjqPj4HSjpbANNllxIZBftYvh_lD8NEZbO</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Ozkan, Burhan</creator><creator>Ceylan, R. Figen</creator><creator>Kizilay, Hatice</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Comparison of energy inputs in glasshouse double crop (fall and summer crops) tomato production</title><author>Ozkan, Burhan ; Ceylan, R. Figen ; Kizilay, Hatice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-7c9d835d215e10c0a43980fd21c0ee2ac69a2e9f08df1fe20052d94c17204a993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animal wastes</topic><topic>Antalya</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>autumn</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>business enterprises</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>crops</topic><topic>double cropping</topic><topic>drugs</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>electricity</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy analysis</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>energy efficiency</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>fertilizers</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fruit and vegetable industries</topic><topic>fuels</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Glasshouse tomato</topic><topic>greenhouses</topic><topic>ingredients</topic><topic>Lycopersicon esculentum</topic><topic>Output–input ratio</topic><topic>specific energy</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>tomatoes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ozkan, Burhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceylan, R. Figen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kizilay, Hatice</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Renewable energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ozkan, Burhan</au><au>Ceylan, R. Figen</au><au>Kizilay, Hatice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of energy inputs in glasshouse double crop (fall and summer crops) tomato production</atitle><jtitle>Renewable energy</jtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1639</spage><epage>1644</epage><pages>1639-1644</pages><issn>0960-1481</issn><eissn>1879-0682</eissn><abstract>The study examines energy use patterns and the relationship between energy inputs and yield for double crop (fall and summer) glasshouse tomato production in Antalya province, where is one of the most important greenhouse centres in Turkey. The data of the study was retrieved from 37 fall and 25 summer glasshouse tomato producers via face to face survey in 2007. The research findings revealed energy use values for inputs such as manure, electricity, chemical fertilizer and fuel. While the average yield per hectare is 25025.4 kg for enterprises involved in tomato production in fall, it is 22392.9 kg for summer production. The overall energy consumption is higher in fall production with 81362.2 MJ ha−1 in comparison to summer production 63023.2 MJ ha−1. In addition, the specific energy requirement is 3521.2 MJ t−1 and 2814.4 MJ t−1 for fall and summer production in order and the energy efficiency was found out to be 0.31 kg MJ−1 and 0.36 kg MJ−1 respectively. Finally, the energy relationship was tested using the production relationship. The findings indicated that direct energy sources are effective in tomato yield for both of the two seasons. More clearly, the most significant energy input was electrical energy for summer production and a combination of electrical energy, human power and machinery for fall production. Yet, excess and unconscious use of chemical ingredients in glasshouse tomato production was confirmed as energy derived from chemical drugs leaded a declination in the yield for fall season. Therefore, the paper revealed energy relationship for double crop glasshouse tomato production in Antalya, being a reference for similar production methodologies.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.renene.2010.11.022</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-1481 |
ispartof | Renewable energy, 2011-05, Vol.36 (5), p.1639-1644 |
issn | 0960-1481 1879-0682 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851468593 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Animal wastes Antalya Applied sciences autumn Biological and medical sciences business enterprises crop yield crops double cropping drugs Economic data electricity Energy Energy analysis Energy economics energy efficiency Exact sciences and technology fertilizers Food industries Fruit and vegetable industries fuels Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General, economic and professional studies Glasshouse tomato greenhouses ingredients Lycopersicon esculentum Output–input ratio specific energy summer surveys tomatoes |
title | Comparison of energy inputs in glasshouse double crop (fall and summer crops) tomato production |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A24%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20energy%20inputs%20in%20glasshouse%20double%20crop%20(fall%20and%20summer%20crops)%20tomato%20production&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20energy&rft.au=Ozkan,%20Burhan&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1639&rft.epage=1644&rft.pages=1639-1644&rft.issn=0960-1481&rft.eissn=1879-0682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.renene.2010.11.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E851468593%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=851468593&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0960148110005355&rfr_iscdi=true |