The effect of tillage, crop rotation and residue management on maize and wheat growth and development evaluated with an optical sensor

Crop growth and development as well as yield are the result of the efficiency of the chosen agricultural management system within the boundaries of the agro-ecological environment. End-of-season yield results do not permit the evaluation of within-season management interactions with the production e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Field crops research 2011-01, Vol.120 (1), p.58-67
Hauptverfasser: Verhulst, Nele, Govaerts, Bram, Nelissen, Victoria, Sayre, Ken D., Crossa, Jose, Raes, Dirk, Deckers, Jozef
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 67
container_issue 1
container_start_page 58
container_title Field crops research
container_volume 120
creator Verhulst, Nele
Govaerts, Bram
Nelissen, Victoria
Sayre, Ken D.
Crossa, Jose
Raes, Dirk
Deckers, Jozef
description Crop growth and development as well as yield are the result of the efficiency of the chosen agricultural management system within the boundaries of the agro-ecological environment. End-of-season yield results do not permit the evaluation of within-season management interactions with the production environment and do not allow for full understanding of the management practice applied. Crop growth and development were measured during the 2004, 2006 and 2008 crop cycles with an optical handheld NDVI sensor for all plots of the different management treatments of a long-term (since 1991) sustainability trial in the highlands of Mexico. Cropping systems varying in (1) tillage (conventional vs. zero tillage); (2) residue management (retention vs. removal); (3) rotation (monocropping vs. a maize [ Zea mays L.]/wheat [ Triticum aestivum L.] rotation) were compared. The NDVI-handheld sensor was evaluated as a tool to monitor crop growth and development and was found to be an excellent tool for this purpose. There was a strong relation between NDVI and biomass accumulation of maize and wheat. The measurement with the handheld sensor was non-destructive and fast so that a representative plot area could be measured easily and time-efficiently. Zero tillage induced different crop growth dynamics over time compared to conventional tillage. Zero tillage with residue retention is characterized by a slower initial crop growth, compensated for by an increased growth in the later stages, positively influencing final grain yield. Also crop rotation influenced early crop growth, with lower NDVI values for crops sown after wheat than crops after maize. Zero tillage with residue removal had low NDVI values throughout the growing season. Zero tillage with retention of crop residues results in time efficient use of resources, as opposed to conventional tillage, regardless of residue management, and zero tillage with residue removal. The results indicated that different tillage, rotation and residue management practices influence crop growth and development. It is important to monitor and understand crop growth under different management systems to select the right varieties and adjust timing and practice of input supply (fertilizer, irrigation etc.) in a holistic way in each cropping system.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.08.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851464048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378429010002297</els_id><sourcerecordid>851464048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-4086861fdf6acc01ea11bd15faf5f1a26ddcb19618db3437eb63d042e1ee9da33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFuEzEQhi0EEqHwAJzwrZdumFnvOo44VRW0lSpxoD1bjj1OHG3Wi-2kggfguXGSnnuxNZ7vH2k-M_YZYY6A8ut27m2at1BrUHPA9g2boVq0jVR9-5bNQCxU07VLeM8-5LwFAClRzti_xw1x8p5s4dHzEobBrOmK2xQnnmIxJcSRm9HxRDm4PfGdGSuxo7EGxlqFv3TqP2_IFL5O8blsTg-ODjTE6UTSwQx7U6hi4dTmcSrBmoFnGnNMH9k7b4ZMn17uC_b04_vjzV3z8PP2_ub6obGiF6XpQEkl0TsvjbWAZBBXDntvfO_RtNI5u8KlROVWohMLWknhoGsJiZbOCHHBLs9zpxR_7ykXvQvZUl16pLjPWvXYyQ46VUk8k9VEzom8nlLYmfRHI-ijcr3VVbk-KtegdFVeM1_OGW-iNusUsn76VQEBuMR6HolvZ4LqkodASWcbaLTkQqpfoF0Mr8z_DxmZlYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>851464048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of tillage, crop rotation and residue management on maize and wheat growth and development evaluated with an optical sensor</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Verhulst, Nele ; Govaerts, Bram ; Nelissen, Victoria ; Sayre, Ken D. ; Crossa, Jose ; Raes, Dirk ; Deckers, Jozef</creator><creatorcontrib>Verhulst, Nele ; Govaerts, Bram ; Nelissen, Victoria ; Sayre, Ken D. ; Crossa, Jose ; Raes, Dirk ; Deckers, Jozef</creatorcontrib><description>Crop growth and development as well as yield are the result of the efficiency of the chosen agricultural management system within the boundaries of the agro-ecological environment. End-of-season yield results do not permit the evaluation of within-season management interactions with the production environment and do not allow for full understanding of the management practice applied. Crop growth and development were measured during the 2004, 2006 and 2008 crop cycles with an optical handheld NDVI sensor for all plots of the different management treatments of a long-term (since 1991) sustainability trial in the highlands of Mexico. Cropping systems varying in (1) tillage (conventional vs. zero tillage); (2) residue management (retention vs. removal); (3) rotation (monocropping vs. a maize [ Zea mays L.]/wheat [ Triticum aestivum L.] rotation) were compared. The NDVI-handheld sensor was evaluated as a tool to monitor crop growth and development and was found to be an excellent tool for this purpose. There was a strong relation between NDVI and biomass accumulation of maize and wheat. The measurement with the handheld sensor was non-destructive and fast so that a representative plot area could be measured easily and time-efficiently. Zero tillage induced different crop growth dynamics over time compared to conventional tillage. Zero tillage with residue retention is characterized by a slower initial crop growth, compensated for by an increased growth in the later stages, positively influencing final grain yield. Also crop rotation influenced early crop growth, with lower NDVI values for crops sown after wheat than crops after maize. Zero tillage with residue removal had low NDVI values throughout the growing season. Zero tillage with retention of crop residues results in time efficient use of resources, as opposed to conventional tillage, regardless of residue management, and zero tillage with residue removal. The results indicated that different tillage, rotation and residue management practices influence crop growth and development. It is important to monitor and understand crop growth under different management systems to select the right varieties and adjust timing and practice of input supply (fertilizer, irrigation etc.) in a holistic way in each cropping system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.08.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>corn ; Crop growth ; crop residue management ; Crop rotation ; crop yield ; equipment performance ; highlands ; measuring devices ; monitoring ; NDVI hand-held sensor ; NDVI sensors ; no-tillage ; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index ; optical equipment ; portable equipment ; precision agriculture ; Residue management ; sensors ; Triticum aestivum ; wheat ; Zea mays ; Zero tillage</subject><ispartof>Field crops research, 2011-01, Vol.120 (1), p.58-67</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-4086861fdf6acc01ea11bd15faf5f1a26ddcb19618db3437eb63d042e1ee9da33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-4086861fdf6acc01ea11bd15faf5f1a26ddcb19618db3437eb63d042e1ee9da33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429010002297$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Verhulst, Nele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Govaerts, Bram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelissen, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayre, Ken D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crossa, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raes, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deckers, Jozef</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of tillage, crop rotation and residue management on maize and wheat growth and development evaluated with an optical sensor</title><title>Field crops research</title><description>Crop growth and development as well as yield are the result of the efficiency of the chosen agricultural management system within the boundaries of the agro-ecological environment. End-of-season yield results do not permit the evaluation of within-season management interactions with the production environment and do not allow for full understanding of the management practice applied. Crop growth and development were measured during the 2004, 2006 and 2008 crop cycles with an optical handheld NDVI sensor for all plots of the different management treatments of a long-term (since 1991) sustainability trial in the highlands of Mexico. Cropping systems varying in (1) tillage (conventional vs. zero tillage); (2) residue management (retention vs. removal); (3) rotation (monocropping vs. a maize [ Zea mays L.]/wheat [ Triticum aestivum L.] rotation) were compared. The NDVI-handheld sensor was evaluated as a tool to monitor crop growth and development and was found to be an excellent tool for this purpose. There was a strong relation between NDVI and biomass accumulation of maize and wheat. The measurement with the handheld sensor was non-destructive and fast so that a representative plot area could be measured easily and time-efficiently. Zero tillage induced different crop growth dynamics over time compared to conventional tillage. Zero tillage with residue retention is characterized by a slower initial crop growth, compensated for by an increased growth in the later stages, positively influencing final grain yield. Also crop rotation influenced early crop growth, with lower NDVI values for crops sown after wheat than crops after maize. Zero tillage with residue removal had low NDVI values throughout the growing season. Zero tillage with retention of crop residues results in time efficient use of resources, as opposed to conventional tillage, regardless of residue management, and zero tillage with residue removal. The results indicated that different tillage, rotation and residue management practices influence crop growth and development. It is important to monitor and understand crop growth under different management systems to select the right varieties and adjust timing and practice of input supply (fertilizer, irrigation etc.) in a holistic way in each cropping system.</description><subject>corn</subject><subject>Crop growth</subject><subject>crop residue management</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>equipment performance</subject><subject>highlands</subject><subject>measuring devices</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>NDVI hand-held sensor</subject><subject>NDVI sensors</subject><subject>no-tillage</subject><subject>Normalized Difference Vegetation Index</subject><subject>optical equipment</subject><subject>portable equipment</subject><subject>precision agriculture</subject><subject>Residue management</subject><subject>sensors</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>wheat</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><subject>Zero tillage</subject><issn>0378-4290</issn><issn>1872-6852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFuEzEQhi0EEqHwAJzwrZdumFnvOo44VRW0lSpxoD1bjj1OHG3Wi-2kggfguXGSnnuxNZ7vH2k-M_YZYY6A8ut27m2at1BrUHPA9g2boVq0jVR9-5bNQCxU07VLeM8-5LwFAClRzti_xw1x8p5s4dHzEobBrOmK2xQnnmIxJcSRm9HxRDm4PfGdGSuxo7EGxlqFv3TqP2_IFL5O8blsTg-ODjTE6UTSwQx7U6hi4dTmcSrBmoFnGnNMH9k7b4ZMn17uC_b04_vjzV3z8PP2_ub6obGiF6XpQEkl0TsvjbWAZBBXDntvfO_RtNI5u8KlROVWohMLWknhoGsJiZbOCHHBLs9zpxR_7ykXvQvZUl16pLjPWvXYyQ46VUk8k9VEzom8nlLYmfRHI-ijcr3VVbk-KtegdFVeM1_OGW-iNusUsn76VQEBuMR6HolvZ4LqkodASWcbaLTkQqpfoF0Mr8z_DxmZlYA</recordid><startdate>20110114</startdate><enddate>20110114</enddate><creator>Verhulst, Nele</creator><creator>Govaerts, Bram</creator><creator>Nelissen, Victoria</creator><creator>Sayre, Ken D.</creator><creator>Crossa, Jose</creator><creator>Raes, Dirk</creator><creator>Deckers, Jozef</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[Amsterdam]: Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110114</creationdate><title>The effect of tillage, crop rotation and residue management on maize and wheat growth and development evaluated with an optical sensor</title><author>Verhulst, Nele ; Govaerts, Bram ; Nelissen, Victoria ; Sayre, Ken D. ; Crossa, Jose ; Raes, Dirk ; Deckers, Jozef</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-4086861fdf6acc01ea11bd15faf5f1a26ddcb19618db3437eb63d042e1ee9da33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>corn</topic><topic>Crop growth</topic><topic>crop residue management</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>equipment performance</topic><topic>highlands</topic><topic>measuring devices</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>NDVI hand-held sensor</topic><topic>NDVI sensors</topic><topic>no-tillage</topic><topic>Normalized Difference Vegetation Index</topic><topic>optical equipment</topic><topic>portable equipment</topic><topic>precision agriculture</topic><topic>Residue management</topic><topic>sensors</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>wheat</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><topic>Zero tillage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Verhulst, Nele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Govaerts, Bram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelissen, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayre, Ken D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crossa, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raes, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deckers, Jozef</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Field crops research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Verhulst, Nele</au><au>Govaerts, Bram</au><au>Nelissen, Victoria</au><au>Sayre, Ken D.</au><au>Crossa, Jose</au><au>Raes, Dirk</au><au>Deckers, Jozef</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of tillage, crop rotation and residue management on maize and wheat growth and development evaluated with an optical sensor</atitle><jtitle>Field crops research</jtitle><date>2011-01-14</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>58-67</pages><issn>0378-4290</issn><eissn>1872-6852</eissn><abstract>Crop growth and development as well as yield are the result of the efficiency of the chosen agricultural management system within the boundaries of the agro-ecological environment. End-of-season yield results do not permit the evaluation of within-season management interactions with the production environment and do not allow for full understanding of the management practice applied. Crop growth and development were measured during the 2004, 2006 and 2008 crop cycles with an optical handheld NDVI sensor for all plots of the different management treatments of a long-term (since 1991) sustainability trial in the highlands of Mexico. Cropping systems varying in (1) tillage (conventional vs. zero tillage); (2) residue management (retention vs. removal); (3) rotation (monocropping vs. a maize [ Zea mays L.]/wheat [ Triticum aestivum L.] rotation) were compared. The NDVI-handheld sensor was evaluated as a tool to monitor crop growth and development and was found to be an excellent tool for this purpose. There was a strong relation between NDVI and biomass accumulation of maize and wheat. The measurement with the handheld sensor was non-destructive and fast so that a representative plot area could be measured easily and time-efficiently. Zero tillage induced different crop growth dynamics over time compared to conventional tillage. Zero tillage with residue retention is characterized by a slower initial crop growth, compensated for by an increased growth in the later stages, positively influencing final grain yield. Also crop rotation influenced early crop growth, with lower NDVI values for crops sown after wheat than crops after maize. Zero tillage with residue removal had low NDVI values throughout the growing season. Zero tillage with retention of crop residues results in time efficient use of resources, as opposed to conventional tillage, regardless of residue management, and zero tillage with residue removal. The results indicated that different tillage, rotation and residue management practices influence crop growth and development. It is important to monitor and understand crop growth under different management systems to select the right varieties and adjust timing and practice of input supply (fertilizer, irrigation etc.) in a holistic way in each cropping system.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fcr.2010.08.012</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-4290
ispartof Field crops research, 2011-01, Vol.120 (1), p.58-67
issn 0378-4290
1872-6852
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_851464048
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects corn
Crop growth
crop residue management
Crop rotation
crop yield
equipment performance
highlands
measuring devices
monitoring
NDVI hand-held sensor
NDVI sensors
no-tillage
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
optical equipment
portable equipment
precision agriculture
Residue management
sensors
Triticum aestivum
wheat
Zea mays
Zero tillage
title The effect of tillage, crop rotation and residue management on maize and wheat growth and development evaluated with an optical sensor
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T20%3A02%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20tillage,%20crop%20rotation%20and%20residue%20management%20on%20maize%20and%20wheat%20growth%20and%20development%20evaluated%20with%20an%20optical%20sensor&rft.jtitle=Field%20crops%20research&rft.au=Verhulst,%20Nele&rft.date=2011-01-14&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=58-67&rft.issn=0378-4290&rft.eissn=1872-6852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.08.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E851464048%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=851464048&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378429010002297&rfr_iscdi=true