Evaluation of the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 in Heart Failure

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change of the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 (HUI-3) in heart failure (HF) for use in cost-effectiveness studies. Methods and Results Two hundred eleven patients with HF recruited from outpa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiac failure 2011-02, Vol.17 (2), p.143-150
Hauptverfasser: Pressler, Susan J., RN, PhD, Eckert, George J., MAS, Morrison, Gwendolyn C., PhD, Murray, Michael D., PharmD, MPH, Oldridge, Neil B., PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 150
container_issue 2
container_start_page 143
container_title Journal of cardiac failure
container_volume 17
creator Pressler, Susan J., RN, PhD
Eckert, George J., MAS
Morrison, Gwendolyn C., PhD
Murray, Michael D., PharmD, MPH
Oldridge, Neil B., PhD
description Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change of the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 (HUI-3) in heart failure (HF) for use in cost-effectiveness studies. Methods and Results Two hundred eleven patients with HF recruited from outpatient clinics were enrolled; 165 completed the 26-week study. Patients completed 4 health-related quality of life questionnaires (baseline and 4, 8, and 26 weeks), including the HUI-3, the Medical Outcomes Study Short-form 12 (SF-12), the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (LHFQ), and the Chronic Heart Failure Questionnaire (CHQ). The HUI-3 indicated moderate or fair health-related quality of life overall; the attributes most impaired were pain, ambulation, cognition, and emotion. Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.51) was low and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.68) was adequate. The HUI-3 total score was significantly associated with the SF-12, LHFQ, and CHQ total scores. It discriminated among patients with varying New York Heart Association class ( P < .001) and varying perceived health ( P < .001). The HUI-3 was less responsive to perceived change in health condition than the LHFQ or the CHQ. Conclusions The HUI-3 demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity in this sample supporting its use in cost-effectiveness studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.08.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_850564892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1071916410010948</els_id><sourcerecordid>850564892</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-cbc66e3ef055a11fb061fac138aad0ae23dd053d847dccfe4bef58d02d7d34023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctOBCEQRYnR-P4F0ztXPRaP7mE2RmPGR6Jxoa4JA0VkZLoVaKN_L51RF25cQcipe8MpQo4oTCjQ9mQ5MTpap32YMCiPICdAxQbZpQ1ntRRUbJY7TGk9o63YIXspLQFACphukx1GOQAHsUvO5u86DDr7vqt6V-VnrK5Rh_xcPWUffPaYqpvO4kd1p-NLzSvfjUDM1WXpHiIekC2nQ8LD73OfPF3OHy-u69v7q5uL89vaCMZybRambZGjg6bRlLoFtNRpQ7nU2oJGxq2FhlspptYYh2KBrpEWmJ1aLoDxfXK8zn2N_duAKauVTwZD0B32Q1KygaYVcjaS7Zo0sU8polOv0a90_FQU1ChPLdWPPDXKUyBVkVcGj74rhsUK7e_Yj60CnK0BLB999xhVMh47g9ZHNFnZ3v_fcfonwgTfeaPDC35iWvZD7IpGRVViCtTDuMJxgxRKyExI_gXefZeU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>850564892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 in Heart Failure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pressler, Susan J., RN, PhD ; Eckert, George J., MAS ; Morrison, Gwendolyn C., PhD ; Murray, Michael D., PharmD, MPH ; Oldridge, Neil B., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Pressler, Susan J., RN, PhD ; Eckert, George J., MAS ; Morrison, Gwendolyn C., PhD ; Murray, Michael D., PharmD, MPH ; Oldridge, Neil B., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change of the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 (HUI-3) in heart failure (HF) for use in cost-effectiveness studies. Methods and Results Two hundred eleven patients with HF recruited from outpatient clinics were enrolled; 165 completed the 26-week study. Patients completed 4 health-related quality of life questionnaires (baseline and 4, 8, and 26 weeks), including the HUI-3, the Medical Outcomes Study Short-form 12 (SF-12), the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (LHFQ), and the Chronic Heart Failure Questionnaire (CHQ). The HUI-3 indicated moderate or fair health-related quality of life overall; the attributes most impaired were pain, ambulation, cognition, and emotion. Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.51) was low and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.68) was adequate. The HUI-3 total score was significantly associated with the SF-12, LHFQ, and CHQ total scores. It discriminated among patients with varying New York Heart Association class ( P &lt; .001) and varying perceived health ( P &lt; .001). The HUI-3 was less responsive to perceived change in health condition than the LHFQ or the CHQ. Conclusions The HUI-3 demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity in this sample supporting its use in cost-effectiveness studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-9164</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8414</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.08.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21300304</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cardiovascular ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Female ; Health Status Indicators ; health utilities ; Health-related quality of life ; heart failure ; Heart Failure - diagnosis ; Heart Failure - pathology ; Heart Failure - psychology ; HUI-3 ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Psychometrics ; quality of life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiac failure, 2011-02, Vol.17 (2), p.143-150</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-cbc66e3ef055a11fb061fac138aad0ae23dd053d847dccfe4bef58d02d7d34023</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.08.014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21300304$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pressler, Susan J., RN, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckert, George J., MAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Gwendolyn C., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Michael D., PharmD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldridge, Neil B., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 in Heart Failure</title><title>Journal of cardiac failure</title><addtitle>J Card Fail</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change of the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 (HUI-3) in heart failure (HF) for use in cost-effectiveness studies. Methods and Results Two hundred eleven patients with HF recruited from outpatient clinics were enrolled; 165 completed the 26-week study. Patients completed 4 health-related quality of life questionnaires (baseline and 4, 8, and 26 weeks), including the HUI-3, the Medical Outcomes Study Short-form 12 (SF-12), the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (LHFQ), and the Chronic Heart Failure Questionnaire (CHQ). The HUI-3 indicated moderate or fair health-related quality of life overall; the attributes most impaired were pain, ambulation, cognition, and emotion. Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.51) was low and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.68) was adequate. The HUI-3 total score was significantly associated with the SF-12, LHFQ, and CHQ total scores. It discriminated among patients with varying New York Heart Association class ( P &lt; .001) and varying perceived health ( P &lt; .001). The HUI-3 was less responsive to perceived change in health condition than the LHFQ or the CHQ. Conclusions The HUI-3 demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity in this sample supporting its use in cost-effectiveness studies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>health utilities</subject><subject>Health-related quality of life</subject><subject>heart failure</subject><subject>Heart Failure - diagnosis</subject><subject>Heart Failure - pathology</subject><subject>Heart Failure - psychology</subject><subject>HUI-3</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1071-9164</issn><issn>1532-8414</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctOBCEQRYnR-P4F0ztXPRaP7mE2RmPGR6Jxoa4JA0VkZLoVaKN_L51RF25cQcipe8MpQo4oTCjQ9mQ5MTpap32YMCiPICdAxQbZpQ1ntRRUbJY7TGk9o63YIXspLQFACphukx1GOQAHsUvO5u86DDr7vqt6V-VnrK5Rh_xcPWUffPaYqpvO4kd1p-NLzSvfjUDM1WXpHiIekC2nQ8LD73OfPF3OHy-u69v7q5uL89vaCMZybRambZGjg6bRlLoFtNRpQ7nU2oJGxq2FhlspptYYh2KBrpEWmJ1aLoDxfXK8zn2N_duAKauVTwZD0B32Q1KygaYVcjaS7Zo0sU8polOv0a90_FQU1ChPLdWPPDXKUyBVkVcGj74rhsUK7e_Yj60CnK0BLB999xhVMh47g9ZHNFnZ3v_fcfonwgTfeaPDC35iWvZD7IpGRVViCtTDuMJxgxRKyExI_gXefZeU</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Pressler, Susan J., RN, PhD</creator><creator>Eckert, George J., MAS</creator><creator>Morrison, Gwendolyn C., PhD</creator><creator>Murray, Michael D., PharmD, MPH</creator><creator>Oldridge, Neil B., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 in Heart Failure</title><author>Pressler, Susan J., RN, PhD ; Eckert, George J., MAS ; Morrison, Gwendolyn C., PhD ; Murray, Michael D., PharmD, MPH ; Oldridge, Neil B., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-cbc66e3ef055a11fb061fac138aad0ae23dd053d847dccfe4bef58d02d7d34023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>health utilities</topic><topic>Health-related quality of life</topic><topic>heart failure</topic><topic>Heart Failure - diagnosis</topic><topic>Heart Failure - pathology</topic><topic>Heart Failure - psychology</topic><topic>HUI-3</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pressler, Susan J., RN, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckert, George J., MAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Gwendolyn C., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Michael D., PharmD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldridge, Neil B., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiac failure</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pressler, Susan J., RN, PhD</au><au>Eckert, George J., MAS</au><au>Morrison, Gwendolyn C., PhD</au><au>Murray, Michael D., PharmD, MPH</au><au>Oldridge, Neil B., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 in Heart Failure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiac failure</jtitle><addtitle>J Card Fail</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>143</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>143-150</pages><issn>1071-9164</issn><eissn>1532-8414</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change of the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 (HUI-3) in heart failure (HF) for use in cost-effectiveness studies. Methods and Results Two hundred eleven patients with HF recruited from outpatient clinics were enrolled; 165 completed the 26-week study. Patients completed 4 health-related quality of life questionnaires (baseline and 4, 8, and 26 weeks), including the HUI-3, the Medical Outcomes Study Short-form 12 (SF-12), the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (LHFQ), and the Chronic Heart Failure Questionnaire (CHQ). The HUI-3 indicated moderate or fair health-related quality of life overall; the attributes most impaired were pain, ambulation, cognition, and emotion. Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.51) was low and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.68) was adequate. The HUI-3 total score was significantly associated with the SF-12, LHFQ, and CHQ total scores. It discriminated among patients with varying New York Heart Association class ( P &lt; .001) and varying perceived health ( P &lt; .001). The HUI-3 was less responsive to perceived change in health condition than the LHFQ or the CHQ. Conclusions The HUI-3 demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity in this sample supporting its use in cost-effectiveness studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21300304</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.08.014</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1071-9164
ispartof Journal of cardiac failure, 2011-02, Vol.17 (2), p.143-150
issn 1071-9164
1532-8414
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_850564892
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cardiovascular
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Health Status Indicators
health utilities
Health-related quality of life
heart failure
Heart Failure - diagnosis
Heart Failure - pathology
Heart Failure - psychology
HUI-3
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Psychometrics
quality of life
Quality of Life - psychology
Reproducibility of Results
Statistics, Nonparametric
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
title Evaluation of the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 in Heart Failure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A38%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Health%20Utilities%20Index%20Mark-3%20in%20Heart%20Failure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiac%20failure&rft.au=Pressler,%20Susan%20J.,%20RN,%20PhD&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=143-150&rft.issn=1071-9164&rft.eissn=1532-8414&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.08.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E850564892%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=850564892&rft_id=info:pmid/21300304&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1071916410010948&rfr_iscdi=true