The novice objective structured clinical evaluation tool: psychometric testing
walsh m., bailey p.h., mossey s. & koren i. (2010) The novice objective structured clinical evaluation tool: psychometric testing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(12), 2807–2818. Aim. This paper is a report of a study of the psychometric properties of the Novice Objective Structured Clinical Eva...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of advanced nursing 2010-12, Vol.66 (12), p.2807-2818 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2818 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 2807 |
| container_title | Journal of advanced nursing |
| container_volume | 66 |
| creator | Walsh, Mireille Bailey, Patricia Hill Mossey, Sharolyn Koren, Irene |
| description | walsh m., bailey p.h., mossey s. & koren i. (2010) The novice objective structured clinical evaluation tool: psychometric testing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(12), 2807–2818.
Aim. This paper is a report of a study of the psychometric properties of the Novice Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation Tool.
Background. A collaborative undergraduate nursing programme is currently using an objective structured clinical evaluation at the conclusion of the first nursing clinical course to determine student competence as a component of quality and safety education. However, the reliability and validity of the assessment tool has not been established.
Methods. Psychometric testing was conducted with a convenience sample of 565 nursing students. Data were collected during three consecutive years from 2002 to 2004. Exploratory factor analysis and reliability testing were conducted on this 25‐item tool.
Results. Principal axis factoring method identified two factors through the orthogonal, oblimin and promax rotations: Factor 1 Safety and Factor 2, Anticipation. Spearman‐Brown’s result for Factor 1 was 0·93 and for Factor 2 was 0·77. Cronbach’s alpha was.94 for Factor 1 and 0·71 for Factor 2.
Conclusion. The tool was found to have adequate construct validity and reliability. Its stability should be tested by conducting test–retest analysis. Equivalency dimensions of reliability should be evaluated by looking at interrater reliability. This tool shows merit for assessing elements of quality and safety education. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05421.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_850451765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>850451765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4651-b8acc6859d23d7ab69435325284acb1eca9fb5e0d0cdce0b5ece3ad7ba78bf2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc2O0zAUhS0EYsrAKyCLDasU_8Sxg8RiNGL-NBSEimZpOc4t45DGxXZK-_bj0KELNuCNr-zvHMv6EMKUzGle77o55ZUoWFWqOSP5lIiS0fnuCZodL56iGeGkLlhJ2Al6EWNHCOWMsefohBHJmCJihhbLe8CD3zoL2Dcd2OS2gGMKo01jgBbb3g3Omh7D1vSjSc4POHnfv8ebuLf3fg0pOIsTxOSG7y_Rs5XpI7x63E_Rt4uPy_Or4vbz5fX52W1hy0rQolHG2kqJumW8laap6pILzgRTpbENBWvqVSOAtMS2FkgeLXDTysZI1ayY5afo7aF3E_zPMb-t1y5a6HszgB-jVoKUgspK_JOUSpKS1Yxn8s1fZOfHMORvaEVkXXFZT5A6QDb4GAOs9Ca4tQl7TYme3OhOTwr0pEBPbvRvN3qXo68f-8dmDe0x-EdGBj4cgF-uh_1_F-ubs8U05XxxyLuYYHfMm_BDV5JLoe8Wl_rm4uru66cvVC_5A59KrWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>807963793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The novice objective structured clinical evaluation tool: psychometric testing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Walsh, Mireille ; Bailey, Patricia Hill ; Mossey, Sharolyn ; Koren, Irene</creator><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Mireille ; Bailey, Patricia Hill ; Mossey, Sharolyn ; Koren, Irene</creatorcontrib><description>walsh m., bailey p.h., mossey s. & koren i. (2010) The novice objective structured clinical evaluation tool: psychometric testing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(12), 2807–2818.
Aim. This paper is a report of a study of the psychometric properties of the Novice Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation Tool.
Background. A collaborative undergraduate nursing programme is currently using an objective structured clinical evaluation at the conclusion of the first nursing clinical course to determine student competence as a component of quality and safety education. However, the reliability and validity of the assessment tool has not been established.
Methods. Psychometric testing was conducted with a convenience sample of 565 nursing students. Data were collected during three consecutive years from 2002 to 2004. Exploratory factor analysis and reliability testing were conducted on this 25‐item tool.
Results. Principal axis factoring method identified two factors through the orthogonal, oblimin and promax rotations: Factor 1 Safety and Factor 2, Anticipation. Spearman‐Brown’s result for Factor 1 was 0·93 and for Factor 2 was 0·77. Cronbach’s alpha was.94 for Factor 1 and 0·71 for Factor 2.
Conclusion. The tool was found to have adequate construct validity and reliability. Its stability should be tested by conducting test–retest analysis. Equivalency dimensions of reliability should be evaluated by looking at interrater reliability. This tool shows merit for assessing elements of quality and safety education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-2402</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05421.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20722805</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anticipation, Psychological ; clinical competence ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Clinical medicine ; Collaboration ; Education, Nursing ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Educational Measurement - standards ; Educational Measurement - statistics & numerical data ; exploratory factor analysis ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Humans ; Novice Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation Tool ; nurse education ; Nursing ; Nursing education ; Nursing Evaluation Research ; Nursing schools ; principal axis factoring ; psychometric testing ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Safety - standards</subject><ispartof>Journal of advanced nursing, 2010-12, Vol.66 (12), p.2807-2818</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Dec 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4651-b8acc6859d23d7ab69435325284acb1eca9fb5e0d0cdce0b5ece3ad7ba78bf2c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4651-b8acc6859d23d7ab69435325284acb1eca9fb5e0d0cdce0b5ece3ad7ba78bf2c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2648.2010.05421.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2648.2010.05421.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20722805$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Mireille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Patricia Hill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossey, Sharolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koren, Irene</creatorcontrib><title>The novice objective structured clinical evaluation tool: psychometric testing</title><title>Journal of advanced nursing</title><addtitle>J Adv Nurs</addtitle><description>walsh m., bailey p.h., mossey s. & koren i. (2010) The novice objective structured clinical evaluation tool: psychometric testing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(12), 2807–2818.
Aim. This paper is a report of a study of the psychometric properties of the Novice Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation Tool.
Background. A collaborative undergraduate nursing programme is currently using an objective structured clinical evaluation at the conclusion of the first nursing clinical course to determine student competence as a component of quality and safety education. However, the reliability and validity of the assessment tool has not been established.
Methods. Psychometric testing was conducted with a convenience sample of 565 nursing students. Data were collected during three consecutive years from 2002 to 2004. Exploratory factor analysis and reliability testing were conducted on this 25‐item tool.
Results. Principal axis factoring method identified two factors through the orthogonal, oblimin and promax rotations: Factor 1 Safety and Factor 2, Anticipation. Spearman‐Brown’s result for Factor 1 was 0·93 and for Factor 2 was 0·77. Cronbach’s alpha was.94 for Factor 1 and 0·71 for Factor 2.
Conclusion. The tool was found to have adequate construct validity and reliability. Its stability should be tested by conducting test–retest analysis. Equivalency dimensions of reliability should be evaluated by looking at interrater reliability. This tool shows merit for assessing elements of quality and safety education.</description><subject>Anticipation, Psychological</subject><subject>clinical competence</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Education, Nursing</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - standards</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>exploratory factor analysis</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Novice Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation Tool</subject><subject>nurse education</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Nursing Evaluation Research</subject><subject>Nursing schools</subject><subject>principal axis factoring</subject><subject>psychometric testing</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Safety - standards</subject><issn>0309-2402</issn><issn>1365-2648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc2O0zAUhS0EYsrAKyCLDasU_8Sxg8RiNGL-NBSEimZpOc4t45DGxXZK-_bj0KELNuCNr-zvHMv6EMKUzGle77o55ZUoWFWqOSP5lIiS0fnuCZodL56iGeGkLlhJ2Al6EWNHCOWMsefohBHJmCJihhbLe8CD3zoL2Dcd2OS2gGMKo01jgBbb3g3Omh7D1vSjSc4POHnfv8ebuLf3fg0pOIsTxOSG7y_Rs5XpI7x63E_Rt4uPy_Or4vbz5fX52W1hy0rQolHG2kqJumW8laap6pILzgRTpbENBWvqVSOAtMS2FkgeLXDTysZI1ayY5afo7aF3E_zPMb-t1y5a6HszgB-jVoKUgspK_JOUSpKS1Yxn8s1fZOfHMORvaEVkXXFZT5A6QDb4GAOs9Ca4tQl7TYme3OhOTwr0pEBPbvRvN3qXo68f-8dmDe0x-EdGBj4cgF-uh_1_F-ubs8U05XxxyLuYYHfMm_BDV5JLoe8Wl_rm4uru66cvVC_5A59KrWw</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Walsh, Mireille</creator><creator>Bailey, Patricia Hill</creator><creator>Mossey, Sharolyn</creator><creator>Koren, Irene</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>The novice objective structured clinical evaluation tool: psychometric testing</title><author>Walsh, Mireille ; Bailey, Patricia Hill ; Mossey, Sharolyn ; Koren, Irene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4651-b8acc6859d23d7ab69435325284acb1eca9fb5e0d0cdce0b5ece3ad7ba78bf2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Anticipation, Psychological</topic><topic>clinical competence</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Education, Nursing</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - standards</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>exploratory factor analysis</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Novice Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation Tool</topic><topic>nurse education</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Nursing Evaluation Research</topic><topic>Nursing schools</topic><topic>principal axis factoring</topic><topic>psychometric testing</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Safety - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Mireille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Patricia Hill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossey, Sharolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koren, Irene</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of advanced nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walsh, Mireille</au><au>Bailey, Patricia Hill</au><au>Mossey, Sharolyn</au><au>Koren, Irene</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The novice objective structured clinical evaluation tool: psychometric testing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advanced nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Adv Nurs</addtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2807</spage><epage>2818</epage><pages>2807-2818</pages><issn>0309-2402</issn><eissn>1365-2648</eissn><abstract>walsh m., bailey p.h., mossey s. & koren i. (2010) The novice objective structured clinical evaluation tool: psychometric testing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(12), 2807–2818.
Aim. This paper is a report of a study of the psychometric properties of the Novice Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation Tool.
Background. A collaborative undergraduate nursing programme is currently using an objective structured clinical evaluation at the conclusion of the first nursing clinical course to determine student competence as a component of quality and safety education. However, the reliability and validity of the assessment tool has not been established.
Methods. Psychometric testing was conducted with a convenience sample of 565 nursing students. Data were collected during three consecutive years from 2002 to 2004. Exploratory factor analysis and reliability testing were conducted on this 25‐item tool.
Results. Principal axis factoring method identified two factors through the orthogonal, oblimin and promax rotations: Factor 1 Safety and Factor 2, Anticipation. Spearman‐Brown’s result for Factor 1 was 0·93 and for Factor 2 was 0·77. Cronbach’s alpha was.94 for Factor 1 and 0·71 for Factor 2.
Conclusion. The tool was found to have adequate construct validity and reliability. Its stability should be tested by conducting test–retest analysis. Equivalency dimensions of reliability should be evaluated by looking at interrater reliability. This tool shows merit for assessing elements of quality and safety education.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20722805</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05421.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0309-2402 |
| ispartof | Journal of advanced nursing, 2010-12, Vol.66 (12), p.2807-2818 |
| issn | 0309-2402 1365-2648 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_850451765 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Anticipation, Psychological clinical competence Clinical Competence - standards Clinical medicine Collaboration Education, Nursing Educational Measurement - methods Educational Measurement - standards Educational Measurement - statistics & numerical data exploratory factor analysis Factor Analysis, Statistical Humans Novice Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation Tool nurse education Nursing Nursing education Nursing Evaluation Research Nursing schools principal axis factoring psychometric testing Psychometrics Quantitative psychology Reproducibility of Results Safety - standards |
| title | The novice objective structured clinical evaluation tool: psychometric testing |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T19%3A48%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20novice%20objective%20structured%20clinical%20evaluation%20tool:%20psychometric%20testing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advanced%20nursing&rft.au=Walsh,%20Mireille&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2807&rft.epage=2818&rft.pages=2807-2818&rft.issn=0309-2402&rft.eissn=1365-2648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05421.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E850451765%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=807963793&rft_id=info:pmid/20722805&rfr_iscdi=true |