Soil Compaction Reduced the Growth of Lodgepole Pine and Douglas-fir Seedlings in Raised Beds after Two Growing Seasons

Growth of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) seedlings after two growing seasons was reduced by medium and high levels of compaction in loamy sand and silt loam soils that received one of three compaction treatments (low = 0.70 relative bulk density [RBD], medium...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil Science Society of America journal 2010-11, Vol.74 (6), p.2162-2174
Hauptverfasser: Bulmer, C.E, Simpson, D.G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2174
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2162
container_title Soil Science Society of America journal
container_volume 74
creator Bulmer, C.E
Simpson, D.G
description Growth of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) seedlings after two growing seasons was reduced by medium and high levels of compaction in loamy sand and silt loam soils that received one of three compaction treatments (low = 0.70 relative bulk density [RBD], medium 0.79–0.82 RBD, and high 0.84 RBD). Survival was reduced on the loamy sand, but not on the silt loam. Soil water content was adjusted with irrigation to levels associated with plant water stress (near wilting point), reduced aeration (near 10% air-filled porosity), and intermediate conditions. Lodgepole pine survival on loamy sand was increased at high water content, but was unaffected by water regime on silt loam. For both soil types, the best lodgepole pine growth was observed for the intermediate watering level. The detrimental effects of compaction were consistent across all water regimes. We also evaluated the response of Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Beissn.) Franco] on silt loam and it was similar to lodgepole pine, except that survival was lower on the compacted silt loam, and under dry conditions. For both species, limitations to growth and survival at medium and high compaction levels were consistent with expectations based on the least limiting water range. Our results, however, are also consistent with a continuously declining growth response due to increasing compaction. The RBD was a good predictor of limiting soil conditions for both soil types and species, and substantially reduced survival and growth was observed at RBD levels higher than 0.80.
doi_str_mv 10.2136/sssaj2009.0458
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_849465413</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>849465413</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4068-8e3b755f8b0c125099a6d794c95141ddb829a7446138090945f895c7bab269e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9v0zAYhiMEEmVw5YqFhDilfI5_JD5wGGUboEogsp0tx3E6V27c-UtU7b_HpdUOXLjYkvW8z2vpLYq3FJYVZfITIpptBaCWwEXzrFhQzkQJUtLnxQKYpKVQSrwsXiFuAahQAIvi0EYfyCru9sZOPo7kt-tn63oy3Ttyk-JhuidxIOvYb9w-Bkd--dERM_bka5w3wWA5-ERa5_rgxw0Snw3GYxZ8cT0SM0wukdtD_OvKREYNxhFfFy8GE9C9Od8Xxd311e3qW7n-efN9dbkuLQfZlI1jXS3E0HRgaSVAKSP7WnGrBOW077umUqbmXFLWgALFM6qErTvTVVI5xS6KjyfvPsWH2eGkdx6tC8GMLs6oG664FJyyTL7_h9zGOY35c7qWuZpDDRlaniCbImJyg94nvzPpUVPQxxX00wr6uEIOfDhbDVoThmRG6_EpVTHWsFoeuc8n7uCDe_yPVbeXP6q2PZ756dzz7pQfTNRmk3LHXVsBZUAVSN5I9gf9x6KM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>762504070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soil Compaction Reduced the Growth of Lodgepole Pine and Douglas-fir Seedlings in Raised Beds after Two Growing Seasons</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bulmer, C.E ; Simpson, D.G</creator><creatorcontrib>Bulmer, C.E ; Simpson, D.G</creatorcontrib><description>Growth of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) seedlings after two growing seasons was reduced by medium and high levels of compaction in loamy sand and silt loam soils that received one of three compaction treatments (low = 0.70 relative bulk density [RBD], medium 0.79–0.82 RBD, and high 0.84 RBD). Survival was reduced on the loamy sand, but not on the silt loam. Soil water content was adjusted with irrigation to levels associated with plant water stress (near wilting point), reduced aeration (near 10% air-filled porosity), and intermediate conditions. Lodgepole pine survival on loamy sand was increased at high water content, but was unaffected by water regime on silt loam. For both soil types, the best lodgepole pine growth was observed for the intermediate watering level. The detrimental effects of compaction were consistent across all water regimes. We also evaluated the response of Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Beissn.) Franco] on silt loam and it was similar to lodgepole pine, except that survival was lower on the compacted silt loam, and under dry conditions. For both species, limitations to growth and survival at medium and high compaction levels were consistent with expectations based on the least limiting water range. Our results, however, are also consistent with a continuously declining growth response due to increasing compaction. The RBD was a good predictor of limiting soil conditions for both soil types and species, and substantially reduced survival and growth was observed at RBD levels higher than 0.80.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-5995</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1435-0661</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2009.0458</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSSJD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: Soil Science Society</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; bulk density ; Constraining ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Evergreen trees ; Exact sciences and technology ; forest trees ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Greenhouse gases ; Growing season ; Loam soils ; Loams ; loamy sand soils ; Loamy sands ; Moisture content ; Pine ; Pine trees ; Pinus contorta ; Porosity ; Productivity ; Pseudotsuga menziesii ; raised beds ; Sand ; seedling growth ; Seedlings ; Silt loam ; silt loam soils ; Silts ; Soil (material) ; soil air ; Soil compaction ; soil pore system ; Soil science ; Soil types ; Soil water ; soil water content ; Soils ; species differences ; Surficial geology ; Survival ; tree mortality ; Trees ; Water content ; Water stress ; Wilting ; Wilting point</subject><ispartof>Soil Science Society of America journal, 2010-11, Vol.74 (6), p.2162-2174</ispartof><rights>Soil Science Society of America</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Nov/Dec 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4068-8e3b755f8b0c125099a6d794c95141ddb829a7446138090945f895c7bab269e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4068-8e3b755f8b0c125099a6d794c95141ddb829a7446138090945f895c7bab269e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2136%2Fsssaj2009.0458$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2136%2Fsssaj2009.0458$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23383768$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bulmer, C.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, D.G</creatorcontrib><title>Soil Compaction Reduced the Growth of Lodgepole Pine and Douglas-fir Seedlings in Raised Beds after Two Growing Seasons</title><title>Soil Science Society of America journal</title><description>Growth of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) seedlings after two growing seasons was reduced by medium and high levels of compaction in loamy sand and silt loam soils that received one of three compaction treatments (low = 0.70 relative bulk density [RBD], medium 0.79–0.82 RBD, and high 0.84 RBD). Survival was reduced on the loamy sand, but not on the silt loam. Soil water content was adjusted with irrigation to levels associated with plant water stress (near wilting point), reduced aeration (near 10% air-filled porosity), and intermediate conditions. Lodgepole pine survival on loamy sand was increased at high water content, but was unaffected by water regime on silt loam. For both soil types, the best lodgepole pine growth was observed for the intermediate watering level. The detrimental effects of compaction were consistent across all water regimes. We also evaluated the response of Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Beissn.) Franco] on silt loam and it was similar to lodgepole pine, except that survival was lower on the compacted silt loam, and under dry conditions. For both species, limitations to growth and survival at medium and high compaction levels were consistent with expectations based on the least limiting water range. Our results, however, are also consistent with a continuously declining growth response due to increasing compaction. The RBD was a good predictor of limiting soil conditions for both soil types and species, and substantially reduced survival and growth was observed at RBD levels higher than 0.80.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>bulk density</subject><subject>Constraining</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Evergreen trees</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>forest trees</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Loam soils</subject><subject>Loams</subject><subject>loamy sand soils</subject><subject>Loamy sands</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Pine</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pinus contorta</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Pseudotsuga menziesii</subject><subject>raised beds</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>seedling growth</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Silt loam</subject><subject>silt loam soils</subject><subject>Silts</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>soil air</subject><subject>Soil compaction</subject><subject>soil pore system</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>Soil types</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>soil water content</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>species differences</subject><subject>Surficial geology</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>tree mortality</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Water content</subject><subject>Water stress</subject><subject>Wilting</subject><subject>Wilting point</subject><issn>0361-5995</issn><issn>1435-0661</issn><issn>1435-0661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9v0zAYhiMEEmVw5YqFhDilfI5_JD5wGGUboEogsp0tx3E6V27c-UtU7b_HpdUOXLjYkvW8z2vpLYq3FJYVZfITIpptBaCWwEXzrFhQzkQJUtLnxQKYpKVQSrwsXiFuAahQAIvi0EYfyCru9sZOPo7kt-tn63oy3Ttyk-JhuidxIOvYb9w-Bkd--dERM_bka5w3wWA5-ERa5_rgxw0Snw3GYxZ8cT0SM0wukdtD_OvKREYNxhFfFy8GE9C9Od8Xxd311e3qW7n-efN9dbkuLQfZlI1jXS3E0HRgaSVAKSP7WnGrBOW077umUqbmXFLWgALFM6qErTvTVVI5xS6KjyfvPsWH2eGkdx6tC8GMLs6oG664FJyyTL7_h9zGOY35c7qWuZpDDRlaniCbImJyg94nvzPpUVPQxxX00wr6uEIOfDhbDVoThmRG6_EpVTHWsFoeuc8n7uCDe_yPVbeXP6q2PZ756dzz7pQfTNRmk3LHXVsBZUAVSN5I9gf9x6KM</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>Bulmer, C.E</creator><creator>Simpson, D.G</creator><general>Soil Science Society</general><general>Soil Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>Soil Compaction Reduced the Growth of Lodgepole Pine and Douglas-fir Seedlings in Raised Beds after Two Growing Seasons</title><author>Bulmer, C.E ; Simpson, D.G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4068-8e3b755f8b0c125099a6d794c95141ddb829a7446138090945f895c7bab269e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>bulk density</topic><topic>Constraining</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Evergreen trees</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>forest trees</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Loam soils</topic><topic>Loams</topic><topic>loamy sand soils</topic><topic>Loamy sands</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Pine</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pinus contorta</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Pseudotsuga menziesii</topic><topic>raised beds</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>seedling growth</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Silt loam</topic><topic>silt loam soils</topic><topic>Silts</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>soil air</topic><topic>Soil compaction</topic><topic>soil pore system</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>Soil types</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>soil water content</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>species differences</topic><topic>Surficial geology</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>tree mortality</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Water content</topic><topic>Water stress</topic><topic>Wilting</topic><topic>Wilting point</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bulmer, C.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, D.G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bulmer, C.E</au><au>Simpson, D.G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soil Compaction Reduced the Growth of Lodgepole Pine and Douglas-fir Seedlings in Raised Beds after Two Growing Seasons</atitle><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2162</spage><epage>2174</epage><pages>2162-2174</pages><issn>0361-5995</issn><issn>1435-0661</issn><eissn>1435-0661</eissn><coden>SSSJD4</coden><abstract>Growth of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) seedlings after two growing seasons was reduced by medium and high levels of compaction in loamy sand and silt loam soils that received one of three compaction treatments (low = 0.70 relative bulk density [RBD], medium 0.79–0.82 RBD, and high 0.84 RBD). Survival was reduced on the loamy sand, but not on the silt loam. Soil water content was adjusted with irrigation to levels associated with plant water stress (near wilting point), reduced aeration (near 10% air-filled porosity), and intermediate conditions. Lodgepole pine survival on loamy sand was increased at high water content, but was unaffected by water regime on silt loam. For both soil types, the best lodgepole pine growth was observed for the intermediate watering level. The detrimental effects of compaction were consistent across all water regimes. We also evaluated the response of Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Beissn.) Franco] on silt loam and it was similar to lodgepole pine, except that survival was lower on the compacted silt loam, and under dry conditions. For both species, limitations to growth and survival at medium and high compaction levels were consistent with expectations based on the least limiting water range. Our results, however, are also consistent with a continuously declining growth response due to increasing compaction. The RBD was a good predictor of limiting soil conditions for both soil types and species, and substantially reduced survival and growth was observed at RBD levels higher than 0.80.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>Soil Science Society</pub><doi>10.2136/sssaj2009.0458</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-5995
ispartof Soil Science Society of America journal, 2010-11, Vol.74 (6), p.2162-2174
issn 0361-5995
1435-0661
1435-0661
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_849465413
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
bulk density
Constraining
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Evergreen trees
Exact sciences and technology
forest trees
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Greenhouse gases
Growing season
Loam soils
Loams
loamy sand soils
Loamy sands
Moisture content
Pine
Pine trees
Pinus contorta
Porosity
Productivity
Pseudotsuga menziesii
raised beds
Sand
seedling growth
Seedlings
Silt loam
silt loam soils
Silts
Soil (material)
soil air
Soil compaction
soil pore system
Soil science
Soil types
Soil water
soil water content
Soils
species differences
Surficial geology
Survival
tree mortality
Trees
Water content
Water stress
Wilting
Wilting point
title Soil Compaction Reduced the Growth of Lodgepole Pine and Douglas-fir Seedlings in Raised Beds after Two Growing Seasons
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T07%3A29%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soil%20Compaction%20Reduced%20the%20Growth%20of%20Lodgepole%20Pine%20and%20Douglas-fir%20Seedlings%20in%20Raised%20Beds%20after%20Two%20Growing%20Seasons&rft.jtitle=Soil%20Science%20Society%20of%20America%20journal&rft.au=Bulmer,%20C.E&rft.date=2010-11&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2162&rft.epage=2174&rft.pages=2162-2174&rft.issn=0361-5995&rft.eissn=1435-0661&rft.coden=SSSJD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.2136/sssaj2009.0458&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E849465413%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=762504070&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true