Friction factors: What are they for torque, drag, vibration, bottom hole assembly and transient surge/swab analyses?
The term “friction factor,” conventionally defined for fluid flow engineering calculations, is also used for solid mechanics calculations in the drilling industry. At first glance, it may seem to be a misnomer, but there are underlying facts and reasons for the adoption of the term “mechanical frict...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of petroleum science & engineering 2010-09, Vol.73 (3), p.258-266 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 266 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 258 |
container_title | Journal of petroleum science & engineering |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Samuel, Robello |
description | The term “friction factor,” conventionally defined for fluid flow engineering calculations, is also used for solid mechanics calculations in the drilling industry. At first glance, it may seem to be a misnomer, but there are underlying facts and reasons for the adoption of the term “mechanical friction factor” that is unique to the industry. This term is used as a proxy for the coefficient of friction (COF) or the Coulomb friction, a dimensionless scalar value, in the estimation of torque, drag, and side forces for the directional tendency prediction, static displacement of string for vibration analysis, and moving pipe elastic force for transient swab/surge pressure estimation. Because of larger uncertainties in the modeling of a long drillstring, including cuttings bed, tortuosity, mud properties, fluid viscous effects, wellbore temperature, pressure, and non-uniform geometrical interferences between the drillstring and wellbore, the COF is termed as a friction factor by including the uncertainties involved without defying the mechanics involved. Another important parameter used during the planning stage in combination with the friction factors is the tortuosity factor to provide artificial undulation to the wellbore. The tortuosity factor causes an additional problem, which requires a different friction factor for the analysis, even though the COF between the drillstring and the wellbore has not changed. Because there is no industry standard for quantifying these parameters, a great deal of confusion exists between these parameters and results in the overestimation or underestimation of the frictional drag. This paper describes the details, clear definition, calibration, pitfalls, and context in which they can be used. It presents the simple guidelines and several example calculations. This paper also provides methods for evaluating these parameters with real-time data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.petrol.2010.07.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_849444435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0920410510001439</els_id><sourcerecordid>849444435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-f058279b1feb59ae37f9434688c2380d5b6ee18a693b1b1c416f30d1aa5e85c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhpfSQN2k_6AHXUp78Dqjj_3qoaGEJi0EcknpUcxqZ2OZ9crVyCn-95VxyDG6DMw8r4Z536L4KGElQdaXm9WOUgzTSkFuQbMCaN4UC9k2ujSNrN4WC-gUlEZC9a54z7wBAF3rZlGkm-hd8mEWI7oUIn8Vf9aYBEYSaU0HMYYocv_vnpZiiPi4FE--j3iULEUfUgpbsQ4TCWSmbT8dBM6DSBFn9jQnwfv4SJf8D_s8wOnAxFcXxdmIE9OH53pe_L758XD9s7y7v_11_f2udAZkKkeoWtV0vRyprzok3Yyd0aZuW6d0C0PV10SyxbrTveylM7IeNQwSsaK2ckafF59P_-5iyAdwslvPjqYJZwp7tq3pTH66yuSXV0lZG6WUqcwRNSfUxcAcabS76LcYD1aCPcZhN_YUhz3GYaGxOY4s-_S8AdnhNGaDnOcXrdKqNrKBzH07cZSNefIULbtspKPBR3LJDsG_vug_YDGjBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1642224545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Friction factors: What are they for torque, drag, vibration, bottom hole assembly and transient surge/swab analyses?</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Samuel, Robello</creator><creatorcontrib>Samuel, Robello</creatorcontrib><description>The term “friction factor,” conventionally defined for fluid flow engineering calculations, is also used for solid mechanics calculations in the drilling industry. At first glance, it may seem to be a misnomer, but there are underlying facts and reasons for the adoption of the term “mechanical friction factor” that is unique to the industry. This term is used as a proxy for the coefficient of friction (COF) or the Coulomb friction, a dimensionless scalar value, in the estimation of torque, drag, and side forces for the directional tendency prediction, static displacement of string for vibration analysis, and moving pipe elastic force for transient swab/surge pressure estimation. Because of larger uncertainties in the modeling of a long drillstring, including cuttings bed, tortuosity, mud properties, fluid viscous effects, wellbore temperature, pressure, and non-uniform geometrical interferences between the drillstring and wellbore, the COF is termed as a friction factor by including the uncertainties involved without defying the mechanics involved. Another important parameter used during the planning stage in combination with the friction factors is the tortuosity factor to provide artificial undulation to the wellbore. The tortuosity factor causes an additional problem, which requires a different friction factor for the analysis, even though the COF between the drillstring and the wellbore has not changed. Because there is no industry standard for quantifying these parameters, a great deal of confusion exists between these parameters and results in the overestimation or underestimation of the frictional drag. This paper describes the details, clear definition, calibration, pitfalls, and context in which they can be used. It presents the simple guidelines and several example calculations. This paper also provides methods for evaluating these parameters with real-time data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-4105</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4715</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2010.07.007</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSEE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products ; Drag ; drilling ; Drilling methods and equipments. Rocks mechanics. Directional and horizontal drilling ; Drilling. Casing. Preparing wells for production ; Energy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fluid flow ; Fluids ; Friction factor ; Fuels ; Mathematical models ; Prospecting and production of crude oil, natural gas, oil shales and tar sands ; Surges ; torque and drag ; Tortuosity ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Journal of petroleum science & engineering, 2010-09, Vol.73 (3), p.258-266</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-f058279b1feb59ae37f9434688c2380d5b6ee18a693b1b1c416f30d1aa5e85c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-f058279b1feb59ae37f9434688c2380d5b6ee18a693b1b1c416f30d1aa5e85c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.07.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23264170$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Samuel, Robello</creatorcontrib><title>Friction factors: What are they for torque, drag, vibration, bottom hole assembly and transient surge/swab analyses?</title><title>Journal of petroleum science & engineering</title><description>The term “friction factor,” conventionally defined for fluid flow engineering calculations, is also used for solid mechanics calculations in the drilling industry. At first glance, it may seem to be a misnomer, but there are underlying facts and reasons for the adoption of the term “mechanical friction factor” that is unique to the industry. This term is used as a proxy for the coefficient of friction (COF) or the Coulomb friction, a dimensionless scalar value, in the estimation of torque, drag, and side forces for the directional tendency prediction, static displacement of string for vibration analysis, and moving pipe elastic force for transient swab/surge pressure estimation. Because of larger uncertainties in the modeling of a long drillstring, including cuttings bed, tortuosity, mud properties, fluid viscous effects, wellbore temperature, pressure, and non-uniform geometrical interferences between the drillstring and wellbore, the COF is termed as a friction factor by including the uncertainties involved without defying the mechanics involved. Another important parameter used during the planning stage in combination with the friction factors is the tortuosity factor to provide artificial undulation to the wellbore. The tortuosity factor causes an additional problem, which requires a different friction factor for the analysis, even though the COF between the drillstring and the wellbore has not changed. Because there is no industry standard for quantifying these parameters, a great deal of confusion exists between these parameters and results in the overestimation or underestimation of the frictional drag. This paper describes the details, clear definition, calibration, pitfalls, and context in which they can be used. It presents the simple guidelines and several example calculations. This paper also provides methods for evaluating these parameters with real-time data.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products</subject><subject>Drag</subject><subject>drilling</subject><subject>Drilling methods and equipments. Rocks mechanics. Directional and horizontal drilling</subject><subject>Drilling. Casing. Preparing wells for production</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Fluids</subject><subject>Friction factor</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Prospecting and production of crude oil, natural gas, oil shales and tar sands</subject><subject>Surges</subject><subject>torque and drag</subject><subject>Tortuosity</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0920-4105</issn><issn>1873-4715</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhpfSQN2k_6AHXUp78Dqjj_3qoaGEJi0EcknpUcxqZ2OZ9crVyCn-95VxyDG6DMw8r4Z536L4KGElQdaXm9WOUgzTSkFuQbMCaN4UC9k2ujSNrN4WC-gUlEZC9a54z7wBAF3rZlGkm-hd8mEWI7oUIn8Vf9aYBEYSaU0HMYYocv_vnpZiiPi4FE--j3iULEUfUgpbsQ4TCWSmbT8dBM6DSBFn9jQnwfv4SJf8D_s8wOnAxFcXxdmIE9OH53pe_L758XD9s7y7v_11_f2udAZkKkeoWtV0vRyprzok3Yyd0aZuW6d0C0PV10SyxbrTveylM7IeNQwSsaK2ckafF59P_-5iyAdwslvPjqYJZwp7tq3pTH66yuSXV0lZG6WUqcwRNSfUxcAcabS76LcYD1aCPcZhN_YUhz3GYaGxOY4s-_S8AdnhNGaDnOcXrdKqNrKBzH07cZSNefIULbtspKPBR3LJDsG_vug_YDGjBQ</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Samuel, Robello</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Friction factors: What are they for torque, drag, vibration, bottom hole assembly and transient surge/swab analyses?</title><author>Samuel, Robello</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-f058279b1feb59ae37f9434688c2380d5b6ee18a693b1b1c416f30d1aa5e85c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products</topic><topic>Drag</topic><topic>drilling</topic><topic>Drilling methods and equipments. Rocks mechanics. Directional and horizontal drilling</topic><topic>Drilling. Casing. Preparing wells for production</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Fluids</topic><topic>Friction factor</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Prospecting and production of crude oil, natural gas, oil shales and tar sands</topic><topic>Surges</topic><topic>torque and drag</topic><topic>Tortuosity</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Samuel, Robello</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of petroleum science & engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Samuel, Robello</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Friction factors: What are they for torque, drag, vibration, bottom hole assembly and transient surge/swab analyses?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of petroleum science & engineering</jtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>258</spage><epage>266</epage><pages>258-266</pages><issn>0920-4105</issn><eissn>1873-4715</eissn><coden>JPSEE6</coden><abstract>The term “friction factor,” conventionally defined for fluid flow engineering calculations, is also used for solid mechanics calculations in the drilling industry. At first glance, it may seem to be a misnomer, but there are underlying facts and reasons for the adoption of the term “mechanical friction factor” that is unique to the industry. This term is used as a proxy for the coefficient of friction (COF) or the Coulomb friction, a dimensionless scalar value, in the estimation of torque, drag, and side forces for the directional tendency prediction, static displacement of string for vibration analysis, and moving pipe elastic force for transient swab/surge pressure estimation. Because of larger uncertainties in the modeling of a long drillstring, including cuttings bed, tortuosity, mud properties, fluid viscous effects, wellbore temperature, pressure, and non-uniform geometrical interferences between the drillstring and wellbore, the COF is termed as a friction factor by including the uncertainties involved without defying the mechanics involved. Another important parameter used during the planning stage in combination with the friction factors is the tortuosity factor to provide artificial undulation to the wellbore. The tortuosity factor causes an additional problem, which requires a different friction factor for the analysis, even though the COF between the drillstring and the wellbore has not changed. Because there is no industry standard for quantifying these parameters, a great deal of confusion exists between these parameters and results in the overestimation or underestimation of the frictional drag. This paper describes the details, clear definition, calibration, pitfalls, and context in which they can be used. It presents the simple guidelines and several example calculations. This paper also provides methods for evaluating these parameters with real-time data.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.petrol.2010.07.007</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0920-4105 |
ispartof | Journal of petroleum science & engineering, 2010-09, Vol.73 (3), p.258-266 |
issn | 0920-4105 1873-4715 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_849444435 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Applied sciences Crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products Drag drilling Drilling methods and equipments. Rocks mechanics. Directional and horizontal drilling Drilling. Casing. Preparing wells for production Energy Exact sciences and technology Fluid flow Fluids Friction factor Fuels Mathematical models Prospecting and production of crude oil, natural gas, oil shales and tar sands Surges torque and drag Tortuosity Uncertainty |
title | Friction factors: What are they for torque, drag, vibration, bottom hole assembly and transient surge/swab analyses? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A19%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Friction%20factors:%20What%20are%20they%20for%20torque,%20drag,%20vibration,%20bottom%20hole%20assembly%20and%20transient%20surge/swab%20analyses?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20petroleum%20science%20&%20engineering&rft.au=Samuel,%20Robello&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=266&rft.pages=258-266&rft.issn=0920-4105&rft.eissn=1873-4715&rft.coden=JPSEE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.07.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E849444435%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1642224545&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0920410510001439&rfr_iscdi=true |