Assessment of innovations in clinical research: strengths and potentials for improvement of research in Germany
Clinical research is a central link in the development chain of new treatment methods; scientifically, it belongs between basic science and health services research. It spans from the first application of a new substance or device in humans to the main proofs of its efficacy and safety. Economically...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 2010, Vol.104 (10), p.738-743 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | ger |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 743 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 738 |
container_title | Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Vollmar, Horst Christian Georgieff, Peter Bührlen, Bernhard |
description | Clinical research is a central link in the development chain of new treatment methods; scientifically, it belongs between basic science and health services research. It spans from the first application of a new substance or device in humans to the main proofs of its efficacy and safety. Economically speaking, it absorbs almost half of the total expenditures for the research and development of a new drug and represents a significant factor in the labour market for researchers and study personnel. Also, through participation in clinical trials, patients gain early access to new treatment methods, while on the other hand they are placed at higher risk for undesired side effects. Politics have taken significant steps to strengthen clinical research, but the pharmaceutical industry continues to complain about competitive disadvantages. Despite internationally recognised and, to a large extent, legally codified guidelines there are still significant national differences in implementation. In addition, traditional practices in clinical research are challenged by novel, mainly biotechnological therapeutic methods for which our current knowledge base is rather limited and which therefore entail a higher risk for patients or trial participants. The following paper summarises a report for the Office of Technology Assessment at the German Federal Parliament (TAB). Based on current regulations, scientific literature and expert interviews, current challenges and solution strategies for clinical research will be analysed in terms of an international comparison. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.10.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_849433882</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>849433882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p140t-f842819e4d0ef22c08cd4840cbe150f2bde05284739c4639a49171f56c701b2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kD1PwzAQhj2AaCn8AQbkjSnBX0kctqqCglSJBebIcc7UVWKndlKp_HoCtNOdTs_76PQidEdJSgnNH3fpN5h9ysjfISWEXqA5lXmWlIwWM3Qd446QnPE8u0IzRqkoBC_myC9jhBg7cAP2Blvn_EEN1rs47Vi31lmtWhwgggp6-4TjEMB9DduIlWtw74cpaVUbsfEB264P_gBn2zn1q1pD6JQ73qBLM9Fwe5oL9Pny_LF6TTbv67fVcpP0VJAhMVIwSUsQDQHDmCZSN0IKomugGTGsboBkTIqCl1rkvFSipAU1Wa4LQmtW8wV6-PdOD-1HiEPV2aihbZUDP8ZKilJwLiWbyPsTOdYdNFUfbKfCsTp3xH8ATp9prQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>849433882</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of innovations in clinical research: strengths and potentials for improvement of research in Germany</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Vollmar, Horst Christian ; Georgieff, Peter ; Bührlen, Bernhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Vollmar, Horst Christian ; Georgieff, Peter ; Bührlen, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical research is a central link in the development chain of new treatment methods; scientifically, it belongs between basic science and health services research. It spans from the first application of a new substance or device in humans to the main proofs of its efficacy and safety. Economically speaking, it absorbs almost half of the total expenditures for the research and development of a new drug and represents a significant factor in the labour market for researchers and study personnel. Also, through participation in clinical trials, patients gain early access to new treatment methods, while on the other hand they are placed at higher risk for undesired side effects. Politics have taken significant steps to strengthen clinical research, but the pharmaceutical industry continues to complain about competitive disadvantages. Despite internationally recognised and, to a large extent, legally codified guidelines there are still significant national differences in implementation. In addition, traditional practices in clinical research are challenged by novel, mainly biotechnological therapeutic methods for which our current knowledge base is rather limited and which therefore entail a higher risk for patients or trial participants. The following paper summarises a report for the Office of Technology Assessment at the German Federal Parliament (TAB). Based on current regulations, scientific literature and expert interviews, current challenges and solution strategies for clinical research will be analysed in terms of an international comparison.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1865-9217</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.10.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21147437</identifier><language>ger</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Biomedical Research - legislation & jurisprudence ; Biotechnology - legislation & jurisprudence ; Clinical Trials as Topic - legislation & jurisprudence ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Device Approval - legislation & jurisprudence ; Diffusion of Innovation ; Drug Approval - legislation & jurisprudence ; Drug Industry - legislation & jurisprudence ; Forecasting ; Germany ; Humans ; Politics ; Technology Assessment, Biomedical - legislation & jurisprudence ; Total Quality Management - legislation & jurisprudence ; Translational Medical Research - legislation & jurisprudence]]></subject><ispartof>Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 2010, Vol.104 (10), p.738-743</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21147437$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vollmar, Horst Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgieff, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bührlen, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of innovations in clinical research: strengths and potentials for improvement of research in Germany</title><title>Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen</title><addtitle>Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes</addtitle><description>Clinical research is a central link in the development chain of new treatment methods; scientifically, it belongs between basic science and health services research. It spans from the first application of a new substance or device in humans to the main proofs of its efficacy and safety. Economically speaking, it absorbs almost half of the total expenditures for the research and development of a new drug and represents a significant factor in the labour market for researchers and study personnel. Also, through participation in clinical trials, patients gain early access to new treatment methods, while on the other hand they are placed at higher risk for undesired side effects. Politics have taken significant steps to strengthen clinical research, but the pharmaceutical industry continues to complain about competitive disadvantages. Despite internationally recognised and, to a large extent, legally codified guidelines there are still significant national differences in implementation. In addition, traditional practices in clinical research are challenged by novel, mainly biotechnological therapeutic methods for which our current knowledge base is rather limited and which therefore entail a higher risk for patients or trial participants. The following paper summarises a report for the Office of Technology Assessment at the German Federal Parliament (TAB). Based on current regulations, scientific literature and expert interviews, current challenges and solution strategies for clinical research will be analysed in terms of an international comparison.</description><subject>Biomedical Research - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Biotechnology - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Device Approval - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Diffusion of Innovation</subject><subject>Drug Approval - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Drug Industry - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Total Quality Management - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Translational Medical Research - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><issn>1865-9217</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kD1PwzAQhj2AaCn8AQbkjSnBX0kctqqCglSJBebIcc7UVWKndlKp_HoCtNOdTs_76PQidEdJSgnNH3fpN5h9ysjfISWEXqA5lXmWlIwWM3Qd446QnPE8u0IzRqkoBC_myC9jhBg7cAP2Blvn_EEN1rs47Vi31lmtWhwgggp6-4TjEMB9DduIlWtw74cpaVUbsfEB264P_gBn2zn1q1pD6JQ73qBLM9Fwe5oL9Pny_LF6TTbv67fVcpP0VJAhMVIwSUsQDQHDmCZSN0IKomugGTGsboBkTIqCl1rkvFSipAU1Wa4LQmtW8wV6-PdOD-1HiEPV2aihbZUDP8ZKilJwLiWbyPsTOdYdNFUfbKfCsTp3xH8ATp9prQ</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Vollmar, Horst Christian</creator><creator>Georgieff, Peter</creator><creator>Bührlen, Bernhard</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Assessment of innovations in clinical research: strengths and potentials for improvement of research in Germany</title><author>Vollmar, Horst Christian ; Georgieff, Peter ; Bührlen, Bernhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p140t-f842819e4d0ef22c08cd4840cbe150f2bde05284739c4639a49171f56c701b2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Research - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Biotechnology - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Device Approval - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Diffusion of Innovation</topic><topic>Drug Approval - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Drug Industry - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Total Quality Management - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Translational Medical Research - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vollmar, Horst Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgieff, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bührlen, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vollmar, Horst Christian</au><au>Georgieff, Peter</au><au>Bührlen, Bernhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of innovations in clinical research: strengths and potentials for improvement of research in Germany</atitle><jtitle>Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen</jtitle><addtitle>Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>738</spage><epage>743</epage><pages>738-743</pages><issn>1865-9217</issn><abstract>Clinical research is a central link in the development chain of new treatment methods; scientifically, it belongs between basic science and health services research. It spans from the first application of a new substance or device in humans to the main proofs of its efficacy and safety. Economically speaking, it absorbs almost half of the total expenditures for the research and development of a new drug and represents a significant factor in the labour market for researchers and study personnel. Also, through participation in clinical trials, patients gain early access to new treatment methods, while on the other hand they are placed at higher risk for undesired side effects. Politics have taken significant steps to strengthen clinical research, but the pharmaceutical industry continues to complain about competitive disadvantages. Despite internationally recognised and, to a large extent, legally codified guidelines there are still significant national differences in implementation. In addition, traditional practices in clinical research are challenged by novel, mainly biotechnological therapeutic methods for which our current knowledge base is rather limited and which therefore entail a higher risk for patients or trial participants. The following paper summarises a report for the Office of Technology Assessment at the German Federal Parliament (TAB). Based on current regulations, scientific literature and expert interviews, current challenges and solution strategies for clinical research will be analysed in terms of an international comparison.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>21147437</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.zefq.2010.10.001</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1865-9217 |
ispartof | Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 2010, Vol.104 (10), p.738-743 |
issn | 1865-9217 |
language | ger |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_849433882 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Biomedical Research - legislation & jurisprudence Biotechnology - legislation & jurisprudence Clinical Trials as Topic - legislation & jurisprudence Cross-Cultural Comparison Device Approval - legislation & jurisprudence Diffusion of Innovation Drug Approval - legislation & jurisprudence Drug Industry - legislation & jurisprudence Forecasting Germany Humans Politics Technology Assessment, Biomedical - legislation & jurisprudence Total Quality Management - legislation & jurisprudence Translational Medical Research - legislation & jurisprudence |
title | Assessment of innovations in clinical research: strengths and potentials for improvement of research in Germany |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A46%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20innovations%20in%20clinical%20research:%20strengths%20and%20potentials%20for%20improvement%20of%20research%20in%20Germany&rft.jtitle=Zeitschrift%20fu%CC%88r%20Evidenz,%20Fortbildung%20und%20Qualita%CC%88t%20im%20Gesundheitswesen&rft.au=Vollmar,%20Horst%20Christian&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=738&rft.epage=743&rft.pages=738-743&rft.issn=1865-9217&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.zefq.2010.10.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E849433882%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=849433882&rft_id=info:pmid/21147437&rfr_iscdi=true |