Lipid therapy utilization rates in a managed-care mixed dyslipidemia population

Background National clinical treatment guidelines recommend pharmacologic treatment in addition to therapeutic lifestyle modifications in patients with mixed dyslipidemia and multiple risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). Objectives To evaluate real-world pharmacologic treatment of mixed dy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical lipidology 2008-10, Vol.2 (5), p.365-374
Hauptverfasser: Toth, Peter P., MD, PhD, Zarotsky, Victoria, PharmD, Sullivan, Jane M., MPH, Laitinen, Dave, MPH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 374
container_issue 5
container_start_page 365
container_title Journal of clinical lipidology
container_volume 2
creator Toth, Peter P., MD, PhD
Zarotsky, Victoria, PharmD
Sullivan, Jane M., MPH
Laitinen, Dave, MPH
description Background National clinical treatment guidelines recommend pharmacologic treatment in addition to therapeutic lifestyle modifications in patients with mixed dyslipidemia and multiple risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). Objectives To evaluate real-world pharmacologic treatment of mixed dyslipidemia patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Methods Commercial health plan members in a large, United States managed-care database with complete lipid panel results (ie, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], total cholesterol [TC], triglycerides [TG]) between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2006 were included. Mixed dyslipidemia was defined as any two nonoptimal lipid parameters (LDL-C, HDL-C, TG) according to National Cholesterol Education Program/Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Subjects were observed for 182 days pre-index to determine CVD risk factors (ie, male aged 45+ years, female 55+ years, CHD history, hypertension, diabetes mellitus). Lipid treatment status 6 months pre- and post-index dates was determined using pharmacy claims for any lipid monotherapy (statin, fibrate, niacin, “other”), or combination therapy (statin + fenofibrate; statin + niacin; statin + other). Results Lipid treatment increased post-index for all mixed dyslipidemia groups and by total number of risk factors. The increased LDL-C and low HDL-C group had the lowest treatment rates; the group with low HDL-C and elevated TG had the highest. In the latter group, when treated, primarily statin monotherapy (51%) was used post-index; only 26% received niacin or fibrate therapy targeting HDL-C or TG abnormalities. Across all mixed dyslipidemia patients, >30% with three to four CVD risk factors were not treated ≥6 months post-index. Conclusions In real-world clinical practice, pharmacologic treatment rates increased upon assessment of multiple lipid abnormalities and by total risk factors for CHD. However, mixed dyslipidemia remained undertreated with low rates of niacin and fibrate usage.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jacl.2008.08.443
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_849431434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1933287408007824</els_id><sourcerecordid>849431434</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-ba387885d7d24935c46e89f53bddf631830f1a46401c4e257dbcd97325cc639c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LHTEUhoMoftU_4KJk52qu-ZpJBkqhSFuFCy6065CbnGkzZj6azEivv96M17pwIRw4WbzPC3kOQueUrCih1WW7ao0NK0aIWuURgu-hY6pkVQip6v38rjkvmJLiCJ2k1BJSlpKUh-iIUVZTWbFjdLv2o3d4-gPRjFs8Tz74JzP5ocfRTJCw77HBnenNb3CFNRFw5_-Bw26bwoJC5w0eh3EOL9QndNCYkODsdZ-iXz--319dF-vbnzdX39aFFZRMxcZwJZUqnXRM1Ly0ogJVNyXfONdUnCpOGmpEJQi1Algp3ca6WnJWWlvx2vJTdLHrHePwd4Y06c4nCyGYHoY5aSVqwangIifZLmnjkFKERo_RdyZuNSV68ahbvXjUi0edJ3vM0OfX-nnTgXtD_ovLgS-7AORPPnqIOlkPvQXnI9hJu8F_3P_1HW6D77014QG2kNphjn3Wp6lOTBN9t1xyOSRRhEjFBH8GQ2iY-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>849431434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lipid therapy utilization rates in a managed-care mixed dyslipidemia population</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Toth, Peter P., MD, PhD ; Zarotsky, Victoria, PharmD ; Sullivan, Jane M., MPH ; Laitinen, Dave, MPH</creator><creatorcontrib>Toth, Peter P., MD, PhD ; Zarotsky, Victoria, PharmD ; Sullivan, Jane M., MPH ; Laitinen, Dave, MPH</creatorcontrib><description>Background National clinical treatment guidelines recommend pharmacologic treatment in addition to therapeutic lifestyle modifications in patients with mixed dyslipidemia and multiple risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). Objectives To evaluate real-world pharmacologic treatment of mixed dyslipidemia patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Methods Commercial health plan members in a large, United States managed-care database with complete lipid panel results (ie, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], total cholesterol [TC], triglycerides [TG]) between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2006 were included. Mixed dyslipidemia was defined as any two nonoptimal lipid parameters (LDL-C, HDL-C, TG) according to National Cholesterol Education Program/Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Subjects were observed for 182 days pre-index to determine CVD risk factors (ie, male aged 45+ years, female 55+ years, CHD history, hypertension, diabetes mellitus). Lipid treatment status 6 months pre- and post-index dates was determined using pharmacy claims for any lipid monotherapy (statin, fibrate, niacin, “other”), or combination therapy (statin + fenofibrate; statin + niacin; statin + other). Results Lipid treatment increased post-index for all mixed dyslipidemia groups and by total number of risk factors. The increased LDL-C and low HDL-C group had the lowest treatment rates; the group with low HDL-C and elevated TG had the highest. In the latter group, when treated, primarily statin monotherapy (51%) was used post-index; only 26% received niacin or fibrate therapy targeting HDL-C or TG abnormalities. Across all mixed dyslipidemia patients, &gt;30% with three to four CVD risk factors were not treated ≥6 months post-index. Conclusions In real-world clinical practice, pharmacologic treatment rates increased upon assessment of multiple lipid abnormalities and by total risk factors for CHD. However, mixed dyslipidemia remained undertreated with low rates of niacin and fibrate usage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1933-2874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-4789</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2008.08.443</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21291762</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular ; Cholesterol ; Dyslipidemia ; HDL-C ; LDL-C ; Triglycerides</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical lipidology, 2008-10, Vol.2 (5), p.365-374</ispartof><rights>2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-ba387885d7d24935c46e89f53bddf631830f1a46401c4e257dbcd97325cc639c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-ba387885d7d24935c46e89f53bddf631830f1a46401c4e257dbcd97325cc639c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2008.08.443$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21291762$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Toth, Peter P., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarotsky, Victoria, PharmD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Jane M., MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laitinen, Dave, MPH</creatorcontrib><title>Lipid therapy utilization rates in a managed-care mixed dyslipidemia population</title><title>Journal of clinical lipidology</title><addtitle>J Clin Lipidol</addtitle><description>Background National clinical treatment guidelines recommend pharmacologic treatment in addition to therapeutic lifestyle modifications in patients with mixed dyslipidemia and multiple risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). Objectives To evaluate real-world pharmacologic treatment of mixed dyslipidemia patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Methods Commercial health plan members in a large, United States managed-care database with complete lipid panel results (ie, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], total cholesterol [TC], triglycerides [TG]) between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2006 were included. Mixed dyslipidemia was defined as any two nonoptimal lipid parameters (LDL-C, HDL-C, TG) according to National Cholesterol Education Program/Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Subjects were observed for 182 days pre-index to determine CVD risk factors (ie, male aged 45+ years, female 55+ years, CHD history, hypertension, diabetes mellitus). Lipid treatment status 6 months pre- and post-index dates was determined using pharmacy claims for any lipid monotherapy (statin, fibrate, niacin, “other”), or combination therapy (statin + fenofibrate; statin + niacin; statin + other). Results Lipid treatment increased post-index for all mixed dyslipidemia groups and by total number of risk factors. The increased LDL-C and low HDL-C group had the lowest treatment rates; the group with low HDL-C and elevated TG had the highest. In the latter group, when treated, primarily statin monotherapy (51%) was used post-index; only 26% received niacin or fibrate therapy targeting HDL-C or TG abnormalities. Across all mixed dyslipidemia patients, &gt;30% with three to four CVD risk factors were not treated ≥6 months post-index. Conclusions In real-world clinical practice, pharmacologic treatment rates increased upon assessment of multiple lipid abnormalities and by total risk factors for CHD. However, mixed dyslipidemia remained undertreated with low rates of niacin and fibrate usage.</description><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Cholesterol</subject><subject>Dyslipidemia</subject><subject>HDL-C</subject><subject>LDL-C</subject><subject>Triglycerides</subject><issn>1933-2874</issn><issn>1876-4789</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1LHTEUhoMoftU_4KJk52qu-ZpJBkqhSFuFCy6065CbnGkzZj6azEivv96M17pwIRw4WbzPC3kOQueUrCih1WW7ao0NK0aIWuURgu-hY6pkVQip6v38rjkvmJLiCJ2k1BJSlpKUh-iIUVZTWbFjdLv2o3d4-gPRjFs8Tz74JzP5ocfRTJCw77HBnenNb3CFNRFw5_-Bw26bwoJC5w0eh3EOL9QndNCYkODsdZ-iXz--319dF-vbnzdX39aFFZRMxcZwJZUqnXRM1Ly0ogJVNyXfONdUnCpOGmpEJQi1Algp3ca6WnJWWlvx2vJTdLHrHePwd4Y06c4nCyGYHoY5aSVqwangIifZLmnjkFKERo_RdyZuNSV68ahbvXjUi0edJ3vM0OfX-nnTgXtD_ovLgS-7AORPPnqIOlkPvQXnI9hJu8F_3P_1HW6D77014QG2kNphjn3Wp6lOTBN9t1xyOSRRhEjFBH8GQ2iY-Q</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Toth, Peter P., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Zarotsky, Victoria, PharmD</creator><creator>Sullivan, Jane M., MPH</creator><creator>Laitinen, Dave, MPH</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Lipid therapy utilization rates in a managed-care mixed dyslipidemia population</title><author>Toth, Peter P., MD, PhD ; Zarotsky, Victoria, PharmD ; Sullivan, Jane M., MPH ; Laitinen, Dave, MPH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-ba387885d7d24935c46e89f53bddf631830f1a46401c4e257dbcd97325cc639c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Cholesterol</topic><topic>Dyslipidemia</topic><topic>HDL-C</topic><topic>LDL-C</topic><topic>Triglycerides</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Toth, Peter P., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarotsky, Victoria, PharmD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Jane M., MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laitinen, Dave, MPH</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical lipidology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Toth, Peter P., MD, PhD</au><au>Zarotsky, Victoria, PharmD</au><au>Sullivan, Jane M., MPH</au><au>Laitinen, Dave, MPH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lipid therapy utilization rates in a managed-care mixed dyslipidemia population</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical lipidology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Lipidol</addtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>365-374</pages><issn>1933-2874</issn><eissn>1876-4789</eissn><abstract>Background National clinical treatment guidelines recommend pharmacologic treatment in addition to therapeutic lifestyle modifications in patients with mixed dyslipidemia and multiple risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). Objectives To evaluate real-world pharmacologic treatment of mixed dyslipidemia patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Methods Commercial health plan members in a large, United States managed-care database with complete lipid panel results (ie, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], total cholesterol [TC], triglycerides [TG]) between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2006 were included. Mixed dyslipidemia was defined as any two nonoptimal lipid parameters (LDL-C, HDL-C, TG) according to National Cholesterol Education Program/Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Subjects were observed for 182 days pre-index to determine CVD risk factors (ie, male aged 45+ years, female 55+ years, CHD history, hypertension, diabetes mellitus). Lipid treatment status 6 months pre- and post-index dates was determined using pharmacy claims for any lipid monotherapy (statin, fibrate, niacin, “other”), or combination therapy (statin + fenofibrate; statin + niacin; statin + other). Results Lipid treatment increased post-index for all mixed dyslipidemia groups and by total number of risk factors. The increased LDL-C and low HDL-C group had the lowest treatment rates; the group with low HDL-C and elevated TG had the highest. In the latter group, when treated, primarily statin monotherapy (51%) was used post-index; only 26% received niacin or fibrate therapy targeting HDL-C or TG abnormalities. Across all mixed dyslipidemia patients, &gt;30% with three to four CVD risk factors were not treated ≥6 months post-index. Conclusions In real-world clinical practice, pharmacologic treatment rates increased upon assessment of multiple lipid abnormalities and by total risk factors for CHD. However, mixed dyslipidemia remained undertreated with low rates of niacin and fibrate usage.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21291762</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacl.2008.08.443</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1933-2874
ispartof Journal of clinical lipidology, 2008-10, Vol.2 (5), p.365-374
issn 1933-2874
1876-4789
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_849431434
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Cardiovascular
Cholesterol
Dyslipidemia
HDL-C
LDL-C
Triglycerides
title Lipid therapy utilization rates in a managed-care mixed dyslipidemia population
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T12%3A41%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lipid%20therapy%20utilization%20rates%20in%20a%20managed-care%20mixed%20dyslipidemia%20population&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20lipidology&rft.au=Toth,%20Peter%20P.,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=365-374&rft.issn=1933-2874&rft.eissn=1876-4789&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacl.2008.08.443&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E849431434%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=849431434&rft_id=info:pmid/21291762&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1933287408007824&rfr_iscdi=true