PERFORMANCE OF TWO SPECIES OF QUAIL ON BASIC REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES

PERFORMANCE OF TWO SPECIES OF QUAIL ON BASIC REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES

Two bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) and two Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) were trained to peck a response key to obtain food. In general, performance on fixed ratio 20 and variable- and fixed-interval 60-sec schedules was comparable to the response patterns of other species under...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1968-03, Vol.11 (2), p.187-190
Hauptverfasser: Cloar, F. Thomas, Melvin, Kenneth B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Animals
Birds
Conditioning, Operant
Female
Male
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Reinforcement Schedule
Species Specificity
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 190
container_issue 2
container_start_page 187
container_title Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
container_volume 11
creator Cloar, F. Thomas
Melvin, Kenneth B.
description Two bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) and two Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) were trained to peck a response key to obtain food. In general, performance on fixed ratio 20 and variable- and fixed-interval 60-sec schedules was comparable to the response patterns of other species under these schedules.
doi_str_mv 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-187
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_84837275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>84837275</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i242t-42c98b3411bcaad6f0114fc66b13570c5ce58b7047fd8e419a63af1f5b44fc4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLw0AUhQdRtD72boSA4C46N_PMRqhxqpE20abV5TBJJ5raNpq0ov_eEYuom_vgfBzOvQgdAj6FEMPZ1JrcTVyeAvggxQbqQEikTwTAJupgHAQ-c3UH7bbt1A0hF8E22macMilEB13eqmEvHQ66SaS8tOeNHlIvu1VRrLKv9W7cjftemngX3SyOvKGKE0dHaqCSkZdF1-py3FfZPtoqzay1B-u-h8Y9NYqu_X56FUfdvl8FNFj6NChCmRMKkBfGTHiJAWhZcJ4DYQIXrLBM5gJTUU6kpRAaTkwJJcupw2hJ9tD5t-_LKp_bSWEXy8bM9EtTzU3zoWtT6b_KonrSj_WbBkIkFdgZnKwNmvp1ZdulnldtYWczs7D1qtWSSiICwRx4_A-c1qtm4Y5zXi41pQRLRx39zvMTZP1dp_vfetUu7fuPbJpnzQURTD8kVzrj_GYQ4HsdkU_fIIU0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311444308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PERFORMANCE OF TWO SPECIES OF QUAIL ON BASIC REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Cloar, F. Thomas ; Melvin, Kenneth B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cloar, F. Thomas ; Melvin, Kenneth B.</creatorcontrib><description>Two bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) and two Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) were trained to peck a response key to obtain food. In general, performance on fixed ratio 20 and variable- and fixed-interval 60-sec schedules was comparable to the response patterns of other species under these schedules.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-187</identifier><identifier>PMID: 5645877</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Birds ; Conditioning, Operant ; Female ; Male ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Reinforcement Schedule ; Species Specificity</subject><ispartof>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1968-03, Vol.11 (2), p.187-190</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1338470/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1338470/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27868,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5645877$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cloar, F. Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melvin, Kenneth B.</creatorcontrib><title>PERFORMANCE OF TWO SPECIES OF QUAIL ON BASIC REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES</title><title>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</title><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><description>Two bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) and two Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) were trained to peck a response key to obtain food. In general, performance on fixed ratio 20 and variable- and fixed-interval 60-sec schedules was comparable to the response patterns of other species under these schedules.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Conditioning, Operant</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Reinforcement Schedule</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1968</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLw0AUhQdRtD72boSA4C46N_PMRqhxqpE20abV5TBJJ5raNpq0ov_eEYuom_vgfBzOvQgdAj6FEMPZ1JrcTVyeAvggxQbqQEikTwTAJupgHAQ-c3UH7bbt1A0hF8E22macMilEB13eqmEvHQ66SaS8tOeNHlIvu1VRrLKv9W7cjftemngX3SyOvKGKE0dHaqCSkZdF1-py3FfZPtoqzay1B-u-h8Y9NYqu_X56FUfdvl8FNFj6NChCmRMKkBfGTHiJAWhZcJ4DYQIXrLBM5gJTUU6kpRAaTkwJJcupw2hJ9tD5t-_LKp_bSWEXy8bM9EtTzU3zoWtT6b_KonrSj_WbBkIkFdgZnKwNmvp1ZdulnldtYWczs7D1qtWSSiICwRx4_A-c1qtm4Y5zXi41pQRLRx39zvMTZP1dp_vfetUu7fuPbJpnzQURTD8kVzrj_GYQ4HsdkU_fIIU0</recordid><startdate>19680301</startdate><enddate>19680301</enddate><creator>Cloar, F. Thomas</creator><creator>Melvin, Kenneth B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>JTYFY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19680301</creationdate><title>PERFORMANCE OF TWO SPECIES OF QUAIL ON BASIC REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES</title><author>Cloar, F. Thomas ; Melvin, Kenneth B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i242t-42c98b3411bcaad6f0114fc66b13570c5ce58b7047fd8e419a63af1f5b44fc4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1968</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Conditioning, Operant</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Reinforcement Schedule</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cloar, F. Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melvin, Kenneth B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 37</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cloar, F. Thomas</au><au>Melvin, Kenneth B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PERFORMANCE OF TWO SPECIES OF QUAIL ON BASIC REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><date>1968-03-01</date><risdate>1968</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>187-190</pages><issn>0022-5002</issn><eissn>1938-3711</eissn><abstract>Two bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) and two Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) were trained to peck a response key to obtain food. In general, performance on fixed ratio 20 and variable- and fixed-interval 60-sec schedules was comparable to the response patterns of other species under these schedules.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>5645877</pmid><doi>10.1901/jeab.1968.11-187</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5002
ispartof Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1968-03, Vol.11 (2), p.187-190
issn 0022-5002
1938-3711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_84837275
source MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Animals
Birds
Conditioning, Operant
Female
Male
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Reinforcement Schedule
Species Specificity
title PERFORMANCE OF TWO SPECIES OF QUAIL ON BASIC REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A41%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PERFORMANCE%20OF%20TWO%20SPECIES%20OF%20QUAIL%20ON%20BASIC%20REINFORCEMENT%20SCHEDULES&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20experimental%20analysis%20of%20behavior&rft.au=Cloar,%20F.%20Thomas&rft.date=1968-03-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=187-190&rft.issn=0022-5002&rft.eissn=1938-3711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1901/jeab.1968.11-187&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E84837275%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311444308&rft_id=info:pmid/5645877&rfr_iscdi=true