A giant oocyte in a cohort of retrieved oocytes: does it have any effect on the in vitro fertilization cycle outcome?
Objective To investigate an association between the presence of a giant oocyte and outcome for the cohort in in vitro fertilization (IVF). Design Retrospective study. Setting Hospital-based academic medical center. Patient(s) IVF and IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles having at least...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fertility and sterility 2011-02, Vol.95 (2), p.573-576 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 576 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 573 |
container_title | Fertility and sterility |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Machtinger, Ronit, M.D Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D Hornstein, Mark D., M.D Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D |
description | Objective To investigate an association between the presence of a giant oocyte and outcome for the cohort in in vitro fertilization (IVF). Design Retrospective study. Setting Hospital-based academic medical center. Patient(s) IVF and IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles having at least one giant oocyte (study group; n = 105), matched with cycles without a giant oocyte (external control group). A further subanalysis compared giant oocyte cycles with the next closest cycles within patients (internal control group; n = 65). Intervention(s) Standard IVF protocols. Main Outcome Measure(s) Incidence of giant oocytes, fertilization rate, quality of cohort embryos, and pregnancy outcome. Result(s) Out of 97,556 oocytes, 117 (0.12%) were giant. Compared with the external control group, cleavage in the study group was abnormal (increased percentage of 1-cell and 10-cell embryos and decreased percentage of 6-cell and 7-cell embryos), although there was no difference for percentage of embryos with perfect symmetry, fragmentation, or implantation, clinical pregnancy, or ongoing/delivered rate. The study group had two cases of pregnancy termination due to chromosomal abnormalities (4.4%) versus none in external controls. No striking differences in embryo quality existed between the study and internal control groups. Conclusion(s) A giant oocyte is associated with abnormal cleavage in cohort embryos, but not with implantation or pregnancy rates. Giant oocytes occur sporadically and appear not to reflect quality of remaining oocytes in the ovary. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.037 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_847286755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0015028210009908</els_id><sourcerecordid>847286755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-74675b8926ff8d0d2fab04ff88b58d4280663daca68a2336399ee2c83f1c391d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuPFCEQx4nRuOPqV1AuxlOPPBqa9qBZN76STTyseyYMFDuMPc0K9CTtp5d2Rjfx5AVI1a8e_KsQwpSsKaHy9W7tIZUxl3quGalmIteEdw_QigohGyEFf4hWhFDREKbYGXqS844QImnHHqMzRmTX9kSt0HSBb4MZC47RzgVwGLHBNm5jqiaPE5QU4ADu5M9vsIuQcSh4aw6AzThj8B5spUdctr8THEJJES8dhiH8NCVUl53tADhOxcY9vHuKHnkzZHh2us_RzccP3y4_N1dfP325vLhqrOCsNF0rO7FRPZPeK0cc82ZD2vpWG6FcyxSRkjtjjVSGcS553wMwq7inlvfU8XP06pj3LsUfE-Si9yFbGAYzQpyyVm3HVK0hKqmOpE0x5wRe36WwN2nWlOhFc73T95rrRXNNpK6a19DnpyLTZg_ub-AfkSvw8gSYbM3gkxltyPccVy2XbOFeHDlvoja3qTI317WSqHNkHW9lJd4fCaiiHQIknW2A0YILqc5Auxj-p9-3_ySxQxhD7ew7zJB3cUpjHYqmOjNN9PWyRcsS0bo__fKfXwq3w90</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>847286755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A giant oocyte in a cohort of retrieved oocytes: does it have any effect on the in vitro fertilization cycle outcome?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Machtinger, Ronit, M.D ; Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D ; Hornstein, Mark D., M.D ; Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D ; Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Machtinger, Ronit, M.D ; Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D ; Hornstein, Mark D., M.D ; Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D ; Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To investigate an association between the presence of a giant oocyte and outcome for the cohort in in vitro fertilization (IVF). Design Retrospective study. Setting Hospital-based academic medical center. Patient(s) IVF and IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles having at least one giant oocyte (study group; n = 105), matched with cycles without a giant oocyte (external control group). A further subanalysis compared giant oocyte cycles with the next closest cycles within patients (internal control group; n = 65). Intervention(s) Standard IVF protocols. Main Outcome Measure(s) Incidence of giant oocytes, fertilization rate, quality of cohort embryos, and pregnancy outcome. Result(s) Out of 97,556 oocytes, 117 (0.12%) were giant. Compared with the external control group, cleavage in the study group was abnormal (increased percentage of 1-cell and 10-cell embryos and decreased percentage of 6-cell and 7-cell embryos), although there was no difference for percentage of embryos with perfect symmetry, fragmentation, or implantation, clinical pregnancy, or ongoing/delivered rate. The study group had two cases of pregnancy termination due to chromosomal abnormalities (4.4%) versus none in external controls. No striking differences in embryo quality existed between the study and internal control groups. Conclusion(s) A giant oocyte is associated with abnormal cleavage in cohort embryos, but not with implantation or pregnancy rates. Giant oocytes occur sporadically and appear not to reflect quality of remaining oocytes in the ovary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20674908</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Case-Control Studies ; Cell Size ; chromosomal anomalies ; Cohort Studies ; day 3 embryo quality ; Embryonic Development - physiology ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - methods ; Fertilization in Vitro - statistics & numerical data ; Giant oocyte ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; implantation rate ; Internal Medicine ; intracytoplasmic sperm injection ; IVF ; Medical sciences ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Oocyte Retrieval - statistics & numerical data ; oocytes ; Oocytes - cytology ; patients ; Pregnancy ; pregnancy outcome ; Pregnancy Rate ; Quality Control ; Retrospective Studies ; Sterility. Assisted procreation ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2011-02, Vol.95 (2), p.573-576</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-74675b8926ff8d0d2fab04ff88b58d4280663daca68a2336399ee2c83f1c391d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-74675b8926ff8d0d2fab04ff88b58d4280663daca68a2336399ee2c83f1c391d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028210009908$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23843628$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20674908$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Machtinger, Ronit, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hornstein, Mark D., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><title>A giant oocyte in a cohort of retrieved oocytes: does it have any effect on the in vitro fertilization cycle outcome?</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To investigate an association between the presence of a giant oocyte and outcome for the cohort in in vitro fertilization (IVF). Design Retrospective study. Setting Hospital-based academic medical center. Patient(s) IVF and IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles having at least one giant oocyte (study group; n = 105), matched with cycles without a giant oocyte (external control group). A further subanalysis compared giant oocyte cycles with the next closest cycles within patients (internal control group; n = 65). Intervention(s) Standard IVF protocols. Main Outcome Measure(s) Incidence of giant oocytes, fertilization rate, quality of cohort embryos, and pregnancy outcome. Result(s) Out of 97,556 oocytes, 117 (0.12%) were giant. Compared with the external control group, cleavage in the study group was abnormal (increased percentage of 1-cell and 10-cell embryos and decreased percentage of 6-cell and 7-cell embryos), although there was no difference for percentage of embryos with perfect symmetry, fragmentation, or implantation, clinical pregnancy, or ongoing/delivered rate. The study group had two cases of pregnancy termination due to chromosomal abnormalities (4.4%) versus none in external controls. No striking differences in embryo quality existed between the study and internal control groups. Conclusion(s) A giant oocyte is associated with abnormal cleavage in cohort embryos, but not with implantation or pregnancy rates. Giant oocytes occur sporadically and appear not to reflect quality of remaining oocytes in the ovary.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cell Size</subject><subject>chromosomal anomalies</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>day 3 embryo quality</subject><subject>Embryonic Development - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - methods</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Giant oocyte</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implantation rate</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>intracytoplasmic sperm injection</subject><subject>IVF</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Oocyte Retrieval - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>oocytes</subject><subject>Oocytes - cytology</subject><subject>patients</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>pregnancy outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuPFCEQx4nRuOPqV1AuxlOPPBqa9qBZN76STTyseyYMFDuMPc0K9CTtp5d2Rjfx5AVI1a8e_KsQwpSsKaHy9W7tIZUxl3quGalmIteEdw_QigohGyEFf4hWhFDREKbYGXqS844QImnHHqMzRmTX9kSt0HSBb4MZC47RzgVwGLHBNm5jqiaPE5QU4ADu5M9vsIuQcSh4aw6AzThj8B5spUdctr8THEJJES8dhiH8NCVUl53tADhOxcY9vHuKHnkzZHh2us_RzccP3y4_N1dfP325vLhqrOCsNF0rO7FRPZPeK0cc82ZD2vpWG6FcyxSRkjtjjVSGcS553wMwq7inlvfU8XP06pj3LsUfE-Si9yFbGAYzQpyyVm3HVK0hKqmOpE0x5wRe36WwN2nWlOhFc73T95rrRXNNpK6a19DnpyLTZg_ub-AfkSvw8gSYbM3gkxltyPccVy2XbOFeHDlvoja3qTI317WSqHNkHW9lJd4fCaiiHQIknW2A0YILqc5Auxj-p9-3_ySxQxhD7ew7zJB3cUpjHYqmOjNN9PWyRcsS0bo__fKfXwq3w90</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Machtinger, Ronit, M.D</creator><creator>Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D</creator><creator>Hornstein, Mark D., M.D</creator><creator>Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D</creator><creator>Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>A giant oocyte in a cohort of retrieved oocytes: does it have any effect on the in vitro fertilization cycle outcome?</title><author>Machtinger, Ronit, M.D ; Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D ; Hornstein, Mark D., M.D ; Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D ; Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-74675b8926ff8d0d2fab04ff88b58d4280663daca68a2336399ee2c83f1c391d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cell Size</topic><topic>chromosomal anomalies</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>day 3 embryo quality</topic><topic>Embryonic Development - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - methods</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Giant oocyte</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implantation rate</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>intracytoplasmic sperm injection</topic><topic>IVF</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Oocyte Retrieval - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>oocytes</topic><topic>Oocytes - cytology</topic><topic>patients</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>pregnancy outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Machtinger, Ronit, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hornstein, Mark D., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Machtinger, Ronit, M.D</au><au>Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D</au><au>Hornstein, Mark D., M.D</au><au>Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D</au><au>Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A giant oocyte in a cohort of retrieved oocytes: does it have any effect on the in vitro fertilization cycle outcome?</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>573</spage><epage>576</epage><pages>573-576</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>Objective To investigate an association between the presence of a giant oocyte and outcome for the cohort in in vitro fertilization (IVF). Design Retrospective study. Setting Hospital-based academic medical center. Patient(s) IVF and IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles having at least one giant oocyte (study group; n = 105), matched with cycles without a giant oocyte (external control group). A further subanalysis compared giant oocyte cycles with the next closest cycles within patients (internal control group; n = 65). Intervention(s) Standard IVF protocols. Main Outcome Measure(s) Incidence of giant oocytes, fertilization rate, quality of cohort embryos, and pregnancy outcome. Result(s) Out of 97,556 oocytes, 117 (0.12%) were giant. Compared with the external control group, cleavage in the study group was abnormal (increased percentage of 1-cell and 10-cell embryos and decreased percentage of 6-cell and 7-cell embryos), although there was no difference for percentage of embryos with perfect symmetry, fragmentation, or implantation, clinical pregnancy, or ongoing/delivered rate. The study group had two cases of pregnancy termination due to chromosomal abnormalities (4.4%) versus none in external controls. No striking differences in embryo quality existed between the study and internal control groups. Conclusion(s) A giant oocyte is associated with abnormal cleavage in cohort embryos, but not with implantation or pregnancy rates. Giant oocytes occur sporadically and appear not to reflect quality of remaining oocytes in the ovary.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20674908</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.037</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-0282 |
ispartof | Fertility and sterility, 2011-02, Vol.95 (2), p.573-576 |
issn | 0015-0282 1556-5653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_847286755 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Birth control Case-Control Studies Cell Size chromosomal anomalies Cohort Studies day 3 embryo quality Embryonic Development - physiology Female Fertilization in Vitro - methods Fertilization in Vitro - statistics & numerical data Giant oocyte Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans implantation rate Internal Medicine intracytoplasmic sperm injection IVF Medical sciences Obstetrics and Gynecology Oocyte Retrieval - statistics & numerical data oocytes Oocytes - cytology patients Pregnancy pregnancy outcome Pregnancy Rate Quality Control Retrospective Studies Sterility. Assisted procreation Treatment Outcome |
title | A giant oocyte in a cohort of retrieved oocytes: does it have any effect on the in vitro fertilization cycle outcome? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A27%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20giant%20oocyte%20in%20a%20cohort%20of%20retrieved%20oocytes:%20does%20it%20have%20any%20effect%20on%20the%20in%20vitro%20fertilization%20cycle%20outcome?&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Machtinger,%20Ronit,%20M.D&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=573&rft.epage=576&rft.pages=573-576&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E847286755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=847286755&rft_id=info:pmid/20674908&rft_els_id=S0015028210009908&rfr_iscdi=true |