A giant oocyte in a cohort of retrieved oocytes: does it have any effect on the in vitro fertilization cycle outcome?

Objective To investigate an association between the presence of a giant oocyte and outcome for the cohort in in vitro fertilization (IVF). Design Retrospective study. Setting Hospital-based academic medical center. Patient(s) IVF and IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles having at least...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility and sterility 2011-02, Vol.95 (2), p.573-576
Hauptverfasser: Machtinger, Ronit, M.D, Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D, Hornstein, Mark D., M.D, Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D, Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 576
container_issue 2
container_start_page 573
container_title Fertility and sterility
container_volume 95
creator Machtinger, Ronit, M.D
Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D
Hornstein, Mark D., M.D
Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D
Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D
description Objective To investigate an association between the presence of a giant oocyte and outcome for the cohort in in vitro fertilization (IVF). Design Retrospective study. Setting Hospital-based academic medical center. Patient(s) IVF and IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles having at least one giant oocyte (study group; n = 105), matched with cycles without a giant oocyte (external control group). A further subanalysis compared giant oocyte cycles with the next closest cycles within patients (internal control group; n = 65). Intervention(s) Standard IVF protocols. Main Outcome Measure(s) Incidence of giant oocytes, fertilization rate, quality of cohort embryos, and pregnancy outcome. Result(s) Out of 97,556 oocytes, 117 (0.12%) were giant. Compared with the external control group, cleavage in the study group was abnormal (increased percentage of 1-cell and 10-cell embryos and decreased percentage of 6-cell and 7-cell embryos), although there was no difference for percentage of embryos with perfect symmetry, fragmentation, or implantation, clinical pregnancy, or ongoing/delivered rate. The study group had two cases of pregnancy termination due to chromosomal abnormalities (4.4%) versus none in external controls. No striking differences in embryo quality existed between the study and internal control groups. Conclusion(s) A giant oocyte is associated with abnormal cleavage in cohort embryos, but not with implantation or pregnancy rates. Giant oocytes occur sporadically and appear not to reflect quality of remaining oocytes in the ovary.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_847286755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0015028210009908</els_id><sourcerecordid>847286755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-74675b8926ff8d0d2fab04ff88b58d4280663daca68a2336399ee2c83f1c391d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuPFCEQx4nRuOPqV1AuxlOPPBqa9qBZN76STTyseyYMFDuMPc0K9CTtp5d2Rjfx5AVI1a8e_KsQwpSsKaHy9W7tIZUxl3quGalmIteEdw_QigohGyEFf4hWhFDREKbYGXqS844QImnHHqMzRmTX9kSt0HSBb4MZC47RzgVwGLHBNm5jqiaPE5QU4ADu5M9vsIuQcSh4aw6AzThj8B5spUdctr8THEJJES8dhiH8NCVUl53tADhOxcY9vHuKHnkzZHh2us_RzccP3y4_N1dfP325vLhqrOCsNF0rO7FRPZPeK0cc82ZD2vpWG6FcyxSRkjtjjVSGcS553wMwq7inlvfU8XP06pj3LsUfE-Si9yFbGAYzQpyyVm3HVK0hKqmOpE0x5wRe36WwN2nWlOhFc73T95rrRXNNpK6a19DnpyLTZg_ub-AfkSvw8gSYbM3gkxltyPccVy2XbOFeHDlvoja3qTI317WSqHNkHW9lJd4fCaiiHQIknW2A0YILqc5Auxj-p9-3_ySxQxhD7ew7zJB3cUpjHYqmOjNN9PWyRcsS0bo__fKfXwq3w90</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>847286755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A giant oocyte in a cohort of retrieved oocytes: does it have any effect on the in vitro fertilization cycle outcome?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Machtinger, Ronit, M.D ; Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D ; Hornstein, Mark D., M.D ; Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D ; Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Machtinger, Ronit, M.D ; Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D ; Hornstein, Mark D., M.D ; Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D ; Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To investigate an association between the presence of a giant oocyte and outcome for the cohort in in vitro fertilization (IVF). Design Retrospective study. Setting Hospital-based academic medical center. Patient(s) IVF and IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles having at least one giant oocyte (study group; n = 105), matched with cycles without a giant oocyte (external control group). A further subanalysis compared giant oocyte cycles with the next closest cycles within patients (internal control group; n = 65). Intervention(s) Standard IVF protocols. Main Outcome Measure(s) Incidence of giant oocytes, fertilization rate, quality of cohort embryos, and pregnancy outcome. Result(s) Out of 97,556 oocytes, 117 (0.12%) were giant. Compared with the external control group, cleavage in the study group was abnormal (increased percentage of 1-cell and 10-cell embryos and decreased percentage of 6-cell and 7-cell embryos), although there was no difference for percentage of embryos with perfect symmetry, fragmentation, or implantation, clinical pregnancy, or ongoing/delivered rate. The study group had two cases of pregnancy termination due to chromosomal abnormalities (4.4%) versus none in external controls. No striking differences in embryo quality existed between the study and internal control groups. Conclusion(s) A giant oocyte is associated with abnormal cleavage in cohort embryos, but not with implantation or pregnancy rates. Giant oocytes occur sporadically and appear not to reflect quality of remaining oocytes in the ovary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20674908</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Case-Control Studies ; Cell Size ; chromosomal anomalies ; Cohort Studies ; day 3 embryo quality ; Embryonic Development - physiology ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - methods ; Fertilization in Vitro - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Giant oocyte ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; implantation rate ; Internal Medicine ; intracytoplasmic sperm injection ; IVF ; Medical sciences ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Oocyte Retrieval - statistics &amp; numerical data ; oocytes ; Oocytes - cytology ; patients ; Pregnancy ; pregnancy outcome ; Pregnancy Rate ; Quality Control ; Retrospective Studies ; Sterility. Assisted procreation ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2011-02, Vol.95 (2), p.573-576</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-74675b8926ff8d0d2fab04ff88b58d4280663daca68a2336399ee2c83f1c391d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-74675b8926ff8d0d2fab04ff88b58d4280663daca68a2336399ee2c83f1c391d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028210009908$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23843628$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20674908$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Machtinger, Ronit, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hornstein, Mark D., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><title>A giant oocyte in a cohort of retrieved oocytes: does it have any effect on the in vitro fertilization cycle outcome?</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To investigate an association between the presence of a giant oocyte and outcome for the cohort in in vitro fertilization (IVF). Design Retrospective study. Setting Hospital-based academic medical center. Patient(s) IVF and IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles having at least one giant oocyte (study group; n = 105), matched with cycles without a giant oocyte (external control group). A further subanalysis compared giant oocyte cycles with the next closest cycles within patients (internal control group; n = 65). Intervention(s) Standard IVF protocols. Main Outcome Measure(s) Incidence of giant oocytes, fertilization rate, quality of cohort embryos, and pregnancy outcome. Result(s) Out of 97,556 oocytes, 117 (0.12%) were giant. Compared with the external control group, cleavage in the study group was abnormal (increased percentage of 1-cell and 10-cell embryos and decreased percentage of 6-cell and 7-cell embryos), although there was no difference for percentage of embryos with perfect symmetry, fragmentation, or implantation, clinical pregnancy, or ongoing/delivered rate. The study group had two cases of pregnancy termination due to chromosomal abnormalities (4.4%) versus none in external controls. No striking differences in embryo quality existed between the study and internal control groups. Conclusion(s) A giant oocyte is associated with abnormal cleavage in cohort embryos, but not with implantation or pregnancy rates. Giant oocytes occur sporadically and appear not to reflect quality of remaining oocytes in the ovary.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cell Size</subject><subject>chromosomal anomalies</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>day 3 embryo quality</subject><subject>Embryonic Development - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - methods</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Giant oocyte</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implantation rate</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>intracytoplasmic sperm injection</subject><subject>IVF</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Oocyte Retrieval - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>oocytes</subject><subject>Oocytes - cytology</subject><subject>patients</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>pregnancy outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuPFCEQx4nRuOPqV1AuxlOPPBqa9qBZN76STTyseyYMFDuMPc0K9CTtp5d2Rjfx5AVI1a8e_KsQwpSsKaHy9W7tIZUxl3quGalmIteEdw_QigohGyEFf4hWhFDREKbYGXqS844QImnHHqMzRmTX9kSt0HSBb4MZC47RzgVwGLHBNm5jqiaPE5QU4ADu5M9vsIuQcSh4aw6AzThj8B5spUdctr8THEJJES8dhiH8NCVUl53tADhOxcY9vHuKHnkzZHh2us_RzccP3y4_N1dfP325vLhqrOCsNF0rO7FRPZPeK0cc82ZD2vpWG6FcyxSRkjtjjVSGcS553wMwq7inlvfU8XP06pj3LsUfE-Si9yFbGAYzQpyyVm3HVK0hKqmOpE0x5wRe36WwN2nWlOhFc73T95rrRXNNpK6a19DnpyLTZg_ub-AfkSvw8gSYbM3gkxltyPccVy2XbOFeHDlvoja3qTI317WSqHNkHW9lJd4fCaiiHQIknW2A0YILqc5Auxj-p9-3_ySxQxhD7ew7zJB3cUpjHYqmOjNN9PWyRcsS0bo__fKfXwq3w90</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Machtinger, Ronit, M.D</creator><creator>Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D</creator><creator>Hornstein, Mark D., M.D</creator><creator>Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D</creator><creator>Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>A giant oocyte in a cohort of retrieved oocytes: does it have any effect on the in vitro fertilization cycle outcome?</title><author>Machtinger, Ronit, M.D ; Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D ; Hornstein, Mark D., M.D ; Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D ; Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-74675b8926ff8d0d2fab04ff88b58d4280663daca68a2336399ee2c83f1c391d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cell Size</topic><topic>chromosomal anomalies</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>day 3 embryo quality</topic><topic>Embryonic Development - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - methods</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Giant oocyte</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implantation rate</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>intracytoplasmic sperm injection</topic><topic>IVF</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Oocyte Retrieval - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>oocytes</topic><topic>Oocytes - cytology</topic><topic>patients</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>pregnancy outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Machtinger, Ronit, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hornstein, Mark D., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Machtinger, Ronit, M.D</au><au>Politch, Joseph A., Ph.D</au><au>Hornstein, Mark D., M.D</au><au>Ginsburg, Elizabeth S., M.D</au><au>Racowsky, Catherine, Ph.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A giant oocyte in a cohort of retrieved oocytes: does it have any effect on the in vitro fertilization cycle outcome?</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>573</spage><epage>576</epage><pages>573-576</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>Objective To investigate an association between the presence of a giant oocyte and outcome for the cohort in in vitro fertilization (IVF). Design Retrospective study. Setting Hospital-based academic medical center. Patient(s) IVF and IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles having at least one giant oocyte (study group; n = 105), matched with cycles without a giant oocyte (external control group). A further subanalysis compared giant oocyte cycles with the next closest cycles within patients (internal control group; n = 65). Intervention(s) Standard IVF protocols. Main Outcome Measure(s) Incidence of giant oocytes, fertilization rate, quality of cohort embryos, and pregnancy outcome. Result(s) Out of 97,556 oocytes, 117 (0.12%) were giant. Compared with the external control group, cleavage in the study group was abnormal (increased percentage of 1-cell and 10-cell embryos and decreased percentage of 6-cell and 7-cell embryos), although there was no difference for percentage of embryos with perfect symmetry, fragmentation, or implantation, clinical pregnancy, or ongoing/delivered rate. The study group had two cases of pregnancy termination due to chromosomal abnormalities (4.4%) versus none in external controls. No striking differences in embryo quality existed between the study and internal control groups. Conclusion(s) A giant oocyte is associated with abnormal cleavage in cohort embryos, but not with implantation or pregnancy rates. Giant oocytes occur sporadically and appear not to reflect quality of remaining oocytes in the ovary.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20674908</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.037</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-0282
ispartof Fertility and sterility, 2011-02, Vol.95 (2), p.573-576
issn 0015-0282
1556-5653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_847286755
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Birth control
Case-Control Studies
Cell Size
chromosomal anomalies
Cohort Studies
day 3 embryo quality
Embryonic Development - physiology
Female
Fertilization in Vitro - methods
Fertilization in Vitro - statistics & numerical data
Giant oocyte
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
implantation rate
Internal Medicine
intracytoplasmic sperm injection
IVF
Medical sciences
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Oocyte Retrieval - statistics & numerical data
oocytes
Oocytes - cytology
patients
Pregnancy
pregnancy outcome
Pregnancy Rate
Quality Control
Retrospective Studies
Sterility. Assisted procreation
Treatment Outcome
title A giant oocyte in a cohort of retrieved oocytes: does it have any effect on the in vitro fertilization cycle outcome?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A27%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20giant%20oocyte%20in%20a%20cohort%20of%20retrieved%20oocytes:%20does%20it%20have%20any%20effect%20on%20the%20in%20vitro%20fertilization%20cycle%20outcome?&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Machtinger,%20Ronit,%20M.D&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=573&rft.epage=576&rft.pages=573-576&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E847286755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=847286755&rft_id=info:pmid/20674908&rft_els_id=S0015028210009908&rfr_iscdi=true