Financial liberalization, bureaucratic corruption and economic development
We study the effect of international financial integration on economic development when the quality of governance may be compromised by corruption. Our analysis is based on a dynamic general equilibrium model of a small economy in which growth is driven by capital accumulation and public policy is a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of international money and finance 2010-11, Vol.29 (7), p.1321-1339 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1339 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1321 |
| container_title | Journal of international money and finance |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Blackburn, Keith Forgues-Puccio, Gonzalo F. |
| description | We study the effect of international financial integration on economic development when the quality of governance may be compromised by corruption. Our analysis is based on a dynamic general equilibrium model of a small economy in which growth is driven by capital accumulation and public policy is administered by government-appointed bureaucrats. Corruption may arise due to the opportunity for bureaucrats to embezzle public funds, an opportunity that is made more attractive by financial liberalization which, at the same time, raises efficiency in capital production. Our main results may be summarized as follows: (1) corruption is always bad for economic development, but its effect is worse if the economy is open than if it is closed; (2) the incidence of corruption may, itself, be affected by both the development and openness of the economy; (3) financial liberalization is good for development when governance is good, but may be bad for development when governance is bad; and (4) corruption and poverty may coexist as permanent, rather than just transitory, fixtures of an economy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2010.05.002 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_847272724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0261560610000598</els_id><sourcerecordid>2145652891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-498a4c30ab841efda52ac1eb41bf6ab53d9c3182ae781f5540b11f57a1efcca03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1v1TAQtBBIPFr-Aoq4cCGPdRw7zg1UUT70pF7as7VxNsJRYgc7eVL59XX0gAMXZI3X3p0ZrYaxNxyOHLj6MB5HNwc_OH-sIDdBHgGqZ-zAdSNKUKJ9zg5QKV5KBeole5XSCABKCX1g32-dR28dTsXkOoo4uV-4uuDfF90WCTcb89cWNsS4LfugQN8XZIMPc-73dKYpLDP59Zq9GHBK9Pp3vWIPt5_vb76Wp7sv324-nUorVbuWdauxtgKw0zWnoUdZoeXU1bwbFHZS9K0VXFdIjeaDlDV0PNcGM9laBHHF3l18lxh-bpRWM7tkaZrQU9iS0XVT7afOzLf_MMewRZ-XM40UGlrd7nbqQrIxpBRpMEt0M8ZHw8HsAZvR_AnY7AEbkCYHnIWnizDSQvaviogyfSefjcCqzdfj_tiVAl1Gk7FkcFFxw4VozY91znYfL3aUszs7iiZZR95S7yLZ1fTB_W-jJyf6ooI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>753809890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Financial liberalization, bureaucratic corruption and economic development</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Blackburn, Keith ; Forgues-Puccio, Gonzalo F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blackburn, Keith ; Forgues-Puccio, Gonzalo F.</creatorcontrib><description>We study the effect of international financial integration on economic development when the quality of governance may be compromised by corruption. Our analysis is based on a dynamic general equilibrium model of a small economy in which growth is driven by capital accumulation and public policy is administered by government-appointed bureaucrats. Corruption may arise due to the opportunity for bureaucrats to embezzle public funds, an opportunity that is made more attractive by financial liberalization which, at the same time, raises efficiency in capital production. Our main results may be summarized as follows: (1) corruption is always bad for economic development, but its effect is worse if the economy is open than if it is closed; (2) the incidence of corruption may, itself, be affected by both the development and openness of the economy; (3) financial liberalization is good for development when governance is good, but may be bad for development when governance is bad; and (4) corruption and poverty may coexist as permanent, rather than just transitory, fixtures of an economy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-5606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-0639</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2010.05.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied general equilibrium models ; Bureaucrats ; Corruption ; Corruption Development Financial liberalization ; Corruption in government ; Development ; Economic development ; Economic theory ; Financial liberalization ; Impact analysis ; International finance ; Liberalization ; Public policy ; Social policy ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of international money and finance, 2010-11, Vol.29 (7), p.1321-1339</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-498a4c30ab841efda52ac1eb41bf6ab53d9c3182ae781f5540b11f57a1efcca03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-498a4c30ab841efda52ac1eb41bf6ab53d9c3182ae781f5540b11f57a1efcca03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2010.05.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejimfin/v_3a29_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a7_3ap_3a1321-1339.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blackburn, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forgues-Puccio, Gonzalo F.</creatorcontrib><title>Financial liberalization, bureaucratic corruption and economic development</title><title>Journal of international money and finance</title><description>We study the effect of international financial integration on economic development when the quality of governance may be compromised by corruption. Our analysis is based on a dynamic general equilibrium model of a small economy in which growth is driven by capital accumulation and public policy is administered by government-appointed bureaucrats. Corruption may arise due to the opportunity for bureaucrats to embezzle public funds, an opportunity that is made more attractive by financial liberalization which, at the same time, raises efficiency in capital production. Our main results may be summarized as follows: (1) corruption is always bad for economic development, but its effect is worse if the economy is open than if it is closed; (2) the incidence of corruption may, itself, be affected by both the development and openness of the economy; (3) financial liberalization is good for development when governance is good, but may be bad for development when governance is bad; and (4) corruption and poverty may coexist as permanent, rather than just transitory, fixtures of an economy.</description><subject>Applied general equilibrium models</subject><subject>Bureaucrats</subject><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>Corruption Development Financial liberalization</subject><subject>Corruption in government</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Financial liberalization</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>International finance</subject><subject>Liberalization</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0261-5606</issn><issn>1873-0639</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1v1TAQtBBIPFr-Aoq4cCGPdRw7zg1UUT70pF7as7VxNsJRYgc7eVL59XX0gAMXZI3X3p0ZrYaxNxyOHLj6MB5HNwc_OH-sIDdBHgGqZ-zAdSNKUKJ9zg5QKV5KBeole5XSCABKCX1g32-dR28dTsXkOoo4uV-4uuDfF90WCTcb89cWNsS4LfugQN8XZIMPc-73dKYpLDP59Zq9GHBK9Pp3vWIPt5_vb76Wp7sv324-nUorVbuWdauxtgKw0zWnoUdZoeXU1bwbFHZS9K0VXFdIjeaDlDV0PNcGM9laBHHF3l18lxh-bpRWM7tkaZrQU9iS0XVT7afOzLf_MMewRZ-XM40UGlrd7nbqQrIxpBRpMEt0M8ZHw8HsAZvR_AnY7AEbkCYHnIWnizDSQvaviogyfSefjcCqzdfj_tiVAl1Gk7FkcFFxw4VozY91znYfL3aUszs7iiZZR95S7yLZ1fTB_W-jJyf6ooI</recordid><startdate>20101101</startdate><enddate>20101101</enddate><creator>Blackburn, Keith</creator><creator>Forgues-Puccio, Gonzalo F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101101</creationdate><title>Financial liberalization, bureaucratic corruption and economic development</title><author>Blackburn, Keith ; Forgues-Puccio, Gonzalo F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-498a4c30ab841efda52ac1eb41bf6ab53d9c3182ae781f5540b11f57a1efcca03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Applied general equilibrium models</topic><topic>Bureaucrats</topic><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>Corruption Development Financial liberalization</topic><topic>Corruption in government</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Financial liberalization</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>International finance</topic><topic>Liberalization</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blackburn, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forgues-Puccio, Gonzalo F.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of international money and finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blackburn, Keith</au><au>Forgues-Puccio, Gonzalo F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Financial liberalization, bureaucratic corruption and economic development</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international money and finance</jtitle><date>2010-11-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1321</spage><epage>1339</epage><pages>1321-1339</pages><issn>0261-5606</issn><eissn>1873-0639</eissn><abstract>We study the effect of international financial integration on economic development when the quality of governance may be compromised by corruption. Our analysis is based on a dynamic general equilibrium model of a small economy in which growth is driven by capital accumulation and public policy is administered by government-appointed bureaucrats. Corruption may arise due to the opportunity for bureaucrats to embezzle public funds, an opportunity that is made more attractive by financial liberalization which, at the same time, raises efficiency in capital production. Our main results may be summarized as follows: (1) corruption is always bad for economic development, but its effect is worse if the economy is open than if it is closed; (2) the incidence of corruption may, itself, be affected by both the development and openness of the economy; (3) financial liberalization is good for development when governance is good, but may be bad for development when governance is bad; and (4) corruption and poverty may coexist as permanent, rather than just transitory, fixtures of an economy.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jimonfin.2010.05.002</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0261-5606 |
| ispartof | Journal of international money and finance, 2010-11, Vol.29 (7), p.1321-1339 |
| issn | 0261-5606 1873-0639 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_847272724 |
| source | RePEc; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Applied general equilibrium models Bureaucrats Corruption Corruption Development Financial liberalization Corruption in government Development Economic development Economic theory Financial liberalization Impact analysis International finance Liberalization Public policy Social policy Studies |
| title | Financial liberalization, bureaucratic corruption and economic development |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A25%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Financial%20liberalization,%20bureaucratic%20corruption%20and%20economic%20development&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20money%20and%20finance&rft.au=Blackburn,%20Keith&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1321&rft.epage=1339&rft.pages=1321-1339&rft.issn=0261-5606&rft.eissn=1873-0639&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2010.05.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2145652891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=753809890&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0261560610000598&rfr_iscdi=true |