Collateral damage for R&D manufacturers: how patent sharks operate in markets for technology

Patent sharks, small firms that exploit information asymmetries in markets for technology to gain patent-based competitive advantages, challenge established theory by which (i) markets for technology benefit large firms and (ii) intellectual property rights systems strictly support markets for techn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Industrial and corporate change 2010-06, Vol.19 (3), p.947-967
Hauptverfasser: Reitzig, Markus, Henkel, Joachim, Schneider, Ferdinand
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 967
container_issue 3
container_start_page 947
container_title Industrial and corporate change
container_volume 19
creator Reitzig, Markus
Henkel, Joachim
Schneider, Ferdinand
description Patent sharks, small firms that exploit information asymmetries in markets for technology to gain patent-based competitive advantages, challenge established theory by which (i) markets for technology benefit large firms and (ii) intellectual property rights systems strictly support markets for technology. Empirically linking the sharks’ different assault strategies to the patents they deploy, we illustrate that patent sharks will likely be an enduring phenomenon in markets for technology. We discuss policy and strategy implications.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/icc/dtq037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_847271473</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>847271473</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-664e2fc847c7936efbf7919c1e29c9c0ac77d75b1b6ede2dccf59ac1ca7134473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0E1rGzEQBmBRGojr5JJfIHpoIbCxtNJKVm7BaT6IIVDaEkJAyLOz9jrrlSNpafLvo8ahh5zm8szLzEvIEWcnnBkxaQEmdXpiQn8iIy6VLISq2GcyYkaxQknD98mXGNeMsZLp6Yg8zHzXuYTBdbR2G7dE2vhAf347pxvXD42DNAQM8ZSu_F-6zbJPNK5ceIzUb_NaQtr22YZHTPFtNyGset_55csB2WtcF_HwfY7J74sfv2ZXxfz28np2Ni9AlDwVSkksG5hKDdoIhc2i0YYb4FgaMMAcaF3rasEXCmssa4CmMg44OM2FlFqMyfdd7jb4pwFjsps2AubHevRDtDm51DzDLL9-kGs_hD4fZ4XU0rBppTI63iEIPsaAjd2GNn_4Yjmz_2q2uWa7qznjYofbmPD5v8x9WKWFruzV3b3VN39utJjOrRSvsgiBDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>347490856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collateral damage for R&amp;D manufacturers: how patent sharks operate in markets for technology</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Reitzig, Markus ; Henkel, Joachim ; Schneider, Ferdinand</creator><creatorcontrib>Reitzig, Markus ; Henkel, Joachim ; Schneider, Ferdinand</creatorcontrib><description>Patent sharks, small firms that exploit information asymmetries in markets for technology to gain patent-based competitive advantages, challenge established theory by which (i) markets for technology benefit large firms and (ii) intellectual property rights systems strictly support markets for technology. Empirically linking the sharks’ different assault strategies to the patents they deploy, we illustrate that patent sharks will likely be an enduring phenomenon in markets for technology. We discuss policy and strategy implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-6491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtq037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Competitive advantage ; High technology ; Information ; Innovation diffusion ; Inventions ; Market structure ; New technology ; Piracy ; Property rights ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Research and development ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Industrial and corporate change, 2010-06, Vol.19 (3), p.947-967</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Jun 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-664e2fc847c7936efbf7919c1e29c9c0ac77d75b1b6ede2dccf59ac1ca7134473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-664e2fc847c7936efbf7919c1e29c9c0ac77d75b1b6ede2dccf59ac1ca7134473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reitzig, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henkel, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Ferdinand</creatorcontrib><title>Collateral damage for R&amp;D manufacturers: how patent sharks operate in markets for technology</title><title>Industrial and corporate change</title><description>Patent sharks, small firms that exploit information asymmetries in markets for technology to gain patent-based competitive advantages, challenge established theory by which (i) markets for technology benefit large firms and (ii) intellectual property rights systems strictly support markets for technology. Empirically linking the sharks’ different assault strategies to the patents they deploy, we illustrate that patent sharks will likely be an enduring phenomenon in markets for technology. We discuss policy and strategy implications.</description><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>High technology</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Innovation diffusion</subject><subject>Inventions</subject><subject>Market structure</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>Piracy</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Research and development</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0960-6491</issn><issn>1464-3650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0E1rGzEQBmBRGojr5JJfIHpoIbCxtNJKVm7BaT6IIVDaEkJAyLOz9jrrlSNpafLvo8ahh5zm8szLzEvIEWcnnBkxaQEmdXpiQn8iIy6VLISq2GcyYkaxQknD98mXGNeMsZLp6Yg8zHzXuYTBdbR2G7dE2vhAf347pxvXD42DNAQM8ZSu_F-6zbJPNK5ceIzUb_NaQtr22YZHTPFtNyGset_55csB2WtcF_HwfY7J74sfv2ZXxfz28np2Ni9AlDwVSkksG5hKDdoIhc2i0YYb4FgaMMAcaF3rasEXCmssa4CmMg44OM2FlFqMyfdd7jb4pwFjsps2AubHevRDtDm51DzDLL9-kGs_hD4fZ4XU0rBppTI63iEIPsaAjd2GNn_4Yjmz_2q2uWa7qznjYofbmPD5v8x9WKWFruzV3b3VN39utJjOrRSvsgiBDA</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Reitzig, Markus</creator><creator>Henkel, Joachim</creator><creator>Schneider, Ferdinand</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>Collateral damage for R&amp;D manufacturers: how patent sharks operate in markets for technology</title><author>Reitzig, Markus ; Henkel, Joachim ; Schneider, Ferdinand</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-664e2fc847c7936efbf7919c1e29c9c0ac77d75b1b6ede2dccf59ac1ca7134473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>High technology</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Innovation diffusion</topic><topic>Inventions</topic><topic>Market structure</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>Piracy</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Research and development</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reitzig, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henkel, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Ferdinand</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Industrial and corporate change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reitzig, Markus</au><au>Henkel, Joachim</au><au>Schneider, Ferdinand</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collateral damage for R&amp;D manufacturers: how patent sharks operate in markets for technology</atitle><jtitle>Industrial and corporate change</jtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>947</spage><epage>967</epage><pages>947-967</pages><issn>0960-6491</issn><eissn>1464-3650</eissn><abstract>Patent sharks, small firms that exploit information asymmetries in markets for technology to gain patent-based competitive advantages, challenge established theory by which (i) markets for technology benefit large firms and (ii) intellectual property rights systems strictly support markets for technology. Empirically linking the sharks’ different assault strategies to the patents they deploy, we illustrate that patent sharks will likely be an enduring phenomenon in markets for technology. We discuss policy and strategy implications.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/icc/dtq037</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-6491
ispartof Industrial and corporate change, 2010-06, Vol.19 (3), p.947-967
issn 0960-6491
1464-3650
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_847271473
source PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Competitive advantage
High technology
Information
Innovation diffusion
Inventions
Market structure
New technology
Piracy
Property rights
R&D
Research & development
Research and development
Studies
title Collateral damage for R&D manufacturers: how patent sharks operate in markets for technology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A06%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collateral%20damage%20for%20R&D%20manufacturers:%20how%20patent%20sharks%20operate%20in%20markets%20for%20technology&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20and%20corporate%20change&rft.au=Reitzig,%20Markus&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=947&rft.epage=967&rft.pages=947-967&rft.issn=0960-6491&rft.eissn=1464-3650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/icc/dtq037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E847271473%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=347490856&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true