Same work, different pay?: Evidence from a US public university
"This study examines detailed data for faculty at a typical public research university in the United States between 1995 and 2004 to explore whether gender wage differentials can be explained by productivity differences. The level of detail - including the number of courses taught, enrollment,...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Feminist economics 2010-10, Vol.16 (4), p.105-135 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 135 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 105 |
| container_title | Feminist economics |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Binder, Melissa Krause, Kate Chermak, Janie Thacher, Jennifer Gilroy, Julia |
| description | "This study examines detailed data for faculty at a typical public research university in the United States between 1995 and 2004 to explore whether gender wage differentials can be explained by productivity differences. The level of detail - including the number of courses taught, enrollment, grant dollars, and number and impact of publications - largely eliminates the problem of unmeasured productivity, and the restriction to one firm eliminates unmeasured work conditions that confound investigations of wider labor markets. The authors find that direct productivity measures reduce the gender wage penalty to about 3 percent, only 1 percentage point lower than estimates from national studies of many institutions and with fewer productivity controls. The wage structure for women faculty differs markedly from the wage structure for men. Interpreted against the institutional features of wage setting for this population, the paper concludes that penalties for women arise at the department level." Die Untersuchung enthält quantitative Daten. Forschungsmethode: empirisch-quantitativ; empirisch; Sekundäranalyse. Die Untersuchung bezieht sich auf den Zeitraum 1995 bis 2004. (author's abstract, IAB-Doku). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13545701.2010.530605 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_847097619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>847097619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-84e244a90e1281d1ce4464e5b93182dfb0316e0469223a2ebe4f87491b94f2d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEEqXwA0A9rHrppVnGnrETn6qq6geoEgfgbHmTscg2X7WzVPvvcQhtJS49jD2yn_eV53WWHQlYCyjhs0BFqgCxlpCOFIIG9So7EKR1TljI16lPSD4zb7N3MW4BBBLhQfbxu-t49TCEu9NV3XjPgftpNbr92fvsjXdt5A__9sPs59Xlj4ub_Pbb9ZeL89u8UlRMeUksiZwBFrIUtaiYSBOrjUFRytpvAIVmIG2kRCd5w-TLgozYGPKy1niYnSy-Yxjudxwn2zWx4rZ1PQ-7aEulCVSp5MskFWAKLUwij_8jt8Mu9GkMW0ppENCIBNECVWGIMbC3Y2g6F_ZWgJ1ztY-52jlXu-SaZF8XWeCRqyfN5FJ4HVeD_W3RCZ2Wfaq_SnRNKko1znegZmf7a-qS2dli1vR-CJ1LH9HWyWvfDsEH11dNtPjCcz4tDnUzPk9gUGuU-Ac-gZuG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>822930391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Same work, different pay?: Evidence from a US public university</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Binder, Melissa ; Krause, Kate ; Chermak, Janie ; Thacher, Jennifer ; Gilroy, Julia</creator><creatorcontrib>Binder, Melissa ; Krause, Kate ; Chermak, Janie ; Thacher, Jennifer ; Gilroy, Julia</creatorcontrib><description>"This study examines detailed data for faculty at a typical public research university in the United States between 1995 and 2004 to explore whether gender wage differentials can be explained by productivity differences. The level of detail - including the number of courses taught, enrollment, grant dollars, and number and impact of publications - largely eliminates the problem of unmeasured productivity, and the restriction to one firm eliminates unmeasured work conditions that confound investigations of wider labor markets. The authors find that direct productivity measures reduce the gender wage penalty to about 3 percent, only 1 percentage point lower than estimates from national studies of many institutions and with fewer productivity controls. The wage structure for women faculty differs markedly from the wage structure for men. Interpreted against the institutional features of wage setting for this population, the paper concludes that penalties for women arise at the department level." Die Untersuchung enthält quantitative Daten. Forschungsmethode: empirisch-quantitativ; empirisch; Sekundäranalyse. Die Untersuchung bezieht sich auf den Zeitraum 1995 bis 2004. (author's abstract, IAB-Doku).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-5701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2010.530605</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FEECFE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Academic labor markets ; College Faculty ; Determinante ; earnings differentials ; Einkommensunterschied ; Erwerbstätiger ; Frau ; Gender equity ; gender wage gap ; Geschlechtsspezifik ; Hochschullehrer ; Labor market ; Libraries ; Lohndiskriminierung ; Lohnhöhe ; Lohnstruktur ; Mann ; Productivity ; Public sector ; Racial inequality ; Sex ; Spanier ; Studies ; U.S.A ; United States of America ; Universities ; Universität ; USA ; Wage determination ; Wage differential ; Wage differentials ; Wage discrimination ; Wages ; Women ; Work Environment ; Working Women</subject><ispartof>Feminist economics, 2010-10, Vol.16 (4), p.105-135</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2010</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group Oct 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-84e244a90e1281d1ce4464e5b93182dfb0316e0469223a2ebe4f87491b94f2d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-84e244a90e1281d1ce4464e5b93182dfb0316e0469223a2ebe4f87491b94f2d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4008,27924,27925,33774,33775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=936632$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/taffemeco/v_3a16_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a105-135.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Binder, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chermak, Janie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thacher, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilroy, Julia</creatorcontrib><title>Same work, different pay?: Evidence from a US public university</title><title>Feminist economics</title><description>"This study examines detailed data for faculty at a typical public research university in the United States between 1995 and 2004 to explore whether gender wage differentials can be explained by productivity differences. The level of detail - including the number of courses taught, enrollment, grant dollars, and number and impact of publications - largely eliminates the problem of unmeasured productivity, and the restriction to one firm eliminates unmeasured work conditions that confound investigations of wider labor markets. The authors find that direct productivity measures reduce the gender wage penalty to about 3 percent, only 1 percentage point lower than estimates from national studies of many institutions and with fewer productivity controls. The wage structure for women faculty differs markedly from the wage structure for men. Interpreted against the institutional features of wage setting for this population, the paper concludes that penalties for women arise at the department level." Die Untersuchung enthält quantitative Daten. Forschungsmethode: empirisch-quantitativ; empirisch; Sekundäranalyse. Die Untersuchung bezieht sich auf den Zeitraum 1995 bis 2004. (author's abstract, IAB-Doku).</description><subject>Academic labor markets</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Determinante</subject><subject>earnings differentials</subject><subject>Einkommensunterschied</subject><subject>Erwerbstätiger</subject><subject>Frau</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>gender wage gap</subject><subject>Geschlechtsspezifik</subject><subject>Hochschullehrer</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Lohndiskriminierung</subject><subject>Lohnhöhe</subject><subject>Lohnstruktur</subject><subject>Mann</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><subject>Racial inequality</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Spanier</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Universität</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Wage determination</subject><subject>Wage differential</subject><subject>Wage differentials</subject><subject>Wage discrimination</subject><subject>Wages</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Work Environment</subject><subject>Working Women</subject><issn>1354-5701</issn><issn>1466-4372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEEqXwA0A9rHrppVnGnrETn6qq6geoEgfgbHmTscg2X7WzVPvvcQhtJS49jD2yn_eV53WWHQlYCyjhs0BFqgCxlpCOFIIG9So7EKR1TljI16lPSD4zb7N3MW4BBBLhQfbxu-t49TCEu9NV3XjPgftpNbr92fvsjXdt5A__9sPs59Xlj4ub_Pbb9ZeL89u8UlRMeUksiZwBFrIUtaiYSBOrjUFRytpvAIVmIG2kRCd5w-TLgozYGPKy1niYnSy-Yxjudxwn2zWx4rZ1PQ-7aEulCVSp5MskFWAKLUwij_8jt8Mu9GkMW0ppENCIBNECVWGIMbC3Y2g6F_ZWgJ1ztY-52jlXu-SaZF8XWeCRqyfN5FJ4HVeD_W3RCZ2Wfaq_SnRNKko1znegZmf7a-qS2dli1vR-CJ1LH9HWyWvfDsEH11dNtPjCcz4tDnUzPk9gUGuU-Ac-gZuG</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Binder, Melissa</creator><creator>Krause, Kate</creator><creator>Chermak, Janie</creator><creator>Thacher, Jennifer</creator><creator>Gilroy, Julia</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor and Francis Journals</general><general>Taylor & Francis LLC</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>Same work, different pay?</title><author>Binder, Melissa ; Krause, Kate ; Chermak, Janie ; Thacher, Jennifer ; Gilroy, Julia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-84e244a90e1281d1ce4464e5b93182dfb0316e0469223a2ebe4f87491b94f2d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Academic labor markets</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Determinante</topic><topic>earnings differentials</topic><topic>Einkommensunterschied</topic><topic>Erwerbstätiger</topic><topic>Frau</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>gender wage gap</topic><topic>Geschlechtsspezifik</topic><topic>Hochschullehrer</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Lohndiskriminierung</topic><topic>Lohnhöhe</topic><topic>Lohnstruktur</topic><topic>Mann</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><topic>Racial inequality</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Spanier</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Universität</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Wage determination</topic><topic>Wage differential</topic><topic>Wage differentials</topic><topic>Wage discrimination</topic><topic>Wages</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Work Environment</topic><topic>Working Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Binder, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chermak, Janie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thacher, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilroy, Julia</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Feminist economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Binder, Melissa</au><au>Krause, Kate</au><au>Chermak, Janie</au><au>Thacher, Jennifer</au><au>Gilroy, Julia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Same work, different pay?: Evidence from a US public university</atitle><jtitle>Feminist economics</jtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>105-135</pages><issn>1354-5701</issn><eissn>1466-4372</eissn><coden>FEECFE</coden><abstract>"This study examines detailed data for faculty at a typical public research university in the United States between 1995 and 2004 to explore whether gender wage differentials can be explained by productivity differences. The level of detail - including the number of courses taught, enrollment, grant dollars, and number and impact of publications - largely eliminates the problem of unmeasured productivity, and the restriction to one firm eliminates unmeasured work conditions that confound investigations of wider labor markets. The authors find that direct productivity measures reduce the gender wage penalty to about 3 percent, only 1 percentage point lower than estimates from national studies of many institutions and with fewer productivity controls. The wage structure for women faculty differs markedly from the wage structure for men. Interpreted against the institutional features of wage setting for this population, the paper concludes that penalties for women arise at the department level." Die Untersuchung enthält quantitative Daten. Forschungsmethode: empirisch-quantitativ; empirisch; Sekundäranalyse. Die Untersuchung bezieht sich auf den Zeitraum 1995 bis 2004. (author's abstract, IAB-Doku).</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13545701.2010.530605</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1354-5701 |
| ispartof | Feminist economics, 2010-10, Vol.16 (4), p.105-135 |
| issn | 1354-5701 1466-4372 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_847097619 |
| source | RePEc; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Academic labor markets College Faculty Determinante earnings differentials Einkommensunterschied Erwerbstätiger Frau Gender equity gender wage gap Geschlechtsspezifik Hochschullehrer Labor market Libraries Lohndiskriminierung Lohnhöhe Lohnstruktur Mann Productivity Public sector Racial inequality Sex Spanier Studies U.S.A United States of America Universities Universität USA Wage determination Wage differential Wage differentials Wage discrimination Wages Women Work Environment Working Women |
| title | Same work, different pay?: Evidence from a US public university |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T16%3A54%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Same%20work,%20different%20pay?:%20Evidence%20from%20a%20US%20public%20university&rft.jtitle=Feminist%20economics&rft.au=Binder,%20Melissa&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=105-135&rft.issn=1354-5701&rft.eissn=1466-4372&rft.coden=FEECFE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13545701.2010.530605&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E847097619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=822930391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |