Achalasia of the Esophagus: Results of Therapy by Dilation, 1950–1967

The past two decades have seen changing patterns of therapy for achalasia of the esophagus. Availability of esophageal motility studies and cineradiography has made more accurate diagnosis posssible. Whereas, in the past, forceful dilation was the only definitive mode of treatment, the success of es...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 1970-08, Vol.58 (2), p.116-121
Hauptverfasser: Sanderson, David R., Ellis, F. Henry, Olsen, Arthur M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 121
container_issue 2
container_start_page 116
container_title Chest
container_volume 58
creator Sanderson, David R.
Ellis, F. Henry
Olsen, Arthur M.
description The past two decades have seen changing patterns of therapy for achalasia of the esophagus. Availability of esophageal motility studies and cineradiography has made more accurate diagnosis posssible. Whereas, in the past, forceful dilation was the only definitive mode of treatment, the success of esophagomyotomy has resulted in its increasing use. Of 456 patients treated primarily by dilation at the Mayo Clinic from 1950 through 1967, 408 patients had hydrostatic dilation performed one or more times, whereas 48 had simple dilation with sounds. Long-term follow-up data on 77 percent of patients who had forceful dilation revealed that 65 percent had excellent or good results, 16 percent were improved but still had significant symptoms, and 19 percent were not improved. Fifty patients subsequently underwent esophagomyotomy because of unsatisfactory initial results. Of 19 patients with complications, ten required mediastinotomy and surgical repair of instrumental perforations. Although forceful dilation can be used in poor risk patients and those who decline operation, the significant incidence of complications and the frequent need for multiple dilations have made esophagomyotomy the preferred form of initial treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1378/chest.58.2.116
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_84686379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0012369216503687</els_id><sourcerecordid>84686379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e49ecc7969aa883cd4a23d3a1b54bc3841ac5949798f3ed08b5e5be4e7252fd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAURi0EglJY2ZAyMZEQx3Zis1XlV6qEhMpsOc4NceU2xU5A3XgH3pAnwaUVsDBdWff7jq4PQic4TTAp-IVuwHcJ40mWYJzvoAEWBMeEUbKLBmmKs5jkIjtAh97P0vDGIt9H-4wylgk8QLcj3SirvFFRW0ddA9G1b5eNeu79ZfQIvredX2-mDTi1XEXlKroyVnWmXZxHWLD08_0jIIsjtFcr6-F4O4fo6eZ6Or6LJw-39-PRJNbh2C4GKkDrQuRCKc6JrqjKSEUULhktNeEUK80EFYXgNYEq5SUDVgKFImNZXaVkiM423KVrX_rwdTk3XoO1agFt7yWnOc9JIUIw2QS1a713UMulM3PlVhKncm1OfpuTjMtMBnOhcLol9-Ucqp_4VtUvsDHPzZtxIP1cWRvSZIOatb1bKPsHyDcFCD5eDTjptYGFhiqUdSer1vx3yxd40Y2j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>84686379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Achalasia of the Esophagus: Results of Therapy by Dilation, 1950–1967</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sanderson, David R. ; Ellis, F. Henry ; Olsen, Arthur M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanderson, David R. ; Ellis, F. Henry ; Olsen, Arthur M.</creatorcontrib><description>The past two decades have seen changing patterns of therapy for achalasia of the esophagus. Availability of esophageal motility studies and cineradiography has made more accurate diagnosis posssible. Whereas, in the past, forceful dilation was the only definitive mode of treatment, the success of esophagomyotomy has resulted in its increasing use. Of 456 patients treated primarily by dilation at the Mayo Clinic from 1950 through 1967, 408 patients had hydrostatic dilation performed one or more times, whereas 48 had simple dilation with sounds. Long-term follow-up data on 77 percent of patients who had forceful dilation revealed that 65 percent had excellent or good results, 16 percent were improved but still had significant symptoms, and 19 percent were not improved. Fifty patients subsequently underwent esophagomyotomy because of unsatisfactory initial results. Of 19 patients with complications, ten required mediastinotomy and surgical repair of instrumental perforations. Although forceful dilation can be used in poor risk patients and those who decline operation, the significant incidence of complications and the frequent need for multiple dilations have made esophagomyotomy the preferred form of initial treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1378/chest.58.2.116</identifier><identifier>PMID: 5455291</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Deglutition Disorders - therapy ; Dilatation ; Esophageal Diseases - therapy ; Esophagoscopy ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastrointestinal Motility ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Methods ; Middle Aged</subject><ispartof>Chest, 1970-08, Vol.58 (2), p.116-121</ispartof><rights>1970 The American College of Chest Physicians</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e49ecc7969aa883cd4a23d3a1b54bc3841ac5949798f3ed08b5e5be4e7252fd03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e49ecc7969aa883cd4a23d3a1b54bc3841ac5949798f3ed08b5e5be4e7252fd03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5455291$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanderson, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, F. Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, Arthur M.</creatorcontrib><title>Achalasia of the Esophagus: Results of Therapy by Dilation, 1950–1967</title><title>Chest</title><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><description>The past two decades have seen changing patterns of therapy for achalasia of the esophagus. Availability of esophageal motility studies and cineradiography has made more accurate diagnosis posssible. Whereas, in the past, forceful dilation was the only definitive mode of treatment, the success of esophagomyotomy has resulted in its increasing use. Of 456 patients treated primarily by dilation at the Mayo Clinic from 1950 through 1967, 408 patients had hydrostatic dilation performed one or more times, whereas 48 had simple dilation with sounds. Long-term follow-up data on 77 percent of patients who had forceful dilation revealed that 65 percent had excellent or good results, 16 percent were improved but still had significant symptoms, and 19 percent were not improved. Fifty patients subsequently underwent esophagomyotomy because of unsatisfactory initial results. Of 19 patients with complications, ten required mediastinotomy and surgical repair of instrumental perforations. Although forceful dilation can be used in poor risk patients and those who decline operation, the significant incidence of complications and the frequent need for multiple dilations have made esophagomyotomy the preferred form of initial treatment.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Deglutition Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Dilatation</subject><subject>Esophageal Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Esophagoscopy</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Motility</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><issn>0012-3692</issn><issn>1931-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1970</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAURi0EglJY2ZAyMZEQx3Zis1XlV6qEhMpsOc4NceU2xU5A3XgH3pAnwaUVsDBdWff7jq4PQic4TTAp-IVuwHcJ40mWYJzvoAEWBMeEUbKLBmmKs5jkIjtAh97P0vDGIt9H-4wylgk8QLcj3SirvFFRW0ddA9G1b5eNeu79ZfQIvredX2-mDTi1XEXlKroyVnWmXZxHWLD08_0jIIsjtFcr6-F4O4fo6eZ6Or6LJw-39-PRJNbh2C4GKkDrQuRCKc6JrqjKSEUULhktNeEUK80EFYXgNYEq5SUDVgKFImNZXaVkiM423KVrX_rwdTk3XoO1agFt7yWnOc9JIUIw2QS1a713UMulM3PlVhKncm1OfpuTjMtMBnOhcLol9-Ucqp_4VtUvsDHPzZtxIP1cWRvSZIOatb1bKPsHyDcFCD5eDTjptYGFhiqUdSer1vx3yxd40Y2j</recordid><startdate>197008</startdate><enddate>197008</enddate><creator>Sanderson, David R.</creator><creator>Ellis, F. Henry</creator><creator>Olsen, Arthur M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American College of Chest Physicians</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197008</creationdate><title>Achalasia of the Esophagus: Results of Therapy by Dilation, 1950–1967</title><author>Sanderson, David R. ; Ellis, F. Henry ; Olsen, Arthur M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e49ecc7969aa883cd4a23d3a1b54bc3841ac5949798f3ed08b5e5be4e7252fd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1970</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Deglutition Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Dilatation</topic><topic>Esophageal Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Esophagoscopy</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Motility</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanderson, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, F. Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, Arthur M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanderson, David R.</au><au>Ellis, F. Henry</au><au>Olsen, Arthur M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Achalasia of the Esophagus: Results of Therapy by Dilation, 1950–1967</atitle><jtitle>Chest</jtitle><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><date>1970-08</date><risdate>1970</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>116-121</pages><issn>0012-3692</issn><eissn>1931-3543</eissn><abstract>The past two decades have seen changing patterns of therapy for achalasia of the esophagus. Availability of esophageal motility studies and cineradiography has made more accurate diagnosis posssible. Whereas, in the past, forceful dilation was the only definitive mode of treatment, the success of esophagomyotomy has resulted in its increasing use. Of 456 patients treated primarily by dilation at the Mayo Clinic from 1950 through 1967, 408 patients had hydrostatic dilation performed one or more times, whereas 48 had simple dilation with sounds. Long-term follow-up data on 77 percent of patients who had forceful dilation revealed that 65 percent had excellent or good results, 16 percent were improved but still had significant symptoms, and 19 percent were not improved. Fifty patients subsequently underwent esophagomyotomy because of unsatisfactory initial results. Of 19 patients with complications, ten required mediastinotomy and surgical repair of instrumental perforations. Although forceful dilation can be used in poor risk patients and those who decline operation, the significant incidence of complications and the frequent need for multiple dilations have made esophagomyotomy the preferred form of initial treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>5455291</pmid><doi>10.1378/chest.58.2.116</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-3692
ispartof Chest, 1970-08, Vol.58 (2), p.116-121
issn 0012-3692
1931-3543
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_84686379
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Child
Child, Preschool
Deglutition Disorders - therapy
Dilatation
Esophageal Diseases - therapy
Esophagoscopy
Follow-Up Studies
Gastrointestinal Motility
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Methods
Middle Aged
title Achalasia of the Esophagus: Results of Therapy by Dilation, 1950–1967
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T05%3A28%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Achalasia%20of%20the%20Esophagus:%20Results%20of%20Therapy%20by%20Dilation,%201950%E2%80%931967&rft.jtitle=Chest&rft.au=Sanderson,%20David%20R.&rft.date=1970-08&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=116-121&rft.issn=0012-3692&rft.eissn=1931-3543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1378/chest.58.2.116&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E84686379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=84686379&rft_id=info:pmid/5455291&rft_els_id=S0012369216503687&rfr_iscdi=true