Coital behaviour in dogs. I. Preferential mating in the bitch
Five male and five female beagles were raised together from puppyhood in a large field and were tested for copulatory behaviour when the females came into oestrus. Mating tests were repeated 8 to 13 months later during a second oestrous period. Females exhibited clear-cut preferences for particular...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal behaviour 1967-10, Vol.15 (4), p.546,IN5,549-548,IN5,558 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 548,IN5,558 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 546,IN5,549 |
container_title | Animal behaviour |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Beach, Frank A. LeBoeuf, Burney J. |
description | Five male and five female beagles were raised together from puppyhood in a large field and were tested for copulatory behaviour when the females came into oestrus. Mating tests were repeated 8 to 13 months later during a second oestrous period. Females exhibited clear-cut preferences for particular males as sexual partners. Feminine rejection behaviour ranged from simple avoidance to active attack. Some females were more selective than others, but all showed discriminatory responses. Some males were rarely rejected by any bitch, whereas others were generally unpopular.
It is suggested that any concept of sexual receptivity as an endogenously controlled condition leading to indiscriminated acceptance of all conspecific masculine partners must be evaluated separately for each species. The absence of preferential responsiveness on the part of the females should not be assumed
a priori. Its existence or nonexistence can be established only by direct investigation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0003-3472(67)90057-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_84569256</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0003347267900577</els_id><sourcerecordid>84569256</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-d3672f5fcac0eb75ae7da1892d5ed95a1df9247765f59e138a86ace259a29e133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LwzAYxoMoc07_A4WeRA-dSdokzUFBhh-DgR70HNLk7Rbp2pmkA_97Wzd29PTy8Dzv1w-hS4KnBBN-hzHO0iwX9IaLW4kxE6k4QmOCJUsLWtBjND5ETtFZCF-95AyzERpxzBgheIzuZ62Luk5KWOmtazufuCax7TJMk_k0efdQgYcmuj6y1tE1y8GPK0hKF83qHJ1Uug5wsa8T9Pn89DF7TRdvL_PZ4yI1GRMxtRkXtGKV0QZDKZgGYTUpJLUMrGSa2ErSXAjOKiaBZIUuuDZAmdR00NkEXe_mbnz73UGIau2CgbrWDbRdUEXOuKSM98F8FzS-DaG_Xm28W2v_owhWAzU1IFEDEsWF-qOmRN92tZ_flWuwh6Y9pt5_2PnQP7l14FUwDhoD1nkwUdnW_b_gF-kTekI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>84569256</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coital behaviour in dogs. I. Preferential mating in the bitch</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Beach, Frank A. ; LeBoeuf, Burney J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Beach, Frank A. ; LeBoeuf, Burney J.</creatorcontrib><description>Five male and five female beagles were raised together from puppyhood in a large field and were tested for copulatory behaviour when the females came into oestrus. Mating tests were repeated 8 to 13 months later during a second oestrous period. Females exhibited clear-cut preferences for particular males as sexual partners. Feminine rejection behaviour ranged from simple avoidance to active attack. Some females were more selective than others, but all showed discriminatory responses. Some males were rarely rejected by any bitch, whereas others were generally unpopular.
It is suggested that any concept of sexual receptivity as an endogenously controlled condition leading to indiscriminated acceptance of all conspecific masculine partners must be evaluated separately for each species. The absence of preferential responsiveness on the part of the females should not be assumed
a priori. Its existence or nonexistence can be established only by direct investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0003-3472(67)90057-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6055110</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Behavior, Animal ; Cattle ; Copulation ; Female ; Male ; Sexual Behavior, Animal</subject><ispartof>Animal behaviour, 1967-10, Vol.15 (4), p.546,IN5,549-548,IN5,558</ispartof><rights>1967</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-d3672f5fcac0eb75ae7da1892d5ed95a1df9247765f59e138a86ace259a29e133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-d3672f5fcac0eb75ae7da1892d5ed95a1df9247765f59e138a86ace259a29e133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(67)90057-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6055110$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beach, Frank A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeBoeuf, Burney J.</creatorcontrib><title>Coital behaviour in dogs. I. Preferential mating in the bitch</title><title>Animal behaviour</title><addtitle>Anim Behav</addtitle><description>Five male and five female beagles were raised together from puppyhood in a large field and were tested for copulatory behaviour when the females came into oestrus. Mating tests were repeated 8 to 13 months later during a second oestrous period. Females exhibited clear-cut preferences for particular males as sexual partners. Feminine rejection behaviour ranged from simple avoidance to active attack. Some females were more selective than others, but all showed discriminatory responses. Some males were rarely rejected by any bitch, whereas others were generally unpopular.
It is suggested that any concept of sexual receptivity as an endogenously controlled condition leading to indiscriminated acceptance of all conspecific masculine partners must be evaluated separately for each species. The absence of preferential responsiveness on the part of the females should not be assumed
a priori. Its existence or nonexistence can be established only by direct investigation.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Copulation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior, Animal</subject><issn>0003-3472</issn><issn>1095-8282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1967</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LwzAYxoMoc07_A4WeRA-dSdokzUFBhh-DgR70HNLk7Rbp2pmkA_97Wzd29PTy8Dzv1w-hS4KnBBN-hzHO0iwX9IaLW4kxE6k4QmOCJUsLWtBjND5ETtFZCF-95AyzERpxzBgheIzuZ62Luk5KWOmtazufuCax7TJMk_k0efdQgYcmuj6y1tE1y8GPK0hKF83qHJ1Uug5wsa8T9Pn89DF7TRdvL_PZ4yI1GRMxtRkXtGKV0QZDKZgGYTUpJLUMrGSa2ErSXAjOKiaBZIUuuDZAmdR00NkEXe_mbnz73UGIau2CgbrWDbRdUEXOuKSM98F8FzS-DaG_Xm28W2v_owhWAzU1IFEDEsWF-qOmRN92tZ_flWuwh6Y9pt5_2PnQP7l14FUwDhoD1nkwUdnW_b_gF-kTekI</recordid><startdate>196710</startdate><enddate>196710</enddate><creator>Beach, Frank A.</creator><creator>LeBoeuf, Burney J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196710</creationdate><title>Coital behaviour in dogs. I. Preferential mating in the bitch</title><author>Beach, Frank A. ; LeBoeuf, Burney J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-d3672f5fcac0eb75ae7da1892d5ed95a1df9247765f59e138a86ace259a29e133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1967</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Copulation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior, Animal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beach, Frank A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeBoeuf, Burney J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beach, Frank A.</au><au>LeBoeuf, Burney J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coital behaviour in dogs. I. Preferential mating in the bitch</atitle><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle><addtitle>Anim Behav</addtitle><date>1967-10</date><risdate>1967</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>546,IN5,549</spage><epage>548,IN5,558</epage><pages>546,IN5,549-548,IN5,558</pages><issn>0003-3472</issn><eissn>1095-8282</eissn><abstract>Five male and five female beagles were raised together from puppyhood in a large field and were tested for copulatory behaviour when the females came into oestrus. Mating tests were repeated 8 to 13 months later during a second oestrous period. Females exhibited clear-cut preferences for particular males as sexual partners. Feminine rejection behaviour ranged from simple avoidance to active attack. Some females were more selective than others, but all showed discriminatory responses. Some males were rarely rejected by any bitch, whereas others were generally unpopular.
It is suggested that any concept of sexual receptivity as an endogenously controlled condition leading to indiscriminated acceptance of all conspecific masculine partners must be evaluated separately for each species. The absence of preferential responsiveness on the part of the females should not be assumed
a priori. Its existence or nonexistence can be established only by direct investigation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>6055110</pmid><doi>10.1016/0003-3472(67)90057-7</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-3472 |
ispartof | Animal behaviour, 1967-10, Vol.15 (4), p.546,IN5,549-548,IN5,558 |
issn | 0003-3472 1095-8282 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_84569256 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Animals Behavior, Animal Cattle Copulation Female Male Sexual Behavior, Animal |
title | Coital behaviour in dogs. I. Preferential mating in the bitch |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T12%3A08%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coital%20behaviour%20in%20dogs.%20I.%20Preferential%20mating%20in%20the%20bitch&rft.jtitle=Animal%20behaviour&rft.au=Beach,%20Frank%20A.&rft.date=1967-10&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=546,IN5,549&rft.epage=548,IN5,558&rft.pages=546,IN5,549-548,IN5,558&rft.issn=0003-3472&rft.eissn=1095-8282&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0003-3472(67)90057-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E84569256%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=84569256&rft_id=info:pmid/6055110&rft_els_id=0003347267900577&rfr_iscdi=true |