A COMPARISON OF THE HÆMAGGLUTINATION-INHIBITION TEST AND THE NEUTRALISATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF RUBELLA ANTIBODY

Two serological tests, neutralisation and hæmagglutination inhibition, were used to demonstrate rubella antibodies in human sera. Results with the two tests correlated extremely well. It was concluded that the hæmagglutination-inhibition procedure was a useful preliminary test in the diagnosis of ru...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 1967-01, Vol.290 (7508), p.182-184
Hauptverfasser: Field, AnneM, Vandervelde, EliseM, Thompson, K.M., Hutchinson, D.N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 184
container_issue 7508
container_start_page 182
container_title The Lancet (British edition)
container_volume 290
creator Field, AnneM
Vandervelde, EliseM
Thompson, K.M.
Hutchinson, D.N.
description Two serological tests, neutralisation and hæmagglutination inhibition, were used to demonstrate rubella antibodies in human sera. Results with the two tests correlated extremely well. It was concluded that the hæmagglutination-inhibition procedure was a useful preliminary test in the diagnosis of rubella and in survey work.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90006-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_84504825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673667900062</els_id><sourcerecordid>84504825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-88b287e08e28eee0cca90e7e489d3cf218dd8106f8da80c3528aba84080b48d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1u2zAQhYkiReKkPUIArYp0oXQoURS9KmhZtgnIUmHTQLsiZGoMKPBPKtoJcoFcLBeLLBvpshsOMe97M5hHyC2FewqU_5gDZeDzOOR3PP7eBwDuB59Ij7KY-RGLf1-Q3gdyRa6de2gZxiG6JJeM8igG3iPP0kuK6S85U_Mi94qRpyepN3l7ncrxOFtolUutitxX-UQN1PHr6XSuPZkPOzJPF3omMzWX_7RRMeu0YarTpGu3Y2eLQZplsjVqNSiGf76Qz6ty7fDrud6QxSjVycTPirFKZObbkMPeF2IZiBhBYCAQEawt-4AxMtGvQrsKqKgqQYGvRFUKsGEUiHJZCgYClkxUNLwh305zH5vd3wO6vdnUzuJ6XW5xd3BGsAiYCKIWjE6gbXbONbgyj029KZsXQ8EcAzdd4OaYZvuYLnATtL7b84LDcoPVh-uccKv_POnYXvlUY2OcrXFrsaobtHtT7er_bHgHZEyGnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>84504825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A COMPARISON OF THE HÆMAGGLUTINATION-INHIBITION TEST AND THE NEUTRALISATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF RUBELLA ANTIBODY</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Field, AnneM ; Vandervelde, EliseM ; Thompson, K.M. ; Hutchinson, D.N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Field, AnneM ; Vandervelde, EliseM ; Thompson, K.M. ; Hutchinson, D.N.</creatorcontrib><description>Two serological tests, neutralisation and hæmagglutination inhibition, were used to demonstrate rubella antibodies in human sera. Results with the two tests correlated extremely well. It was concluded that the hæmagglutination-inhibition procedure was a useful preliminary test in the diagnosis of rubella and in survey work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90006-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4165706</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Antibody Formation ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Mass Screening ; Middle Aged ; Neutralization Tests ; Rubella - diagnosis ; Rubella - immunology</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 1967-01, Vol.290 (7508), p.182-184</ispartof><rights>1967</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-88b287e08e28eee0cca90e7e489d3cf218dd8106f8da80c3528aba84080b48d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-88b287e08e28eee0cca90e7e489d3cf218dd8106f8da80c3528aba84080b48d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90006-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4165706$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Field, AnneM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandervelde, EliseM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, K.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, D.N.</creatorcontrib><title>A COMPARISON OF THE HÆMAGGLUTINATION-INHIBITION TEST AND THE NEUTRALISATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF RUBELLA ANTIBODY</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>Two serological tests, neutralisation and hæmagglutination inhibition, were used to demonstrate rubella antibodies in human sera. Results with the two tests correlated extremely well. It was concluded that the hæmagglutination-inhibition procedure was a useful preliminary test in the diagnosis of rubella and in survey work.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibody Formation</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neutralization Tests</subject><subject>Rubella - diagnosis</subject><subject>Rubella - immunology</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1967</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1u2zAQhYkiReKkPUIArYp0oXQoURS9KmhZtgnIUmHTQLsiZGoMKPBPKtoJcoFcLBeLLBvpshsOMe97M5hHyC2FewqU_5gDZeDzOOR3PP7eBwDuB59Ij7KY-RGLf1-Q3gdyRa6de2gZxiG6JJeM8igG3iPP0kuK6S85U_Mi94qRpyepN3l7ncrxOFtolUutitxX-UQN1PHr6XSuPZkPOzJPF3omMzWX_7RRMeu0YarTpGu3Y2eLQZplsjVqNSiGf76Qz6ty7fDrud6QxSjVycTPirFKZObbkMPeF2IZiBhBYCAQEawt-4AxMtGvQrsKqKgqQYGvRFUKsGEUiHJZCgYClkxUNLwh305zH5vd3wO6vdnUzuJ6XW5xd3BGsAiYCKIWjE6gbXbONbgyj029KZsXQ8EcAzdd4OaYZvuYLnATtL7b84LDcoPVh-uccKv_POnYXvlUY2OcrXFrsaobtHtT7er_bHgHZEyGnA</recordid><startdate>19670101</startdate><enddate>19670101</enddate><creator>Field, AnneM</creator><creator>Vandervelde, EliseM</creator><creator>Thompson, K.M.</creator><creator>Hutchinson, D.N.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19670101</creationdate><title>A COMPARISON OF THE HÆMAGGLUTINATION-INHIBITION TEST AND THE NEUTRALISATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF RUBELLA ANTIBODY</title><author>Field, AnneM ; Vandervelde, EliseM ; Thompson, K.M. ; Hutchinson, D.N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-88b287e08e28eee0cca90e7e489d3cf218dd8106f8da80c3528aba84080b48d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1967</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibody Formation</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neutralization Tests</topic><topic>Rubella - diagnosis</topic><topic>Rubella - immunology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Field, AnneM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandervelde, EliseM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, K.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, D.N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Field, AnneM</au><au>Vandervelde, EliseM</au><au>Thompson, K.M.</au><au>Hutchinson, D.N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A COMPARISON OF THE HÆMAGGLUTINATION-INHIBITION TEST AND THE NEUTRALISATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF RUBELLA ANTIBODY</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>1967-01-01</date><risdate>1967</risdate><volume>290</volume><issue>7508</issue><spage>182</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>182-184</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><abstract>Two serological tests, neutralisation and hæmagglutination inhibition, were used to demonstrate rubella antibodies in human sera. Results with the two tests correlated extremely well. It was concluded that the hæmagglutination-inhibition procedure was a useful preliminary test in the diagnosis of rubella and in survey work.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>4165706</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90006-2</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-6736
ispartof The Lancet (British edition), 1967-01, Vol.290 (7508), p.182-184
issn 0140-6736
1474-547X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_84504825
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Antibody Formation
Child
Child, Preschool
Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Mass Screening
Middle Aged
Neutralization Tests
Rubella - diagnosis
Rubella - immunology
title A COMPARISON OF THE HÆMAGGLUTINATION-INHIBITION TEST AND THE NEUTRALISATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF RUBELLA ANTIBODY
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A25%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20COMPARISON%20OF%20THE%20H%C3%86MAGGLUTINATION-INHIBITION%20TEST%20AND%20THE%20NEUTRALISATION%20TEST%20FOR%20THE%20DETECTION%20OF%20RUBELLA%20ANTIBODY&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Field,%20AnneM&rft.date=1967-01-01&rft.volume=290&rft.issue=7508&rft.spage=182&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=182-184&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90006-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E84504825%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=84504825&rft_id=info:pmid/4165706&rft_els_id=S0140673667900062&rfr_iscdi=true