A COMPARISON OF THE HÆMAGGLUTINATION-INHIBITION TEST AND THE NEUTRALISATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF RUBELLA ANTIBODY
Two serological tests, neutralisation and hæmagglutination inhibition, were used to demonstrate rubella antibodies in human sera. Results with the two tests correlated extremely well. It was concluded that the hæmagglutination-inhibition procedure was a useful preliminary test in the diagnosis of ru...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 1967-01, Vol.290 (7508), p.182-184 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 184 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7508 |
container_start_page | 182 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 290 |
creator | Field, AnneM Vandervelde, EliseM Thompson, K.M. Hutchinson, D.N. |
description | Two serological tests, neutralisation and hæmagglutination inhibition, were used to demonstrate rubella antibodies in human sera. Results with the two tests correlated extremely well. It was concluded that the hæmagglutination-inhibition procedure was a useful preliminary test in the diagnosis of rubella and in survey work. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90006-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_84504825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673667900062</els_id><sourcerecordid>84504825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-88b287e08e28eee0cca90e7e489d3cf218dd8106f8da80c3528aba84080b48d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1u2zAQhYkiReKkPUIArYp0oXQoURS9KmhZtgnIUmHTQLsiZGoMKPBPKtoJcoFcLBeLLBvpshsOMe97M5hHyC2FewqU_5gDZeDzOOR3PP7eBwDuB59Ij7KY-RGLf1-Q3gdyRa6de2gZxiG6JJeM8igG3iPP0kuK6S85U_Mi94qRpyepN3l7ncrxOFtolUutitxX-UQN1PHr6XSuPZkPOzJPF3omMzWX_7RRMeu0YarTpGu3Y2eLQZplsjVqNSiGf76Qz6ty7fDrud6QxSjVycTPirFKZObbkMPeF2IZiBhBYCAQEawt-4AxMtGvQrsKqKgqQYGvRFUKsGEUiHJZCgYClkxUNLwh305zH5vd3wO6vdnUzuJ6XW5xd3BGsAiYCKIWjE6gbXbONbgyj029KZsXQ8EcAzdd4OaYZvuYLnATtL7b84LDcoPVh-uccKv_POnYXvlUY2OcrXFrsaobtHtT7er_bHgHZEyGnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>84504825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A COMPARISON OF THE HÆMAGGLUTINATION-INHIBITION TEST AND THE NEUTRALISATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF RUBELLA ANTIBODY</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Field, AnneM ; Vandervelde, EliseM ; Thompson, K.M. ; Hutchinson, D.N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Field, AnneM ; Vandervelde, EliseM ; Thompson, K.M. ; Hutchinson, D.N.</creatorcontrib><description>Two serological tests, neutralisation and hæmagglutination inhibition, were used to demonstrate rubella antibodies in human sera. Results with the two tests correlated extremely well. It was concluded that the hæmagglutination-inhibition procedure was a useful preliminary test in the diagnosis of rubella and in survey work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90006-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4165706</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Antibody Formation ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Mass Screening ; Middle Aged ; Neutralization Tests ; Rubella - diagnosis ; Rubella - immunology</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 1967-01, Vol.290 (7508), p.182-184</ispartof><rights>1967</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-88b287e08e28eee0cca90e7e489d3cf218dd8106f8da80c3528aba84080b48d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-88b287e08e28eee0cca90e7e489d3cf218dd8106f8da80c3528aba84080b48d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90006-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4165706$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Field, AnneM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandervelde, EliseM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, K.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, D.N.</creatorcontrib><title>A COMPARISON OF THE HÆMAGGLUTINATION-INHIBITION TEST AND THE NEUTRALISATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF RUBELLA ANTIBODY</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>Two serological tests, neutralisation and hæmagglutination inhibition, were used to demonstrate rubella antibodies in human sera. Results with the two tests correlated extremely well. It was concluded that the hæmagglutination-inhibition procedure was a useful preliminary test in the diagnosis of rubella and in survey work.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibody Formation</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neutralization Tests</subject><subject>Rubella - diagnosis</subject><subject>Rubella - immunology</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1967</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1u2zAQhYkiReKkPUIArYp0oXQoURS9KmhZtgnIUmHTQLsiZGoMKPBPKtoJcoFcLBeLLBvpshsOMe97M5hHyC2FewqU_5gDZeDzOOR3PP7eBwDuB59Ij7KY-RGLf1-Q3gdyRa6de2gZxiG6JJeM8igG3iPP0kuK6S85U_Mi94qRpyepN3l7ncrxOFtolUutitxX-UQN1PHr6XSuPZkPOzJPF3omMzWX_7RRMeu0YarTpGu3Y2eLQZplsjVqNSiGf76Qz6ty7fDrud6QxSjVycTPirFKZObbkMPeF2IZiBhBYCAQEawt-4AxMtGvQrsKqKgqQYGvRFUKsGEUiHJZCgYClkxUNLwh305zH5vd3wO6vdnUzuJ6XW5xd3BGsAiYCKIWjE6gbXbONbgyj029KZsXQ8EcAzdd4OaYZvuYLnATtL7b84LDcoPVh-uccKv_POnYXvlUY2OcrXFrsaobtHtT7er_bHgHZEyGnA</recordid><startdate>19670101</startdate><enddate>19670101</enddate><creator>Field, AnneM</creator><creator>Vandervelde, EliseM</creator><creator>Thompson, K.M.</creator><creator>Hutchinson, D.N.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19670101</creationdate><title>A COMPARISON OF THE HÆMAGGLUTINATION-INHIBITION TEST AND THE NEUTRALISATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF RUBELLA ANTIBODY</title><author>Field, AnneM ; Vandervelde, EliseM ; Thompson, K.M. ; Hutchinson, D.N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-88b287e08e28eee0cca90e7e489d3cf218dd8106f8da80c3528aba84080b48d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1967</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibody Formation</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neutralization Tests</topic><topic>Rubella - diagnosis</topic><topic>Rubella - immunology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Field, AnneM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandervelde, EliseM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, K.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, D.N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Field, AnneM</au><au>Vandervelde, EliseM</au><au>Thompson, K.M.</au><au>Hutchinson, D.N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A COMPARISON OF THE HÆMAGGLUTINATION-INHIBITION TEST AND THE NEUTRALISATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF RUBELLA ANTIBODY</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>1967-01-01</date><risdate>1967</risdate><volume>290</volume><issue>7508</issue><spage>182</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>182-184</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><abstract>Two serological tests, neutralisation and hæmagglutination inhibition, were used to demonstrate rubella antibodies in human sera. Results with the two tests correlated extremely well. It was concluded that the hæmagglutination-inhibition procedure was a useful preliminary test in the diagnosis of rubella and in survey work.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>4165706</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90006-2</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 1967-01, Vol.290 (7508), p.182-184 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_84504825 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Antibody Formation Child Child, Preschool Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Mass Screening Middle Aged Neutralization Tests Rubella - diagnosis Rubella - immunology |
title | A COMPARISON OF THE HÆMAGGLUTINATION-INHIBITION TEST AND THE NEUTRALISATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF RUBELLA ANTIBODY |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A25%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20COMPARISON%20OF%20THE%20H%C3%86MAGGLUTINATION-INHIBITION%20TEST%20AND%20THE%20NEUTRALISATION%20TEST%20FOR%20THE%20DETECTION%20OF%20RUBELLA%20ANTIBODY&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Field,%20AnneM&rft.date=1967-01-01&rft.volume=290&rft.issue=7508&rft.spage=182&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=182-184&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90006-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E84504825%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=84504825&rft_id=info:pmid/4165706&rft_els_id=S0140673667900062&rfr_iscdi=true |