Evaluation of various QuEChERS based methods for the analysis of herbicides and other commonly used pesticides in polished rice by LC–MS/MS
Four different extraction and clean-up protocols based on the QuEChERS method were compared for the development of an optimized sample preparation procedure for the multiresidue analysis of 16 commonly applied herbicides in rice crops using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally the methods were evaluated for the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Talanta (Oxford) 2011-02, Vol.83 (5), p.1613-1622 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1622 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1613 |
container_title | Talanta (Oxford) |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Pareja, Lucía Cesio, Verónica Heinzen, Horacio Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R. |
description | Four different extraction and clean-up protocols based on the QuEChERS method were compared for the development of an optimized sample preparation procedure for the multiresidue analysis of 16 commonly applied herbicides in rice crops using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally the methods were evaluated for the analysis of 26 insecticides and fungicides currently used in rice crops. The methods comprise, in general, the hydratation of the sample with water followed by the extraction with acetonitrile, phase separation with the addition of different salts and finally a clean-up step with various sorbents.
Matrix effects were evaluated for the 4 studied methods using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally LC-TOF/MS was used to compare the co-extractants obtained with the four assayed methodologies. Thirty-six pesticides presented good performance with recoveries in the range 70–120% and relative standard deviations below 20% using 7.5g of milled polished rice and the buffered acetate QuEChERS method without clean-up at both fortification levels: 10 and 300μgkg−1. The other six pesticides presented low recovery rates, nevertheless all these analytes could be analyzed with at least one of the other three studied procedures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.052 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_843415674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S003991401000932X</els_id><sourcerecordid>843415674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-664472df029273034c48195eb9275c12a4e00899c7c9c068a23c262d65e8b4403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuO0zAUhi0EYsrAI4C8QazSOb7ktkKoKhepo9FMYW05zoniKomLnVTqjhdgxRvyJOOoAZasLB9_v885_0_IawZrBiy7OaxH3elh1GsOc42tIeVPyIoVuUhEmounZAUgyqRkEq7IixAOAMAFiOfkijMuijyDFfm5Pelu0qN1A3UNPWlv3RTo_bTdtNuHPa10wJr2OLauDrRxno4tUj3o7hxsmCUt-soaW2OI5Zq6-O6pcX3vhu5Mp1l-xDAuiB3o0XU2tLHsrUFanelu8_vHr9v9ze3-JXnW6C7gq-W8Jt8-br9uPie7u09fNh92iZEZjEmWSZnzugFe8jxuJI0sWJliFa-pYVxLBCjK0uSmNJAVmgvDM15nKRaVlCCuybvLv0fvvk9xOtXbYLCLhmJcXxVSSJZmuYxkeiGNdyF4bNTR2177s2Kg5iDUQS1BqDkIxZiKQUTdm6XDVPVY_1X9cT4CbxdAB6O7xuvB2PCPEwUvCyYi9_7CYfTjZNGrYCwOBmvr0YyqdvY_ozwCYTupqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>843415674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of various QuEChERS based methods for the analysis of herbicides and other commonly used pesticides in polished rice by LC–MS/MS</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Pareja, Lucía ; Cesio, Verónica ; Heinzen, Horacio ; Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pareja, Lucía ; Cesio, Verónica ; Heinzen, Horacio ; Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</creatorcontrib><description>Four different extraction and clean-up protocols based on the QuEChERS method were compared for the development of an optimized sample preparation procedure for the multiresidue analysis of 16 commonly applied herbicides in rice crops using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally the methods were evaluated for the analysis of 26 insecticides and fungicides currently used in rice crops. The methods comprise, in general, the hydratation of the sample with water followed by the extraction with acetonitrile, phase separation with the addition of different salts and finally a clean-up step with various sorbents.
Matrix effects were evaluated for the 4 studied methods using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally LC-TOF/MS was used to compare the co-extractants obtained with the four assayed methodologies. Thirty-six pesticides presented good performance with recoveries in the range 70–120% and relative standard deviations below 20% using 7.5g of milled polished rice and the buffered acetate QuEChERS method without clean-up at both fortification levels: 10 and 300μgkg−1. The other six pesticides presented low recovery rates, nevertheless all these analytes could be analyzed with at least one of the other three studied procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-9140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21238760</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TLNTA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Chemistry ; Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography ; Chromatography, Liquid - methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; Herbicides - analysis ; Herbicides - chemistry ; Liquid chromatography ; Mass spectrometry ; Oryza - chemistry ; Other chromatographic methods ; Pesticide residues ; Pesticide Residues - analysis ; Pesticide Residues - chemistry ; QuEChERS ; Rice ; Spectrometric and optical methods ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><ispartof>Talanta (Oxford), 2011-02, Vol.83 (5), p.1613-1622</ispartof><rights>2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-664472df029273034c48195eb9275c12a4e00899c7c9c068a23c262d65e8b4403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-664472df029273034c48195eb9275c12a4e00899c7c9c068a23c262d65e8b4403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003991401000932X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23829813$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21238760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pareja, Lucía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesio, Verónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinzen, Horacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of various QuEChERS based methods for the analysis of herbicides and other commonly used pesticides in polished rice by LC–MS/MS</title><title>Talanta (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Talanta</addtitle><description>Four different extraction and clean-up protocols based on the QuEChERS method were compared for the development of an optimized sample preparation procedure for the multiresidue analysis of 16 commonly applied herbicides in rice crops using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally the methods were evaluated for the analysis of 26 insecticides and fungicides currently used in rice crops. The methods comprise, in general, the hydratation of the sample with water followed by the extraction with acetonitrile, phase separation with the addition of different salts and finally a clean-up step with various sorbents.
Matrix effects were evaluated for the 4 studied methods using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally LC-TOF/MS was used to compare the co-extractants obtained with the four assayed methodologies. Thirty-six pesticides presented good performance with recoveries in the range 70–120% and relative standard deviations below 20% using 7.5g of milled polished rice and the buffered acetate QuEChERS method without clean-up at both fortification levels: 10 and 300μgkg−1. The other six pesticides presented low recovery rates, nevertheless all these analytes could be analyzed with at least one of the other three studied procedures.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Herbicides - analysis</subject><subject>Herbicides - chemistry</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Oryza - chemistry</subject><subject>Other chromatographic methods</subject><subject>Pesticide residues</subject><subject>Pesticide Residues - analysis</subject><subject>Pesticide Residues - chemistry</subject><subject>QuEChERS</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Spectrometric and optical methods</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><issn>0039-9140</issn><issn>1873-3573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcuO0zAUhi0EYsrAI4C8QazSOb7ktkKoKhepo9FMYW05zoniKomLnVTqjhdgxRvyJOOoAZasLB9_v885_0_IawZrBiy7OaxH3elh1GsOc42tIeVPyIoVuUhEmounZAUgyqRkEq7IixAOAMAFiOfkijMuijyDFfm5Pelu0qN1A3UNPWlv3RTo_bTdtNuHPa10wJr2OLauDrRxno4tUj3o7hxsmCUt-soaW2OI5Zq6-O6pcX3vhu5Mp1l-xDAuiB3o0XU2tLHsrUFanelu8_vHr9v9ze3-JXnW6C7gq-W8Jt8-br9uPie7u09fNh92iZEZjEmWSZnzugFe8jxuJI0sWJliFa-pYVxLBCjK0uSmNJAVmgvDM15nKRaVlCCuybvLv0fvvk9xOtXbYLCLhmJcXxVSSJZmuYxkeiGNdyF4bNTR2177s2Kg5iDUQS1BqDkIxZiKQUTdm6XDVPVY_1X9cT4CbxdAB6O7xuvB2PCPEwUvCyYi9_7CYfTjZNGrYCwOBmvr0YyqdvY_ozwCYTupqQ</recordid><startdate>20110215</startdate><enddate>20110215</enddate><creator>Pareja, Lucía</creator><creator>Cesio, Verónica</creator><creator>Heinzen, Horacio</creator><creator>Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110215</creationdate><title>Evaluation of various QuEChERS based methods for the analysis of herbicides and other commonly used pesticides in polished rice by LC–MS/MS</title><author>Pareja, Lucía ; Cesio, Verónica ; Heinzen, Horacio ; Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-664472df029273034c48195eb9275c12a4e00899c7c9c068a23c262d65e8b4403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Herbicides - analysis</topic><topic>Herbicides - chemistry</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Oryza - chemistry</topic><topic>Other chromatographic methods</topic><topic>Pesticide residues</topic><topic>Pesticide Residues - analysis</topic><topic>Pesticide Residues - chemistry</topic><topic>QuEChERS</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Spectrometric and optical methods</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pareja, Lucía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesio, Verónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinzen, Horacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Talanta (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pareja, Lucía</au><au>Cesio, Verónica</au><au>Heinzen, Horacio</au><au>Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of various QuEChERS based methods for the analysis of herbicides and other commonly used pesticides in polished rice by LC–MS/MS</atitle><jtitle>Talanta (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Talanta</addtitle><date>2011-02-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1613</spage><epage>1622</epage><pages>1613-1622</pages><issn>0039-9140</issn><eissn>1873-3573</eissn><coden>TLNTA2</coden><abstract>Four different extraction and clean-up protocols based on the QuEChERS method were compared for the development of an optimized sample preparation procedure for the multiresidue analysis of 16 commonly applied herbicides in rice crops using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally the methods were evaluated for the analysis of 26 insecticides and fungicides currently used in rice crops. The methods comprise, in general, the hydratation of the sample with water followed by the extraction with acetonitrile, phase separation with the addition of different salts and finally a clean-up step with various sorbents.
Matrix effects were evaluated for the 4 studied methods using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally LC-TOF/MS was used to compare the co-extractants obtained with the four assayed methodologies. Thirty-six pesticides presented good performance with recoveries in the range 70–120% and relative standard deviations below 20% using 7.5g of milled polished rice and the buffered acetate QuEChERS method without clean-up at both fortification levels: 10 and 300μgkg−1. The other six pesticides presented low recovery rates, nevertheless all these analytes could be analyzed with at least one of the other three studied procedures.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>21238760</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.052</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-9140 |
ispartof | Talanta (Oxford), 2011-02, Vol.83 (5), p.1613-1622 |
issn | 0039-9140 1873-3573 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_843415674 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Analytical chemistry Chemistry Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography Chromatography, Liquid - methods Exact sciences and technology Herbicides - analysis Herbicides - chemistry Liquid chromatography Mass spectrometry Oryza - chemistry Other chromatographic methods Pesticide residues Pesticide Residues - analysis Pesticide Residues - chemistry QuEChERS Rice Spectrometric and optical methods Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods |
title | Evaluation of various QuEChERS based methods for the analysis of herbicides and other commonly used pesticides in polished rice by LC–MS/MS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T09%3A25%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20various%20QuEChERS%20based%20methods%20for%20the%20analysis%20of%20herbicides%20and%20other%20commonly%20used%20pesticides%20in%20polished%20rice%20by%20LC%E2%80%93MS/MS&rft.jtitle=Talanta%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Pareja,%20Luc%C3%ADa&rft.date=2011-02-15&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1613&rft.epage=1622&rft.pages=1613-1622&rft.issn=0039-9140&rft.eissn=1873-3573&rft.coden=TLNTA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E843415674%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=843415674&rft_id=info:pmid/21238760&rft_els_id=S003991401000932X&rfr_iscdi=true |