Evaluation of various QuEChERS based methods for the analysis of herbicides and other commonly used pesticides in polished rice by LC–MS/MS

Four different extraction and clean-up protocols based on the QuEChERS method were compared for the development of an optimized sample preparation procedure for the multiresidue analysis of 16 commonly applied herbicides in rice crops using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally the methods were evaluated for the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Talanta (Oxford) 2011-02, Vol.83 (5), p.1613-1622
Hauptverfasser: Pareja, Lucía, Cesio, Verónica, Heinzen, Horacio, Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1622
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1613
container_title Talanta (Oxford)
container_volume 83
creator Pareja, Lucía
Cesio, Verónica
Heinzen, Horacio
Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.
description Four different extraction and clean-up protocols based on the QuEChERS method were compared for the development of an optimized sample preparation procedure for the multiresidue analysis of 16 commonly applied herbicides in rice crops using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally the methods were evaluated for the analysis of 26 insecticides and fungicides currently used in rice crops. The methods comprise, in general, the hydratation of the sample with water followed by the extraction with acetonitrile, phase separation with the addition of different salts and finally a clean-up step with various sorbents. Matrix effects were evaluated for the 4 studied methods using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally LC-TOF/MS was used to compare the co-extractants obtained with the four assayed methodologies. Thirty-six pesticides presented good performance with recoveries in the range 70–120% and relative standard deviations below 20% using 7.5g of milled polished rice and the buffered acetate QuEChERS method without clean-up at both fortification levels: 10 and 300μgkg−1. The other six pesticides presented low recovery rates, nevertheless all these analytes could be analyzed with at least one of the other three studied procedures.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.052
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_843415674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S003991401000932X</els_id><sourcerecordid>843415674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-664472df029273034c48195eb9275c12a4e00899c7c9c068a23c262d65e8b4403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuO0zAUhi0EYsrAI4C8QazSOb7ktkKoKhepo9FMYW05zoniKomLnVTqjhdgxRvyJOOoAZasLB9_v885_0_IawZrBiy7OaxH3elh1GsOc42tIeVPyIoVuUhEmounZAUgyqRkEq7IixAOAMAFiOfkijMuijyDFfm5Pelu0qN1A3UNPWlv3RTo_bTdtNuHPa10wJr2OLauDrRxno4tUj3o7hxsmCUt-soaW2OI5Zq6-O6pcX3vhu5Mp1l-xDAuiB3o0XU2tLHsrUFanelu8_vHr9v9ze3-JXnW6C7gq-W8Jt8-br9uPie7u09fNh92iZEZjEmWSZnzugFe8jxuJI0sWJliFa-pYVxLBCjK0uSmNJAVmgvDM15nKRaVlCCuybvLv0fvvk9xOtXbYLCLhmJcXxVSSJZmuYxkeiGNdyF4bNTR2177s2Kg5iDUQS1BqDkIxZiKQUTdm6XDVPVY_1X9cT4CbxdAB6O7xuvB2PCPEwUvCyYi9_7CYfTjZNGrYCwOBmvr0YyqdvY_ozwCYTupqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>843415674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of various QuEChERS based methods for the analysis of herbicides and other commonly used pesticides in polished rice by LC–MS/MS</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Pareja, Lucía ; Cesio, Verónica ; Heinzen, Horacio ; Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pareja, Lucía ; Cesio, Verónica ; Heinzen, Horacio ; Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</creatorcontrib><description>Four different extraction and clean-up protocols based on the QuEChERS method were compared for the development of an optimized sample preparation procedure for the multiresidue analysis of 16 commonly applied herbicides in rice crops using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally the methods were evaluated for the analysis of 26 insecticides and fungicides currently used in rice crops. The methods comprise, in general, the hydratation of the sample with water followed by the extraction with acetonitrile, phase separation with the addition of different salts and finally a clean-up step with various sorbents. Matrix effects were evaluated for the 4 studied methods using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally LC-TOF/MS was used to compare the co-extractants obtained with the four assayed methodologies. Thirty-six pesticides presented good performance with recoveries in the range 70–120% and relative standard deviations below 20% using 7.5g of milled polished rice and the buffered acetate QuEChERS method without clean-up at both fortification levels: 10 and 300μgkg−1. The other six pesticides presented low recovery rates, nevertheless all these analytes could be analyzed with at least one of the other three studied procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-9140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21238760</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TLNTA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Chemistry ; Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography ; Chromatography, Liquid - methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; Herbicides - analysis ; Herbicides - chemistry ; Liquid chromatography ; Mass spectrometry ; Oryza - chemistry ; Other chromatographic methods ; Pesticide residues ; Pesticide Residues - analysis ; Pesticide Residues - chemistry ; QuEChERS ; Rice ; Spectrometric and optical methods ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><ispartof>Talanta (Oxford), 2011-02, Vol.83 (5), p.1613-1622</ispartof><rights>2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-664472df029273034c48195eb9275c12a4e00899c7c9c068a23c262d65e8b4403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-664472df029273034c48195eb9275c12a4e00899c7c9c068a23c262d65e8b4403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003991401000932X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23829813$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21238760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pareja, Lucía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesio, Verónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinzen, Horacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of various QuEChERS based methods for the analysis of herbicides and other commonly used pesticides in polished rice by LC–MS/MS</title><title>Talanta (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Talanta</addtitle><description>Four different extraction and clean-up protocols based on the QuEChERS method were compared for the development of an optimized sample preparation procedure for the multiresidue analysis of 16 commonly applied herbicides in rice crops using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally the methods were evaluated for the analysis of 26 insecticides and fungicides currently used in rice crops. The methods comprise, in general, the hydratation of the sample with water followed by the extraction with acetonitrile, phase separation with the addition of different salts and finally a clean-up step with various sorbents. Matrix effects were evaluated for the 4 studied methods using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally LC-TOF/MS was used to compare the co-extractants obtained with the four assayed methodologies. Thirty-six pesticides presented good performance with recoveries in the range 70–120% and relative standard deviations below 20% using 7.5g of milled polished rice and the buffered acetate QuEChERS method without clean-up at both fortification levels: 10 and 300μgkg−1. The other six pesticides presented low recovery rates, nevertheless all these analytes could be analyzed with at least one of the other three studied procedures.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Herbicides - analysis</subject><subject>Herbicides - chemistry</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Oryza - chemistry</subject><subject>Other chromatographic methods</subject><subject>Pesticide residues</subject><subject>Pesticide Residues - analysis</subject><subject>Pesticide Residues - chemistry</subject><subject>QuEChERS</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Spectrometric and optical methods</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><issn>0039-9140</issn><issn>1873-3573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcuO0zAUhi0EYsrAI4C8QazSOb7ktkKoKhepo9FMYW05zoniKomLnVTqjhdgxRvyJOOoAZasLB9_v885_0_IawZrBiy7OaxH3elh1GsOc42tIeVPyIoVuUhEmounZAUgyqRkEq7IixAOAMAFiOfkijMuijyDFfm5Pelu0qN1A3UNPWlv3RTo_bTdtNuHPa10wJr2OLauDrRxno4tUj3o7hxsmCUt-soaW2OI5Zq6-O6pcX3vhu5Mp1l-xDAuiB3o0XU2tLHsrUFanelu8_vHr9v9ze3-JXnW6C7gq-W8Jt8-br9uPie7u09fNh92iZEZjEmWSZnzugFe8jxuJI0sWJliFa-pYVxLBCjK0uSmNJAVmgvDM15nKRaVlCCuybvLv0fvvk9xOtXbYLCLhmJcXxVSSJZmuYxkeiGNdyF4bNTR2177s2Kg5iDUQS1BqDkIxZiKQUTdm6XDVPVY_1X9cT4CbxdAB6O7xuvB2PCPEwUvCyYi9_7CYfTjZNGrYCwOBmvr0YyqdvY_ozwCYTupqQ</recordid><startdate>20110215</startdate><enddate>20110215</enddate><creator>Pareja, Lucía</creator><creator>Cesio, Verónica</creator><creator>Heinzen, Horacio</creator><creator>Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110215</creationdate><title>Evaluation of various QuEChERS based methods for the analysis of herbicides and other commonly used pesticides in polished rice by LC–MS/MS</title><author>Pareja, Lucía ; Cesio, Verónica ; Heinzen, Horacio ; Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-664472df029273034c48195eb9275c12a4e00899c7c9c068a23c262d65e8b4403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Herbicides - analysis</topic><topic>Herbicides - chemistry</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Oryza - chemistry</topic><topic>Other chromatographic methods</topic><topic>Pesticide residues</topic><topic>Pesticide Residues - analysis</topic><topic>Pesticide Residues - chemistry</topic><topic>QuEChERS</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Spectrometric and optical methods</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pareja, Lucía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesio, Verónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinzen, Horacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Talanta (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pareja, Lucía</au><au>Cesio, Verónica</au><au>Heinzen, Horacio</au><au>Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of various QuEChERS based methods for the analysis of herbicides and other commonly used pesticides in polished rice by LC–MS/MS</atitle><jtitle>Talanta (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Talanta</addtitle><date>2011-02-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1613</spage><epage>1622</epage><pages>1613-1622</pages><issn>0039-9140</issn><eissn>1873-3573</eissn><coden>TLNTA2</coden><abstract>Four different extraction and clean-up protocols based on the QuEChERS method were compared for the development of an optimized sample preparation procedure for the multiresidue analysis of 16 commonly applied herbicides in rice crops using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally the methods were evaluated for the analysis of 26 insecticides and fungicides currently used in rice crops. The methods comprise, in general, the hydratation of the sample with water followed by the extraction with acetonitrile, phase separation with the addition of different salts and finally a clean-up step with various sorbents. Matrix effects were evaluated for the 4 studied methods using LC-QqQ/MS. Additionally LC-TOF/MS was used to compare the co-extractants obtained with the four assayed methodologies. Thirty-six pesticides presented good performance with recoveries in the range 70–120% and relative standard deviations below 20% using 7.5g of milled polished rice and the buffered acetate QuEChERS method without clean-up at both fortification levels: 10 and 300μgkg−1. The other six pesticides presented low recovery rates, nevertheless all these analytes could be analyzed with at least one of the other three studied procedures.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>21238760</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.052</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-9140
ispartof Talanta (Oxford), 2011-02, Vol.83 (5), p.1613-1622
issn 0039-9140
1873-3573
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_843415674
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Analytical chemistry
Chemistry
Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography
Chromatography, Liquid - methods
Exact sciences and technology
Herbicides - analysis
Herbicides - chemistry
Liquid chromatography
Mass spectrometry
Oryza - chemistry
Other chromatographic methods
Pesticide residues
Pesticide Residues - analysis
Pesticide Residues - chemistry
QuEChERS
Rice
Spectrometric and optical methods
Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods
title Evaluation of various QuEChERS based methods for the analysis of herbicides and other commonly used pesticides in polished rice by LC–MS/MS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T09%3A25%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20various%20QuEChERS%20based%20methods%20for%20the%20analysis%20of%20herbicides%20and%20other%20commonly%20used%20pesticides%20in%20polished%20rice%20by%20LC%E2%80%93MS/MS&rft.jtitle=Talanta%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Pareja,%20Luc%C3%ADa&rft.date=2011-02-15&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1613&rft.epage=1622&rft.pages=1613-1622&rft.issn=0039-9140&rft.eissn=1873-3573&rft.coden=TLNTA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E843415674%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=843415674&rft_id=info:pmid/21238760&rft_els_id=S003991401000932X&rfr_iscdi=true