A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MORPHOLOGIC METHODS OF DETERMINING BONE FORMATION

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1965-05, Vol.40 (1), p.7-11
Hauptverfasser:	KELLY, P J, JOWSEY, J, RIGGS, B L
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents Dogs Fluorescence Microradiography Microscopy Microscopy, Fluorescence Old Medline Osteogenesis Tetracycline
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	11
container_issue	1
container_start_page	7
container_title	Clinical orthopaedics and related research
container_volume	40
creator	KELLY, P J JOWSEY, J RIGGS, B L
description
doi_str_mv	10.1097/00003086-196500400-00003
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_84098587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>84098587</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1584-544428b55280b8dc668614f35e81c0f6f757fe5bbe9621cdba75fb5f5bed673f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtOwzAURL0A0VL4BeQVu4Cd-JVlaJ02oomrNEjsrDixpaKWlrhd8PekD-BuRhrNzJUOABCjJ4xi_oz6i5BgAY4ZRYggFJysKzDsJQ7iEL8PwK33H0eX0PAGDDCJEOGYDMFrAscqXyRltlQFVCmcZGkqS1lUMFflYqbmapqNYS6rmZosTwFZyTLPiqyYwhdVSJiqMk-qTBV34NrVa2_vLzoCb6msxrPgtJHMgwZTQQJKCAmFoTQUyIi2YUwwTFxErcANcsxxyp2lxtiYhbhpTc2pM9RRY1vGIxeNwON5d9dtvw7W7_Vm5Ru7XtefdnvwWhAUCyp4HxTnYNNtve-s07tutam7b42RPsLTv_D0H7yz1VcfLj8OZmPb_-KFXPQDTBBkng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>84098587</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MORPHOLOGIC METHODS OF DETERMINING BONE FORMATION</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>KELLY, P J ; JOWSEY, J ; RIGGS, B L</creator><creatorcontrib>KELLY, P J ; JOWSEY, J ; RIGGS, B L</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0009-921X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00003086-196500400-00003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14304714</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Dogs ; Fluorescence ; Microradiography ; Microscopy ; Microscopy, Fluorescence ; Old Medline ; Osteogenesis ; Tetracycline</subject><ispartof>Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1965-05, Vol.40 (1), p.7-11</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1584-544428b55280b8dc668614f35e81c0f6f757fe5bbe9621cdba75fb5f5bed673f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14304714$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KELLY, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOWSEY, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RIGGS, B L</creatorcontrib><title>A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MORPHOLOGIC METHODS OF DETERMINING BONE FORMATION</title><title>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Microradiography</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Microscopy, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Old Medline</subject><subject>Osteogenesis</subject><subject>Tetracycline</subject><issn>0009-921X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1965</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMtOwzAURL0A0VL4BeQVu4Cd-JVlaJ02oomrNEjsrDixpaKWlrhd8PekD-BuRhrNzJUOABCjJ4xi_oz6i5BgAY4ZRYggFJysKzDsJQ7iEL8PwK33H0eX0PAGDDCJEOGYDMFrAscqXyRltlQFVCmcZGkqS1lUMFflYqbmapqNYS6rmZosTwFZyTLPiqyYwhdVSJiqMk-qTBV34NrVa2_vLzoCb6msxrPgtJHMgwZTQQJKCAmFoTQUyIi2YUwwTFxErcANcsxxyp2lxtiYhbhpTc2pM9RRY1vGIxeNwON5d9dtvw7W7_Vm5Ru7XtefdnvwWhAUCyp4HxTnYNNtve-s07tutam7b42RPsLTv_D0H7yz1VcfLj8OZmPb_-KFXPQDTBBkng</recordid><startdate>196505</startdate><enddate>196505</enddate><creator>KELLY, P J</creator><creator>JOWSEY, J</creator><creator>RIGGS, B L</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196505</creationdate><title>A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MORPHOLOGIC METHODS OF DETERMINING BONE FORMATION</title><author>KELLY, P J ; JOWSEY, J ; RIGGS, B L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1584-544428b55280b8dc668614f35e81c0f6f757fe5bbe9621cdba75fb5f5bed673f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1965</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Microradiography</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Microscopy, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Old Medline</topic><topic>Osteogenesis</topic><topic>Tetracycline</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KELLY, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOWSEY, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RIGGS, B L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KELLY, P J</au><au>JOWSEY, J</au><au>RIGGS, B L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MORPHOLOGIC METHODS OF DETERMINING BONE FORMATION</atitle><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><date>1965-05</date><risdate>1965</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>7-11</pages><issn>0009-921X</issn><cop>United States</cop><pmid>14304714</pmid><doi>10.1097/00003086-196500400-00003</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0009-921X
ispartof	Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1965-05, Vol.40 (1), p.7-11
issn	0009-921X
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_84098587
source	MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects	Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents Dogs Fluorescence Microradiography Microscopy Microscopy, Fluorescence Old Medline Osteogenesis Tetracycline
title	A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MORPHOLOGIC METHODS OF DETERMINING BONE FORMATION
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T00%3A45%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20COMPARISON%20OF%20DIFFERENT%20MORPHOLOGIC%20METHODS%20OF%20DETERMINING%20BONE%20FORMATION&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20orthopaedics%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=KELLY,%20P%20J&rft.date=1965-05&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=7-11&rft.issn=0009-921X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00003086-196500400-00003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E84098587%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=84098587&rft_id=info:pmid/14304714&rfr_iscdi=true