The criterion method: Some analyses and remarks
The distribution of trials to criterion under the null hypothesis of no learning is obtained for 2 broad classes of criteria. Tables are provided which give the maximum permissible number of trials which may be run such that the probability of reaching criterion when learning does not occur remains...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological bulletin 1965-07, Vol.64 (1), p.1-14 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 14 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Psychological bulletin |
| container_volume | 64 |
| creator | Bogartz, Richard S |
| description | The distribution of trials to criterion under the null hypothesis of no learning is obtained for 2 broad classes of criteria. Tables are provided which give the maximum permissible number of trials which may be run such that the probability of reaching criterion when learning does not occur remains less than a selected value. These results include Grant's analysis of the "runs" criterion as a special case. Illustrations of a number of problems which arise in the use of the criterion method also are presented to emphasize the often ignored dependence of method upon theory. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0021997 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_84021769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614261498</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a276t-b5ad2c39aa5c17b931ace9352b1cfedb7a8cc63a318ae6b752ded944ba5794973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLw0AQB_BFFK0P8BNIUBAvsfverDcpvkDwYD0vk82UpiZN3U0O_fautFIQPAwzhx_DzJ-Qc0ZvGRVmPKeUM2vNHhkxK2zOpFL7ZESpEDm31B6R4xgXlFKjtDgkR0wKqQUVIzKezjHzoe4x1N0ya7Gfd9Vd9t61mMESmnXEmIYqC9hC-Iyn5GAGTcSzbT8hH48P08lz_vr29DK5f82BG93npYKKe2EBlGemtIKBRysUL5mfYVUaKLzXAgQrAHVpFK-wslKWoIyV1ogTcr3Zuwrd14Cxd20dPTYNLLEboitk-thom-DlH7johpAuj04zyVPZIqGr_xDjVhdKGsaTutkoH7oYA87cKtTp67Vj1P3k7H5zTvRiu3AoW6x2cBvs7ixYgVvFtYfQ177B6MqhcVo65pj4Bg2EgUo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614261498</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The criterion method: Some analyses and remarks</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Bogartz, Richard S</creator><creatorcontrib>Bogartz, Richard S</creatorcontrib><description>The distribution of trials to criterion under the null hypothesis of no learning is obtained for 2 broad classes of criteria. Tables are provided which give the maximum permissible number of trials which may be run such that the probability of reaching criterion when learning does not occur remains less than a selected value. These results include Grant's analysis of the "runs" criterion as a special case. Illustrations of a number of problems which arise in the use of the criterion method also are presented to emphasize the often ignored dependence of method upon theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0021997</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14346303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Human ; Humans ; Learning ; Null Hypothesis Testing ; Old Medline ; Probability ; Psychometrics ; Transfer (Psychology)</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 1965-07, Vol.64 (1), p.1-14</ispartof><rights>1965 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1965, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a276t-b5ad2c39aa5c17b931ace9352b1cfedb7a8cc63a318ae6b752ded944ba5794973</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14346303$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bogartz, Richard S</creatorcontrib><title>The criterion method: Some analyses and remarks</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>The distribution of trials to criterion under the null hypothesis of no learning is obtained for 2 broad classes of criteria. Tables are provided which give the maximum permissible number of trials which may be run such that the probability of reaching criterion when learning does not occur remains less than a selected value. These results include Grant's analysis of the "runs" criterion as a special case. Illustrations of a number of problems which arise in the use of the criterion method also are presented to emphasize the often ignored dependence of method upon theory.</description><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Null Hypothesis Testing</subject><subject>Old Medline</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Transfer (Psychology)</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1965</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EtLw0AQB_BFFK0P8BNIUBAvsfverDcpvkDwYD0vk82UpiZN3U0O_fautFIQPAwzhx_DzJ-Qc0ZvGRVmPKeUM2vNHhkxK2zOpFL7ZESpEDm31B6R4xgXlFKjtDgkR0wKqQUVIzKezjHzoe4x1N0ya7Gfd9Vd9t61mMESmnXEmIYqC9hC-Iyn5GAGTcSzbT8hH48P08lz_vr29DK5f82BG93npYKKe2EBlGemtIKBRysUL5mfYVUaKLzXAgQrAHVpFK-wslKWoIyV1ogTcr3Zuwrd14Cxd20dPTYNLLEboitk-thom-DlH7johpAuj04zyVPZIqGr_xDjVhdKGsaTutkoH7oYA87cKtTp67Vj1P3k7H5zTvRiu3AoW6x2cBvs7ixYgVvFtYfQ177B6MqhcVo65pj4Bg2EgUo</recordid><startdate>196507</startdate><enddate>196507</enddate><creator>Bogartz, Richard S</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196507</creationdate><title>The criterion method: Some analyses and remarks</title><author>Bogartz, Richard S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a276t-b5ad2c39aa5c17b931ace9352b1cfedb7a8cc63a318ae6b752ded944ba5794973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1965</creationdate><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Null Hypothesis Testing</topic><topic>Old Medline</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Transfer (Psychology)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bogartz, Richard S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bogartz, Richard S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The criterion method: Some analyses and remarks</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>1965-07</date><risdate>1965</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><abstract>The distribution of trials to criterion under the null hypothesis of no learning is obtained for 2 broad classes of criteria. Tables are provided which give the maximum permissible number of trials which may be run such that the probability of reaching criterion when learning does not occur remains less than a selected value. These results include Grant's analysis of the "runs" criterion as a special case. Illustrations of a number of problems which arise in the use of the criterion method also are presented to emphasize the often ignored dependence of method upon theory.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>14346303</pmid><doi>10.1037/h0021997</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-2909 |
| ispartof | Psychological bulletin, 1965-07, Vol.64 (1), p.1-14 |
| issn | 0033-2909 1939-1455 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_84021769 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Human Humans Learning Null Hypothesis Testing Old Medline Probability Psychometrics Transfer (Psychology) |
| title | The criterion method: Some analyses and remarks |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T01%3A09%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20criterion%20method:%20Some%20analyses%20and%20remarks&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Bogartz,%20Richard%20S&rft.date=1965-07&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0021997&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614261498%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614261498&rft_id=info:pmid/14346303&rfr_iscdi=true |