Constraints on the Proterozoic evolution of the Aravalli–Delhi Orogenic belt (NW India) from monazite geochronology and mineral trace element geochemistry

The timing and extent of polymetamorphism in the Mangalwar and Sandmata Complexes from the Aravalli–Delhi Orogenic Belt of Rajasthan (NW India) remains contentious, with Archaean, Paleoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic events having previously been postulated. Monazite SHRIMP U–Pb and electron micropro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lithos 2010-12, Vol.120 (3), p.511-528
Hauptverfasser: Buick, I.S., Clark, C., Rubatto, D., Hermann, J., Pandit, M., Hand, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 528
container_issue 3
container_start_page 511
container_title Lithos
container_volume 120
creator Buick, I.S.
Clark, C.
Rubatto, D.
Hermann, J.
Pandit, M.
Hand, M.
description The timing and extent of polymetamorphism in the Mangalwar and Sandmata Complexes from the Aravalli–Delhi Orogenic Belt of Rajasthan (NW India) remains contentious, with Archaean, Paleoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic events having previously been postulated. Monazite SHRIMP U–Pb and electron microprobe (EPMA) chemical ages obtained from metasediments in the amphibolite-facies Mangalwar Complex show that it was metamorphosed at ca . 0.97–93 Ga, with evidence in one sample for an earlier event at ca. 1.82 Ga. Monazite and garnet REE patterns from metapelitic and metapsammitic rocks are characterised by small negative Eu anomalies, suggesting that they experienced amphibolite-facies conditions during both events. In contrast, granulite-facies metamorphism in the Sandmata Complex occurred at ca. 1.72 Ga, although the monazite U–Pb system was partially disturbed during a localised high-strain overprint that occurred at ca. 1 Ga. A comparison of the REE patterns of porphyroclastic and neoblastic garnets in the Sandmata Complex rocks shows that the second event occurred at amphibolite-facies conditions, consistent with Zr thermometry of rutile in the shear fabric. Garnet REE patterns show that relict granulite-facies garnet porphyroclasts are present even in Sandmata samples so sheared and rehydrated that they are now amphibolite-facies schists. REE patterns of isotopically disturbed Sandmata Complex monazite suggest that the age variations generally reflect partial Pb loss due to solid-state deformation in the later shear zones. New (ca. 1 Ga) monazite growth under amphibolite-facies conditions occurred only in the most intensely recrystallised and rehydrated rock. In metapelitic rocks the magnitude of Eu anomalies developed in garnet and accessory phases such as monazite is particularly sensitive as to whether K-feldspar grew at the same time. In the case of the Sandmata granulites this distinction makes it possible to determine abundance of relict granulite-facies, and newly formed amphibolite-facies garnet, in extensively sheared, rehydrated and recrystallised granulites, and the extent of new monazite growth during the shearing event. ►Monazite dating shows polymetamorphism in Rajasthan. ►REE patterns in monazite and garnet linked through Eu anomaly. ►Garnet REE patterns discriminate between low-T and high-T origins.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.lithos.2010.09.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839691018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0024493710002628</els_id><sourcerecordid>839691018</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a427t-d44523c9df39657b22f402dd97da02dd64b76c22679c20461f6889bf36ebfc213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFuEzEQXSGQCIU_4OAbcNhgex3v7gWpCrRUqmgPRRwtrz2bOPJ6iu1ESk_8Q6_9Or4Eh-XMaTQzb96bmVdVbxldMsrkx93Su7zFtOS0lGi_pIw9qxasa3ktmWieVwtKuahF37Qvq1cp7WjJmxVbVE9rDClH7UJOBAPJWyC3ETNEfEBnCBzQ77MrHRz_Ns-jPmjv3e9fj5_Bbx25ibiBUKAD-Ezef_tBroJ1-gMZI05kwqAfXAayATTbiAE9bo5EB0smFyBqT4q6AQIeJgh5xsHkylLH19WLUfsEb_7Fs-r7xZe79df6-ubyan1-XWvB21xbIVa8Mb0dm16u2oHzUVBubd9afYpSDK00nMu2N5wKyUbZdf0wNhKG0XDWnFXvZt77iD_3kLIq-ga81wFwn1RXePvy6a4gxYw0EVOKMKr76CYdj4pRdfJC7dTshTp5oWivihdl7NM8BuWKg4OoknEQDFgXwWRl0f2f4A98d5jQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>839691018</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Constraints on the Proterozoic evolution of the Aravalli–Delhi Orogenic belt (NW India) from monazite geochronology and mineral trace element geochemistry</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Buick, I.S. ; Clark, C. ; Rubatto, D. ; Hermann, J. ; Pandit, M. ; Hand, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buick, I.S. ; Clark, C. ; Rubatto, D. ; Hermann, J. ; Pandit, M. ; Hand, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The timing and extent of polymetamorphism in the Mangalwar and Sandmata Complexes from the Aravalli–Delhi Orogenic Belt of Rajasthan (NW India) remains contentious, with Archaean, Paleoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic events having previously been postulated. Monazite SHRIMP U–Pb and electron microprobe (EPMA) chemical ages obtained from metasediments in the amphibolite-facies Mangalwar Complex show that it was metamorphosed at ca . 0.97–93 Ga, with evidence in one sample for an earlier event at ca. 1.82 Ga. Monazite and garnet REE patterns from metapelitic and metapsammitic rocks are characterised by small negative Eu anomalies, suggesting that they experienced amphibolite-facies conditions during both events. In contrast, granulite-facies metamorphism in the Sandmata Complex occurred at ca. 1.72 Ga, although the monazite U–Pb system was partially disturbed during a localised high-strain overprint that occurred at ca. 1 Ga. A comparison of the REE patterns of porphyroclastic and neoblastic garnets in the Sandmata Complex rocks shows that the second event occurred at amphibolite-facies conditions, consistent with Zr thermometry of rutile in the shear fabric. Garnet REE patterns show that relict granulite-facies garnet porphyroclasts are present even in Sandmata samples so sheared and rehydrated that they are now amphibolite-facies schists. REE patterns of isotopically disturbed Sandmata Complex monazite suggest that the age variations generally reflect partial Pb loss due to solid-state deformation in the later shear zones. New (ca. 1 Ga) monazite growth under amphibolite-facies conditions occurred only in the most intensely recrystallised and rehydrated rock. In metapelitic rocks the magnitude of Eu anomalies developed in garnet and accessory phases such as monazite is particularly sensitive as to whether K-feldspar grew at the same time. In the case of the Sandmata granulites this distinction makes it possible to determine abundance of relict granulite-facies, and newly formed amphibolite-facies garnet, in extensively sheared, rehydrated and recrystallised granulites, and the extent of new monazite growth during the shearing event. ►Monazite dating shows polymetamorphism in Rajasthan. ►REE patterns in monazite and garnet linked through Eu anomaly. ►Garnet REE patterns discriminate between low-T and high-T origins.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-4937</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2010.09.011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Mineral REE geochemistry ; NW India ; Polymetamorphism ; Rajasthan ; U–Pb geochronology</subject><ispartof>Lithos, 2010-12, Vol.120 (3), p.511-528</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a427t-d44523c9df39657b22f402dd97da02dd64b76c22679c20461f6889bf36ebfc213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a427t-d44523c9df39657b22f402dd97da02dd64b76c22679c20461f6889bf36ebfc213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2010.09.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buick, I.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubatto, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermann, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandit, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hand, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Constraints on the Proterozoic evolution of the Aravalli–Delhi Orogenic belt (NW India) from monazite geochronology and mineral trace element geochemistry</title><title>Lithos</title><description>The timing and extent of polymetamorphism in the Mangalwar and Sandmata Complexes from the Aravalli–Delhi Orogenic Belt of Rajasthan (NW India) remains contentious, with Archaean, Paleoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic events having previously been postulated. Monazite SHRIMP U–Pb and electron microprobe (EPMA) chemical ages obtained from metasediments in the amphibolite-facies Mangalwar Complex show that it was metamorphosed at ca . 0.97–93 Ga, with evidence in one sample for an earlier event at ca. 1.82 Ga. Monazite and garnet REE patterns from metapelitic and metapsammitic rocks are characterised by small negative Eu anomalies, suggesting that they experienced amphibolite-facies conditions during both events. In contrast, granulite-facies metamorphism in the Sandmata Complex occurred at ca. 1.72 Ga, although the monazite U–Pb system was partially disturbed during a localised high-strain overprint that occurred at ca. 1 Ga. A comparison of the REE patterns of porphyroclastic and neoblastic garnets in the Sandmata Complex rocks shows that the second event occurred at amphibolite-facies conditions, consistent with Zr thermometry of rutile in the shear fabric. Garnet REE patterns show that relict granulite-facies garnet porphyroclasts are present even in Sandmata samples so sheared and rehydrated that they are now amphibolite-facies schists. REE patterns of isotopically disturbed Sandmata Complex monazite suggest that the age variations generally reflect partial Pb loss due to solid-state deformation in the later shear zones. New (ca. 1 Ga) monazite growth under amphibolite-facies conditions occurred only in the most intensely recrystallised and rehydrated rock. In metapelitic rocks the magnitude of Eu anomalies developed in garnet and accessory phases such as monazite is particularly sensitive as to whether K-feldspar grew at the same time. In the case of the Sandmata granulites this distinction makes it possible to determine abundance of relict granulite-facies, and newly formed amphibolite-facies garnet, in extensively sheared, rehydrated and recrystallised granulites, and the extent of new monazite growth during the shearing event. ►Monazite dating shows polymetamorphism in Rajasthan. ►REE patterns in monazite and garnet linked through Eu anomaly. ►Garnet REE patterns discriminate between low-T and high-T origins.</description><subject>Mineral REE geochemistry</subject><subject>NW India</subject><subject>Polymetamorphism</subject><subject>Rajasthan</subject><subject>U–Pb geochronology</subject><issn>0024-4937</issn><issn>1872-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcFuEzEQXSGQCIU_4OAbcNhgex3v7gWpCrRUqmgPRRwtrz2bOPJ6iu1ESk_8Q6_9Or4Eh-XMaTQzb96bmVdVbxldMsrkx93Su7zFtOS0lGi_pIw9qxasa3ktmWieVwtKuahF37Qvq1cp7WjJmxVbVE9rDClH7UJOBAPJWyC3ETNEfEBnCBzQ77MrHRz_Ns-jPmjv3e9fj5_Bbx25ibiBUKAD-Ezef_tBroJ1-gMZI05kwqAfXAayATTbiAE9bo5EB0smFyBqT4q6AQIeJgh5xsHkylLH19WLUfsEb_7Fs-r7xZe79df6-ubyan1-XWvB21xbIVa8Mb0dm16u2oHzUVBubd9afYpSDK00nMu2N5wKyUbZdf0wNhKG0XDWnFXvZt77iD_3kLIq-ga81wFwn1RXePvy6a4gxYw0EVOKMKr76CYdj4pRdfJC7dTshTp5oWivihdl7NM8BuWKg4OoknEQDFgXwWRl0f2f4A98d5jQ</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Buick, I.S.</creator><creator>Clark, C.</creator><creator>Rubatto, D.</creator><creator>Hermann, J.</creator><creator>Pandit, M.</creator><creator>Hand, M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Constraints on the Proterozoic evolution of the Aravalli–Delhi Orogenic belt (NW India) from monazite geochronology and mineral trace element geochemistry</title><author>Buick, I.S. ; Clark, C. ; Rubatto, D. ; Hermann, J. ; Pandit, M. ; Hand, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a427t-d44523c9df39657b22f402dd97da02dd64b76c22679c20461f6889bf36ebfc213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Mineral REE geochemistry</topic><topic>NW India</topic><topic>Polymetamorphism</topic><topic>Rajasthan</topic><topic>U–Pb geochronology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buick, I.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubatto, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermann, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandit, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hand, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Lithos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buick, I.S.</au><au>Clark, C.</au><au>Rubatto, D.</au><au>Hermann, J.</au><au>Pandit, M.</au><au>Hand, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Constraints on the Proterozoic evolution of the Aravalli–Delhi Orogenic belt (NW India) from monazite geochronology and mineral trace element geochemistry</atitle><jtitle>Lithos</jtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>511</spage><epage>528</epage><pages>511-528</pages><issn>0024-4937</issn><eissn>1872-6143</eissn><abstract>The timing and extent of polymetamorphism in the Mangalwar and Sandmata Complexes from the Aravalli–Delhi Orogenic Belt of Rajasthan (NW India) remains contentious, with Archaean, Paleoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic events having previously been postulated. Monazite SHRIMP U–Pb and electron microprobe (EPMA) chemical ages obtained from metasediments in the amphibolite-facies Mangalwar Complex show that it was metamorphosed at ca . 0.97–93 Ga, with evidence in one sample for an earlier event at ca. 1.82 Ga. Monazite and garnet REE patterns from metapelitic and metapsammitic rocks are characterised by small negative Eu anomalies, suggesting that they experienced amphibolite-facies conditions during both events. In contrast, granulite-facies metamorphism in the Sandmata Complex occurred at ca. 1.72 Ga, although the monazite U–Pb system was partially disturbed during a localised high-strain overprint that occurred at ca. 1 Ga. A comparison of the REE patterns of porphyroclastic and neoblastic garnets in the Sandmata Complex rocks shows that the second event occurred at amphibolite-facies conditions, consistent with Zr thermometry of rutile in the shear fabric. Garnet REE patterns show that relict granulite-facies garnet porphyroclasts are present even in Sandmata samples so sheared and rehydrated that they are now amphibolite-facies schists. REE patterns of isotopically disturbed Sandmata Complex monazite suggest that the age variations generally reflect partial Pb loss due to solid-state deformation in the later shear zones. New (ca. 1 Ga) monazite growth under amphibolite-facies conditions occurred only in the most intensely recrystallised and rehydrated rock. In metapelitic rocks the magnitude of Eu anomalies developed in garnet and accessory phases such as monazite is particularly sensitive as to whether K-feldspar grew at the same time. In the case of the Sandmata granulites this distinction makes it possible to determine abundance of relict granulite-facies, and newly formed amphibolite-facies garnet, in extensively sheared, rehydrated and recrystallised granulites, and the extent of new monazite growth during the shearing event. ►Monazite dating shows polymetamorphism in Rajasthan. ►REE patterns in monazite and garnet linked through Eu anomaly. ►Garnet REE patterns discriminate between low-T and high-T origins.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.lithos.2010.09.011</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-4937
ispartof Lithos, 2010-12, Vol.120 (3), p.511-528
issn 0024-4937
1872-6143
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839691018
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Mineral REE geochemistry
NW India
Polymetamorphism
Rajasthan
U–Pb geochronology
title Constraints on the Proterozoic evolution of the Aravalli–Delhi Orogenic belt (NW India) from monazite geochronology and mineral trace element geochemistry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A06%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Constraints%20on%20the%20Proterozoic%20evolution%20of%20the%20Aravalli%E2%80%93Delhi%20Orogenic%20belt%20(NW%20India)%20from%20monazite%20geochronology%20and%20mineral%20trace%20element%20geochemistry&rft.jtitle=Lithos&rft.au=Buick,%20I.S.&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=511&rft.epage=528&rft.pages=511-528&rft.issn=0024-4937&rft.eissn=1872-6143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.lithos.2010.09.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E839691018%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=839691018&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0024493710002628&rfr_iscdi=true