Factors Associated with Differences between Conventional Contact Tracing and Molecular Epidemiology in Study of Tuberculosis Transmission and Analysis in the City of Barcelona, Spain
The aim of this study was to analyze the factors associated with conventional contact tracing (CCT) and molecular epidemiology (ME) methods in assessing tuberculosis (TB) transmission, comparing the populations studied and the epidemiological links established by both methods. Data were obtained fro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2009-01, Vol.47 (1), p.198-204 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 204 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 198 |
container_title | Journal of Clinical Microbiology |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Borrell, Sònia Español, Montserrat Orcau, Àngels Tudó, Griselda March, Francesca Caylà, Joan A Jansà, Josep Maria Alcaide, Fernando Martín-Casabona, Núria Salvadó, Margarita Martínez, José Antonio Vidal, Rafael Sánchez, Francesca Altet, Neus Coll, Pere González-Martín, Juliàn |
description | The aim of this study was to analyze the factors associated with conventional contact tracing (CCT) and molecular epidemiology (ME) methods in assessing tuberculosis (TB) transmission, comparing the populations studied and the epidemiological links established by both methods. Data were obtained from TB case and CCT registries, and ME was performed using IS6110-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit 12 (MIRU12) typing as a secondary typing method. During two years (2003 and 2004), 892 cases of TB were reported, of which 687 (77%) were confirmed by culture. RFLP analysis was performed with 463 (67.4%) of the 687 isolated strains, and MIRU12 types in 75 strains were evaluated; 280 strains (60.5%) had a unique RFLP pattern, and 183 (39.5%) shared patterns, grouping into 65 clusters. CCT of 613 (68.7%) of 892 cases detected 44 clusters involving 101 patients. The results of both CCT and ME methods yielded 96 clusters involving 255 patients. The household link was the one most frequently identified by CCT (corresponding to 80.7% of the cases clustered by this method), whereas nonhousehold and unknown links were associated with 94.1% of the strains clustered by ME. When both methods were used in 351 cases (39.3%), they showed the same results in 214 cases (61%). Of the remainder, 106 (30.2%) were clustered only by ME, 19 (5.5%) were clustered only by CCT, and 12 (3.4%) were clustered by both methods but into different clusters. Patients with factors potentially associated with social problems were less frequently studied by CCT (P = 0.002), whereas patients of |
doi_str_mv | 10.1128/JCM.00507-08 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839681434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66786747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-5a758004fa35b112b13acb941b6801c7764665dee030525b97520f74b69ea4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kktv1DAUhSMEotPCjjV4A2yacp34kWyQhqHloVYsZpDYWY7jzLhK7KntdDR_rL8Pz0MFNqwsy98518c-WfYKwwXGRfXh--zmAoACz6F6kk0w1FXOGPx6mk0AappjXPKT7DSEWwBMCKXPsxNcQwHA-CR7uJIqOh_QNASnjIy6RRsTV-iz6TrttVU6oEbHjdYWzZy91zYaZ2W_28SkRQsvlbFLJG2Lblyv1dhLjy7XptWDcb1bbpGxaB7HdotchxZjo31iXDBhp7VhMCEky73BNDlvdydJElcazUzcqz5Jr3Sf5p6j-Voa-yJ71sk-6JfH9SxbXF0uZl_z6x9fvs2m17kidRlzKjmtAEgnS9qk12pwKVVTE9ywCrDinBHGaKs1lEAL2tScFtBx0rBaS6LKs-zjwXY9NoNuVQrvZS_W3gzSb4WTRvx7Ys1KLN29KFgBFWXJ4P3RwLu7UYcoUtqUpJdWuzGIqqxZhUlJEvnuvyRjvGKc8ASeH0DlXQhed4_XwSB2jRCpEWLfCAFVwl__HeEPfKxAAt4eARmU7Lv0JcqER67AmGNWQuLQgVuZ5WpjvBYyDOJWDYJwgZPfbtabA9JJJ-TSJ5uf8wJwCZhyygta_gbDa9Xc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66786747</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors Associated with Differences between Conventional Contact Tracing and Molecular Epidemiology in Study of Tuberculosis Transmission and Analysis in the City of Barcelona, Spain</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Borrell, Sònia ; Español, Montserrat ; Orcau, Àngels ; Tudó, Griselda ; March, Francesca ; Caylà, Joan A ; Jansà, Josep Maria ; Alcaide, Fernando ; Martín-Casabona, Núria ; Salvadó, Margarita ; Martínez, José Antonio ; Vidal, Rafael ; Sánchez, Francesca ; Altet, Neus ; Coll, Pere ; González-Martín, Juliàn</creator><creatorcontrib>Borrell, Sònia ; Español, Montserrat ; Orcau, Àngels ; Tudó, Griselda ; March, Francesca ; Caylà, Joan A ; Jansà, Josep Maria ; Alcaide, Fernando ; Martín-Casabona, Núria ; Salvadó, Margarita ; Martínez, José Antonio ; Vidal, Rafael ; Sánchez, Francesca ; Altet, Neus ; Coll, Pere ; González-Martín, Juliàn</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to analyze the factors associated with conventional contact tracing (CCT) and molecular epidemiology (ME) methods in assessing tuberculosis (TB) transmission, comparing the populations studied and the epidemiological links established by both methods. Data were obtained from TB case and CCT registries, and ME was performed using IS6110-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit 12 (MIRU12) typing as a secondary typing method. During two years (2003 and 2004), 892 cases of TB were reported, of which 687 (77%) were confirmed by culture. RFLP analysis was performed with 463 (67.4%) of the 687 isolated strains, and MIRU12 types in 75 strains were evaluated; 280 strains (60.5%) had a unique RFLP pattern, and 183 (39.5%) shared patterns, grouping into 65 clusters. CCT of 613 (68.7%) of 892 cases detected 44 clusters involving 101 patients. The results of both CCT and ME methods yielded 96 clusters involving 255 patients. The household link was the one most frequently identified by CCT (corresponding to 80.7% of the cases clustered by this method), whereas nonhousehold and unknown links were associated with 94.1% of the strains clustered by ME. When both methods were used in 351 cases (39.3%), they showed the same results in 214 cases (61%). Of the remainder, 106 (30.2%) were clustered only by ME, 19 (5.5%) were clustered only by CCT, and 12 (3.4%) were clustered by both methods but into different clusters. Patients with factors potentially associated with social problems were less frequently studied by CCT (P = 0.002), whereas patients of <15 years of age, most with negative cultures, were less frequently studied by ME (P = 0.005). Significant differences in the populations studied by ME versus CCT were observed, possibly explaining the scarce correlation found between the results of these methods. Moreover, ME allowed the detection of nonhousehold contact relationships, whereas CCT was more useful for tracing transmission chains involving patients of <15 years of age. In conclusion, the two methods are complementary, suggesting the need to improve the methodology of contact study protocols.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00507-08</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19020067</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMIDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bacterial Typing Techniques ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cluster Analysis ; Contact Tracing ; DNA Fingerprinting ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genotype ; Humans ; Male ; Microbiology ; Middle Aged ; Molecular Epidemiology ; Mycobacterium ; Mycobacterium tuberculosis - genetics ; Mycobacterium tuberculosis - isolation & purification ; Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length ; Spain - epidemiology ; Tuberculosis - epidemiology ; Tuberculosis - transmission</subject><ispartof>Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2009-01, Vol.47 (1), p.198-204</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-5a758004fa35b112b13acb941b6801c7764665dee030525b97520f74b69ea4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-5a758004fa35b112b13acb941b6801c7764665dee030525b97520f74b69ea4c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2620856/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2620856/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3175,3176,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21171630$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19020067$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borrell, Sònia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Español, Montserrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orcau, Àngels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tudó, Griselda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>March, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caylà, Joan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansà, Josep Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alcaide, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Casabona, Núria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvadó, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, José Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altet, Neus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coll, Pere</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Martín, Juliàn</creatorcontrib><title>Factors Associated with Differences between Conventional Contact Tracing and Molecular Epidemiology in Study of Tuberculosis Transmission and Analysis in the City of Barcelona, Spain</title><title>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to analyze the factors associated with conventional contact tracing (CCT) and molecular epidemiology (ME) methods in assessing tuberculosis (TB) transmission, comparing the populations studied and the epidemiological links established by both methods. Data were obtained from TB case and CCT registries, and ME was performed using IS6110-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit 12 (MIRU12) typing as a secondary typing method. During two years (2003 and 2004), 892 cases of TB were reported, of which 687 (77%) were confirmed by culture. RFLP analysis was performed with 463 (67.4%) of the 687 isolated strains, and MIRU12 types in 75 strains were evaluated; 280 strains (60.5%) had a unique RFLP pattern, and 183 (39.5%) shared patterns, grouping into 65 clusters. CCT of 613 (68.7%) of 892 cases detected 44 clusters involving 101 patients. The results of both CCT and ME methods yielded 96 clusters involving 255 patients. The household link was the one most frequently identified by CCT (corresponding to 80.7% of the cases clustered by this method), whereas nonhousehold and unknown links were associated with 94.1% of the strains clustered by ME. When both methods were used in 351 cases (39.3%), they showed the same results in 214 cases (61%). Of the remainder, 106 (30.2%) were clustered only by ME, 19 (5.5%) were clustered only by CCT, and 12 (3.4%) were clustered by both methods but into different clusters. Patients with factors potentially associated with social problems were less frequently studied by CCT (P = 0.002), whereas patients of <15 years of age, most with negative cultures, were less frequently studied by ME (P = 0.005). Significant differences in the populations studied by ME versus CCT were observed, possibly explaining the scarce correlation found between the results of these methods. Moreover, ME allowed the detection of nonhousehold contact relationships, whereas CCT was more useful for tracing transmission chains involving patients of <15 years of age. In conclusion, the two methods are complementary, suggesting the need to improve the methodology of contact study protocols.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bacterial Typing Techniques</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Contact Tracing</subject><subject>DNA Fingerprinting</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Molecular Epidemiology</subject><subject>Mycobacterium</subject><subject>Mycobacterium tuberculosis - genetics</subject><subject>Mycobacterium tuberculosis - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</subject><subject>Spain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - transmission</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kktv1DAUhSMEotPCjjV4A2yacp34kWyQhqHloVYsZpDYWY7jzLhK7KntdDR_rL8Pz0MFNqwsy98518c-WfYKwwXGRfXh--zmAoACz6F6kk0w1FXOGPx6mk0AappjXPKT7DSEWwBMCKXPsxNcQwHA-CR7uJIqOh_QNASnjIy6RRsTV-iz6TrttVU6oEbHjdYWzZy91zYaZ2W_28SkRQsvlbFLJG2Lblyv1dhLjy7XptWDcb1bbpGxaB7HdotchxZjo31iXDBhp7VhMCEky73BNDlvdydJElcazUzcqz5Jr3Sf5p6j-Voa-yJ71sk-6JfH9SxbXF0uZl_z6x9fvs2m17kidRlzKjmtAEgnS9qk12pwKVVTE9ywCrDinBHGaKs1lEAL2tScFtBx0rBaS6LKs-zjwXY9NoNuVQrvZS_W3gzSb4WTRvx7Ys1KLN29KFgBFWXJ4P3RwLu7UYcoUtqUpJdWuzGIqqxZhUlJEvnuvyRjvGKc8ASeH0DlXQhed4_XwSB2jRCpEWLfCAFVwl__HeEPfKxAAt4eARmU7Lv0JcqER67AmGNWQuLQgVuZ5WpjvBYyDOJWDYJwgZPfbtabA9JJJ-TSJ5uf8wJwCZhyygta_gbDa9Xc</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Borrell, Sònia</creator><creator>Español, Montserrat</creator><creator>Orcau, Àngels</creator><creator>Tudó, Griselda</creator><creator>March, Francesca</creator><creator>Caylà, Joan A</creator><creator>Jansà, Josep Maria</creator><creator>Alcaide, Fernando</creator><creator>Martín-Casabona, Núria</creator><creator>Salvadó, Margarita</creator><creator>Martínez, José Antonio</creator><creator>Vidal, Rafael</creator><creator>Sánchez, Francesca</creator><creator>Altet, Neus</creator><creator>Coll, Pere</creator><creator>González-Martín, Juliàn</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><general>American Society for Microbiology (ASM)</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Factors Associated with Differences between Conventional Contact Tracing and Molecular Epidemiology in Study of Tuberculosis Transmission and Analysis in the City of Barcelona, Spain</title><author>Borrell, Sònia ; Español, Montserrat ; Orcau, Àngels ; Tudó, Griselda ; March, Francesca ; Caylà, Joan A ; Jansà, Josep Maria ; Alcaide, Fernando ; Martín-Casabona, Núria ; Salvadó, Margarita ; Martínez, José Antonio ; Vidal, Rafael ; Sánchez, Francesca ; Altet, Neus ; Coll, Pere ; González-Martín, Juliàn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-5a758004fa35b112b13acb941b6801c7764665dee030525b97520f74b69ea4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bacterial Typing Techniques</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Contact Tracing</topic><topic>DNA Fingerprinting</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Molecular Epidemiology</topic><topic>Mycobacterium</topic><topic>Mycobacterium tuberculosis - genetics</topic><topic>Mycobacterium tuberculosis - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</topic><topic>Spain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - transmission</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borrell, Sònia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Español, Montserrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orcau, Àngels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tudó, Griselda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>March, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caylà, Joan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansà, Josep Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alcaide, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Casabona, Núria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvadó, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, José Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altet, Neus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coll, Pere</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Martín, Juliàn</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borrell, Sònia</au><au>Español, Montserrat</au><au>Orcau, Àngels</au><au>Tudó, Griselda</au><au>March, Francesca</au><au>Caylà, Joan A</au><au>Jansà, Josep Maria</au><au>Alcaide, Fernando</au><au>Martín-Casabona, Núria</au><au>Salvadó, Margarita</au><au>Martínez, José Antonio</au><au>Vidal, Rafael</au><au>Sánchez, Francesca</au><au>Altet, Neus</au><au>Coll, Pere</au><au>González-Martín, Juliàn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors Associated with Differences between Conventional Contact Tracing and Molecular Epidemiology in Study of Tuberculosis Transmission and Analysis in the City of Barcelona, Spain</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>204</epage><pages>198-204</pages><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><coden>JCMIDW</coden><abstract>The aim of this study was to analyze the factors associated with conventional contact tracing (CCT) and molecular epidemiology (ME) methods in assessing tuberculosis (TB) transmission, comparing the populations studied and the epidemiological links established by both methods. Data were obtained from TB case and CCT registries, and ME was performed using IS6110-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit 12 (MIRU12) typing as a secondary typing method. During two years (2003 and 2004), 892 cases of TB were reported, of which 687 (77%) were confirmed by culture. RFLP analysis was performed with 463 (67.4%) of the 687 isolated strains, and MIRU12 types in 75 strains were evaluated; 280 strains (60.5%) had a unique RFLP pattern, and 183 (39.5%) shared patterns, grouping into 65 clusters. CCT of 613 (68.7%) of 892 cases detected 44 clusters involving 101 patients. The results of both CCT and ME methods yielded 96 clusters involving 255 patients. The household link was the one most frequently identified by CCT (corresponding to 80.7% of the cases clustered by this method), whereas nonhousehold and unknown links were associated with 94.1% of the strains clustered by ME. When both methods were used in 351 cases (39.3%), they showed the same results in 214 cases (61%). Of the remainder, 106 (30.2%) were clustered only by ME, 19 (5.5%) were clustered only by CCT, and 12 (3.4%) were clustered by both methods but into different clusters. Patients with factors potentially associated with social problems were less frequently studied by CCT (P = 0.002), whereas patients of <15 years of age, most with negative cultures, were less frequently studied by ME (P = 0.005). Significant differences in the populations studied by ME versus CCT were observed, possibly explaining the scarce correlation found between the results of these methods. Moreover, ME allowed the detection of nonhousehold contact relationships, whereas CCT was more useful for tracing transmission chains involving patients of <15 years of age. In conclusion, the two methods are complementary, suggesting the need to improve the methodology of contact study protocols.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>19020067</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.00507-08</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-1137 |
ispartof | Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2009-01, Vol.47 (1), p.198-204 |
issn | 0095-1137 1098-660X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839681434 |
source | American Society for Microbiology; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Bacterial Typing Techniques Biological and medical sciences Cluster Analysis Contact Tracing DNA Fingerprinting Epidemiology Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genotype Humans Male Microbiology Middle Aged Molecular Epidemiology Mycobacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis - genetics Mycobacterium tuberculosis - isolation & purification Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length Spain - epidemiology Tuberculosis - epidemiology Tuberculosis - transmission |
title | Factors Associated with Differences between Conventional Contact Tracing and Molecular Epidemiology in Study of Tuberculosis Transmission and Analysis in the City of Barcelona, Spain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A59%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20Associated%20with%20Differences%20between%20Conventional%20Contact%20Tracing%20and%20Molecular%20Epidemiology%20in%20Study%20of%20Tuberculosis%20Transmission%20and%20Analysis%20in%20the%20City%20of%20Barcelona,%20Spain&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Clinical%20Microbiology&rft.au=Borrell,%20S%C3%B2nia&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=204&rft.pages=198-204&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft.coden=JCMIDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.00507-08&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E66786747%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66786747&rft_id=info:pmid/19020067&rfr_iscdi=true |