Developmental origins of disruptive behaviour problems: the 'original sin' hypothesis, epigenetics and their consequences for prevention

This paper reviews publications on developmental trajectories of disruptive behaviour (DB) problems (aggression, opposition‐defiance, rule breaking, and stealing‐vandalism) over the past decade. Prior to these studies two theoretical models had strongly influenced research on DB: social learning and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of child psychology and psychiatry 2010-04, Vol.51 (4), p.341-367
1. Verfasser: Tremblay, Richard E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 367
container_issue 4
container_start_page 341
container_title Journal of child psychology and psychiatry
container_volume 51
creator Tremblay, Richard E.
description This paper reviews publications on developmental trajectories of disruptive behaviour (DB) problems (aggression, opposition‐defiance, rule breaking, and stealing‐vandalism) over the past decade. Prior to these studies two theoretical models had strongly influenced research on DB: social learning and disease onset. According to these developmental perspectives, children learn DB from their environment and onset of the disease is triggered by accumulated exposition to disruptive models in the environment, including the media. Most of the evidence came from studies of school age children and adolescents. Longitudinal studies tracing developmental trajectories of DB from early childhood onwards suggest an inversed developmental process. DB are universal during early childhood. With age, children learn socially acceptable behaviours from interactions with their environment. A ‘disease’ status is given to children who fail to learn the socially acceptable behaviours. The mechanisms that lead to deficits in using socially accepted behaviours are strongly intergenerational, based on complex genetic and environmental contributions, including epigenetic mechanisms. Prevention of these deficits requires early, intensive and long‐term support to parents and child. Newly discovered epigenetic mechanisms suggest that intensive perinatal interventions will have impacts on numerous aspects of physical and mental health, including DB. This review also concludes that: a) subtypes of disruptive behaviours should not be aggregated because they have different developmental trajectories and require specific corrective interventions; b) the overt–covert and destructive–nondestructive dimensions appear the most useful to create DB subtypes; c) overt DB onset before covert DB because the latter require more brain maturation; d) DB subtype taxonomies are more useful for clinicians than developmental taxonomies because the latter are post mortem diagnoses and clinicians’ retrospective information is unreliable; e) we need large‐scale collaborative preventive experimental interventions starting during early pregnancy to advance knowledge on causes and prevention of DB problems.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02211.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839581905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733894310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4981-e9a5939af6b6051dda257a702fc4c378de3850f2e189b2b9780b5320503cb4cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEokPhFZDFZjZk8E8cxyyQqiktoAoqxI_ExnKcm46HxA5xMsy8AY-NQ8os2BQvbOv6O8fXPkmCCF6ROF5sVyTLZSryWKA4TphSQlb7e8nieHA_WWBMSSpzhk-SRyFsMcY548XD5CRqslxwskh-ncMOGt-14AbdIN_bG-sC8jWqbOjHbrA7QCVs9M76sUdd78sG2vASDRtAyxmPumDdEm0OnY_lYMNzBJ29AQeDNQFpV0247ZHxLsCPEZyBgGo_-cXr3WC9e5w8qHUT4Mntepp8vnj9af0mvfpw-XZ9dpWaTBYkBam5ZFLXeZljTqpKUy60wLQ2mWGiqIAVHNcUSCFLWkpR4JIzijlmpsxMyU6T5ewbnxI7CYNqbTDQNNqBH4MqmOQFkZjfSYospzL2Qu8mGStkxgiO5LN_yG381viDQVEmMOExmQgVM2R6H0IPtep62-r-oAhWU_5qq6aY1RSzmvJXf_JX-yh9eus_li1UR-HfwCPwagZ-2gYO_22s3q2vr6dtNEhnAxsG2B8NdP9d5YIJrr6-v1SSfvty_lFSdcF-Azx5zu0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>237015201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developmental origins of disruptive behaviour problems: the 'original sin' hypothesis, epigenetics and their consequences for prevention</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Tremblay, Richard E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reviews publications on developmental trajectories of disruptive behaviour (DB) problems (aggression, opposition‐defiance, rule breaking, and stealing‐vandalism) over the past decade. Prior to these studies two theoretical models had strongly influenced research on DB: social learning and disease onset. According to these developmental perspectives, children learn DB from their environment and onset of the disease is triggered by accumulated exposition to disruptive models in the environment, including the media. Most of the evidence came from studies of school age children and adolescents. Longitudinal studies tracing developmental trajectories of DB from early childhood onwards suggest an inversed developmental process. DB are universal during early childhood. With age, children learn socially acceptable behaviours from interactions with their environment. A ‘disease’ status is given to children who fail to learn the socially acceptable behaviours. The mechanisms that lead to deficits in using socially accepted behaviours are strongly intergenerational, based on complex genetic and environmental contributions, including epigenetic mechanisms. Prevention of these deficits requires early, intensive and long‐term support to parents and child. Newly discovered epigenetic mechanisms suggest that intensive perinatal interventions will have impacts on numerous aspects of physical and mental health, including DB. This review also concludes that: a) subtypes of disruptive behaviours should not be aggregated because they have different developmental trajectories and require specific corrective interventions; b) the overt–covert and destructive–nondestructive dimensions appear the most useful to create DB subtypes; c) overt DB onset before covert DB because the latter require more brain maturation; d) DB subtype taxonomies are more useful for clinicians than developmental taxonomies because the latter are post mortem diagnoses and clinicians’ retrospective information is unreliable; e) we need large‐scale collaborative preventive experimental interventions starting during early pregnancy to advance knowledge on causes and prevention of DB problems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02211.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20146751</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPPDAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescents ; aggression ; Anger ; Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders - epidemiology ; Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders - genetics ; Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders - prevention &amp; control ; Behavior disorders ; Child ; Child psychology ; Children ; Classification ; defiance ; Developmental Disabilities - epidemiology ; Developmental Disabilities - genetics ; Developmental Disabilities - prevention &amp; control ; developmental origins ; Developmental psychology ; developmental trajectories ; Disruptive behaviour ; Early intervention programmes ; Epigenesis, Genetic ; epigenetics ; Female ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Intergenerational Relations ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; opposition ; Prevention ; Psychological Theory ; rule breaking ; Social interaction ; stealing ; Subtypes ; Temperament ; vandalism ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 2010-04, Vol.51 (4), p.341-367</ispartof><rights>2010 The Author. Journal compilation © 2010 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health</rights><rights>Journal Compilation © 2010 ACAMH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4981-e9a5939af6b6051dda257a702fc4c378de3850f2e189b2b9780b5320503cb4cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4981-e9a5939af6b6051dda257a702fc4c378de3850f2e189b2b9780b5320503cb4cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1469-7610.2010.02211.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1469-7610.2010.02211.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,30980,30981,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20146751$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><title>Developmental origins of disruptive behaviour problems: the 'original sin' hypothesis, epigenetics and their consequences for prevention</title><title>Journal of child psychology and psychiatry</title><addtitle>J Child Psychol Psychiatry</addtitle><description>This paper reviews publications on developmental trajectories of disruptive behaviour (DB) problems (aggression, opposition‐defiance, rule breaking, and stealing‐vandalism) over the past decade. Prior to these studies two theoretical models had strongly influenced research on DB: social learning and disease onset. According to these developmental perspectives, children learn DB from their environment and onset of the disease is triggered by accumulated exposition to disruptive models in the environment, including the media. Most of the evidence came from studies of school age children and adolescents. Longitudinal studies tracing developmental trajectories of DB from early childhood onwards suggest an inversed developmental process. DB are universal during early childhood. With age, children learn socially acceptable behaviours from interactions with their environment. A ‘disease’ status is given to children who fail to learn the socially acceptable behaviours. The mechanisms that lead to deficits in using socially accepted behaviours are strongly intergenerational, based on complex genetic and environmental contributions, including epigenetic mechanisms. Prevention of these deficits requires early, intensive and long‐term support to parents and child. Newly discovered epigenetic mechanisms suggest that intensive perinatal interventions will have impacts on numerous aspects of physical and mental health, including DB. This review also concludes that: a) subtypes of disruptive behaviours should not be aggregated because they have different developmental trajectories and require specific corrective interventions; b) the overt–covert and destructive–nondestructive dimensions appear the most useful to create DB subtypes; c) overt DB onset before covert DB because the latter require more brain maturation; d) DB subtype taxonomies are more useful for clinicians than developmental taxonomies because the latter are post mortem diagnoses and clinicians’ retrospective information is unreliable; e) we need large‐scale collaborative preventive experimental interventions starting during early pregnancy to advance knowledge on causes and prevention of DB problems.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>aggression</subject><subject>Anger</subject><subject>Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders - genetics</subject><subject>Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Behavior disorders</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child psychology</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>defiance</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - epidemiology</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - genetics</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>developmental origins</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>developmental trajectories</subject><subject>Disruptive behaviour</subject><subject>Early intervention programmes</subject><subject>Epigenesis, Genetic</subject><subject>epigenetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Intergenerational Relations</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>opposition</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>rule breaking</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>stealing</subject><subject>Subtypes</subject><subject>Temperament</subject><subject>vandalism</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0021-9630</issn><issn>1469-7610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEokPhFZDFZjZk8E8cxyyQqiktoAoqxI_ExnKcm46HxA5xMsy8AY-NQ8os2BQvbOv6O8fXPkmCCF6ROF5sVyTLZSryWKA4TphSQlb7e8nieHA_WWBMSSpzhk-SRyFsMcY548XD5CRqslxwskh-ncMOGt-14AbdIN_bG-sC8jWqbOjHbrA7QCVs9M76sUdd78sG2vASDRtAyxmPumDdEm0OnY_lYMNzBJ29AQeDNQFpV0247ZHxLsCPEZyBgGo_-cXr3WC9e5w8qHUT4Mntepp8vnj9af0mvfpw-XZ9dpWaTBYkBam5ZFLXeZljTqpKUy60wLQ2mWGiqIAVHNcUSCFLWkpR4JIzijlmpsxMyU6T5ewbnxI7CYNqbTDQNNqBH4MqmOQFkZjfSYospzL2Qu8mGStkxgiO5LN_yG381viDQVEmMOExmQgVM2R6H0IPtep62-r-oAhWU_5qq6aY1RSzmvJXf_JX-yh9eus_li1UR-HfwCPwagZ-2gYO_22s3q2vr6dtNEhnAxsG2B8NdP9d5YIJrr6-v1SSfvty_lFSdcF-Azx5zu0</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Tremblay, Richard E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>Developmental origins of disruptive behaviour problems: the 'original sin' hypothesis, epigenetics and their consequences for prevention</title><author>Tremblay, Richard E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4981-e9a5939af6b6051dda257a702fc4c378de3850f2e189b2b9780b5320503cb4cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>aggression</topic><topic>Anger</topic><topic>Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders - genetics</topic><topic>Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Behavior disorders</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child psychology</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>defiance</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - epidemiology</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - genetics</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>developmental origins</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>developmental trajectories</topic><topic>Disruptive behaviour</topic><topic>Early intervention programmes</topic><topic>Epigenesis, Genetic</topic><topic>epigenetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Intergenerational Relations</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>opposition</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>rule breaking</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>stealing</topic><topic>Subtypes</topic><topic>Temperament</topic><topic>vandalism</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of child psychology and psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tremblay, Richard E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developmental origins of disruptive behaviour problems: the 'original sin' hypothesis, epigenetics and their consequences for prevention</atitle><jtitle>Journal of child psychology and psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>J Child Psychol Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>341</spage><epage>367</epage><pages>341-367</pages><issn>0021-9630</issn><eissn>1469-7610</eissn><coden>JPPDAI</coden><abstract>This paper reviews publications on developmental trajectories of disruptive behaviour (DB) problems (aggression, opposition‐defiance, rule breaking, and stealing‐vandalism) over the past decade. Prior to these studies two theoretical models had strongly influenced research on DB: social learning and disease onset. According to these developmental perspectives, children learn DB from their environment and onset of the disease is triggered by accumulated exposition to disruptive models in the environment, including the media. Most of the evidence came from studies of school age children and adolescents. Longitudinal studies tracing developmental trajectories of DB from early childhood onwards suggest an inversed developmental process. DB are universal during early childhood. With age, children learn socially acceptable behaviours from interactions with their environment. A ‘disease’ status is given to children who fail to learn the socially acceptable behaviours. The mechanisms that lead to deficits in using socially accepted behaviours are strongly intergenerational, based on complex genetic and environmental contributions, including epigenetic mechanisms. Prevention of these deficits requires early, intensive and long‐term support to parents and child. Newly discovered epigenetic mechanisms suggest that intensive perinatal interventions will have impacts on numerous aspects of physical and mental health, including DB. This review also concludes that: a) subtypes of disruptive behaviours should not be aggregated because they have different developmental trajectories and require specific corrective interventions; b) the overt–covert and destructive–nondestructive dimensions appear the most useful to create DB subtypes; c) overt DB onset before covert DB because the latter require more brain maturation; d) DB subtype taxonomies are more useful for clinicians than developmental taxonomies because the latter are post mortem diagnoses and clinicians’ retrospective information is unreliable; e) we need large‐scale collaborative preventive experimental interventions starting during early pregnancy to advance knowledge on causes and prevention of DB problems.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20146751</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02211.x</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9630
ispartof Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 2010-04, Vol.51 (4), p.341-367
issn 0021-9630
1469-7610
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839581905
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Adolescent
Adolescents
aggression
Anger
Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders - epidemiology
Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders - genetics
Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders - prevention & control
Behavior disorders
Child
Child psychology
Children
Classification
defiance
Developmental Disabilities - epidemiology
Developmental Disabilities - genetics
Developmental Disabilities - prevention & control
developmental origins
Developmental psychology
developmental trajectories
Disruptive behaviour
Early intervention programmes
Epigenesis, Genetic
epigenetics
Female
Humans
Hypotheses
Intergenerational Relations
Longitudinal Studies
Male
opposition
Prevention
Psychological Theory
rule breaking
Social interaction
stealing
Subtypes
Temperament
vandalism
Young Children
title Developmental origins of disruptive behaviour problems: the 'original sin' hypothesis, epigenetics and their consequences for prevention
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T22%3A10%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developmental%20origins%20of%20disruptive%20behaviour%20problems:%20the%20'original%20sin'%20hypothesis,%20epigenetics%20and%20their%20consequences%20for%20prevention&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20child%20psychology%20and%20psychiatry&rft.au=Tremblay,%20Richard%20E.&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=341&rft.epage=367&rft.pages=341-367&rft.issn=0021-9630&rft.eissn=1469-7610&rft.coden=JPPDAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02211.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733894310%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=237015201&rft_id=info:pmid/20146751&rfr_iscdi=true