Heterogeneity and the Provision of Governance for Common-Pool Resources
This paper provides an initial analysis of the governance provision problem for common-pool resources characterized by appropriation cost heterogeneities. Provision first requires the selection of a governance structure that lowers overall appropriation and allocates individual appropriation rights....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of theoretical politics 1992-07, Vol.4 (3), p.325-342 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 342 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 325 |
container_title | Journal of theoretical politics |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Hackett, Steven C. |
description | This paper provides an initial analysis of the governance provision problem for common-pool resources characterized by appropriation cost heterogeneities. Provision first requires the selection of a governance structure that lowers overall appropriation and allocates individual appropriation rights. The likelihood of successful implementation is then increased when appropriators make sunk, CPR-specific investments in monitoring and enforcement. Heterogeneity complicates efficient governance structures; appropriation rights allocations cannot minimize both implementation costs and heterogeneous appropriation costs. Some additional instrument, such as marketable appropriation rights or transfer payment schemes, are needed to minimize both forms of provision cost. The analysis identifies a voting rule tradeoff in which the form of provision cost depends on the form of voting rule used by appropriator groups attempting self-governance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0951692892004003005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839263776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0951692892004003005</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1300553312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-acc37e49cc37ce1ccea4f91361c8ecca9f6ad6796e0412e347fcda38d42cd08c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1LAzEQBuAgCtbqL_ASEPS0OvnYZHOUoq1QsIiel5CdrVu6SU22hf57d6kHEelpLs_7wswQcs3gnjGtH8DkTBleGA4gAQRAfkJGTCrIhFL6lIwGkSluinNykdIKgOXA5IhMZ9hhDEv02HR7an1Fu0-kixh2TWqCp6Gm07DD6K13SOsQ6SS0bfDZIoQ1fcMUttFhuiRntV0nvPqZY_Lx_PQ-mWXz1-nL5HGeOW5Ul1nnhEZphuGQOYdW1oYJxVyBzllTK1spbRSCZByF1LWrrCgqyV0FhRNjcnfo3cTwtcXUlW2THK7X1mPYprIQhiuhterl7VGpoLdaDPDmD1z1O_l-i5INl8yFYLxX4qBcDClFrMtNbFob9yWDcnhC-c8T-hQcUsku8Vfvkcg3uViG-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300553312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heterogeneity and the Provision of Governance for Common-Pool Resources</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sage Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Hackett, Steven C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hackett, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper provides an initial analysis of the governance provision problem for common-pool resources characterized by appropriation cost heterogeneities. Provision first requires the selection of a governance structure that lowers overall appropriation and allocates individual appropriation rights. The likelihood of successful implementation is then increased when appropriators make sunk, CPR-specific investments in monitoring and enforcement. Heterogeneity complicates efficient governance structures; appropriation rights allocations cannot minimize both implementation costs and heterogeneous appropriation costs. Some additional instrument, such as marketable appropriation rights or transfer payment schemes, are needed to minimize both forms of provision cost. The analysis identifies a voting rule tradeoff in which the form of provision cost depends on the form of voting rule used by appropriator groups attempting self-governance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-6298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3667</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0951692892004003005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>6 Bonhill Street, London EC2A 4PU, UK: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>COLLECTIVE FARMS ; Cost ; Government ; INVESTMENT ; Natural Resources ; Political Theory ; RESOURCE ALLOCATION ; Resource management ; VOTING</subject><ispartof>Journal of theoretical politics, 1992-07, Vol.4 (3), p.325-342</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-acc37e49cc37ce1ccea4f91361c8ecca9f6ad6796e0412e347fcda38d42cd08c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-acc37e49cc37ce1ccea4f91361c8ecca9f6ad6796e0412e347fcda38d42cd08c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0951692892004003005$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0951692892004003005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27846,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hackett, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><title>Heterogeneity and the Provision of Governance for Common-Pool Resources</title><title>Journal of theoretical politics</title><description>This paper provides an initial analysis of the governance provision problem for common-pool resources characterized by appropriation cost heterogeneities. Provision first requires the selection of a governance structure that lowers overall appropriation and allocates individual appropriation rights. The likelihood of successful implementation is then increased when appropriators make sunk, CPR-specific investments in monitoring and enforcement. Heterogeneity complicates efficient governance structures; appropriation rights allocations cannot minimize both implementation costs and heterogeneous appropriation costs. Some additional instrument, such as marketable appropriation rights or transfer payment schemes, are needed to minimize both forms of provision cost. The analysis identifies a voting rule tradeoff in which the form of provision cost depends on the form of voting rule used by appropriator groups attempting self-governance.</description><subject>COLLECTIVE FARMS</subject><subject>Cost</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>INVESTMENT</subject><subject>Natural Resources</subject><subject>Political Theory</subject><subject>RESOURCE ALLOCATION</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>VOTING</subject><issn>0951-6298</issn><issn>1460-3667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1LAzEQBuAgCtbqL_ASEPS0OvnYZHOUoq1QsIiel5CdrVu6SU22hf57d6kHEelpLs_7wswQcs3gnjGtH8DkTBleGA4gAQRAfkJGTCrIhFL6lIwGkSluinNykdIKgOXA5IhMZ9hhDEv02HR7an1Fu0-kixh2TWqCp6Gm07DD6K13SOsQ6SS0bfDZIoQ1fcMUttFhuiRntV0nvPqZY_Lx_PQ-mWXz1-nL5HGeOW5Ul1nnhEZphuGQOYdW1oYJxVyBzllTK1spbRSCZByF1LWrrCgqyV0FhRNjcnfo3cTwtcXUlW2THK7X1mPYprIQhiuhterl7VGpoLdaDPDmD1z1O_l-i5INl8yFYLxX4qBcDClFrMtNbFob9yWDcnhC-c8T-hQcUsku8Vfvkcg3uViG-g</recordid><startdate>199207</startdate><enddate>199207</enddate><creator>Hackett, Steven C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFXKP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199207</creationdate><title>Heterogeneity and the Provision of Governance for Common-Pool Resources</title><author>Hackett, Steven C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-acc37e49cc37ce1ccea4f91361c8ecca9f6ad6796e0412e347fcda38d42cd08c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>COLLECTIVE FARMS</topic><topic>Cost</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>INVESTMENT</topic><topic>Natural Resources</topic><topic>Political Theory</topic><topic>RESOURCE ALLOCATION</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>VOTING</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hackett, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 17</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of theoretical politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hackett, Steven C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heterogeneity and the Provision of Governance for Common-Pool Resources</atitle><jtitle>Journal of theoretical politics</jtitle><date>1992-07</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>342</epage><pages>325-342</pages><issn>0951-6298</issn><eissn>1460-3667</eissn><abstract>This paper provides an initial analysis of the governance provision problem for common-pool resources characterized by appropriation cost heterogeneities. Provision first requires the selection of a governance structure that lowers overall appropriation and allocates individual appropriation rights. The likelihood of successful implementation is then increased when appropriators make sunk, CPR-specific investments in monitoring and enforcement. Heterogeneity complicates efficient governance structures; appropriation rights allocations cannot minimize both implementation costs and heterogeneous appropriation costs. Some additional instrument, such as marketable appropriation rights or transfer payment schemes, are needed to minimize both forms of provision cost. The analysis identifies a voting rule tradeoff in which the form of provision cost depends on the form of voting rule used by appropriator groups attempting self-governance.</abstract><cop>6 Bonhill Street, London EC2A 4PU, UK</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0951692892004003005</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0951-6298 |
ispartof | Journal of theoretical politics, 1992-07, Vol.4 (3), p.325-342 |
issn | 0951-6298 1460-3667 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839263776 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sage Journals; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | COLLECTIVE FARMS Cost Government INVESTMENT Natural Resources Political Theory RESOURCE ALLOCATION Resource management VOTING |
title | Heterogeneity and the Provision of Governance for Common-Pool Resources |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T18%3A55%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heterogeneity%20and%20the%20Provision%20of%20Governance%20for%20Common-Pool%20Resources&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20theoretical%20politics&rft.au=Hackett,%20Steven%20C.&rft.date=1992-07&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=342&rft.pages=325-342&rft.issn=0951-6298&rft.eissn=1460-3667&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0951692892004003005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1300553312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300553312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0951692892004003005&rfr_iscdi=true |