Heterogeneity and the Provision of Governance for Common-Pool Resources

This paper provides an initial analysis of the governance provision problem for common-pool resources characterized by appropriation cost heterogeneities. Provision first requires the selection of a governance structure that lowers overall appropriation and allocates individual appropriation rights....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of theoretical politics 1992-07, Vol.4 (3), p.325-342
1. Verfasser: Hackett, Steven C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 342
container_issue 3
container_start_page 325
container_title Journal of theoretical politics
container_volume 4
creator Hackett, Steven C.
description This paper provides an initial analysis of the governance provision problem for common-pool resources characterized by appropriation cost heterogeneities. Provision first requires the selection of a governance structure that lowers overall appropriation and allocates individual appropriation rights. The likelihood of successful implementation is then increased when appropriators make sunk, CPR-specific investments in monitoring and enforcement. Heterogeneity complicates efficient governance structures; appropriation rights allocations cannot minimize both implementation costs and heterogeneous appropriation costs. Some additional instrument, such as marketable appropriation rights or transfer payment schemes, are needed to minimize both forms of provision cost. The analysis identifies a voting rule tradeoff in which the form of provision cost depends on the form of voting rule used by appropriator groups attempting self-governance.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0951692892004003005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839263776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0951692892004003005</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1300553312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-acc37e49cc37ce1ccea4f91361c8ecca9f6ad6796e0412e347fcda38d42cd08c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1LAzEQBuAgCtbqL_ASEPS0OvnYZHOUoq1QsIiel5CdrVu6SU22hf57d6kHEelpLs_7wswQcs3gnjGtH8DkTBleGA4gAQRAfkJGTCrIhFL6lIwGkSluinNykdIKgOXA5IhMZ9hhDEv02HR7an1Fu0-kixh2TWqCp6Gm07DD6K13SOsQ6SS0bfDZIoQ1fcMUttFhuiRntV0nvPqZY_Lx_PQ-mWXz1-nL5HGeOW5Ul1nnhEZphuGQOYdW1oYJxVyBzllTK1spbRSCZByF1LWrrCgqyV0FhRNjcnfo3cTwtcXUlW2THK7X1mPYprIQhiuhterl7VGpoLdaDPDmD1z1O_l-i5INl8yFYLxX4qBcDClFrMtNbFob9yWDcnhC-c8T-hQcUsku8Vfvkcg3uViG-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300553312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heterogeneity and the Provision of Governance for Common-Pool Resources</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sage Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Hackett, Steven C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hackett, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper provides an initial analysis of the governance provision problem for common-pool resources characterized by appropriation cost heterogeneities. Provision first requires the selection of a governance structure that lowers overall appropriation and allocates individual appropriation rights. The likelihood of successful implementation is then increased when appropriators make sunk, CPR-specific investments in monitoring and enforcement. Heterogeneity complicates efficient governance structures; appropriation rights allocations cannot minimize both implementation costs and heterogeneous appropriation costs. Some additional instrument, such as marketable appropriation rights or transfer payment schemes, are needed to minimize both forms of provision cost. The analysis identifies a voting rule tradeoff in which the form of provision cost depends on the form of voting rule used by appropriator groups attempting self-governance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-6298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3667</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0951692892004003005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>6 Bonhill Street, London EC2A 4PU, UK: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>COLLECTIVE FARMS ; Cost ; Government ; INVESTMENT ; Natural Resources ; Political Theory ; RESOURCE ALLOCATION ; Resource management ; VOTING</subject><ispartof>Journal of theoretical politics, 1992-07, Vol.4 (3), p.325-342</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-acc37e49cc37ce1ccea4f91361c8ecca9f6ad6796e0412e347fcda38d42cd08c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-acc37e49cc37ce1ccea4f91361c8ecca9f6ad6796e0412e347fcda38d42cd08c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0951692892004003005$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0951692892004003005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27846,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hackett, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><title>Heterogeneity and the Provision of Governance for Common-Pool Resources</title><title>Journal of theoretical politics</title><description>This paper provides an initial analysis of the governance provision problem for common-pool resources characterized by appropriation cost heterogeneities. Provision first requires the selection of a governance structure that lowers overall appropriation and allocates individual appropriation rights. The likelihood of successful implementation is then increased when appropriators make sunk, CPR-specific investments in monitoring and enforcement. Heterogeneity complicates efficient governance structures; appropriation rights allocations cannot minimize both implementation costs and heterogeneous appropriation costs. Some additional instrument, such as marketable appropriation rights or transfer payment schemes, are needed to minimize both forms of provision cost. The analysis identifies a voting rule tradeoff in which the form of provision cost depends on the form of voting rule used by appropriator groups attempting self-governance.</description><subject>COLLECTIVE FARMS</subject><subject>Cost</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>INVESTMENT</subject><subject>Natural Resources</subject><subject>Political Theory</subject><subject>RESOURCE ALLOCATION</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>VOTING</subject><issn>0951-6298</issn><issn>1460-3667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1LAzEQBuAgCtbqL_ASEPS0OvnYZHOUoq1QsIiel5CdrVu6SU22hf57d6kHEelpLs_7wswQcs3gnjGtH8DkTBleGA4gAQRAfkJGTCrIhFL6lIwGkSluinNykdIKgOXA5IhMZ9hhDEv02HR7an1Fu0-kixh2TWqCp6Gm07DD6K13SOsQ6SS0bfDZIoQ1fcMUttFhuiRntV0nvPqZY_Lx_PQ-mWXz1-nL5HGeOW5Ul1nnhEZphuGQOYdW1oYJxVyBzllTK1spbRSCZByF1LWrrCgqyV0FhRNjcnfo3cTwtcXUlW2THK7X1mPYprIQhiuhterl7VGpoLdaDPDmD1z1O_l-i5INl8yFYLxX4qBcDClFrMtNbFob9yWDcnhC-c8T-hQcUsku8Vfvkcg3uViG-g</recordid><startdate>199207</startdate><enddate>199207</enddate><creator>Hackett, Steven C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFXKP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199207</creationdate><title>Heterogeneity and the Provision of Governance for Common-Pool Resources</title><author>Hackett, Steven C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-acc37e49cc37ce1ccea4f91361c8ecca9f6ad6796e0412e347fcda38d42cd08c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>COLLECTIVE FARMS</topic><topic>Cost</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>INVESTMENT</topic><topic>Natural Resources</topic><topic>Political Theory</topic><topic>RESOURCE ALLOCATION</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>VOTING</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hackett, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 17</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of theoretical politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hackett, Steven C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heterogeneity and the Provision of Governance for Common-Pool Resources</atitle><jtitle>Journal of theoretical politics</jtitle><date>1992-07</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>342</epage><pages>325-342</pages><issn>0951-6298</issn><eissn>1460-3667</eissn><abstract>This paper provides an initial analysis of the governance provision problem for common-pool resources characterized by appropriation cost heterogeneities. Provision first requires the selection of a governance structure that lowers overall appropriation and allocates individual appropriation rights. The likelihood of successful implementation is then increased when appropriators make sunk, CPR-specific investments in monitoring and enforcement. Heterogeneity complicates efficient governance structures; appropriation rights allocations cannot minimize both implementation costs and heterogeneous appropriation costs. Some additional instrument, such as marketable appropriation rights or transfer payment schemes, are needed to minimize both forms of provision cost. The analysis identifies a voting rule tradeoff in which the form of provision cost depends on the form of voting rule used by appropriator groups attempting self-governance.</abstract><cop>6 Bonhill Street, London EC2A 4PU, UK</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0951692892004003005</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-6298
ispartof Journal of theoretical politics, 1992-07, Vol.4 (3), p.325-342
issn 0951-6298
1460-3667
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839263776
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sage Journals; Periodicals Index Online
subjects COLLECTIVE FARMS
Cost
Government
INVESTMENT
Natural Resources
Political Theory
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
Resource management
VOTING
title Heterogeneity and the Provision of Governance for Common-Pool Resources
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T18%3A55%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heterogeneity%20and%20the%20Provision%20of%20Governance%20for%20Common-Pool%20Resources&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20theoretical%20politics&rft.au=Hackett,%20Steven%20C.&rft.date=1992-07&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=342&rft.pages=325-342&rft.issn=0951-6298&rft.eissn=1460-3667&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0951692892004003005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1300553312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300553312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0951692892004003005&rfr_iscdi=true