Representative Deliberations and Representative Decisions: Proportional Representation and the Borda Rule

The development of social choice theory over the past three decades has brought many new insights into democratic theory. Surprisingly, the theory of representation has gone almost untouched by social choice theorists. This article redresses this neglect and provides an axiomatic study of one means...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American political science review 1983-09, Vol.77 (3), p.718-733
Hauptverfasser: Chamberlin, John R., Courant, Paul N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 733
container_issue 3
container_start_page 718
container_title The American political science review
container_volume 77
creator Chamberlin, John R.
Courant, Paul N.
description The development of social choice theory over the past three decades has brought many new insights into democratic theory. Surprisingly, the theory of representation has gone almost untouched by social choice theorists. This article redresses this neglect and provides an axiomatic study of one means of implementing proportional representation. The distinguishing feature of proportional representation is its concern for the representativeness of deliberations as well as decisions. We define a representative in a way that is particularly attentive to this feature and then define a method of selecting representatives (a variant of the Borda rule) which selects a maximally representative body. We also prove that this method of selection meets four social choice axioms that are met by a number of other important social choice functions (including pairwise majority decision and the Borda rule).
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1957270
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839193928</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_1957270</cupid><jstor_id>1957270</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1957270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-a0d09047514f7c824b4a7d4b4d7a285c16a19726154960d52bb244cea630ae4e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90d1LwzAQAPAgCs4p_gsFRfGhevlqGt90fsJAGfpc0vamHV1Tk1bwvzdzA79gLzmO_HKX4wjZp3DKOKgzqqViCjbIgEquYqkF3yQDAOAxSCm2yY73s5AChXRAqgm2Dj02nemqd4yusK5ydCGxjY9MU0b_QFH5xeV59Ohsa91CmvoXs83Xy-4Vo0vrShNN-hp3ydbU1B73VnFInm-un0Z38fjh9n50MY4LrnQXGyhBg1CSiqkqUiZyYVQZzlIZlsqCJoZqxRIqhU6glCzPmRAFmoSDQYF8SI6XdVtn33r0XTavfIF1bRq0vc9SrqnmmqVBHq2VCaUMgLEAD_7Ame1dmNpnlIe_ppwy_d24cNZ7h9OsddXcuI-MQrZYTbZaTZCHSznznXVr2MmqoJnnripf8EffP_YTdtSYXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1304783129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Representative Deliberations and Representative Decisions: Proportional Representation and the Borda Rule</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Chamberlin, John R. ; Courant, Paul N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chamberlin, John R. ; Courant, Paul N.</creatorcontrib><description>The development of social choice theory over the past three decades has brought many new insights into democratic theory. Surprisingly, the theory of representation has gone almost untouched by social choice theorists. This article redresses this neglect and provides an axiomatic study of one means of implementing proportional representation. The distinguishing feature of proportional representation is its concern for the representativeness of deliberations as well as decisions. We define a representative in a way that is particularly attentive to this feature and then define a method of selecting representatives (a variant of the Borda rule) which selects a maximally representative body. We also prove that this method of selection meets four social choice axioms that are met by a number of other important social choice functions (including pairwise majority decision and the Borda rule).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0554</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1957270</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>CHOICE, IN ANY CONTEXT ; Committees ; Constituents ; Decision making ; DEMOCRATIC PROCESS AND INSTITUTIONS ; Direct democracy ; Judgment ; Majority voting ; Mathematical functions ; Political candidates ; PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION ; Representation ; Representatives ; Social choice ; THEORY BUILDING OR THEORETICAL APPROACH ; Voting</subject><ispartof>The American political science review, 1983-09, Vol.77 (3), p.718-733</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 1983</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-a0d09047514f7c824b4a7d4b4d7a285c16a19726154960d52bb244cea630ae4e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-a0d09047514f7c824b4a7d4b4d7a285c16a19726154960d52bb244cea630ae4e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1957270$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1957270$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chamberlin, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Courant, Paul N.</creatorcontrib><title>Representative Deliberations and Representative Decisions: Proportional Representation and the Borda Rule</title><title>The American political science review</title><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><description>The development of social choice theory over the past three decades has brought many new insights into democratic theory. Surprisingly, the theory of representation has gone almost untouched by social choice theorists. This article redresses this neglect and provides an axiomatic study of one means of implementing proportional representation. The distinguishing feature of proportional representation is its concern for the representativeness of deliberations as well as decisions. We define a representative in a way that is particularly attentive to this feature and then define a method of selecting representatives (a variant of the Borda rule) which selects a maximally representative body. We also prove that this method of selection meets four social choice axioms that are met by a number of other important social choice functions (including pairwise majority decision and the Borda rule).</description><subject>CHOICE, IN ANY CONTEXT</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Constituents</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>DEMOCRATIC PROCESS AND INSTITUTIONS</subject><subject>Direct democracy</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Majority voting</subject><subject>Mathematical functions</subject><subject>Political candidates</subject><subject>PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION</subject><subject>Representation</subject><subject>Representatives</subject><subject>Social choice</subject><subject>THEORY BUILDING OR THEORETICAL APPROACH</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0003-0554</issn><issn>1537-5943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp90d1LwzAQAPAgCs4p_gsFRfGhevlqGt90fsJAGfpc0vamHV1Tk1bwvzdzA79gLzmO_HKX4wjZp3DKOKgzqqViCjbIgEquYqkF3yQDAOAxSCm2yY73s5AChXRAqgm2Dj02nemqd4yusK5ydCGxjY9MU0b_QFH5xeV59Ohsa91CmvoXs83Xy-4Vo0vrShNN-hp3ydbU1B73VnFInm-un0Z38fjh9n50MY4LrnQXGyhBg1CSiqkqUiZyYVQZzlIZlsqCJoZqxRIqhU6glCzPmRAFmoSDQYF8SI6XdVtn33r0XTavfIF1bRq0vc9SrqnmmqVBHq2VCaUMgLEAD_7Ame1dmNpnlIe_ppwy_d24cNZ7h9OsddXcuI-MQrZYTbZaTZCHSznznXVr2MmqoJnnripf8EffP_YTdtSYXA</recordid><startdate>19830901</startdate><enddate>19830901</enddate><creator>Chamberlin, John R.</creator><creator>Courant, Paul N.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>The American Political Science Association</general><general>American Political Science Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHXMH</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19830901</creationdate><title>Representative Deliberations and Representative Decisions: Proportional Representation and the Borda Rule</title><author>Chamberlin, John R. ; Courant, Paul N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-a0d09047514f7c824b4a7d4b4d7a285c16a19726154960d52bb244cea630ae4e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>CHOICE, IN ANY CONTEXT</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Constituents</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>DEMOCRATIC PROCESS AND INSTITUTIONS</topic><topic>Direct democracy</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Majority voting</topic><topic>Mathematical functions</topic><topic>Political candidates</topic><topic>PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION</topic><topic>Representation</topic><topic>Representatives</topic><topic>Social choice</topic><topic>THEORY BUILDING OR THEORETICAL APPROACH</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chamberlin, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Courant, Paul N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 09</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chamberlin, John R.</au><au>Courant, Paul N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Representative Deliberations and Representative Decisions: Proportional Representation and the Borda Rule</atitle><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><date>1983-09-01</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>718</spage><epage>733</epage><pages>718-733</pages><issn>0003-0554</issn><eissn>1537-5943</eissn><abstract>The development of social choice theory over the past three decades has brought many new insights into democratic theory. Surprisingly, the theory of representation has gone almost untouched by social choice theorists. This article redresses this neglect and provides an axiomatic study of one means of implementing proportional representation. The distinguishing feature of proportional representation is its concern for the representativeness of deliberations as well as decisions. We define a representative in a way that is particularly attentive to this feature and then define a method of selecting representatives (a variant of the Borda rule) which selects a maximally representative body. We also prove that this method of selection meets four social choice axioms that are met by a number of other important social choice functions (including pairwise majority decision and the Borda rule).</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/1957270</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0554
ispartof The American political science review, 1983-09, Vol.77 (3), p.718-733
issn 0003-0554
1537-5943
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839193928
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects CHOICE, IN ANY CONTEXT
Committees
Constituents
Decision making
DEMOCRATIC PROCESS AND INSTITUTIONS
Direct democracy
Judgment
Majority voting
Mathematical functions
Political candidates
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION
Representation
Representatives
Social choice
THEORY BUILDING OR THEORETICAL APPROACH
Voting
title Representative Deliberations and Representative Decisions: Proportional Representation and the Borda Rule
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T10%3A46%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Representative%20Deliberations%20and%20Representative%20Decisions:%20Proportional%20Representation%20and%20the%20Borda%20Rule&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=Chamberlin,%20John%20R.&rft.date=1983-09-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=718&rft.epage=733&rft.pages=718-733&rft.issn=0003-0554&rft.eissn=1537-5943&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1957270&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1957270%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1304783129&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_2307_1957270&rft_jstor_id=1957270&rfr_iscdi=true