TOWARDS GLOBAL SCHOLARSHIP IN PUBLIC AFFAIRS
One can imagine two futures for public administration, public management and public service around the world. A first would be what we see as a continuation of the status quo: with public administration essentially continuing as a series of national discourses, with perhaps a bit of cross‐fertilizat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Public administration (London) 2010-09, Vol.88 (3), p.836-850 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 850 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 836 |
| container_title | Public administration (London) |
| container_volume | 88 |
| creator | CANDLER, GAYLORD GEORGE AZEVÊDO, ARISTON ALBERNAZ, RENATA OVENHAUSEN |
| description | One can imagine two futures for public administration, public management and public service around the world. A first would be what we see as a continuation of the status quo: with public administration essentially continuing as a series of national discourses, with perhaps a bit of cross‐fertilization, but with this characterized by a classic core‐periphery model. The preferable model, outlined in this paper, would see the development of an integrated community of scholars of public affairs.
At least three hurdles need to be overcome to arrive at this integrated community. A first concerns the tension in the periphery between an epistemic nationalism and epistemic colonialism. The second hurdle to be overcome concerns the central role of the American literature in intellectual discourse in public administration. A third hurdle is more specific to public administration: what Canadian Iain Gow has referred to as public administration's profile, as ‘une science empirique par excellence’. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01842.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839141881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>839141881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-58788f8ab296aae895654f06a0f2bc8cb254b4030ca4cc6bb68fbc54bc2158463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1PwjAchhujiYj-D4sXL272c-suJgMElkyGDMLxl67ZEpAvV4jw39s5w8GL9tLm1-d9mz4IOQR7xK6npUe4H7ghDUOPYjvFRHLqHS9Q63xxiVoYM-YyGsprdGPMEmPMfcFb6HGazqNJL3MGSdqJEifrDtMkmmTDeOzEI2c86yRx14n6_SieZLfoqlQrU9z97G00679Mu0M3SQdxN0pczTmjrpCBlKVUOQ19pQoZCvtUiX2FS5prqXMqeM4xw1pxrf0892WZazvTlAjJfdZGD03vrtp-HAqzh_XC6GK1UptiezAgWUg4kZL8SQZCEooFZ5a8_0Uut4dqY78BAQ8DIggOLCQbSFdbY6qihF21WKvqBARDrRuWUFuF2irUuuFbNxxt9LmJfi5WxenfORhHvdf6aAvcpmBh9sXxXKCqd_ADFgiYjwaQyN58mok3oOwLi8yOjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>749715107</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>TOWARDS GLOBAL SCHOLARSHIP IN PUBLIC AFFAIRS</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>CANDLER, GAYLORD GEORGE ; AZEVÊDO, ARISTON ; ALBERNAZ, RENATA OVENHAUSEN</creator><creatorcontrib>CANDLER, GAYLORD GEORGE ; AZEVÊDO, ARISTON ; ALBERNAZ, RENATA OVENHAUSEN</creatorcontrib><description>One can imagine two futures for public administration, public management and public service around the world. A first would be what we see as a continuation of the status quo: with public administration essentially continuing as a series of national discourses, with perhaps a bit of cross‐fertilization, but with this characterized by a classic core‐periphery model. The preferable model, outlined in this paper, would see the development of an integrated community of scholars of public affairs.
At least three hurdles need to be overcome to arrive at this integrated community. A first concerns the tension in the periphery between an epistemic nationalism and epistemic colonialism. The second hurdle to be overcome concerns the central role of the American literature in intellectual discourse in public administration. A third hurdle is more specific to public administration: what Canadian Iain Gow has referred to as public administration's profile, as ‘une science empirique par excellence’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9299</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01842.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PUADDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic discipline ; Canada ; Center and Periphery ; Colonialism ; Discourse ; Empirical research ; Epistemology ; Globalization ; Integrated approach ; Intellectual development ; Intellectuals ; Management ; Nationalism ; Profiles ; Public Administration ; Public Services ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Public administration (London), 2010-09, Vol.88 (3), p.836-850</ispartof><rights>2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-58788f8ab296aae895654f06a0f2bc8cb254b4030ca4cc6bb68fbc54bc2158463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-58788f8ab296aae895654f06a0f2bc8cb254b4030ca4cc6bb68fbc54bc2158463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9299.2010.01842.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9299.2010.01842.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27845,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>CANDLER, GAYLORD GEORGE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AZEVÊDO, ARISTON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALBERNAZ, RENATA OVENHAUSEN</creatorcontrib><title>TOWARDS GLOBAL SCHOLARSHIP IN PUBLIC AFFAIRS</title><title>Public administration (London)</title><description>One can imagine two futures for public administration, public management and public service around the world. A first would be what we see as a continuation of the status quo: with public administration essentially continuing as a series of national discourses, with perhaps a bit of cross‐fertilization, but with this characterized by a classic core‐periphery model. The preferable model, outlined in this paper, would see the development of an integrated community of scholars of public affairs.
At least three hurdles need to be overcome to arrive at this integrated community. A first concerns the tension in the periphery between an epistemic nationalism and epistemic colonialism. The second hurdle to be overcome concerns the central role of the American literature in intellectual discourse in public administration. A third hurdle is more specific to public administration: what Canadian Iain Gow has referred to as public administration's profile, as ‘une science empirique par excellence’.</description><subject>Academic discipline</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Center and Periphery</subject><subject>Colonialism</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Integrated approach</subject><subject>Intellectual development</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Public Administration</subject><subject>Public Services</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0033-3298</issn><issn>1467-9299</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1PwjAchhujiYj-D4sXL272c-suJgMElkyGDMLxl67ZEpAvV4jw39s5w8GL9tLm1-d9mz4IOQR7xK6npUe4H7ghDUOPYjvFRHLqHS9Q63xxiVoYM-YyGsprdGPMEmPMfcFb6HGazqNJL3MGSdqJEifrDtMkmmTDeOzEI2c86yRx14n6_SieZLfoqlQrU9z97G00679Mu0M3SQdxN0pczTmjrpCBlKVUOQ19pQoZCvtUiX2FS5prqXMqeM4xw1pxrf0892WZazvTlAjJfdZGD03vrtp-HAqzh_XC6GK1UptiezAgWUg4kZL8SQZCEooFZ5a8_0Uut4dqY78BAQ8DIggOLCQbSFdbY6qihF21WKvqBARDrRuWUFuF2irUuuFbNxxt9LmJfi5WxenfORhHvdf6aAvcpmBh9sXxXKCqd_ADFgiYjwaQyN58mok3oOwLi8yOjg</recordid><startdate>201009</startdate><enddate>201009</enddate><creator>CANDLER, GAYLORD GEORGE</creator><creator>AZEVÊDO, ARISTON</creator><creator>ALBERNAZ, RENATA OVENHAUSEN</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201009</creationdate><title>TOWARDS GLOBAL SCHOLARSHIP IN PUBLIC AFFAIRS</title><author>CANDLER, GAYLORD GEORGE ; AZEVÊDO, ARISTON ; ALBERNAZ, RENATA OVENHAUSEN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-58788f8ab296aae895654f06a0f2bc8cb254b4030ca4cc6bb68fbc54bc2158463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Academic discipline</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Center and Periphery</topic><topic>Colonialism</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Integrated approach</topic><topic>Intellectual development</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Public Administration</topic><topic>Public Services</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CANDLER, GAYLORD GEORGE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AZEVÊDO, ARISTON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALBERNAZ, RENATA OVENHAUSEN</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Public administration (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CANDLER, GAYLORD GEORGE</au><au>AZEVÊDO, ARISTON</au><au>ALBERNAZ, RENATA OVENHAUSEN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>TOWARDS GLOBAL SCHOLARSHIP IN PUBLIC AFFAIRS</atitle><jtitle>Public administration (London)</jtitle><date>2010-09</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>836</spage><epage>850</epage><pages>836-850</pages><issn>0033-3298</issn><eissn>1467-9299</eissn><coden>PUADDD</coden><abstract>One can imagine two futures for public administration, public management and public service around the world. A first would be what we see as a continuation of the status quo: with public administration essentially continuing as a series of national discourses, with perhaps a bit of cross‐fertilization, but with this characterized by a classic core‐periphery model. The preferable model, outlined in this paper, would see the development of an integrated community of scholars of public affairs.
At least three hurdles need to be overcome to arrive at this integrated community. A first concerns the tension in the periphery between an epistemic nationalism and epistemic colonialism. The second hurdle to be overcome concerns the central role of the American literature in intellectual discourse in public administration. A third hurdle is more specific to public administration: what Canadian Iain Gow has referred to as public administration's profile, as ‘une science empirique par excellence’.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01842.x</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-3298 |
| ispartof | Public administration (London), 2010-09, Vol.88 (3), p.836-850 |
| issn | 0033-3298 1467-9299 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839141881 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; Political Science Complete |
| subjects | Academic discipline Canada Center and Periphery Colonialism Discourse Empirical research Epistemology Globalization Integrated approach Intellectual development Intellectuals Management Nationalism Profiles Public Administration Public Services Studies |
| title | TOWARDS GLOBAL SCHOLARSHIP IN PUBLIC AFFAIRS |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A54%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=TOWARDS%20GLOBAL%20SCHOLARSHIP%20IN%20PUBLIC%20AFFAIRS&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20(London)&rft.au=CANDLER,%20GAYLORD%20GEORGE&rft.date=2010-09&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=836&rft.epage=850&rft.pages=836-850&rft.issn=0033-3298&rft.eissn=1467-9299&rft.coden=PUADDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01842.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E839141881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=749715107&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |