Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don't Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward From Here
We examine the current state of the social entrepreneurship literature, asking what is unique about social entrepreneurship and what avenues create opportunities for the future of the field. After an evaluation of social entrepreneurship definitions and comparison of social entrepreneurship to other...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Academy of Management perspectives 2010-08, Vol.24 (3), p.37-57 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 57 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Academy of Management perspectives |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Dacin, Peter A Dacin, M Tina Matear, Margaret |
description | We examine the current state of the social entrepreneurship literature, asking what is unique about social entrepreneurship and what avenues create opportunities for the future of the field. After an evaluation of social entrepreneurship definitions and comparison of social entrepreneurship to other forms, we conclude that while it is not a distinct type of entrepreneurship, researchers stand to benefit most from further research on social entrepreneurship as a context in which established types of entrepreneurs operate. We demonstrate these opportunities by describing avenues for further inquiry that emerge when examining valuable assumptions and insights from existing theories inherent in conventional, cultural, and institutional entrepreneurship frameworks and integrating these insights in ways that address the unique phenomena that exist in the context of social entrepreneurship. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.5465/AMP.2010.52842950 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839140784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2133044041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-cb9a6fc1512733e614d8d3364e8f6f88a3b5c34ad2ce1f016f4cbf8ff6ecc29d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEFLwzAYhosoOKc_wFvwslNn0iRt4m3MzQmbCk6Gp5ClX1hH18ykdezf2zK9eHq_Fx4-Xp4ouiV4yFnK70eLt2GCu5YIlkiOz6IekYzGjCfyvL05F7HEAl9GVyFsMWaM8awXfb47U-gSTaraw95DBY0Pm2L_gFabI1oBenTVoEYvADnSbRzQcgPOH5GucjRzhw5ZuG9AU-cP2udo6t0OzcDDdXRhdRng5jf70cd0shzP4vnr0_N4NI8NFbSOzVrq1BrCSZJRCilhucgpTRkIm1ohNF1zQ5nOEwPEYpJaZtZWWJuCMYnMaT8anP7uvftqINRqVwQDZakrcE1QgkrCcCZYS979I7eu8VU7TmVMihRjLFqInCDjXQgerNr7Yqf9URGsOtWqVa061epPNf0BButwCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>749860008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don't Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward From Here</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Dacin, Peter A ; Dacin, M Tina ; Matear, Margaret</creator><creatorcontrib>Dacin, Peter A ; Dacin, M Tina ; Matear, Margaret</creatorcontrib><description>We examine the current state of the social entrepreneurship literature, asking what is unique about social entrepreneurship and what avenues create opportunities for the future of the field. After an evaluation of social entrepreneurship definitions and comparison of social entrepreneurship to other forms, we conclude that while it is not a distinct type of entrepreneurship, researchers stand to benefit most from further research on social entrepreneurship as a context in which established types of entrepreneurs operate. We demonstrate these opportunities by describing avenues for further inquiry that emerge when examining valuable assumptions and insights from existing theories inherent in conventional, cultural, and institutional entrepreneurship frameworks and integrating these insights in ways that address the unique phenomena that exist in the context of social entrepreneurship. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1558-9080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5465/AMP.2010.52842950</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Briarcliff Manor: Academy of Management</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Contextual analysis ; Corporate social responsibility ; Cultural dynamics ; Economic theory ; Entrepreneurship ; Institutions ; Research programmes ; Review articles ; Social entrepreneurship ; Social responsibility ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Academy of Management perspectives, 2010-08, Vol.24 (3), p.37-57</ispartof><rights>Copyright Academy of Management Aug 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-cb9a6fc1512733e614d8d3364e8f6f88a3b5c34ad2ce1f016f4cbf8ff6ecc29d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dacin, Peter A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dacin, M Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matear, Margaret</creatorcontrib><title>Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don't Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward From Here</title><title>Academy of Management perspectives</title><description>We examine the current state of the social entrepreneurship literature, asking what is unique about social entrepreneurship and what avenues create opportunities for the future of the field. After an evaluation of social entrepreneurship definitions and comparison of social entrepreneurship to other forms, we conclude that while it is not a distinct type of entrepreneurship, researchers stand to benefit most from further research on social entrepreneurship as a context in which established types of entrepreneurs operate. We demonstrate these opportunities by describing avenues for further inquiry that emerge when examining valuable assumptions and insights from existing theories inherent in conventional, cultural, and institutional entrepreneurship frameworks and integrating these insights in ways that address the unique phenomena that exist in the context of social entrepreneurship. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Contextual analysis</subject><subject>Corporate social responsibility</subject><subject>Cultural dynamics</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Research programmes</subject><subject>Review articles</subject><subject>Social entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1558-9080</issn><issn>1943-4529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEFLwzAYhosoOKc_wFvwslNn0iRt4m3MzQmbCk6Gp5ClX1hH18ykdezf2zK9eHq_Fx4-Xp4ouiV4yFnK70eLt2GCu5YIlkiOz6IekYzGjCfyvL05F7HEAl9GVyFsMWaM8awXfb47U-gSTaraw95DBY0Pm2L_gFabI1oBenTVoEYvADnSbRzQcgPOH5GucjRzhw5ZuG9AU-cP2udo6t0OzcDDdXRhdRng5jf70cd0shzP4vnr0_N4NI8NFbSOzVrq1BrCSZJRCilhucgpTRkIm1ohNF1zQ5nOEwPEYpJaZtZWWJuCMYnMaT8anP7uvftqINRqVwQDZakrcE1QgkrCcCZYS979I7eu8VU7TmVMihRjLFqInCDjXQgerNr7Yqf9URGsOtWqVa061epPNf0BButwCg</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Dacin, Peter A</creator><creator>Dacin, M Tina</creator><creator>Matear, Margaret</creator><general>Academy of Management</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don't Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward From Here</title><author>Dacin, Peter A ; Dacin, M Tina ; Matear, Margaret</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-cb9a6fc1512733e614d8d3364e8f6f88a3b5c34ad2ce1f016f4cbf8ff6ecc29d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Contextual analysis</topic><topic>Corporate social responsibility</topic><topic>Cultural dynamics</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Research programmes</topic><topic>Review articles</topic><topic>Social entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dacin, Peter A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dacin, M Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matear, Margaret</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Academy of Management perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dacin, Peter A</au><au>Dacin, M Tina</au><au>Matear, Margaret</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don't Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward From Here</atitle><jtitle>Academy of Management perspectives</jtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>37-57</pages><issn>1558-9080</issn><eissn>1943-4529</eissn><abstract>We examine the current state of the social entrepreneurship literature, asking what is unique about social entrepreneurship and what avenues create opportunities for the future of the field. After an evaluation of social entrepreneurship definitions and comparison of social entrepreneurship to other forms, we conclude that while it is not a distinct type of entrepreneurship, researchers stand to benefit most from further research on social entrepreneurship as a context in which established types of entrepreneurs operate. We demonstrate these opportunities by describing avenues for further inquiry that emerge when examining valuable assumptions and insights from existing theories inherent in conventional, cultural, and institutional entrepreneurship frameworks and integrating these insights in ways that address the unique phenomena that exist in the context of social entrepreneurship. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Briarcliff Manor</cop><pub>Academy of Management</pub><doi>10.5465/AMP.2010.52842950</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1558-9080 |
ispartof | Academy of Management perspectives, 2010-08, Vol.24 (3), p.37-57 |
issn | 1558-9080 1943-4529 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839140784 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Comparative analysis Contextual analysis Corporate social responsibility Cultural dynamics Economic theory Entrepreneurship Institutions Research programmes Review articles Social entrepreneurship Social responsibility Studies |
title | Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don't Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward From Here |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T16%3A58%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20Entrepreneurship:%20Why%20We%20Don't%20Need%20a%20New%20Theory%20and%20How%20We%20Move%20Forward%20From%20Here&rft.jtitle=Academy%20of%20Management%20perspectives&rft.au=Dacin,%20Peter%20A&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=37-57&rft.issn=1558-9080&rft.eissn=1943-4529&rft_id=info:doi/10.5465/AMP.2010.52842950&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2133044041%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=749860008&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |