State income taxes and economic growth
This article explores the impact of tax policy on economic growth in the states within the framework of an endogenous growth model. Regression analysis is used to estimate the impact of taxes on economic growth in the states from 1964 to 2004. The analysis reveals a significant negative impact of hi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Cato journal 2008-01, Vol.28 (1), p.53-71 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 71 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 53 |
container_title | The Cato journal |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Poulson, Barry W Kaplan, Jules Gordon |
description | This article explores the impact of tax policy on economic growth in the states within the framework of an endogenous growth model. Regression analysis is used to estimate the impact of taxes on economic growth in the states from 1964 to 2004. The analysis reveals a significant negative impact of higher marginal tax rates on economic growth. The analysis underscores the importance of controlling for regressivity, convergence, and regional influences in isolating the effect of taxes on economic growth in the states. Most states introduced an income tax and came to rely on the income tax as the primary source of revenue. Jurisdictions that imposed an income tax to generate a given level of revenue experienced lower rates of economic growth relative to jurisdictions that relied on alternative taxes to generate the same revenue. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839133840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A179241460</galeid><sourcerecordid>A179241460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g299t-9d809ec9c0adddcc48388a7dbf8045ea2d3f0479caafa7e58f7983efdcdbb0953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhoMoWKv_IXiop8h-JjvHUvyCggf1HKa7szEl3dVkg_58U-pJiszhHYbnnZeZk2zGQclCqtKcZjMmqqlnlTjPLoZhyxgXmstZtnhJmChvg407yhN-05BjcDnZGOKutXnTx6_0fpmdeewGuvrVefZ2f_e6eizWzw9Pq-W6aARAKsAZBmTBMnTOWauMNAYrt_GGKU0onPRMVWARPVakja_ASPLOus2GgZbz7Oaw96OPnyMNqd61g6Wuw0BxHGojgUtpFJvIxb-kBsNKXvIJvP4DbuPYh-mKmoPWAILtc4sD1GBHdRt8TD3ahgL12MVAvp3GS16BUFyV-_TbI_xUjqanHTH8ADuYd_4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195599205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>State income taxes and economic growth</title><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete (BSC) 商管财经类全文数据库(完整版)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Columbia International Affairs Online Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EZB*</source><creator>Poulson, Barry W ; Kaplan, Jules Gordon</creator><creatorcontrib>Poulson, Barry W ; Kaplan, Jules Gordon</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores the impact of tax policy on economic growth in the states within the framework of an endogenous growth model. Regression analysis is used to estimate the impact of taxes on economic growth in the states from 1964 to 2004. The analysis reveals a significant negative impact of higher marginal tax rates on economic growth. The analysis underscores the importance of controlling for regressivity, convergence, and regional influences in isolating the effect of taxes on economic growth in the states. Most states introduced an income tax and came to rely on the income tax as the primary source of revenue. Jurisdictions that imposed an income tax to generate a given level of revenue experienced lower rates of economic growth relative to jurisdictions that relied on alternative taxes to generate the same revenue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-3072</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3468</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CAJODC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Cato Institute</publisher><subject>20th century ; Economic Development ; Economic growth ; Economic impact ; Endogenous growth ; Fiscal policy ; Forecasts and trends ; Growth models ; Hypotheses ; Income tax ; Income taxes ; Influence ; Interpretation and construction ; Jurisdiction ; Manufacturing ; National income ; Per capita ; Public finance ; Public policy ; Regression analysis ; Service industries ; State taxes ; States (Political Subdivisions) ; Tax base ; Tax policy ; Tax rates ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>The Cato journal, 2008-01, Vol.28 (1), p.53-71</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 Cato Institute</rights><rights>Copyright Cato Institute Winter 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,27866</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poulson, Barry W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Jules Gordon</creatorcontrib><title>State income taxes and economic growth</title><title>The Cato journal</title><description>This article explores the impact of tax policy on economic growth in the states within the framework of an endogenous growth model. Regression analysis is used to estimate the impact of taxes on economic growth in the states from 1964 to 2004. The analysis reveals a significant negative impact of higher marginal tax rates on economic growth. The analysis underscores the importance of controlling for regressivity, convergence, and regional influences in isolating the effect of taxes on economic growth in the states. Most states introduced an income tax and came to rely on the income tax as the primary source of revenue. Jurisdictions that imposed an income tax to generate a given level of revenue experienced lower rates of economic growth relative to jurisdictions that relied on alternative taxes to generate the same revenue.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Endogenous growth</subject><subject>Fiscal policy</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Growth models</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Income tax</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Interpretation and construction</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>National income</subject><subject>Per capita</subject><subject>Public finance</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Service industries</subject><subject>State taxes</subject><subject>States (Political Subdivisions)</subject><subject>Tax base</subject><subject>Tax policy</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>0273-3072</issn><issn>1943-3468</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhoMoWKv_IXiop8h-JjvHUvyCggf1HKa7szEl3dVkg_58U-pJiszhHYbnnZeZk2zGQclCqtKcZjMmqqlnlTjPLoZhyxgXmstZtnhJmChvg407yhN-05BjcDnZGOKutXnTx6_0fpmdeewGuvrVefZ2f_e6eizWzw9Pq-W6aARAKsAZBmTBMnTOWauMNAYrt_GGKU0onPRMVWARPVakja_ASPLOus2GgZbz7Oaw96OPnyMNqd61g6Wuw0BxHGojgUtpFJvIxb-kBsNKXvIJvP4DbuPYh-mKmoPWAILtc4sD1GBHdRt8TD3ahgL12MVAvp3GS16BUFyV-_TbI_xUjqanHTH8ADuYd_4</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Poulson, Barry W</creator><creator>Kaplan, Jules Gordon</creator><general>Cato Institute</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>State income taxes and economic growth</title><author>Poulson, Barry W ; Kaplan, Jules Gordon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g299t-9d809ec9c0adddcc48388a7dbf8045ea2d3f0479caafa7e58f7983efdcdbb0953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Endogenous growth</topic><topic>Fiscal policy</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Growth models</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Income tax</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Interpretation and construction</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>National income</topic><topic>Per capita</topic><topic>Public finance</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Service industries</topic><topic>State taxes</topic><topic>States (Political Subdivisions)</topic><topic>Tax base</topic><topic>Tax policy</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poulson, Barry W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Jules Gordon</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Cato journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poulson, Barry W</au><au>Kaplan, Jules Gordon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>State income taxes and economic growth</atitle><jtitle>The Cato journal</jtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>53-71</pages><issn>0273-3072</issn><eissn>1943-3468</eissn><coden>CAJODC</coden><abstract>This article explores the impact of tax policy on economic growth in the states within the framework of an endogenous growth model. Regression analysis is used to estimate the impact of taxes on economic growth in the states from 1964 to 2004. The analysis reveals a significant negative impact of higher marginal tax rates on economic growth. The analysis underscores the importance of controlling for regressivity, convergence, and regional influences in isolating the effect of taxes on economic growth in the states. Most states introduced an income tax and came to rely on the income tax as the primary source of revenue. Jurisdictions that imposed an income tax to generate a given level of revenue experienced lower rates of economic growth relative to jurisdictions that relied on alternative taxes to generate the same revenue.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Cato Institute</pub><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0273-3072 |
ispartof | The Cato journal, 2008-01, Vol.28 (1), p.53-71 |
issn | 0273-3072 1943-3468 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839133840 |
source | EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Business Source Complete (BSC) 商管财经类全文数据库(完整版); PAIS Index; Columbia International Affairs Online Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EZB* |
subjects | 20th century Economic Development Economic growth Economic impact Endogenous growth Fiscal policy Forecasts and trends Growth models Hypotheses Income tax Income taxes Influence Interpretation and construction Jurisdiction Manufacturing National income Per capita Public finance Public policy Regression analysis Service industries State taxes States (Political Subdivisions) Tax base Tax policy Tax rates Taxation |
title | State income taxes and economic growth |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A14%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State%20income%20taxes%20and%20economic%20growth&rft.jtitle=The%20Cato%20journal&rft.au=Poulson,%20Barry%20W&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=53-71&rft.issn=0273-3072&rft.eissn=1943-3468&rft.coden=CAJODC&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA179241460%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195599205&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A179241460&rfr_iscdi=true |