CONTEMPORARY PENAL TRENDS: Modern or Postmodern?
The postmodern argument in the punishment literature is in its formative beginnings. The achievements in applying a postmodern framework to the study of punishment, thus far, have been speculative and empirically narrow. Consequently, a question that remains is 'do postmodern or modern concepti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of criminology 1998, Vol.38 (1), p.106-123 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 123 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 106 |
| container_title | British journal of criminology |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Lucken, Karol |
| description | The postmodern argument in the punishment literature is in its formative beginnings. The achievements in applying a postmodern framework to the study of punishment, thus far, have been speculative and empirically narrow. Consequently, a question that remains is 'do postmodern or modern conceptions capture the form and function of contemporary penality'? The current study addresses this question by exploring contemporary penality as it exists for those working in the penal system. Three salient trends are identified, penality as a balancing act, corporate penality, and offender subsidization of penality. A modern and postmodern interpretation are considered in the analysis of these trends. It is concluded that contemporary penality is not qualitatively different from past penality, and therefore, is best understood in the context of modernity. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014215 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839123649</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A20402320</galeid><jstor_id>23638585</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A20402320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-2e8bcbe78f157161cbbe3a0340a472c86dee7e911d54a21372587ce7eb48f3b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ltrE0EUAOBBLBirP0FYKuhLN8790hcJaayFNAkxPvg0zM6eLRs2O3VmA_rvnZhWUKoyD8M5fGcuh4PQGcFjgg17F741IdbbsI-969K42vqxw4RTIp6gEeGSl0xQ8xSNMMaqxEaIZ-h5StscSsPJCOHpcrGZ3ayW68n6S7GaLSbzYrOeLS4_XRQ3oYbYFyEWq5CG3c_o_Qt00uSr4OX9foo-f5htph_L-fLqejqZl15IMZQUdOUrULohQhFJfFUBc5hx7LiiXssaQIEhpBbcUcIUFVr5nKq4blhF2Sl6ezz3Loave0iD3bXJQ9e5HsI-Wc0MoUxyk-Wbf0qZ_8q4wP-FQskD4xme_QEfOmyJMZya3LyMXv8VSc2UJobLrM6P6tZ1YNu-CUN0_hZ6iK4LPTRtTk8o5pgyenhi-QjPq4Zd6x_zF0fvY0gpQmPvYrtz8bsl2B4mxP4-ITZPiL2fkFz86li8TUOIvypzV5kWWrAfpha5Gg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683781946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CONTEMPORARY PENAL TRENDS: Modern or Postmodern?</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Lucken, Karol</creator><creatorcontrib>Lucken, Karol</creatorcontrib><description>The postmodern argument in the punishment literature is in its formative beginnings. The achievements in applying a postmodern framework to the study of punishment, thus far, have been speculative and empirically narrow. Consequently, a question that remains is 'do postmodern or modern conceptions capture the form and function of contemporary penality'? The current study addresses this question by exploring contemporary penality as it exists for those working in the penal system. Three salient trends are identified, penality as a balancing act, corporate penality, and offender subsidization of penality. A modern and postmodern interpretation are considered in the analysis of these trends. It is concluded that contemporary penality is not qualitatively different from past penality, and therefore, is best understood in the context of modernity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0955</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014215</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJCDAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes ; Correctional institutions ; Correctional Personnel ; Correctional System ; Corrections ; Criminal justice ; Criminal Justice Policy ; Criminal law ; Criminal probation ; Criminal punishment ; Criminal sentences ; Criminals ; Criminology ; Fees ; Florida ; Influences ; Modernity ; Penal policy ; Postmodern philosophy ; Postmodernism ; Prisoners ; Prisons ; Punishment ; Social Theories ; Trends</subject><ispartof>British journal of criminology, 1998, Vol.38 (1), p.106-123</ispartof><rights>The Institute for the Study and Treatment of Delinquency 1998</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1998 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Winter 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-2e8bcbe78f157161cbbe3a0340a472c86dee7e911d54a21372587ce7eb48f3b23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23638585$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23638585$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4024,27869,27923,27924,27925,31000,33774,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lucken, Karol</creatorcontrib><title>CONTEMPORARY PENAL TRENDS: Modern or Postmodern?</title><title>British journal of criminology</title><description>The postmodern argument in the punishment literature is in its formative beginnings. The achievements in applying a postmodern framework to the study of punishment, thus far, have been speculative and empirically narrow. Consequently, a question that remains is 'do postmodern or modern conceptions capture the form and function of contemporary penality'? The current study addresses this question by exploring contemporary penality as it exists for those working in the penal system. Three salient trends are identified, penality as a balancing act, corporate penality, and offender subsidization of penality. A modern and postmodern interpretation are considered in the analysis of these trends. It is concluded that contemporary penality is not qualitatively different from past penality, and therefore, is best understood in the context of modernity.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</subject><subject>Correctional institutions</subject><subject>Correctional Personnel</subject><subject>Correctional System</subject><subject>Corrections</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminal Justice Policy</subject><subject>Criminal law</subject><subject>Criminal probation</subject><subject>Criminal punishment</subject><subject>Criminal sentences</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Criminology</subject><subject>Fees</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Influences</subject><subject>Modernity</subject><subject>Penal policy</subject><subject>Postmodern philosophy</subject><subject>Postmodernism</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Prisons</subject><subject>Punishment</subject><subject>Social Theories</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0007-0955</issn><issn>1464-3529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ltrE0EUAOBBLBirP0FYKuhLN8790hcJaayFNAkxPvg0zM6eLRs2O3VmA_rvnZhWUKoyD8M5fGcuh4PQGcFjgg17F741IdbbsI-969K42vqxw4RTIp6gEeGSl0xQ8xSNMMaqxEaIZ-h5StscSsPJCOHpcrGZ3ayW68n6S7GaLSbzYrOeLS4_XRQ3oYbYFyEWq5CG3c_o_Qt00uSr4OX9foo-f5htph_L-fLqejqZl15IMZQUdOUrULohQhFJfFUBc5hx7LiiXssaQIEhpBbcUcIUFVr5nKq4blhF2Sl6ezz3Loave0iD3bXJQ9e5HsI-Wc0MoUxyk-Wbf0qZ_8q4wP-FQskD4xme_QEfOmyJMZya3LyMXv8VSc2UJobLrM6P6tZ1YNu-CUN0_hZ6iK4LPTRtTk8o5pgyenhi-QjPq4Zd6x_zF0fvY0gpQmPvYrtz8bsl2B4mxP4-ITZPiL2fkFz86li8TUOIvypzV5kWWrAfpha5Gg</recordid><startdate>1998</startdate><enddate>1998</enddate><creator>Lucken, Karol</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Stevens</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FMSEA</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>ICWRT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1998</creationdate><title>CONTEMPORARY PENAL TRENDS: Modern or Postmodern?</title><author>Lucken, Karol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-2e8bcbe78f157161cbbe3a0340a472c86dee7e911d54a21372587ce7eb48f3b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</topic><topic>Correctional institutions</topic><topic>Correctional Personnel</topic><topic>Correctional System</topic><topic>Corrections</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminal Justice Policy</topic><topic>Criminal law</topic><topic>Criminal probation</topic><topic>Criminal punishment</topic><topic>Criminal sentences</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Criminology</topic><topic>Fees</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Influences</topic><topic>Modernity</topic><topic>Penal policy</topic><topic>Postmodern philosophy</topic><topic>Postmodernism</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Prisons</topic><topic>Punishment</topic><topic>Social Theories</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lucken, Karol</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 05</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 28</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>British journal of criminology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lucken, Karol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CONTEMPORARY PENAL TRENDS: Modern or Postmodern?</atitle><jtitle>British journal of criminology</jtitle><date>1998</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>106</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>106-123</pages><issn>0007-0955</issn><eissn>1464-3529</eissn><coden>BJCDAR</coden><abstract>The postmodern argument in the punishment literature is in its formative beginnings. The achievements in applying a postmodern framework to the study of punishment, thus far, have been speculative and empirically narrow. Consequently, a question that remains is 'do postmodern or modern conceptions capture the form and function of contemporary penality'? The current study addresses this question by exploring contemporary penality as it exists for those working in the penal system. Three salient trends are identified, penality as a balancing act, corporate penality, and offender subsidization of penality. A modern and postmodern interpretation are considered in the analysis of these trends. It is concluded that contemporary penality is not qualitatively different from past penality, and therefore, is best understood in the context of modernity.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014215</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0007-0955 |
| ispartof | British journal of criminology, 1998, Vol.38 (1), p.106-123 |
| issn | 0007-0955 1464-3529 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839123649 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); JSTOR |
| subjects | Analysis Beliefs, opinions and attitudes Correctional institutions Correctional Personnel Correctional System Corrections Criminal justice Criminal Justice Policy Criminal law Criminal probation Criminal punishment Criminal sentences Criminals Criminology Fees Florida Influences Modernity Penal policy Postmodern philosophy Postmodernism Prisoners Prisons Punishment Social Theories Trends |
| title | CONTEMPORARY PENAL TRENDS: Modern or Postmodern? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A16%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CONTEMPORARY%20PENAL%20TRENDS:%20Modern%20or%20Postmodern?&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20criminology&rft.au=Lucken,%20Karol&rft.date=1998&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=106&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=106-123&rft.issn=0007-0955&rft.eissn=1464-3529&rft.coden=BJCDAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014215&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA20402320%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683781946&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A20402320&rft_jstor_id=23638585&rfr_iscdi=true |