Police interviewing and psychological vulnerabilities: predicting the likelihood of a confession

This paper is concerned with examining the differences between people who confess and those who deny offences during a police interview. The main hypothesis under investigation is that psychologically vulnerable suspects are particularly likely to confess. This paper is also concerned with identifyi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of community & applied social psychology 1998-01, Vol.8 (1), p.1-21
Hauptverfasser: Pearse, J., Gudjonsson, G. H., Clare, I. C. H., Rutter, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of community & applied social psychology
container_volume 8
creator Pearse, J.
Gudjonsson, G. H.
Clare, I. C. H.
Rutter, S.
description This paper is concerned with examining the differences between people who confess and those who deny offences during a police interview. The main hypothesis under investigation is that psychologically vulnerable suspects are particularly likely to confess. This paper is also concerned with identifying variables that might be related to the confession process. One hundred and sixty suspects detained at two London police stations were assessed psychologically prior to being interviewed by the police. The results of this assessment, an analysis of the interview procedure and biographic details were subjected to a logistic regression analysis. There was no evidence to support our main hypothesis. However, suspects were more likely to confess if they reported having consumed an illicit (non‐prescribed) drug in the previous 24‐hour period, and less likely to confess when interviewed in the presence of a legal adviser or if they had experience of prison or custodial remand. In this study younger suspects were also more likely to confess. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(199801/02)8:1<1::AID-CASP435>3.0.CO;2-D
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839114279</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>839114279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4465-cee0c281e203e0891b384e631547d510bbb7b556e81e226893b8f0d293cfdcaa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV9v0zAUxSMEEmPwHfKAYHtI5z9xYhcEKikrlQadNNAQLxfHuVnNvLjE6Ua__RK19AUE8oOv7J_Psc6JoreUjCgh7OToYl7MjylRKqFMySOqlCT0hLBjOaav6Xg8mU-TYnJxnnLxho_IqFi8Ysn0QXSwf_NwmAVLFJPp4-hJCD8IIZkS2UH0_dw7azC2TYftrcU721zFuqniVdiYpXf-yhrt4tu1a7DVpXW2sxjG8arFyppuoLslxs5eo7NL76vY17GOjW9qDMH65mn0qNYu4LPdfhh9OX3_ufiQnC1m82Jylpg0zURiEIlhkiIjHIlUtOQyxYxTkeaVoKQsy7wUIsMBYZlUvJQ1qZjipq6M1vwwernVXbX-5xpDBzc2GHRON-jXASRXlKYsVz354p-kyHORs5z04OUWNK0PocUaVq290e0GKIGhG4ChGxhyhiFn2HYD_U0_9wv6bmDXDXAgUCyAwbRXfr77gg59vHWrG2PDXp7RXDApeuzbFruzDjd_uP_H_O_ev4968WQrbkOHv_biur2GLOe5gMtPMyjeiY9fpySFGb8HnbO_6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57757270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Police interviewing and psychological vulnerabilities: predicting the likelihood of a confession</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Pearse, J. ; Gudjonsson, G. H. ; Clare, I. C. H. ; Rutter, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pearse, J. ; Gudjonsson, G. H. ; Clare, I. C. H. ; Rutter, S.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is concerned with examining the differences between people who confess and those who deny offences during a police interview. The main hypothesis under investigation is that psychologically vulnerable suspects are particularly likely to confess. This paper is also concerned with identifying variables that might be related to the confession process. One hundred and sixty suspects detained at two London police stations were assessed psychologically prior to being interviewed by the police. The results of this assessment, an analysis of the interview procedure and biographic details were subjected to a logistic regression analysis. There was no evidence to support our main hypothesis. However, suspects were more likely to confess if they reported having consumed an illicit (non‐prescribed) drug in the previous 24‐hour period, and less likely to confess when interviewed in the presence of a legal adviser or if they had experience of prison or custodial remand. In this study younger suspects were also more likely to confess. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-9284</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(199801/02)8:1&lt;1::AID-CASP435&gt;3.0.CO;2-D</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLCPEX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; confession ; confession, denial, psychological vulnerabilities, drug use ; Confessions ; Criminal justice ; denial ; Drug abuse ; drug use ; England ; Interviews ; Lawyers ; London ; Medical sciences ; Offenders ; Police ; Psychological aspects ; psychological vulnerabilities ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Social behavior disorders. Criminal behavior. Delinquency</subject><ispartof>Journal of community &amp; applied social psychology, 1998-01, Vol.8 (1), p.1-21</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4465-cee0c281e203e0891b384e631547d510bbb7b556e81e226893b8f0d293cfdcaa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291099-1298%28199801%2F02%298%3A1%3C1%3A%3AAID-CASP435%3E3.0.CO%3B2-D$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291099-1298%28199801%2F02%298%3A1%3C1%3A%3AAID-CASP435%3E3.0.CO%3B2-D$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,4025,27925,27926,27927,31002,45576,45577</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2175285$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pearse, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gudjonsson, G. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clare, I. C. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutter, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Police interviewing and psychological vulnerabilities: predicting the likelihood of a confession</title><title>Journal of community &amp; applied social psychology</title><addtitle>J. Community. Appl. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><description>This paper is concerned with examining the differences between people who confess and those who deny offences during a police interview. The main hypothesis under investigation is that psychologically vulnerable suspects are particularly likely to confess. This paper is also concerned with identifying variables that might be related to the confession process. One hundred and sixty suspects detained at two London police stations were assessed psychologically prior to being interviewed by the police. The results of this assessment, an analysis of the interview procedure and biographic details were subjected to a logistic regression analysis. There was no evidence to support our main hypothesis. However, suspects were more likely to confess if they reported having consumed an illicit (non‐prescribed) drug in the previous 24‐hour period, and less likely to confess when interviewed in the presence of a legal adviser or if they had experience of prison or custodial remand. In this study younger suspects were also more likely to confess. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>confession</subject><subject>confession, denial, psychological vulnerabilities, drug use</subject><subject>Confessions</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>denial</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>drug use</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Lawyers</subject><subject>London</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Offenders</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>psychological vulnerabilities</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Social behavior disorders. Criminal behavior. Delinquency</subject><issn>1052-9284</issn><issn>1099-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV9v0zAUxSMEEmPwHfKAYHtI5z9xYhcEKikrlQadNNAQLxfHuVnNvLjE6Ua__RK19AUE8oOv7J_Psc6JoreUjCgh7OToYl7MjylRKqFMySOqlCT0hLBjOaav6Xg8mU-TYnJxnnLxho_IqFi8Ysn0QXSwf_NwmAVLFJPp4-hJCD8IIZkS2UH0_dw7azC2TYftrcU721zFuqniVdiYpXf-yhrt4tu1a7DVpXW2sxjG8arFyppuoLslxs5eo7NL76vY17GOjW9qDMH65mn0qNYu4LPdfhh9OX3_ufiQnC1m82Jylpg0zURiEIlhkiIjHIlUtOQyxYxTkeaVoKQsy7wUIsMBYZlUvJQ1qZjipq6M1vwwernVXbX-5xpDBzc2GHRON-jXASRXlKYsVz354p-kyHORs5z04OUWNK0PocUaVq290e0GKIGhG4ChGxhyhiFn2HYD_U0_9wv6bmDXDXAgUCyAwbRXfr77gg59vHWrG2PDXp7RXDApeuzbFruzDjd_uP_H_O_ev4968WQrbkOHv_biur2GLOe5gMtPMyjeiY9fpySFGb8HnbO_6Q</recordid><startdate>199801</startdate><enddate>199801</enddate><creator>Pearse, J.</creator><creator>Gudjonsson, G. H.</creator><creator>Clare, I. C. H.</creator><creator>Rutter, S.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199801</creationdate><title>Police interviewing and psychological vulnerabilities: predicting the likelihood of a confession</title><author>Pearse, J. ; Gudjonsson, G. H. ; Clare, I. C. H. ; Rutter, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4465-cee0c281e203e0891b384e631547d510bbb7b556e81e226893b8f0d293cfdcaa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>confession</topic><topic>confession, denial, psychological vulnerabilities, drug use</topic><topic>Confessions</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>denial</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>drug use</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Lawyers</topic><topic>London</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Offenders</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>psychological vulnerabilities</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Social behavior disorders. Criminal behavior. Delinquency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pearse, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gudjonsson, G. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clare, I. C. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutter, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of community &amp; applied social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pearse, J.</au><au>Gudjonsson, G. H.</au><au>Clare, I. C. H.</au><au>Rutter, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Police interviewing and psychological vulnerabilities: predicting the likelihood of a confession</atitle><jtitle>Journal of community &amp; applied social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Community. Appl. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><date>1998-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>1-21</pages><issn>1052-9284</issn><eissn>1099-1298</eissn><coden>JLCPEX</coden><abstract>This paper is concerned with examining the differences between people who confess and those who deny offences during a police interview. The main hypothesis under investigation is that psychologically vulnerable suspects are particularly likely to confess. This paper is also concerned with identifying variables that might be related to the confession process. One hundred and sixty suspects detained at two London police stations were assessed psychologically prior to being interviewed by the police. The results of this assessment, an analysis of the interview procedure and biographic details were subjected to a logistic regression analysis. There was no evidence to support our main hypothesis. However, suspects were more likely to confess if they reported having consumed an illicit (non‐prescribed) drug in the previous 24‐hour period, and less likely to confess when interviewed in the presence of a legal adviser or if they had experience of prison or custodial remand. In this study younger suspects were also more likely to confess. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(199801/02)8:1&lt;1::AID-CASP435&gt;3.0.CO;2-D</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-9284
ispartof Journal of community & applied social psychology, 1998-01, Vol.8 (1), p.1-21
issn 1052-9284
1099-1298
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839114279
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Biological and medical sciences
confession
confession, denial, psychological vulnerabilities, drug use
Confessions
Criminal justice
denial
Drug abuse
drug use
England
Interviews
Lawyers
London
Medical sciences
Offenders
Police
Psychological aspects
psychological vulnerabilities
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Social behavior disorders. Criminal behavior. Delinquency
title Police interviewing and psychological vulnerabilities: predicting the likelihood of a confession
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T20%3A28%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Police%20interviewing%20and%20psychological%20vulnerabilities:%20predicting%20the%20likelihood%20of%20a%20confession&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20community%20&%20applied%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Pearse,%20J.&rft.date=1998-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=1-21&rft.issn=1052-9284&rft.eissn=1099-1298&rft.coden=JLCPEX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(199801/02)8:1%3C1::AID-CASP435%3E3.0.CO;2-D&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E839114279%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57757270&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true