The Hong Kong Government's Strategy for Promoting Home Ownership - An Approach to Reducing the Decommodifying Effects of Public Housing Services
The Hong Kong Government is a well‐known believer in laissez faire values and capitalism. However, it provides massive public housing programmes. In order to reduce the adverse effects of the public housing programmes on capitalism, it has tried to promote the recommodification of public housing by...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of urban and regional research 1997-12, Vol.21 (4), p.537-553 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 553 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 537 |
container_title | International journal of urban and regional research |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Yu, Sam Wai Kam |
description | The Hong Kong Government is a well‐known believer in laissez faire values and capitalism. However, it provides massive public housing programmes. In order to reduce the adverse effects of the public housing programmes on capitalism, it has tried to promote the recommodification of public housing by encouraging and assisting public housing tenants to become home owners. The aim of this paper is to study the Hong Kong Government’s measures for promoting home ownership. It is argued that these measures are not very effective in reducing the decommodifying effects of the public housing services. Despite the fact that these measures aim to reduce people’s dependence on the government and to help them to re‐establish their relation with the private market, they are paradoxically also a kind of decommodification — people can enjoy some benefits independently of how they perform in the private market. Hence, it can be said that the government’s measures for promoting home ownership serve more to change the form than to reduce the degree of the decommodification of the public housing services.
Le gouvernement de Hong Kong est un partisan bien connu du laissez‐faire et du capitalisme. Il fournit néanmoins des programmes massifs de logement public. Afin de réuire les effets adverses que les programmes de logement public ont sur le capitalisme, il a essayé de promouvoir la recommercialisation du logement public en encourageant et en aidant les locataires du logement public à devenir propriétaires. Le but de cet article est d’étudier les mesures que le gouvernement de Hong Kong a prises afin de promouvoir l’accès à la propriété. Cet essai soutient que ces mesures ne sont pas très efficaces pour réduire les effets de décommercialisation qu’ont les services de logement public. Bien qu’elles aient pour but de réduire la dépendance des habitants du gouvernement et de les aider à rétablir leur rapport avec le marché privé, elles sont aussi, paradoxicalement, une espèce de décommercialisation — dont les gens peuvent bénéficier indépendamment de leur performance sur le marché privé. On peut donc dire que les mesures prises par le gouvernement pour promouvoir l'accès à la propriété servent plus à changer la forme de la décommercialisation des services de logement public qu’à en réduire leur niveau. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1468-2427.00100 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839095822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>839095822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6720-f27583cd6d0183dffcc9cce14ea5900cd1b0a10fc4adfb81bc488012063458a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEEkvLmaslJHpKO47txDkubdntbkWrfqjcLK9jd7MkcbCTLfsv-Ml1CNoDB4qlmZHGz_t6ZE0UfcBwjMM5wTTlcUKT7BgAA7yKJvvO62gCBPIYE5y9jd55vwGAhHA6iX7drTWa2-YRLYc0s1vtmlo33ZFHt52TnX7cIWMduna2tl0ZmLmtNbp6arTz67JFMZo2aNq2zkq1Rp1FN7ro1QB2wfpMK1vXtijNbmidG6NV55E16LpfVaUKbr0fbm6125ZK-8PojZGV1-__1IPo_sv53ek8vryaXZxOL2OVZgnEJskYJ6pIC8CcFMYolSulMdWS5QCqwCuQGIyisjArjleKcg44gZRQxiUjB9HR6BsG_9Fr34m69EpXlWx0GElwkkPOeJIE8tM_yRQzymlC_wPELM8YvAiyjBDgZBjy41_gxvauCf8iMKcAKUtxHqiTkVLOeu-0Ea0ra-l2AoMYdkMMmyCGTRC_dyMoFqPC6VarPb6qZLnpnfNiK4hMcEi7EDjPs1DKEDREG4KRTDBGxLqrgxkdzZ7KSu9eeltcLO5vxhniUVb6Tv_cy6T7LtKMZEw8fJ2Js-Rh8W25ZOIzeQbXm-L3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1840065619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Hong Kong Government's Strategy for Promoting Home Ownership - An Approach to Reducing the Decommodifying Effects of Public Housing Services</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Yu, Sam Wai Kam</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Sam Wai Kam</creatorcontrib><description>The Hong Kong Government is a well‐known believer in laissez faire values and capitalism. However, it provides massive public housing programmes. In order to reduce the adverse effects of the public housing programmes on capitalism, it has tried to promote the recommodification of public housing by encouraging and assisting public housing tenants to become home owners. The aim of this paper is to study the Hong Kong Government’s measures for promoting home ownership. It is argued that these measures are not very effective in reducing the decommodifying effects of the public housing services. Despite the fact that these measures aim to reduce people’s dependence on the government and to help them to re‐establish their relation with the private market, they are paradoxically also a kind of decommodification — people can enjoy some benefits independently of how they perform in the private market. Hence, it can be said that the government’s measures for promoting home ownership serve more to change the form than to reduce the degree of the decommodification of the public housing services.
Le gouvernement de Hong Kong est un partisan bien connu du laissez‐faire et du capitalisme. Il fournit néanmoins des programmes massifs de logement public. Afin de réuire les effets adverses que les programmes de logement public ont sur le capitalisme, il a essayé de promouvoir la recommercialisation du logement public en encourageant et en aidant les locataires du logement public à devenir propriétaires. Le but de cet article est d’étudier les mesures que le gouvernement de Hong Kong a prises afin de promouvoir l’accès à la propriété. Cet essai soutient que ces mesures ne sont pas très efficaces pour réduire les effets de décommercialisation qu’ont les services de logement public. Bien qu’elles aient pour but de réduire la dépendance des habitants du gouvernement et de les aider à rétablir leur rapport avec le marché privé, elles sont aussi, paradoxicalement, une espèce de décommercialisation — dont les gens peuvent bénéficier indépendamment de leur performance sur le marché privé. On peut donc dire que les mesures prises par le gouvernement pour promouvoir l'accès à la propriété servent plus à changer la forme de la décommercialisation des services de logement public qu’à en réduire leur niveau.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1317</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00100</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJURDZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><subject>China ; Government ; Government Policy ; Home Ownership ; Hong Kong ; Housing ; Housing market ; Housing Policy ; Ownership ; Promotion ; Public Housing ; Social housing ; Strategies ; Strategy ; Urban development</subject><ispartof>International journal of urban and regional research, 1997-12, Vol.21 (4), p.537-553</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6720-f27583cd6d0183dffcc9cce14ea5900cd1b0a10fc4adfb81bc488012063458a53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1468-2427.00100$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1468-2427.00100$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,3994,27846,27901,27902,30977,33752,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/blaijurrs/v_3a21_3ay_3a1997_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a537-553.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Sam Wai Kam</creatorcontrib><title>The Hong Kong Government's Strategy for Promoting Home Ownership - An Approach to Reducing the Decommodifying Effects of Public Housing Services</title><title>International journal of urban and regional research</title><description>The Hong Kong Government is a well‐known believer in laissez faire values and capitalism. However, it provides massive public housing programmes. In order to reduce the adverse effects of the public housing programmes on capitalism, it has tried to promote the recommodification of public housing by encouraging and assisting public housing tenants to become home owners. The aim of this paper is to study the Hong Kong Government’s measures for promoting home ownership. It is argued that these measures are not very effective in reducing the decommodifying effects of the public housing services. Despite the fact that these measures aim to reduce people’s dependence on the government and to help them to re‐establish their relation with the private market, they are paradoxically also a kind of decommodification — people can enjoy some benefits independently of how they perform in the private market. Hence, it can be said that the government’s measures for promoting home ownership serve more to change the form than to reduce the degree of the decommodification of the public housing services.
Le gouvernement de Hong Kong est un partisan bien connu du laissez‐faire et du capitalisme. Il fournit néanmoins des programmes massifs de logement public. Afin de réuire les effets adverses que les programmes de logement public ont sur le capitalisme, il a essayé de promouvoir la recommercialisation du logement public en encourageant et en aidant les locataires du logement public à devenir propriétaires. Le but de cet article est d’étudier les mesures que le gouvernement de Hong Kong a prises afin de promouvoir l’accès à la propriété. Cet essai soutient que ces mesures ne sont pas très efficaces pour réduire les effets de décommercialisation qu’ont les services de logement public. Bien qu’elles aient pour but de réduire la dépendance des habitants du gouvernement et de les aider à rétablir leur rapport avec le marché privé, elles sont aussi, paradoxicalement, une espèce de décommercialisation — dont les gens peuvent bénéficier indépendamment de leur performance sur le marché privé. On peut donc dire que les mesures prises par le gouvernement pour promouvoir l'accès à la propriété servent plus à changer la forme de la décommercialisation des services de logement public qu’à en réduire leur niveau.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government Policy</subject><subject>Home Ownership</subject><subject>Hong Kong</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing market</subject><subject>Housing Policy</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Promotion</subject><subject>Public Housing</subject><subject>Social housing</subject><subject>Strategies</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><issn>0309-1317</issn><issn>1468-2427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEEkvLmaslJHpKO47txDkubdntbkWrfqjcLK9jd7MkcbCTLfsv-Ml1CNoDB4qlmZHGz_t6ZE0UfcBwjMM5wTTlcUKT7BgAA7yKJvvO62gCBPIYE5y9jd55vwGAhHA6iX7drTWa2-YRLYc0s1vtmlo33ZFHt52TnX7cIWMduna2tl0ZmLmtNbp6arTz67JFMZo2aNq2zkq1Rp1FN7ro1QB2wfpMK1vXtijNbmidG6NV55E16LpfVaUKbr0fbm6125ZK-8PojZGV1-__1IPo_sv53ek8vryaXZxOL2OVZgnEJskYJ6pIC8CcFMYolSulMdWS5QCqwCuQGIyisjArjleKcg44gZRQxiUjB9HR6BsG_9Fr34m69EpXlWx0GElwkkPOeJIE8tM_yRQzymlC_wPELM8YvAiyjBDgZBjy41_gxvauCf8iMKcAKUtxHqiTkVLOeu-0Ea0ra-l2AoMYdkMMmyCGTRC_dyMoFqPC6VarPb6qZLnpnfNiK4hMcEi7EDjPs1DKEDREG4KRTDBGxLqrgxkdzZ7KSu9eeltcLO5vxhniUVb6Tv_cy6T7LtKMZEw8fJ2Js-Rh8W25ZOIzeQbXm-L3</recordid><startdate>199712</startdate><enddate>199712</enddate><creator>Yu, Sam Wai Kam</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</general><general>Wiley Blackwell</general><general>E. Arnold</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HGTKA</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199712</creationdate><title>The Hong Kong Government's Strategy for Promoting Home Ownership - An Approach to Reducing the Decommodifying Effects of Public Housing Services</title><author>Yu, Sam Wai Kam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6720-f27583cd6d0183dffcc9cce14ea5900cd1b0a10fc4adfb81bc488012063458a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government Policy</topic><topic>Home Ownership</topic><topic>Hong Kong</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing market</topic><topic>Housing Policy</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Promotion</topic><topic>Public Housing</topic><topic>Social housing</topic><topic>Strategies</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Sam Wai Kam</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 18</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of urban and regional research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Sam Wai Kam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Hong Kong Government's Strategy for Promoting Home Ownership - An Approach to Reducing the Decommodifying Effects of Public Housing Services</atitle><jtitle>International journal of urban and regional research</jtitle><date>1997-12</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>537</spage><epage>553</epage><pages>537-553</pages><issn>0309-1317</issn><eissn>1468-2427</eissn><coden>IJURDZ</coden><abstract>The Hong Kong Government is a well‐known believer in laissez faire values and capitalism. However, it provides massive public housing programmes. In order to reduce the adverse effects of the public housing programmes on capitalism, it has tried to promote the recommodification of public housing by encouraging and assisting public housing tenants to become home owners. The aim of this paper is to study the Hong Kong Government’s measures for promoting home ownership. It is argued that these measures are not very effective in reducing the decommodifying effects of the public housing services. Despite the fact that these measures aim to reduce people’s dependence on the government and to help them to re‐establish their relation with the private market, they are paradoxically also a kind of decommodification — people can enjoy some benefits independently of how they perform in the private market. Hence, it can be said that the government’s measures for promoting home ownership serve more to change the form than to reduce the degree of the decommodification of the public housing services.
Le gouvernement de Hong Kong est un partisan bien connu du laissez‐faire et du capitalisme. Il fournit néanmoins des programmes massifs de logement public. Afin de réuire les effets adverses que les programmes de logement public ont sur le capitalisme, il a essayé de promouvoir la recommercialisation du logement public en encourageant et en aidant les locataires du logement public à devenir propriétaires. Le but de cet article est d’étudier les mesures que le gouvernement de Hong Kong a prises afin de promouvoir l’accès à la propriété. Cet essai soutient que ces mesures ne sont pas très efficaces pour réduire les effets de décommercialisation qu’ont les services de logement public. Bien qu’elles aient pour but de réduire la dépendance des habitants du gouvernement et de les aider à rétablir leur rapport avec le marché privé, elles sont aussi, paradoxicalement, une espèce de décommercialisation — dont les gens peuvent bénéficier indépendamment de leur performance sur le marché privé. On peut donc dire que les mesures prises par le gouvernement pour promouvoir l'accès à la propriété servent plus à changer la forme de la décommercialisation des services de logement public qu’à en réduire leur niveau.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1468-2427.00100</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0309-1317 |
ispartof | International journal of urban and regional research, 1997-12, Vol.21 (4), p.537-553 |
issn | 0309-1317 1468-2427 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839095822 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); RePEc; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | China Government Government Policy Home Ownership Hong Kong Housing Housing market Housing Policy Ownership Promotion Public Housing Social housing Strategies Strategy Urban development |
title | The Hong Kong Government's Strategy for Promoting Home Ownership - An Approach to Reducing the Decommodifying Effects of Public Housing Services |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A25%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Hong%20Kong%20Government's%20Strategy%20for%20Promoting%20Home%20Ownership%20-%20An%20Approach%20to%20Reducing%20the%20Decommodifying%20Effects%20of%20Public%20Housing%20Services&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20urban%20and%20regional%20research&rft.au=Yu,%20Sam%20Wai%20Kam&rft.date=1997-12&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=537&rft.epage=553&rft.pages=537-553&rft.issn=0309-1317&rft.eissn=1468-2427&rft.coden=IJURDZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1468-2427.00100&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E839095822%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1840065619&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |