Interpersonal factors and post-treatment drinking and subjective well-being
AIMS: A conceptual clarification of the domain of social relationships defines three aspects of social relationships (structure, function and quality), which have both alcohol-specific and general components. We analyse the correlations among post-treatment indicators of social relationships and the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Addiction (Abingdon, England) England), 1997-11, Vol.92 (11), p.1507-1522 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1522 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1507 |
container_title | Addiction (Abingdon, England) |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Beattie, Martha C Longabaugh, Richard |
description | AIMS: A conceptual clarification of the domain of social relationships defines three aspects of social relationships (structure, function and quality), which have both alcohol-specific and general components. We analyse the correlations among post-treatment indicators of social relationships and the association between these interpersonal variables and post-treatment drinking and subjective wellbeing. DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of data from an alcohol treatment outcome study, in which subjects were randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions and followed for 18 months. SETTING: The outpatient treatment program is located within a private psychiatric hospital in the north-eastern United States. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed the 140 subjects who completed a social network instrument 12 months following treatment assignment. INTERVENTION: This secondary analysis combined clients from three treatment conditions, all of which were based upon social learning theory. MEASUREMENTS: Interview and questionnaire self-report data were collected by trained interviewers. FINDINGS: Indicators of social relationships are found to be relatively independent of one another. Only alcohol-specific social relationship indicators are significantly associated with drinking outcomes, and only general indicators are significantly associated with subjective wellbeing. Functional indicators, addressing social interaction content, have stronger effects on outcomes than structural or quality indicators. General and alcohol-specific support from friends have more influence than support from family; both surpass the influence of co-workers. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of the roles of social relationships during the course of treatment and recovery or relapse may help clarify how treatment personnel can utilize clients' interpersonal relationships more effectively to maximize treatment effectiveness. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839088625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>839088625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p595-9afb40553e95f77aa6d98e8a276e7f60243983aeeea5e1de000f96dd7abb57cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj81KxDAYRYMoOI6-Q3HjKpA2_0sZ_BkccDP78rX5Iq2dpCapvr5FXbm6i3O5nHtGNjVXjDIh-DnZMKskbWrBLslVziNjTBsrNuRlHwqmGVOOAabKQ19iyhUEV80xF1oSQjlhKJVLQ3gfwtsPy0s3Yl-GT6y-cJpohyu5Jhcepow3f7klx8eH4-6ZHl6f9rv7A52lldSC7wSTkqOVXmsA5axBA41WqL1ijeDWcEBEkFg7XFW9Vc5p6Dqpe8-35O53dk7xY8Fc2tOQ-9UCAsYlt4ZbZoxq5Nq8_dcc45LWn7mtrVWcaa75Nz4lWNU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199630737</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interpersonal factors and post-treatment drinking and subjective well-being</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Beattie, Martha C ; Longabaugh, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Beattie, Martha C ; Longabaugh, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>AIMS: A conceptual clarification of the domain of social relationships defines three aspects of social relationships (structure, function and quality), which have both alcohol-specific and general components. We analyse the correlations among post-treatment indicators of social relationships and the association between these interpersonal variables and post-treatment drinking and subjective wellbeing. DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of data from an alcohol treatment outcome study, in which subjects were randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions and followed for 18 months. SETTING: The outpatient treatment program is located within a private psychiatric hospital in the north-eastern United States. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed the 140 subjects who completed a social network instrument 12 months following treatment assignment. INTERVENTION: This secondary analysis combined clients from three treatment conditions, all of which were based upon social learning theory. MEASUREMENTS: Interview and questionnaire self-report data were collected by trained interviewers. FINDINGS: Indicators of social relationships are found to be relatively independent of one another. Only alcohol-specific social relationship indicators are significantly associated with drinking outcomes, and only general indicators are significantly associated with subjective wellbeing. Functional indicators, addressing social interaction content, have stronger effects on outcomes than structural or quality indicators. General and alcohol-specific support from friends have more influence than support from family; both surpass the influence of co-workers. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of the roles of social relationships during the course of treatment and recovery or relapse may help clarify how treatment personnel can utilize clients' interpersonal relationships more effectively to maximize treatment effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-2140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-0443</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADICE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Addictions ; Alcoholism ; Interpersonal communication ; Interpersonal relations ; Personal relationships ; Social relations ; Substance abuse ; Substance abuse treatment ; Therapy</subject><ispartof>Addiction (Abingdon, England), 1997-11, Vol.92 (11), p.1507-1522</ispartof><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Nov 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beattie, Martha C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longabaugh, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Interpersonal factors and post-treatment drinking and subjective well-being</title><title>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</title><description>AIMS: A conceptual clarification of the domain of social relationships defines three aspects of social relationships (structure, function and quality), which have both alcohol-specific and general components. We analyse the correlations among post-treatment indicators of social relationships and the association between these interpersonal variables and post-treatment drinking and subjective wellbeing. DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of data from an alcohol treatment outcome study, in which subjects were randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions and followed for 18 months. SETTING: The outpatient treatment program is located within a private psychiatric hospital in the north-eastern United States. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed the 140 subjects who completed a social network instrument 12 months following treatment assignment. INTERVENTION: This secondary analysis combined clients from three treatment conditions, all of which were based upon social learning theory. MEASUREMENTS: Interview and questionnaire self-report data were collected by trained interviewers. FINDINGS: Indicators of social relationships are found to be relatively independent of one another. Only alcohol-specific social relationship indicators are significantly associated with drinking outcomes, and only general indicators are significantly associated with subjective wellbeing. Functional indicators, addressing social interaction content, have stronger effects on outcomes than structural or quality indicators. General and alcohol-specific support from friends have more influence than support from family; both surpass the influence of co-workers. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of the roles of social relationships during the course of treatment and recovery or relapse may help clarify how treatment personnel can utilize clients' interpersonal relationships more effectively to maximize treatment effectiveness.</description><subject>Addictions</subject><subject>Alcoholism</subject><subject>Interpersonal communication</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Social relations</subject><subject>Substance abuse</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><issn>0965-2140</issn><issn>1360-0443</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdj81KxDAYRYMoOI6-Q3HjKpA2_0sZ_BkccDP78rX5Iq2dpCapvr5FXbm6i3O5nHtGNjVXjDIh-DnZMKskbWrBLslVziNjTBsrNuRlHwqmGVOOAabKQ19iyhUEV80xF1oSQjlhKJVLQ3gfwtsPy0s3Yl-GT6y-cJpohyu5Jhcepow3f7klx8eH4-6ZHl6f9rv7A52lldSC7wSTkqOVXmsA5axBA41WqL1ijeDWcEBEkFg7XFW9Vc5p6Dqpe8-35O53dk7xY8Fc2tOQ-9UCAsYlt4ZbZoxq5Nq8_dcc45LWn7mtrVWcaa75Nz4lWNU</recordid><startdate>19971101</startdate><enddate>19971101</enddate><creator>Beattie, Martha C</creator><creator>Longabaugh, Richard</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971101</creationdate><title>Interpersonal factors and post-treatment drinking and subjective well-being</title><author>Beattie, Martha C ; Longabaugh, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p595-9afb40553e95f77aa6d98e8a276e7f60243983aeeea5e1de000f96dd7abb57cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Addictions</topic><topic>Alcoholism</topic><topic>Interpersonal communication</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Social relations</topic><topic>Substance abuse</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beattie, Martha C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longabaugh, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beattie, Martha C</au><au>Longabaugh, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interpersonal factors and post-treatment drinking and subjective well-being</atitle><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle><date>1997-11-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1507</spage><epage>1522</epage><pages>1507-1522</pages><issn>0965-2140</issn><eissn>1360-0443</eissn><coden>ADICE5</coden><abstract>AIMS: A conceptual clarification of the domain of social relationships defines three aspects of social relationships (structure, function and quality), which have both alcohol-specific and general components. We analyse the correlations among post-treatment indicators of social relationships and the association between these interpersonal variables and post-treatment drinking and subjective wellbeing. DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of data from an alcohol treatment outcome study, in which subjects were randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions and followed for 18 months. SETTING: The outpatient treatment program is located within a private psychiatric hospital in the north-eastern United States. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed the 140 subjects who completed a social network instrument 12 months following treatment assignment. INTERVENTION: This secondary analysis combined clients from three treatment conditions, all of which were based upon social learning theory. MEASUREMENTS: Interview and questionnaire self-report data were collected by trained interviewers. FINDINGS: Indicators of social relationships are found to be relatively independent of one another. Only alcohol-specific social relationship indicators are significantly associated with drinking outcomes, and only general indicators are significantly associated with subjective wellbeing. Functional indicators, addressing social interaction content, have stronger effects on outcomes than structural or quality indicators. General and alcohol-specific support from friends have more influence than support from family; both surpass the influence of co-workers. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of the roles of social relationships during the course of treatment and recovery or relapse may help clarify how treatment personnel can utilize clients' interpersonal relationships more effectively to maximize treatment effectiveness.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0965-2140 |
ispartof | Addiction (Abingdon, England), 1997-11, Vol.92 (11), p.1507-1522 |
issn | 0965-2140 1360-0443 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839088625 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Addictions Alcoholism Interpersonal communication Interpersonal relations Personal relationships Social relations Substance abuse Substance abuse treatment Therapy |
title | Interpersonal factors and post-treatment drinking and subjective well-being |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T22%3A41%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interpersonal%20factors%20and%20post-treatment%20drinking%20and%20subjective%20well-being&rft.jtitle=Addiction%20(Abingdon,%20England)&rft.au=Beattie,%20Martha%20C&rft.date=1997-11-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1507&rft.epage=1522&rft.pages=1507-1522&rft.issn=0965-2140&rft.eissn=1360-0443&rft.coden=ADICE5&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E839088625%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199630737&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |