Managerial discretion and managerial compensation
This paper examines two hypotheses regarding the determinants of managerial compensation. The one views managers as being hired by the owners of the firm to provide managerial services, and sees their compensation as a purely functional return for services rendered. It uses a simple model of bureauc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of industrial organization 1997-07, Vol.15 (4), p.441-454 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper examines two hypotheses regarding the determinants of managerial compensation. The one views managers as being hired by the owners of the firm to provide managerial services, and sees their compensation as a purely functional return for services rendered. It uses a simple model of bureaucracy to explain managerial compensation. The second model assumes that managers set their own salaries. It uses estimates of returns on investment to measure the degree to which managers have and exercise discretion in their investment policies. This measure of discretion is also found to explain why some managers receive higher salaries than are predicted by the bureaucracy model. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-7187 1873-7986 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0167-7187(96)01029-6 |