Status and Adobe Quality at Fort Fillmore, New Mexico: Old Questions, New Techniques
Adobe and soil samples from Fort Fillmore (1851-1862), New Mexico, were subjected to various laboratory tests in order to evaluate the nature of adobe decay. Samples were collected from the Officers' Quarters and the Enlisted Men's Barracks, so that adobe quality at these two distinctive a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Historical archaeology 1996-01, Vol.30 (3), p.1-19 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 19 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Historical archaeology |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Staski, Edward Reiter, Joanne |
| description | Adobe and soil samples from Fort Fillmore (1851-1862), New Mexico, were subjected to various laboratory tests in order to evaluate the nature of adobe decay. Samples were collected from the Officers' Quarters and the Enlisted Men's Barracks, so that adobe quality at these two distinctive areas—once housing two distinctive groups of soldiers—could be estimated. Test results provided measures of various agents and processes of adobe decay, such as structural failure or chemical and water activities, and suggested that most of the adobe decay at Fort Fillmore has been due to imperfections in the manufacturing process. Adobe for the Officers' Quarters was better made than adobe for the barracks. Some tentative explanations for this difference in quality are discussed, including the possibility that it was the result of a symbolic expression of status distinctions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF03374219 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839048387</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25616474</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25616474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-8b45ae8f719a766aad40b1f2d7fee949b7ad9ff90b086e04d18eef6ba3088a8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0FFLwzAQB_AgCs7pi-9C3gSxemnSJvFNh1NhOsT5XNL2gh1dM5MM3be3o6Ivd3D34w7-hJwyuGIA8vpuCpxLkTK9R0YpT1XCGPB9MgIhINEp44fkKIQlQMa14COyeIsmbgI1XU1va1cifd2YtolbaiKdOt-Xpm1XzuMlfcEv-ozfTeVu6Lyte4khNq4Lw2qB1UfXfPbDY3JgTRvw5LePyfv0fjF5TGbzh6fJ7SypUpbFRJUiM6isZNrIPDemFlAym9bSImqhS2lqba2GElSOIGqmEG1eGg5KGWX5mJwPd9fe7f7GYtWECtvWdOg2oVBcg1BcyV5eDLLyLgSPtlj7ZmX8tmBQ7JIr_pPr8dmAlyE6_yfTLGe5kIL_AJ2_aXs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>839048387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Status and Adobe Quality at Fort Fillmore, New Mexico: Old Questions, New Techniques</title><source>JSTOR</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Staski, Edward ; Reiter, Joanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Staski, Edward ; Reiter, Joanne</creatorcontrib><description>Adobe and soil samples from Fort Fillmore (1851-1862), New Mexico, were subjected to various laboratory tests in order to evaluate the nature of adobe decay. Samples were collected from the Officers' Quarters and the Enlisted Men's Barracks, so that adobe quality at these two distinctive areas—once housing two distinctive groups of soldiers—could be estimated. Test results provided measures of various agents and processes of adobe decay, such as structural failure or chemical and water activities, and suggested that most of the adobe decay at Fort Fillmore has been due to imperfections in the manufacturing process. Adobe for the Officers' Quarters was better made than adobe for the barracks. Some tentative explanations for this difference in quality are discussed, including the possibility that it was the result of a symbolic expression of status distinctions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0440-9213</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-1103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03374219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Society for Historical Archaeology</publisher><subject>Adobe ; Adobe buildings ; Agricultural soils ; Archaeology ; Barracks ; Forts ; Historic monuments ; Historical archaeology ; New Mexico ; Soil salts ; Soil samples ; Soil water ; Surface water ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Historical archaeology, 1996-01, Vol.30 (3), p.1-19</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 The Society for Historical Archaeology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-8b45ae8f719a766aad40b1f2d7fee949b7ad9ff90b086e04d18eef6ba3088a8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-8b45ae8f719a766aad40b1f2d7fee949b7ad9ff90b086e04d18eef6ba3088a8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25616474$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25616474$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Staski, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Joanne</creatorcontrib><title>Status and Adobe Quality at Fort Fillmore, New Mexico: Old Questions, New Techniques</title><title>Historical archaeology</title><description>Adobe and soil samples from Fort Fillmore (1851-1862), New Mexico, were subjected to various laboratory tests in order to evaluate the nature of adobe decay. Samples were collected from the Officers' Quarters and the Enlisted Men's Barracks, so that adobe quality at these two distinctive areas—once housing two distinctive groups of soldiers—could be estimated. Test results provided measures of various agents and processes of adobe decay, such as structural failure or chemical and water activities, and suggested that most of the adobe decay at Fort Fillmore has been due to imperfections in the manufacturing process. Adobe for the Officers' Quarters was better made than adobe for the barracks. Some tentative explanations for this difference in quality are discussed, including the possibility that it was the result of a symbolic expression of status distinctions.</description><subject>Adobe</subject><subject>Adobe buildings</subject><subject>Agricultural soils</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Barracks</subject><subject>Forts</subject><subject>Historic monuments</subject><subject>Historical archaeology</subject><subject>New Mexico</subject><subject>Soil salts</subject><subject>Soil samples</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0440-9213</issn><issn>2328-1103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpF0FFLwzAQB_AgCs7pi-9C3gSxemnSJvFNh1NhOsT5XNL2gh1dM5MM3be3o6Ivd3D34w7-hJwyuGIA8vpuCpxLkTK9R0YpT1XCGPB9MgIhINEp44fkKIQlQMa14COyeIsmbgI1XU1va1cifd2YtolbaiKdOt-Xpm1XzuMlfcEv-ozfTeVu6Lyte4khNq4Lw2qB1UfXfPbDY3JgTRvw5LePyfv0fjF5TGbzh6fJ7SypUpbFRJUiM6isZNrIPDemFlAym9bSImqhS2lqba2GElSOIGqmEG1eGg5KGWX5mJwPd9fe7f7GYtWECtvWdOg2oVBcg1BcyV5eDLLyLgSPtlj7ZmX8tmBQ7JIr_pPr8dmAlyE6_yfTLGe5kIL_AJ2_aXs</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>Staski, Edward</creator><creator>Reiter, Joanne</creator><general>Society for Historical Archaeology</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>Status and Adobe Quality at Fort Fillmore, New Mexico: Old Questions, New Techniques</title><author>Staski, Edward ; Reiter, Joanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-8b45ae8f719a766aad40b1f2d7fee949b7ad9ff90b086e04d18eef6ba3088a8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adobe</topic><topic>Adobe buildings</topic><topic>Agricultural soils</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Barracks</topic><topic>Forts</topic><topic>Historic monuments</topic><topic>Historical archaeology</topic><topic>New Mexico</topic><topic>Soil salts</topic><topic>Soil samples</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Staski, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Joanne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Historical archaeology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Staski, Edward</au><au>Reiter, Joanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Status and Adobe Quality at Fort Fillmore, New Mexico: Old Questions, New Techniques</atitle><jtitle>Historical archaeology</jtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>1-19</pages><issn>0440-9213</issn><eissn>2328-1103</eissn><abstract>Adobe and soil samples from Fort Fillmore (1851-1862), New Mexico, were subjected to various laboratory tests in order to evaluate the nature of adobe decay. Samples were collected from the Officers' Quarters and the Enlisted Men's Barracks, so that adobe quality at these two distinctive areas—once housing two distinctive groups of soldiers—could be estimated. Test results provided measures of various agents and processes of adobe decay, such as structural failure or chemical and water activities, and suggested that most of the adobe decay at Fort Fillmore has been due to imperfections in the manufacturing process. Adobe for the Officers' Quarters was better made than adobe for the barracks. Some tentative explanations for this difference in quality are discussed, including the possibility that it was the result of a symbolic expression of status distinctions.</abstract><pub>Society for Historical Archaeology</pub><doi>10.1007/BF03374219</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0440-9213 |
| ispartof | Historical archaeology, 1996-01, Vol.30 (3), p.1-19 |
| issn | 0440-9213 2328-1103 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839048387 |
| source | JSTOR; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Adobe Adobe buildings Agricultural soils Archaeology Barracks Forts Historic monuments Historical archaeology New Mexico Soil salts Soil samples Soil water Surface water U.S.A |
| title | Status and Adobe Quality at Fort Fillmore, New Mexico: Old Questions, New Techniques |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A38%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Status%20and%20Adobe%20Quality%20at%20Fort%20Fillmore,%20New%20Mexico:%20Old%20Questions,%20New%20Techniques&rft.jtitle=Historical%20archaeology&rft.au=Staski,%20Edward&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=1-19&rft.issn=0440-9213&rft.eissn=2328-1103&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03374219&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25616474%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=839048387&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25616474&rfr_iscdi=true |