Strategic Agricultural Trade Policy Interdependence and the Exchange Rate: A Game Theoretic Analysis

Strategic Agricultural Trade Policy Interdependence is modeled using a game theoretic framework. The model distinguishes between the European Community, the United States and a politically passive rest-of-the-world. Particular emphasis is placed on the effect of the exchange rate on the equilibrium...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public choice 1996-07, Vol.88 (1/2), p.43-56
Hauptverfasser: Kennedy, P. Lynn, Von Witzke, Harald, Roe, Terry L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 56
container_issue 1/2
container_start_page 43
container_title Public choice
container_volume 88
creator Kennedy, P. Lynn
Von Witzke, Harald
Roe, Terry L.
description Strategic Agricultural Trade Policy Interdependence is modeled using a game theoretic framework. The model distinguishes between the European Community, the United States and a politically passive rest-of-the-world. Particular emphasis is placed on the effect of the exchange rate on the equilibrium outcome of this game. Without compensatory payments to those with the highest political influence, the results suggest that only modest reform is possible. With compensation, liberalization occurs but free trade is not obtained. Simulations also indicate that the U.S. gains incentive to reduce protection given a depreciation of the dollar, while incentive to liberalize trade policies decreases as the dollar appreciates.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00130408
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839032144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>30027251</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>30027251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ae7377f2e25d919debb4433066628fe18f65d72732984c939711216995c2467c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1rGzEQh3ERWqjr9tJ7QPTQQGDbGUmrl96ckDcItLTueVG0s_aa9a4raSH-9lnjkEIPOc3lxwPDn7FPCF8RwHy7uAZACQrsCZthaWRhEPANmwEoW5RWuHfsfUobAJDaljNW_87RZ1q1gS9WsQ1jl8foO76Mvib-c-jasOd3faZY0476mvpA3Pc1z2viV49h7fsV8V9T4jtf8Bu_Jb5c0xApH4q97_apTR_Y28Z3iT4-3zn7c321vLwt7n_c3F0u7ougFObCk5HGNIJEWTt0NT08KCUlaK2FbQhto8vaCCOFsyo46QyiQO1cGYTSJsg5Ozt2d3H4O1LK1bZNgbrO9zSMqbLSgRQ4Refsy6tSI5YC5AF-_g9uhjFOf6UKndLSGuUmdH5EIQ4pRWqqXWy3Pu4rhOqwS_VvlwmfHvEm5SG-SAkgjChRPgHtB4Zi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194638749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategic Agricultural Trade Policy Interdependence and the Exchange Rate: A Game Theoretic Analysis</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Kennedy, P. Lynn ; Von Witzke, Harald ; Roe, Terry L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, P. Lynn ; Von Witzke, Harald ; Roe, Terry L.</creatorcontrib><description>Strategic Agricultural Trade Policy Interdependence is modeled using a game theoretic framework. The model distinguishes between the European Community, the United States and a politically passive rest-of-the-world. Particular emphasis is placed on the effect of the exchange rate on the equilibrium outcome of this game. Without compensatory payments to those with the highest political influence, the results suggest that only modest reform is possible. With compensation, liberalization occurs but free trade is not obtained. Simulations also indicate that the U.S. gains incentive to reduce protection given a depreciation of the dollar, while incentive to liberalize trade policies decreases as the dollar appreciates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00130408</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leiden: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Agricultural trade ; Agriculture ; Budget policy ; Commodities ; Common Agricultural Policy ; Consumption ; Crop economics ; Demand curves ; Endowment ; EUROPEAN COMMUNITY ; Exchange rates ; Expenditures ; Exports ; Farm exports ; Financial budgets ; Foreign exchange rates ; Game Theory ; GAME THEORY AND DECISION THEORY IN MODELS ; Government budgets ; International agreements ; International Trade ; Liberalization ; Market prices ; MODELING, MODELS ; Nash equilibrium ; Policymaking ; PUBLIC POLICY ; REFORM, REFORMERS ; Strategy ; Subsidies ; Trade policy ; UNITED STATES, 1945 TO PRESENT</subject><ispartof>Public choice, 1996-07, Vol.88 (1/2), p.43-56</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><rights>Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers Jul 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ae7377f2e25d919debb4433066628fe18f65d72732984c939711216995c2467c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ae7377f2e25d919debb4433066628fe18f65d72732984c939711216995c2467c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30027251$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30027251$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, P. Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Witzke, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roe, Terry L.</creatorcontrib><title>Strategic Agricultural Trade Policy Interdependence and the Exchange Rate: A Game Theoretic Analysis</title><title>Public choice</title><description>Strategic Agricultural Trade Policy Interdependence is modeled using a game theoretic framework. The model distinguishes between the European Community, the United States and a politically passive rest-of-the-world. Particular emphasis is placed on the effect of the exchange rate on the equilibrium outcome of this game. Without compensatory payments to those with the highest political influence, the results suggest that only modest reform is possible. With compensation, liberalization occurs but free trade is not obtained. Simulations also indicate that the U.S. gains incentive to reduce protection given a depreciation of the dollar, while incentive to liberalize trade policies decreases as the dollar appreciates.</description><subject>Agricultural trade</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Budget policy</subject><subject>Commodities</subject><subject>Common Agricultural Policy</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Crop economics</subject><subject>Demand curves</subject><subject>Endowment</subject><subject>EUROPEAN COMMUNITY</subject><subject>Exchange rates</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Farm exports</subject><subject>Financial budgets</subject><subject>Foreign exchange rates</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>GAME THEORY AND DECISION THEORY IN MODELS</subject><subject>Government budgets</subject><subject>International agreements</subject><subject>International Trade</subject><subject>Liberalization</subject><subject>Market prices</subject><subject>MODELING, MODELS</subject><subject>Nash equilibrium</subject><subject>Policymaking</subject><subject>PUBLIC POLICY</subject><subject>REFORM, REFORMERS</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><subject>UNITED STATES, 1945 TO PRESENT</subject><issn>0048-5829</issn><issn>1573-7101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1rGzEQh3ERWqjr9tJ7QPTQQGDbGUmrl96ckDcItLTueVG0s_aa9a4raSH-9lnjkEIPOc3lxwPDn7FPCF8RwHy7uAZACQrsCZthaWRhEPANmwEoW5RWuHfsfUobAJDaljNW_87RZ1q1gS9WsQ1jl8foO76Mvib-c-jasOd3faZY0476mvpA3Pc1z2viV49h7fsV8V9T4jtf8Bu_Jb5c0xApH4q97_apTR_Y28Z3iT4-3zn7c321vLwt7n_c3F0u7ougFObCk5HGNIJEWTt0NT08KCUlaK2FbQhto8vaCCOFsyo46QyiQO1cGYTSJsg5Ozt2d3H4O1LK1bZNgbrO9zSMqbLSgRQ4Refsy6tSI5YC5AF-_g9uhjFOf6UKndLSGuUmdH5EIQ4pRWqqXWy3Pu4rhOqwS_VvlwmfHvEm5SG-SAkgjChRPgHtB4Zi</recordid><startdate>19960701</startdate><enddate>19960701</enddate><creator>Kennedy, P. Lynn</creator><creator>Von Witzke, Harald</creator><creator>Roe, Terry L.</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0A</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960701</creationdate><title>Strategic Agricultural Trade Policy Interdependence and the Exchange Rate: A Game Theoretic Analysis</title><author>Kennedy, P. Lynn ; Von Witzke, Harald ; Roe, Terry L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-ae7377f2e25d919debb4433066628fe18f65d72732984c939711216995c2467c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Agricultural trade</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Budget policy</topic><topic>Commodities</topic><topic>Common Agricultural Policy</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Crop economics</topic><topic>Demand curves</topic><topic>Endowment</topic><topic>EUROPEAN COMMUNITY</topic><topic>Exchange rates</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Farm exports</topic><topic>Financial budgets</topic><topic>Foreign exchange rates</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>GAME THEORY AND DECISION THEORY IN MODELS</topic><topic>Government budgets</topic><topic>International agreements</topic><topic>International Trade</topic><topic>Liberalization</topic><topic>Market prices</topic><topic>MODELING, MODELS</topic><topic>Nash equilibrium</topic><topic>Policymaking</topic><topic>PUBLIC POLICY</topic><topic>REFORM, REFORMERS</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><topic>UNITED STATES, 1945 TO PRESENT</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, P. Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Witzke, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roe, Terry L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Archive</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Public choice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kennedy, P. Lynn</au><au>Von Witzke, Harald</au><au>Roe, Terry L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategic Agricultural Trade Policy Interdependence and the Exchange Rate: A Game Theoretic Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Public choice</jtitle><date>1996-07-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>56</epage><pages>43-56</pages><issn>0048-5829</issn><eissn>1573-7101</eissn><abstract>Strategic Agricultural Trade Policy Interdependence is modeled using a game theoretic framework. The model distinguishes between the European Community, the United States and a politically passive rest-of-the-world. Particular emphasis is placed on the effect of the exchange rate on the equilibrium outcome of this game. Without compensatory payments to those with the highest political influence, the results suggest that only modest reform is possible. With compensation, liberalization occurs but free trade is not obtained. Simulations also indicate that the U.S. gains incentive to reduce protection given a depreciation of the dollar, while incentive to liberalize trade policies decreases as the dollar appreciates.</abstract><cop>Leiden</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1007/BF00130408</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-5829
ispartof Public choice, 1996-07, Vol.88 (1/2), p.43-56
issn 0048-5829
1573-7101
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839032144
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SpringerNature Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete
subjects Agricultural trade
Agriculture
Budget policy
Commodities
Common Agricultural Policy
Consumption
Crop economics
Demand curves
Endowment
EUROPEAN COMMUNITY
Exchange rates
Expenditures
Exports
Farm exports
Financial budgets
Foreign exchange rates
Game Theory
GAME THEORY AND DECISION THEORY IN MODELS
Government budgets
International agreements
International Trade
Liberalization
Market prices
MODELING, MODELS
Nash equilibrium
Policymaking
PUBLIC POLICY
REFORM, REFORMERS
Strategy
Subsidies
Trade policy
UNITED STATES, 1945 TO PRESENT
title Strategic Agricultural Trade Policy Interdependence and the Exchange Rate: A Game Theoretic Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A14%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategic%20Agricultural%20Trade%20Policy%20Interdependence%20and%20the%20Exchange%20Rate:%20A%20Game%20Theoretic%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Public%20choice&rft.au=Kennedy,%20P.%20Lynn&rft.date=1996-07-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=56&rft.pages=43-56&rft.issn=0048-5829&rft.eissn=1573-7101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00130408&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E30027251%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194638749&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=30027251&rfr_iscdi=true