A three-tiered approach to participatory vulnerability assessment in the Solomon Islands

Greater recognition of the seriousness of global environmental change has led to an increase in research that assesses the vulnerability of households, communities and regions to changing environmental or economic conditions. So far, however, there has been relatively little attention given to how a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global environmental change 2010-10, Vol.20 (4), p.713-728
Hauptverfasser: Fazey, Ioan, Kesby, Mike, Evely, Anna, Latham, Ian, Wagatora, Daniel, Hagasua, Jude-Edward, Reed, Mark S., Christie, Mike
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 728
container_issue 4
container_start_page 713
container_title Global environmental change
container_volume 20
creator Fazey, Ioan
Kesby, Mike
Evely, Anna
Latham, Ian
Wagatora, Daniel
Hagasua, Jude-Edward
Reed, Mark S.
Christie, Mike
description Greater recognition of the seriousness of global environmental change has led to an increase in research that assesses the vulnerability of households, communities and regions to changing environmental or economic conditions. So far, however, there has been relatively little attention given to how assessments can be conducted in ways that help build capacity for local communities to understand and find their own solutions to their problems. This paper reports on an approach that was designed and used to work with a local grass roots organization in the Solomon Islands to promote inclusivity and participation in decision-making and to build the capacity of the organization to reduce the vulnerability of communities to drivers of change. The process involved working collaboratively with the organization and training its members to conduct vulnerability assessments with communities using participatory and deliberative methods. To make best use of the learning opportunities provided by the research process, specific periods for formal reflection were incorporated for the three key stakeholders involved: the primary researchers; research assistants; and community members. Overall, the approach: (1) promoted learning about the current situation in Kahua and encouraged deeper analysis of problems; (2) built capacity for communities to manage the challenges they were facing; and (3) fostered local ownership and responsibility for problems and set precedents for future participation in decision-making. While the local organization and the communities it serves still face significant challenges, the research approach set the scene for greater local participation and effort to maintain and enhance livelihoods and wellbeing. The outcomes highlight the need for greater emphasis on embedding participatory approaches in vulnerability assessments for communities to benefit fully from the process.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839006664</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959378010000403</els_id><sourcerecordid>839006664</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-dd4f466dfad7276a9c80eeffafe15ac28eae13ef49b71af0826b14122eced9d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9rGzEQxUVooG6Sz1Dd2ss6o11ZWh2N6R-DIYc2kJuQpVEss15tJdngbx8Flx5rXQbEb97MvEfIZwZzBkw87uevQ8TxZHdm3kL9BT4Hxm7IjPWybRRXiw9kBmqhmk728JF8ynkP9amum5GXJS27hNiUgAkdNdOUorE7WiKdTCrBhsmUmM70dBxGTGYbhlDO1OSMOR9wLDSMVQLprzjEQxzpOg9mdPme3HozZHz4W-_I8_dvv1c_m83Tj_VquWksZ21pnOOeC-G8cbKVwijbA6L3xiNbGNv2aJB16LnaSmY89K3YstrZokWnHHR35MtFt-7954i56EPIFoe6BMZj1n2nAIQQ_DrJpIBFta6SX_9LMiklExxYX1F5QW2KOSf0ekrhYNJZM9Dv-ei9_pePfs9HA9eXIctLJ1Z3TtV9nW3AsZ4VEtqiXQxXNd4AbxKffw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777164018</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A three-tiered approach to participatory vulnerability assessment in the Solomon Islands</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Fazey, Ioan ; Kesby, Mike ; Evely, Anna ; Latham, Ian ; Wagatora, Daniel ; Hagasua, Jude-Edward ; Reed, Mark S. ; Christie, Mike</creator><creatorcontrib>Fazey, Ioan ; Kesby, Mike ; Evely, Anna ; Latham, Ian ; Wagatora, Daniel ; Hagasua, Jude-Edward ; Reed, Mark S. ; Christie, Mike</creatorcontrib><description>Greater recognition of the seriousness of global environmental change has led to an increase in research that assesses the vulnerability of households, communities and regions to changing environmental or economic conditions. So far, however, there has been relatively little attention given to how assessments can be conducted in ways that help build capacity for local communities to understand and find their own solutions to their problems. This paper reports on an approach that was designed and used to work with a local grass roots organization in the Solomon Islands to promote inclusivity and participation in decision-making and to build the capacity of the organization to reduce the vulnerability of communities to drivers of change. The process involved working collaboratively with the organization and training its members to conduct vulnerability assessments with communities using participatory and deliberative methods. To make best use of the learning opportunities provided by the research process, specific periods for formal reflection were incorporated for the three key stakeholders involved: the primary researchers; research assistants; and community members. Overall, the approach: (1) promoted learning about the current situation in Kahua and encouraged deeper analysis of problems; (2) built capacity for communities to manage the challenges they were facing; and (3) fostered local ownership and responsibility for problems and set precedents for future participation in decision-making. While the local organization and the communities it serves still face significant challenges, the research approach set the scene for greater local participation and effort to maintain and enhance livelihoods and wellbeing. The outcomes highlight the need for greater emphasis on embedding participatory approaches in vulnerability assessments for communities to benefit fully from the process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-3780</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9495</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptive comanagement ; Assessments ; Bridging organization ; Communities ; Community ; Construction ; Decision making ; Drivers ; Engagement ; Environment ; Environmental change ; Islands ; Learning ; Local communities ; Organizations ; Ownership ; Participation ; Social learning ; Vulnerability assessment ; Well-being</subject><ispartof>Global environmental change, 2010-10, Vol.20 (4), p.713-728</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-dd4f466dfad7276a9c80eeffafe15ac28eae13ef49b71af0826b14122eced9d03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fazey, Ioan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesby, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evely, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latham, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagatora, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagasua, Jude-Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christie, Mike</creatorcontrib><title>A three-tiered approach to participatory vulnerability assessment in the Solomon Islands</title><title>Global environmental change</title><description>Greater recognition of the seriousness of global environmental change has led to an increase in research that assesses the vulnerability of households, communities and regions to changing environmental or economic conditions. So far, however, there has been relatively little attention given to how assessments can be conducted in ways that help build capacity for local communities to understand and find their own solutions to their problems. This paper reports on an approach that was designed and used to work with a local grass roots organization in the Solomon Islands to promote inclusivity and participation in decision-making and to build the capacity of the organization to reduce the vulnerability of communities to drivers of change. The process involved working collaboratively with the organization and training its members to conduct vulnerability assessments with communities using participatory and deliberative methods. To make best use of the learning opportunities provided by the research process, specific periods for formal reflection were incorporated for the three key stakeholders involved: the primary researchers; research assistants; and community members. Overall, the approach: (1) promoted learning about the current situation in Kahua and encouraged deeper analysis of problems; (2) built capacity for communities to manage the challenges they were facing; and (3) fostered local ownership and responsibility for problems and set precedents for future participation in decision-making. While the local organization and the communities it serves still face significant challenges, the research approach set the scene for greater local participation and effort to maintain and enhance livelihoods and wellbeing. The outcomes highlight the need for greater emphasis on embedding participatory approaches in vulnerability assessments for communities to benefit fully from the process.</description><subject>Adaptive comanagement</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Bridging organization</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Drivers</subject><subject>Engagement</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental change</subject><subject>Islands</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Local communities</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Social learning</subject><subject>Vulnerability assessment</subject><subject>Well-being</subject><issn>0959-3780</issn><issn>1872-9495</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9rGzEQxUVooG6Sz1Dd2ss6o11ZWh2N6R-DIYc2kJuQpVEss15tJdngbx8Flx5rXQbEb97MvEfIZwZzBkw87uevQ8TxZHdm3kL9BT4Hxm7IjPWybRRXiw9kBmqhmk728JF8ynkP9amum5GXJS27hNiUgAkdNdOUorE7WiKdTCrBhsmUmM70dBxGTGYbhlDO1OSMOR9wLDSMVQLprzjEQxzpOg9mdPme3HozZHz4W-_I8_dvv1c_m83Tj_VquWksZ21pnOOeC-G8cbKVwijbA6L3xiNbGNv2aJB16LnaSmY89K3YstrZokWnHHR35MtFt-7954i56EPIFoe6BMZj1n2nAIQQ_DrJpIBFta6SX_9LMiklExxYX1F5QW2KOSf0ekrhYNJZM9Dv-ei9_pePfs9HA9eXIctLJ1Z3TtV9nW3AsZ4VEtqiXQxXNd4AbxKffw</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Fazey, Ioan</creator><creator>Kesby, Mike</creator><creator>Evely, Anna</creator><creator>Latham, Ian</creator><creator>Wagatora, Daniel</creator><creator>Hagasua, Jude-Edward</creator><creator>Reed, Mark S.</creator><creator>Christie, Mike</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>A three-tiered approach to participatory vulnerability assessment in the Solomon Islands</title><author>Fazey, Ioan ; Kesby, Mike ; Evely, Anna ; Latham, Ian ; Wagatora, Daniel ; Hagasua, Jude-Edward ; Reed, Mark S. ; Christie, Mike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-dd4f466dfad7276a9c80eeffafe15ac28eae13ef49b71af0826b14122eced9d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adaptive comanagement</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Bridging organization</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Drivers</topic><topic>Engagement</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental change</topic><topic>Islands</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Local communities</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Social learning</topic><topic>Vulnerability assessment</topic><topic>Well-being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fazey, Ioan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesby, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evely, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latham, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagatora, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagasua, Jude-Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christie, Mike</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Global environmental change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fazey, Ioan</au><au>Kesby, Mike</au><au>Evely, Anna</au><au>Latham, Ian</au><au>Wagatora, Daniel</au><au>Hagasua, Jude-Edward</au><au>Reed, Mark S.</au><au>Christie, Mike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A three-tiered approach to participatory vulnerability assessment in the Solomon Islands</atitle><jtitle>Global environmental change</jtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>713</spage><epage>728</epage><pages>713-728</pages><issn>0959-3780</issn><eissn>1872-9495</eissn><abstract>Greater recognition of the seriousness of global environmental change has led to an increase in research that assesses the vulnerability of households, communities and regions to changing environmental or economic conditions. So far, however, there has been relatively little attention given to how assessments can be conducted in ways that help build capacity for local communities to understand and find their own solutions to their problems. This paper reports on an approach that was designed and used to work with a local grass roots organization in the Solomon Islands to promote inclusivity and participation in decision-making and to build the capacity of the organization to reduce the vulnerability of communities to drivers of change. The process involved working collaboratively with the organization and training its members to conduct vulnerability assessments with communities using participatory and deliberative methods. To make best use of the learning opportunities provided by the research process, specific periods for formal reflection were incorporated for the three key stakeholders involved: the primary researchers; research assistants; and community members. Overall, the approach: (1) promoted learning about the current situation in Kahua and encouraged deeper analysis of problems; (2) built capacity for communities to manage the challenges they were facing; and (3) fostered local ownership and responsibility for problems and set precedents for future participation in decision-making. While the local organization and the communities it serves still face significant challenges, the research approach set the scene for greater local participation and effort to maintain and enhance livelihoods and wellbeing. The outcomes highlight the need for greater emphasis on embedding participatory approaches in vulnerability assessments for communities to benefit fully from the process.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.011</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-3780
ispartof Global environmental change, 2010-10, Vol.20 (4), p.713-728
issn 0959-3780
1872-9495
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_839006664
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adaptive comanagement
Assessments
Bridging organization
Communities
Community
Construction
Decision making
Drivers
Engagement
Environment
Environmental change
Islands
Learning
Local communities
Organizations
Ownership
Participation
Social learning
Vulnerability assessment
Well-being
title A three-tiered approach to participatory vulnerability assessment in the Solomon Islands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A37%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20three-tiered%20approach%20to%20participatory%20vulnerability%20assessment%20in%20the%20Solomon%20Islands&rft.jtitle=Global%20environmental%20change&rft.au=Fazey,%20Ioan&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=713&rft.epage=728&rft.pages=713-728&rft.issn=0959-3780&rft.eissn=1872-9495&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E839006664%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777164018&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0959378010000403&rfr_iscdi=true