Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors

This paper address factors underlying public opinion regarding offshore wind power based on a survey of residents near a proposed development off Cape Cod, MA, USA. Supporters are found to be younger, better educated, and more likely to own their own home. Opponents are more likely to earn over $200...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy policy 2007-03, Vol.35 (3), p.1584-1598
Hauptverfasser: Firestone, Jeremy, Kempton, Willett
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1598
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1584
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 35
creator Firestone, Jeremy
Kempton, Willett
description This paper address factors underlying public opinion regarding offshore wind power based on a survey of residents near a proposed development off Cape Cod, MA, USA. Supporters are found to be younger, better educated, and more likely to own their own home. Opponents are more likely to earn over $200,000/year, and more likely to expect to see the project from their daily routine. The overwhelming majority of the population expects negative impacts from the project; much smaller numbers expect positive effects. When asked which factors most affected their position, the most frequently mentioned was damage to marine life/environmental impacts, followed by electricity rates, aesthetics, and impacts on fishing or boating. When the expectations expressed by our respondents are compared with the findings of the project's draft Environmental Impact Statement, many of the beliefs upon which opinion are based appear to be factually incorrect. Finally, we tested whether change in the project would affect support. The biggest change was an increase in the level of support, by 47% of the sample, if the project was the first of 300 such projects, in sum having proportionately larger impacts as well as greater benefits. Implications of this research are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_838988701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421506001881</els_id><sourcerecordid>58760032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c651t-634350d64cc710882a4549bcd6f37d33c1591946409d8b8fd69f069466a845713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhhtRcFz9BV4aQT11W-l8tuBhXfyCAT2455BJqncz9CRt0r3L_HvTzqLgYTdQKSiet3ipt6peEmgJEPFu32KY4th2AKIF1gKBR9WGKEkbIaV8XG2AAmlYR_jT6lnOewBgqmeb6uOPZTd6W8fJBx9DbXZxmevRpCus4zDk65iwvvXB1VO8xfS-vgwO03j04aoejJ1jys-rJ4MZM76462fV5edPPy--NtvvX75dnG8bKziZG0EZ5eAEs1YSUKozjLN-Z50YqHSUWsJ70jPBoHdqpwYn-gFEGQijGJeEnlVvT3unFH8tmGd98NniOJqAcclaUdUrJWEl39xLciUFAO0eBIsfBYLzh0EmeyXluvHVf-A-LimUu-gOOCWSMFUgeoJsijknHPSU_MGkoyag10D1Xv8JVK-BamC6BFpU25Mq4YT2rwTLC7jCN5oayst3LFWUsjS_zkpNpQhXTJcrK309H8q613dOTbZmHJIJ1ud_ThQntCOicB9OHJZsbzwmna3HYNH5hHbWLvp7bf8GFQHNng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205317148</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Collection</source><creator>Firestone, Jeremy ; Kempton, Willett</creator><creatorcontrib>Firestone, Jeremy ; Kempton, Willett</creatorcontrib><description>This paper address factors underlying public opinion regarding offshore wind power based on a survey of residents near a proposed development off Cape Cod, MA, USA. Supporters are found to be younger, better educated, and more likely to own their own home. Opponents are more likely to earn over $200,000/year, and more likely to expect to see the project from their daily routine. The overwhelming majority of the population expects negative impacts from the project; much smaller numbers expect positive effects. When asked which factors most affected their position, the most frequently mentioned was damage to marine life/environmental impacts, followed by electricity rates, aesthetics, and impacts on fishing or boating. When the expectations expressed by our respondents are compared with the findings of the project's draft Environmental Impact Statement, many of the beliefs upon which opinion are based appear to be factually incorrect. Finally, we tested whether change in the project would affect support. The biggest change was an increase in the level of support, by 47% of the sample, if the project was the first of 300 such projects, in sum having proportionately larger impacts as well as greater benefits. Implications of this research are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.010</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Climate change ; Economic data ; Electric rates ; Energy ; Energy economics ; Energy policy ; Energy policy - Public opinion ; Environmental impact ; Environmental impact studies ; Environmental policy ; Exact sciences and technology ; General, economic and professional studies ; Massachusetts - Energy policy ; Natural energy ; Offshore ; Public opinion ; Studies ; U.S.A ; Wind energy ; Wind power ; Wind power - Public opinion</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2007-03, Vol.35 (3), p.1584-1598</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c651t-634350d64cc710882a4549bcd6f37d33c1591946409d8b8fd69f069466a845713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c651t-634350d64cc710882a4549bcd6f37d33c1591946409d8b8fd69f069466a845713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421506001881$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,27842,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18513216$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a35_3ay_3a2007_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a1584-1598.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Firestone, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kempton, Willett</creatorcontrib><title>Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>This paper address factors underlying public opinion regarding offshore wind power based on a survey of residents near a proposed development off Cape Cod, MA, USA. Supporters are found to be younger, better educated, and more likely to own their own home. Opponents are more likely to earn over $200,000/year, and more likely to expect to see the project from their daily routine. The overwhelming majority of the population expects negative impacts from the project; much smaller numbers expect positive effects. When asked which factors most affected their position, the most frequently mentioned was damage to marine life/environmental impacts, followed by electricity rates, aesthetics, and impacts on fishing or boating. When the expectations expressed by our respondents are compared with the findings of the project's draft Environmental Impact Statement, many of the beliefs upon which opinion are based appear to be factually incorrect. Finally, we tested whether change in the project would affect support. The biggest change was an increase in the level of support, by 47% of the sample, if the project was the first of 300 such projects, in sum having proportionately larger impacts as well as greater benefits. Implications of this research are discussed.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Electric rates</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Energy policy - Public opinion</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental impact studies</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Massachusetts - Energy policy</subject><subject>Natural energy</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Wind energy</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><subject>Wind power - Public opinion</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhhtRcFz9BV4aQT11W-l8tuBhXfyCAT2455BJqncz9CRt0r3L_HvTzqLgYTdQKSiet3ipt6peEmgJEPFu32KY4th2AKIF1gKBR9WGKEkbIaV8XG2AAmlYR_jT6lnOewBgqmeb6uOPZTd6W8fJBx9DbXZxmevRpCus4zDk65iwvvXB1VO8xfS-vgwO03j04aoejJ1jys-rJ4MZM76462fV5edPPy--NtvvX75dnG8bKziZG0EZ5eAEs1YSUKozjLN-Z50YqHSUWsJ70jPBoHdqpwYn-gFEGQijGJeEnlVvT3unFH8tmGd98NniOJqAcclaUdUrJWEl39xLciUFAO0eBIsfBYLzh0EmeyXluvHVf-A-LimUu-gOOCWSMFUgeoJsijknHPSU_MGkoyag10D1Xv8JVK-BamC6BFpU25Mq4YT2rwTLC7jCN5oayst3LFWUsjS_zkpNpQhXTJcrK309H8q613dOTbZmHJIJ1ud_ThQntCOicB9OHJZsbzwmna3HYNH5hHbWLvp7bf8GFQHNng</recordid><startdate>20070301</startdate><enddate>20070301</enddate><creator>Firestone, Jeremy</creator><creator>Kempton, Willett</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070301</creationdate><title>Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors</title><author>Firestone, Jeremy ; Kempton, Willett</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c651t-634350d64cc710882a4549bcd6f37d33c1591946409d8b8fd69f069466a845713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Electric rates</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Energy policy - Public opinion</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental impact studies</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Massachusetts - Energy policy</topic><topic>Natural energy</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Wind energy</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><topic>Wind power - Public opinion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Firestone, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kempton, Willett</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Firestone, Jeremy</au><au>Kempton, Willett</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2007-03-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1584</spage><epage>1598</epage><pages>1584-1598</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>This paper address factors underlying public opinion regarding offshore wind power based on a survey of residents near a proposed development off Cape Cod, MA, USA. Supporters are found to be younger, better educated, and more likely to own their own home. Opponents are more likely to earn over $200,000/year, and more likely to expect to see the project from their daily routine. The overwhelming majority of the population expects negative impacts from the project; much smaller numbers expect positive effects. When asked which factors most affected their position, the most frequently mentioned was damage to marine life/environmental impacts, followed by electricity rates, aesthetics, and impacts on fishing or boating. When the expectations expressed by our respondents are compared with the findings of the project's draft Environmental Impact Statement, many of the beliefs upon which opinion are based appear to be factually incorrect. Finally, we tested whether change in the project would affect support. The biggest change was an increase in the level of support, by 47% of the sample, if the project was the first of 300 such projects, in sum having proportionately larger impacts as well as greater benefits. Implications of this research are discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.010</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2007-03, Vol.35 (3), p.1584-1598
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_838988701
source RePEc; PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Collection
subjects Applied sciences
Climate change
Economic data
Electric rates
Energy
Energy economics
Energy policy
Energy policy - Public opinion
Environmental impact
Environmental impact studies
Environmental policy
Exact sciences and technology
General, economic and professional studies
Massachusetts - Energy policy
Natural energy
Offshore
Public opinion
Studies
U.S.A
Wind energy
Wind power
Wind power - Public opinion
title Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A28%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20opinion%20about%20large%20offshore%20wind%20power:%20Underlying%20factors&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Firestone,%20Jeremy&rft.date=2007-03-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1584&rft.epage=1598&rft.pages=1584-1598&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E58760032%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205317148&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421506001881&rfr_iscdi=true