Ileal substitute of ureter with reflux-plasty by terminal intussusception of bowel Animal experiments and clinical experience
The conflicting results reported after substitution of the ureter by isolated bowel segments suggest that the procedure is still hazardous. This induced us to check experimentally the performance of the ileal ureter with antireflux-plasty before using it clinically. The antireflux mechanism is const...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 1977-04, Vol.9 (4), p.385-389 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 389 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 385 |
container_title | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Tscholl, R. Tettamanti, F. Zingg, E. |
description | The conflicting results reported after substitution of the ureter by isolated bowel segments suggest that the procedure is still hazardous. This induced us to check experimentally the performance of the ileal ureter with antireflux-plasty before using it clinically. The antireflux mechanism is constructed by intussuscepting the terminal 8 cm. of an isolated ileal segment into each other thus forming a nipple. After vesicoileostomy the nipple protrudes into the urinary bladder. In the pig vesicoileorenal reflux was prevented, and anterograde urinary flow from the kidney through the ileal ureter into the bladder was unobstructed. Finally, the case of a patient is recorded who was submitted to the same procedure successfully. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0090-4295(77)90211-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_83888739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0090429577902114</els_id><sourcerecordid>83888739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-1127e8bfb8c76c53d03e65589f0837351eb71a769c4af1e79f3d19c13c8a5e733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtu3DAURIkgr43jP3DBykgKxaQoimRjYGEkjgEDaZKaoKgrmAFFKXzE3sL_bq7X2NLVLc7M4M4gdEbJN0pof0GIIk3XKv5FiK-KtJQ23Ru0obwVjVKKv0Wbo-Qj-pTSX0JI3_fiA3ovuWCCbtDjjQfjcSpDyi6XDHiZcImQIeJ7l-9whMmXh2b1JuUdHna4ktmF6nEhl5RKsrBmt4S9cVjuweNtcHPl8LBCdDOEnLAJI7beBWePAIKFz-jdZHyC05d7gv78-P776mdz--v65mp729hW0NxQ2gqQwzRIK3rL2UgY9JxLNRHJBOMUBkGN6JXtzERBqImNVFnKrDQcBGMn6PyQu8blX4GU9ezq396bAEtJWjIppWCqCruD0MYlpdpdr7WCiTtNid6PrveL6v2iWgj9PLruqu3sJb8MM4xH02Hlii8PGGrH_w6iTva5_-gi2KzHxb2e_wS1m5Oe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>83888739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ileal substitute of ureter with reflux-plasty by terminal intussusception of bowel Animal experiments and clinical experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Tscholl, R. ; Tettamanti, F. ; Zingg, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tscholl, R. ; Tettamanti, F. ; Zingg, E.</creatorcontrib><description>The conflicting results reported after substitution of the ureter by isolated bowel segments suggest that the procedure is still hazardous. This induced us to check experimentally the performance of the ileal ureter with antireflux-plasty before using it clinically. The antireflux mechanism is constructed by intussuscepting the terminal 8 cm. of an isolated ileal segment into each other thus forming a nipple. After vesicoileostomy the nipple protrudes into the urinary bladder. In the pig vesicoileorenal reflux was prevented, and anterograde urinary flow from the kidney through the ileal ureter into the bladder was unobstructed. Finally, the case of a patient is recorded who was submitted to the same procedure successfully.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(77)90211-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 857371</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Female ; Humans ; Ileum - transplantation ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Swine ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Ureter - physiology ; Ureter - surgery ; Vesico-Ureteral Reflux - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 1977-04, Vol.9 (4), p.385-389</ispartof><rights>1977</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-1127e8bfb8c76c53d03e65589f0837351eb71a769c4af1e79f3d19c13c8a5e733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-1127e8bfb8c76c53d03e65589f0837351eb71a769c4af1e79f3d19c13c8a5e733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(77)90211-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/857371$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tscholl, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tettamanti, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zingg, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Ileal substitute of ureter with reflux-plasty by terminal intussusception of bowel Animal experiments and clinical experience</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>The conflicting results reported after substitution of the ureter by isolated bowel segments suggest that the procedure is still hazardous. This induced us to check experimentally the performance of the ileal ureter with antireflux-plasty before using it clinically. The antireflux mechanism is constructed by intussuscepting the terminal 8 cm. of an isolated ileal segment into each other thus forming a nipple. After vesicoileostomy the nipple protrudes into the urinary bladder. In the pig vesicoileorenal reflux was prevented, and anterograde urinary flow from the kidney through the ileal ureter into the bladder was unobstructed. Finally, the case of a patient is recorded who was submitted to the same procedure successfully.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ileum - transplantation</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Ureter - physiology</subject><subject>Ureter - surgery</subject><subject>Vesico-Ureteral Reflux - prevention & control</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLtu3DAURIkgr43jP3DBykgKxaQoimRjYGEkjgEDaZKaoKgrmAFFKXzE3sL_bq7X2NLVLc7M4M4gdEbJN0pof0GIIk3XKv5FiK-KtJQ23Ru0obwVjVKKv0Wbo-Qj-pTSX0JI3_fiA3ovuWCCbtDjjQfjcSpDyi6XDHiZcImQIeJ7l-9whMmXh2b1JuUdHna4ktmF6nEhl5RKsrBmt4S9cVjuweNtcHPl8LBCdDOEnLAJI7beBWePAIKFz-jdZHyC05d7gv78-P776mdz--v65mp729hW0NxQ2gqQwzRIK3rL2UgY9JxLNRHJBOMUBkGN6JXtzERBqImNVFnKrDQcBGMn6PyQu8blX4GU9ezq396bAEtJWjIppWCqCruD0MYlpdpdr7WCiTtNid6PrveL6v2iWgj9PLruqu3sJb8MM4xH02Hlii8PGGrH_w6iTva5_-gi2KzHxb2e_wS1m5Oe</recordid><startdate>197704</startdate><enddate>197704</enddate><creator>Tscholl, R.</creator><creator>Tettamanti, F.</creator><creator>Zingg, E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197704</creationdate><title>Ileal substitute of ureter with reflux-plasty by terminal intussusception of bowel Animal experiments and clinical experience</title><author>Tscholl, R. ; Tettamanti, F. ; Zingg, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-1127e8bfb8c76c53d03e65589f0837351eb71a769c4af1e79f3d19c13c8a5e733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ileum - transplantation</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Ureter - physiology</topic><topic>Ureter - surgery</topic><topic>Vesico-Ureteral Reflux - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tscholl, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tettamanti, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zingg, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tscholl, R.</au><au>Tettamanti, F.</au><au>Zingg, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ileal substitute of ureter with reflux-plasty by terminal intussusception of bowel Animal experiments and clinical experience</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>1977-04</date><risdate>1977</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>389</epage><pages>385-389</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><abstract>The conflicting results reported after substitution of the ureter by isolated bowel segments suggest that the procedure is still hazardous. This induced us to check experimentally the performance of the ileal ureter with antireflux-plasty before using it clinically. The antireflux mechanism is constructed by intussuscepting the terminal 8 cm. of an isolated ileal segment into each other thus forming a nipple. After vesicoileostomy the nipple protrudes into the urinary bladder. In the pig vesicoileorenal reflux was prevented, and anterograde urinary flow from the kidney through the ileal ureter into the bladder was unobstructed. Finally, the case of a patient is recorded who was submitted to the same procedure successfully.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>857371</pmid><doi>10.1016/0090-4295(77)90211-4</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-4295 |
ispartof | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 1977-04, Vol.9 (4), p.385-389 |
issn | 0090-4295 1527-9995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_83888739 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Animals Female Humans Ileum - transplantation Methods Middle Aged Swine Transplantation, Autologous Ureter - physiology Ureter - surgery Vesico-Ureteral Reflux - prevention & control |
title | Ileal substitute of ureter with reflux-plasty by terminal intussusception of bowel Animal experiments and clinical experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T17%3A51%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ileal%20substitute%20of%20ureter%20with%20reflux-plasty%20by%20terminal%20intussusception%20of%20bowel%20Animal%20experiments%20and%20clinical%20experience&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Tscholl,%20R.&rft.date=1977-04&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=389&rft.pages=385-389&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0090-4295(77)90211-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E83888739%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=83888739&rft_id=info:pmid/857371&rft_els_id=0090429577902114&rfr_iscdi=true |