Peritoneal lavage
The concept of lavage as an effective means for detecting intraperitoneal injury secondary to trauma has been adequately demonstrated. The value of peritoneal lavage is especially reflected in the statistics reporting approximately 20 per cent incidence of unnecessary celiotomies when physical exami...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The American Journal of Surgery 1977-03, Vol.133 (3), p.365-369 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 369 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 365 |
| container_title | The American Journal of Surgery |
| container_volume | 133 |
| creator | Jergens, Mark E. |
| description | The concept of lavage as an effective means for detecting intraperitoneal injury secondary to trauma has been adequately demonstrated. The value of peritoneal lavage is especially reflected in the statistics reporting approximately 20 per cent incidence of unnecessary celiotomies when physical examination findings alone are used, whereas the number of false-positives and false-negatives may be lowered significantly.
Not only does peritoneal lavage decrease the number of unnecessary celiotomies, but it also provides for a more rapid diagnosis that can prevent greater blood loss, thereby reducing the number of subsequent transfusions, minimizing chances of hepatitis, and lowering the incidence of shock with its coincident complications. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90546-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_83869375</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0002961077905463</els_id><sourcerecordid>83869375</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-559624a5f05de3417ac9b90aba27d708670f413bb9b09f6ffce73c06d986a10c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS3EKxQG9g5MCIbAdRy_FiRU8ZIqwQCz5TjXyChNip1W4t-Tkqoj09XVeUjfIWRK4YYCFbcAUORaULiS8loDL0XO9khGldQ5VYrtk2xnOSYnKX0NL6UlOyKHrCg41Rk5f8MY-q5F21w0dm0_8ZQceNskPNveCfl4fHifPefz16eX2f08d4yLPudci6K03AOvkZVUWqcrDbayhawlKCHBl5RVla5Ae-G9Q8kciForYSk4NiGXY-8ydt8rTL1ZhOSwaWyL3SoZxZTQTPLBWI5GF7uUInqzjGFh44-hYDZDmA2l2VAaKc3fEIYNsem2f1UtsN6FRvJBvhtlHBjXAaNJLmDrsA4RXW_qLvzf_wsHI2n9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>83869375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peritoneal lavage</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jergens, Mark E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jergens, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><description>The concept of lavage as an effective means for detecting intraperitoneal injury secondary to trauma has been adequately demonstrated. The value of peritoneal lavage is especially reflected in the statistics reporting approximately 20 per cent incidence of unnecessary celiotomies when physical examination findings alone are used, whereas the number of false-positives and false-negatives may be lowered significantly.
Not only does peritoneal lavage decrease the number of unnecessary celiotomies, but it also provides for a more rapid diagnosis that can prevent greater blood loss, thereby reducing the number of subsequent transfusions, minimizing chances of hepatitis, and lowering the incidence of shock with its coincident complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90546-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 322519</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abdominal Injuries - diagnosis ; Amylases - analysis ; Ascitic Fluid - analysis ; Blood Cell Count ; False Negative Reactions ; False Positive Reactions ; Hemoperitoneum - diagnosis ; Humans ; Peritoneal Cavity ; Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects ; Therapeutic Irrigation - methods ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>The American Journal of Surgery, 1977-03, Vol.133 (3), p.365-369</ispartof><rights>1977</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-559624a5f05de3417ac9b90aba27d708670f413bb9b09f6ffce73c06d986a10c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-559624a5f05de3417ac9b90aba27d708670f413bb9b09f6ffce73c06d986a10c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0002961077905463$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,3537,27899,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/322519$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jergens, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><title>Peritoneal lavage</title><title>The American Journal of Surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>The concept of lavage as an effective means for detecting intraperitoneal injury secondary to trauma has been adequately demonstrated. The value of peritoneal lavage is especially reflected in the statistics reporting approximately 20 per cent incidence of unnecessary celiotomies when physical examination findings alone are used, whereas the number of false-positives and false-negatives may be lowered significantly.
Not only does peritoneal lavage decrease the number of unnecessary celiotomies, but it also provides for a more rapid diagnosis that can prevent greater blood loss, thereby reducing the number of subsequent transfusions, minimizing chances of hepatitis, and lowering the incidence of shock with its coincident complications.</description><subject>Abdominal Injuries - diagnosis</subject><subject>Amylases - analysis</subject><subject>Ascitic Fluid - analysis</subject><subject>Blood Cell Count</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Hemoperitoneum - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Peritoneal Cavity</subject><subject>Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Therapeutic Irrigation - methods</subject><subject>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnosis</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS3EKxQG9g5MCIbAdRy_FiRU8ZIqwQCz5TjXyChNip1W4t-Tkqoj09XVeUjfIWRK4YYCFbcAUORaULiS8loDL0XO9khGldQ5VYrtk2xnOSYnKX0NL6UlOyKHrCg41Rk5f8MY-q5F21w0dm0_8ZQceNskPNveCfl4fHifPefz16eX2f08d4yLPudci6K03AOvkZVUWqcrDbayhawlKCHBl5RVla5Ae-G9Q8kciForYSk4NiGXY-8ydt8rTL1ZhOSwaWyL3SoZxZTQTPLBWI5GF7uUInqzjGFh44-hYDZDmA2l2VAaKc3fEIYNsem2f1UtsN6FRvJBvhtlHBjXAaNJLmDrsA4RXW_qLvzf_wsHI2n9</recordid><startdate>197703</startdate><enddate>197703</enddate><creator>Jergens, Mark E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197703</creationdate><title>Peritoneal lavage</title><author>Jergens, Mark E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-559624a5f05de3417ac9b90aba27d708670f413bb9b09f6ffce73c06d986a10c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Injuries - diagnosis</topic><topic>Amylases - analysis</topic><topic>Ascitic Fluid - analysis</topic><topic>Blood Cell Count</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Hemoperitoneum - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Peritoneal Cavity</topic><topic>Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Therapeutic Irrigation - methods</topic><topic>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jergens, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American Journal of Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jergens, Mark E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peritoneal lavage</atitle><jtitle>The American Journal of Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>1977-03</date><risdate>1977</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>369</epage><pages>365-369</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>The concept of lavage as an effective means for detecting intraperitoneal injury secondary to trauma has been adequately demonstrated. The value of peritoneal lavage is especially reflected in the statistics reporting approximately 20 per cent incidence of unnecessary celiotomies when physical examination findings alone are used, whereas the number of false-positives and false-negatives may be lowered significantly.
Not only does peritoneal lavage decrease the number of unnecessary celiotomies, but it also provides for a more rapid diagnosis that can prevent greater blood loss, thereby reducing the number of subsequent transfusions, minimizing chances of hepatitis, and lowering the incidence of shock with its coincident complications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>322519</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9610(77)90546-3</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
| ispartof | The American Journal of Surgery, 1977-03, Vol.133 (3), p.365-369 |
| issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_83869375 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Abdominal Injuries - diagnosis Amylases - analysis Ascitic Fluid - analysis Blood Cell Count False Negative Reactions False Positive Reactions Hemoperitoneum - diagnosis Humans Peritoneal Cavity Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects Therapeutic Irrigation - methods Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnosis |
| title | Peritoneal lavage |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A18%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peritoneal%20lavage&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20Journal%20of%20Surgery&rft.au=Jergens,%20Mark%20E.&rft.date=1977-03&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=369&rft.pages=365-369&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9610(77)90546-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E83869375%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=83869375&rft_id=info:pmid/322519&rft_els_id=0002961077905463&rfr_iscdi=true |