Comparison of the Wintrobe erythrocyte sedimentation rate with the zeta sedimentation ratio

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) determinations performed by the Wintrobe method were correlated with a newer, rapid method, the zeta sedimentation ratio (ZSR), in 189 adult patients. Good correlation between the two methods was achieved over a wide range of values, with a correlation coefficien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	American journal of clinical pathology 1976-05, Vol.65 (5), p.690-693
Hauptverfasser:	Raich, P C, Temperly, N
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adult Blood Sedimentation Female Humans Male Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Time Factors
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	693
container_issue	5
container_start_page	690
container_title	American journal of clinical pathology
container_volume	65
creator	Raich, P C Temperly, N
description	Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) determinations performed by the Wintrobe method were correlated with a newer, rapid method, the zeta sedimentation ratio (ZSR), in 189 adult patients. Good correlation between the two methods was achieved over a wide range of values, with a correlation coefficient of 0.88 in female and 0.92 in male subjects. The precision of each method was evaluated by performing ten replicate determinations for 11 patients. The average variance for the ZSR was 2.91%, compared with 7.04% for the Wintrobe ESR; a difference significant at p < 0.01. Good correlation with standard methods, speed of performance and superior precision make the ZSR an attractive alternate procedure for the determination of the sedimentation rate.
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_83819205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>83819205</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p207t-923c5a6f0682a9ac4e1269d96bf578fded6755b148256c64e3ef8f8dbcc4eaf93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpl0EtLxDAUBeAsFGcc_QvSlbtCHk2aLGXwBQNuFBcuSprc0Ejb1CRF6q-36LhydeHwnbO4J2iLMaalIjXboPOU3jEmVOLqDG2I4IxLQrbobR-GSUefwlgEV-QOilc_5hhaKCAuuYvBLBmKBNYPMGad_SqjXqNPn7ufwhdk_R_4cIFOne4TXB7vDr3c3T7vH8rD0_3j_uZQThTXuVSUGa6Fw0JSrbSpgFChrBKt47V0FqyoOW9JJSkXRlTAwEknbWtWqp1iO3T9uzvF8DFDys3gk4G-1yOEOTWSSaIo5iu8OsK5HcA2U_SDjkvz9w72DVojXTk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>83819205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Wintrobe erythrocyte sedimentation rate with the zeta sedimentation ratio</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><creator>Raich, P C ; Temperly, N</creator><creatorcontrib>Raich, P C ; Temperly, N</creatorcontrib><description>Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) determinations performed by the Wintrobe method were correlated with a newer, rapid method, the zeta sedimentation ratio (ZSR), in 189 adult patients. Good correlation between the two methods was achieved over a wide range of values, with a correlation coefficient of 0.88 in female and 0.92 in male subjects. The precision of each method was evaluated by performing ten replicate determinations for 11 patients. The average variance for the ZSR was 2.91%, compared with 7.04% for the Wintrobe ESR; a difference significant at p < 0.01. Good correlation with standard methods, speed of performance and superior precision make the ZSR an attractive alternate procedure for the determination of the sedimentation rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9173</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16535811</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Blood Sedimentation ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>American journal of clinical pathology, 1976-05, Vol.65 (5), p.690-693</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16535811$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raich, P C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Temperly, N</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Wintrobe erythrocyte sedimentation rate with the zeta sedimentation ratio</title><title>American journal of clinical pathology</title><addtitle>Am J Clin Pathol</addtitle><description>Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) determinations performed by the Wintrobe method were correlated with a newer, rapid method, the zeta sedimentation ratio (ZSR), in 189 adult patients. Good correlation between the two methods was achieved over a wide range of values, with a correlation coefficient of 0.88 in female and 0.92 in male subjects. The precision of each method was evaluated by performing ten replicate determinations for 11 patients. The average variance for the ZSR was 2.91%, compared with 7.04% for the Wintrobe ESR; a difference significant at p < 0.01. Good correlation with standard methods, speed of performance and superior precision make the ZSR an attractive alternate procedure for the determination of the sedimentation rate.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blood Sedimentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0002-9173</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1976</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpl0EtLxDAUBeAsFGcc_QvSlbtCHk2aLGXwBQNuFBcuSprc0Ejb1CRF6q-36LhydeHwnbO4J2iLMaalIjXboPOU3jEmVOLqDG2I4IxLQrbobR-GSUefwlgEV-QOilc_5hhaKCAuuYvBLBmKBNYPMGad_SqjXqNPn7ufwhdk_R_4cIFOne4TXB7vDr3c3T7vH8rD0_3j_uZQThTXuVSUGa6Fw0JSrbSpgFChrBKt47V0FqyoOW9JJSkXRlTAwEknbWtWqp1iO3T9uzvF8DFDys3gk4G-1yOEOTWSSaIo5iu8OsK5HcA2U_SDjkvz9w72DVojXTk</recordid><startdate>197605</startdate><enddate>197605</enddate><creator>Raich, P C</creator><creator>Temperly, N</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197605</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Wintrobe erythrocyte sedimentation rate with the zeta sedimentation ratio</title><author>Raich, P C ; Temperly, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p207t-923c5a6f0682a9ac4e1269d96bf578fded6755b148256c64e3ef8f8dbcc4eaf93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1976</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blood Sedimentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raich, P C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Temperly, N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of clinical pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raich, P C</au><au>Temperly, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Wintrobe erythrocyte sedimentation rate with the zeta sedimentation ratio</atitle><jtitle>American journal of clinical pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Clin Pathol</addtitle><date>1976-05</date><risdate>1976</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>690</spage><epage>693</epage><pages>690-693</pages><issn>0002-9173</issn><abstract>Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) determinations performed by the Wintrobe method were correlated with a newer, rapid method, the zeta sedimentation ratio (ZSR), in 189 adult patients. Good correlation between the two methods was achieved over a wide range of values, with a correlation coefficient of 0.88 in female and 0.92 in male subjects. The precision of each method was evaluated by performing ten replicate determinations for 11 patients. The average variance for the ZSR was 2.91%, compared with 7.04% for the Wintrobe ESR; a difference significant at p < 0.01. Good correlation with standard methods, speed of performance and superior precision make the ZSR an attractive alternate procedure for the determination of the sedimentation rate.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>16535811</pmid><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0002-9173
ispartof	American journal of clinical pathology, 1976-05, Vol.65 (5), p.690-693
issn	0002-9173
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_83819205
source	MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy
subjects	Adult Blood Sedimentation Female Humans Male Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Time Factors
title	Comparison of the Wintrobe erythrocyte sedimentation rate with the zeta sedimentation ratio
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A53%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Wintrobe%20erythrocyte%20sedimentation%20rate%20with%20the%20zeta%20sedimentation%20ratio&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pathology&rft.au=Raich,%20P%20C&rft.date=1976-05&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=690&rft.epage=693&rft.pages=690-693&rft.issn=0002-9173&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E83819205%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=83819205&rft_id=info:pmid/16535811&rfr_iscdi=true