Automated In-Vitro Testing of Orthopaedic Implants: A Case Study in Shoulder Joint Replacement

This investigation presents the design and preliminary validation of a single station simulator with biaxial motion and loading designed to mimic the kinematics of the glenohumeral joint during arm abduction in the scapular plane. Although the design of the glenoid holder allows the glenoid componen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine Journal of engineering in medicine, 2010-11, Vol.224 (11), p.1297-1309
Hauptverfasser: Geary, C, O'Donnell, G E, Jones, E, FitzPatrick, D, Birkinshaw, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1309
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1297
container_title Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine
container_volume 224
creator Geary, C
O'Donnell, G E
Jones, E
FitzPatrick, D
Birkinshaw, C
description This investigation presents the design and preliminary validation of a single station simulator with biaxial motion and loading designed to mimic the kinematics of the glenohumeral joint during arm abduction in the scapular plane. Although the design of the glenoid holder allows the glenoid component to translate in all three axes, it is primarily loaded axially, which brings it into contact with the oscillating humeral head, but is also loaded superiorly to simulate common subluxation of the humeral head. Simulating arm abduction in the scapular plane simplifies component alignment and removes the need for anterior—posterior loading, thereby creating a stable joint without the need to simulate capsular constraints. In this more physiologically accurate simulator design, the load and motion profiles influence the contact kinematics, but the wear path is ultimately determined by the conformity and constraint designed into the bearing couple. The wear data are determined and correlated with clinically retrieved glenoid components, as well as previously reported in-vitro studies, thus verifying use of the simulator in testing alternative materials and designs. The key design features, as well as the improvements proposed through this study, can be incorporated into the design of test fixtures for any other orthopaedic implant such as the hip, knee, spine, elbow, and finger.
doi_str_mv 10.1243/09544119JEIM746
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_837456593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1243_09544119JEIM746</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1904264263</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-f3980f9df13d93a6d381a33583e02ba5a38c30e7d5322a09b7078e643a5a991e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLLDEQhYMoOj7Wd3cJunBja5JKdyd3Nww-RhTB19Im06nWlunO3CS98N-bYVREEApqcb46deAQ8oezYy4knDCdS8m5vjydXpeyWCMjwSTPgAGsk9FSzZbyFtkO4ZUxxjkrNsmW4IKrQosReRoP0XUmoqXTPntso3f0HkNs-2fqGnrj44tbGLRtTafdYm76GP7RMZ2YgPQuDvaNtj29e3HD3KKnl67tI73FBNbYYR93yUZj5gH3PvYOeTg7vZ9cZFc359PJ-CqrQamYNaAVa7RtOFgNprCguAHIFSATM5MbUDUwLG0OQhimZyUrFRYSkqQ1R9ghhyvfhXf_h5S_6tpQ4zwFRjeESkEp8yLXkMj9H-SrG3yfwlWqAJkrKVSCDn6DuGZSFGmWVicrqvYuBI9NtfBtZ_xbxVm1rKf6UU-6-PvhO8w6tF_8Zx8JOFoBwTzjt6e_-L0DZROU-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>863458428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated In-Vitro Testing of Orthopaedic Implants: A Case Study in Shoulder Joint Replacement</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Geary, C ; O'Donnell, G E ; Jones, E ; FitzPatrick, D ; Birkinshaw, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Geary, C ; O'Donnell, G E ; Jones, E ; FitzPatrick, D ; Birkinshaw, C</creatorcontrib><description>This investigation presents the design and preliminary validation of a single station simulator with biaxial motion and loading designed to mimic the kinematics of the glenohumeral joint during arm abduction in the scapular plane. Although the design of the glenoid holder allows the glenoid component to translate in all three axes, it is primarily loaded axially, which brings it into contact with the oscillating humeral head, but is also loaded superiorly to simulate common subluxation of the humeral head. Simulating arm abduction in the scapular plane simplifies component alignment and removes the need for anterior—posterior loading, thereby creating a stable joint without the need to simulate capsular constraints. In this more physiologically accurate simulator design, the load and motion profiles influence the contact kinematics, but the wear path is ultimately determined by the conformity and constraint designed into the bearing couple. The wear data are determined and correlated with clinically retrieved glenoid components, as well as previously reported in-vitro studies, thus verifying use of the simulator in testing alternative materials and designs. The key design features, as well as the improvements proposed through this study, can be incorporated into the design of test fixtures for any other orthopaedic implant such as the hip, knee, spine, elbow, and finger.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-4119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-3033</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM746</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21218692</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Alignment ; Arm ; Automation ; Axes (reference lines) ; Bearing ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Case studies ; Constraint modelling ; Correlation ; Design ; Design improvements ; Elbow ; Elbow (anatomy) ; Equipment Failure Analysis - instrumentation ; Finger ; Fixtures ; Glenoid components ; Hip ; Humans ; Humerus ; Implants ; Joint Prosthesis ; Joint replacement surgery ; Kinematics ; Knee ; Materials Testing - instrumentation ; Mechanical engineering ; Medical equipment ; Microscopy, Atomic Force ; Models, Biological ; Motion effects ; Orthopaedic implants ; Orthopedics ; Prosthesis Design ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reproducibility of Results ; Shoulder ; Shoulder Joint ; Simulation ; Spine ; Surface Properties ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Wear</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine, 2010-11, Vol.224 (11), p.1297-1309</ispartof><rights>2010 Institution of Mechanical Engineers</rights><rights>Copyright Professional Engineering Publishing Ltd Nov 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-f3980f9df13d93a6d381a33583e02ba5a38c30e7d5322a09b7078e643a5a991e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-f3980f9df13d93a6d381a33583e02ba5a38c30e7d5322a09b7078e643a5a991e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1243/09544119JEIM746$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1243/09544119JEIM746$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21218692$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geary, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, G E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FitzPatrick, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birkinshaw, C</creatorcontrib><title>Automated In-Vitro Testing of Orthopaedic Implants: A Case Study in Shoulder Joint Replacement</title><title>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine</title><addtitle>Proc Inst Mech Eng H</addtitle><description>This investigation presents the design and preliminary validation of a single station simulator with biaxial motion and loading designed to mimic the kinematics of the glenohumeral joint during arm abduction in the scapular plane. Although the design of the glenoid holder allows the glenoid component to translate in all three axes, it is primarily loaded axially, which brings it into contact with the oscillating humeral head, but is also loaded superiorly to simulate common subluxation of the humeral head. Simulating arm abduction in the scapular plane simplifies component alignment and removes the need for anterior—posterior loading, thereby creating a stable joint without the need to simulate capsular constraints. In this more physiologically accurate simulator design, the load and motion profiles influence the contact kinematics, but the wear path is ultimately determined by the conformity and constraint designed into the bearing couple. The wear data are determined and correlated with clinically retrieved glenoid components, as well as previously reported in-vitro studies, thus verifying use of the simulator in testing alternative materials and designs. The key design features, as well as the improvements proposed through this study, can be incorporated into the design of test fixtures for any other orthopaedic implant such as the hip, knee, spine, elbow, and finger.</description><subject>Alignment</subject><subject>Arm</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Axes (reference lines)</subject><subject>Bearing</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Constraint modelling</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design improvements</subject><subject>Elbow</subject><subject>Elbow (anatomy)</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis - instrumentation</subject><subject>Finger</subject><subject>Fixtures</subject><subject>Glenoid components</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humerus</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Joint Prosthesis</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Materials Testing - instrumentation</subject><subject>Mechanical engineering</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Microscopy, Atomic Force</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Motion effects</subject><subject>Orthopaedic implants</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Wear</subject><issn>0954-4119</issn><issn>2041-3033</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLLDEQhYMoOj7Wd3cJunBja5JKdyd3Nww-RhTB19Im06nWlunO3CS98N-bYVREEApqcb46deAQ8oezYy4knDCdS8m5vjydXpeyWCMjwSTPgAGsk9FSzZbyFtkO4ZUxxjkrNsmW4IKrQosReRoP0XUmoqXTPntso3f0HkNs-2fqGnrj44tbGLRtTafdYm76GP7RMZ2YgPQuDvaNtj29e3HD3KKnl67tI73FBNbYYR93yUZj5gH3PvYOeTg7vZ9cZFc359PJ-CqrQamYNaAVa7RtOFgNprCguAHIFSATM5MbUDUwLG0OQhimZyUrFRYSkqQ1R9ghhyvfhXf_h5S_6tpQ4zwFRjeESkEp8yLXkMj9H-SrG3yfwlWqAJkrKVSCDn6DuGZSFGmWVicrqvYuBI9NtfBtZ_xbxVm1rKf6UU-6-PvhO8w6tF_8Zx8JOFoBwTzjt6e_-L0DZROU-g</recordid><startdate>20101101</startdate><enddate>20101101</enddate><creator>Geary, C</creator><creator>O'Donnell, G E</creator><creator>Jones, E</creator><creator>FitzPatrick, D</creator><creator>Birkinshaw, C</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101101</creationdate><title>Automated In-Vitro Testing of Orthopaedic Implants: A Case Study in Shoulder Joint Replacement</title><author>Geary, C ; O'Donnell, G E ; Jones, E ; FitzPatrick, D ; Birkinshaw, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-f3980f9df13d93a6d381a33583e02ba5a38c30e7d5322a09b7078e643a5a991e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Alignment</topic><topic>Arm</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Axes (reference lines)</topic><topic>Bearing</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Constraint modelling</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design improvements</topic><topic>Elbow</topic><topic>Elbow (anatomy)</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis - instrumentation</topic><topic>Finger</topic><topic>Fixtures</topic><topic>Glenoid components</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humerus</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Joint Prosthesis</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Materials Testing - instrumentation</topic><topic>Mechanical engineering</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Microscopy, Atomic Force</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Motion effects</topic><topic>Orthopaedic implants</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Wear</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geary, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, G E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FitzPatrick, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birkinshaw, C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geary, C</au><au>O'Donnell, G E</au><au>Jones, E</au><au>FitzPatrick, D</au><au>Birkinshaw, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated In-Vitro Testing of Orthopaedic Implants: A Case Study in Shoulder Joint Replacement</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Inst Mech Eng H</addtitle><date>2010-11-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>224</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1297</spage><epage>1309</epage><pages>1297-1309</pages><issn>0954-4119</issn><eissn>2041-3033</eissn><abstract>This investigation presents the design and preliminary validation of a single station simulator with biaxial motion and loading designed to mimic the kinematics of the glenohumeral joint during arm abduction in the scapular plane. Although the design of the glenoid holder allows the glenoid component to translate in all three axes, it is primarily loaded axially, which brings it into contact with the oscillating humeral head, but is also loaded superiorly to simulate common subluxation of the humeral head. Simulating arm abduction in the scapular plane simplifies component alignment and removes the need for anterior—posterior loading, thereby creating a stable joint without the need to simulate capsular constraints. In this more physiologically accurate simulator design, the load and motion profiles influence the contact kinematics, but the wear path is ultimately determined by the conformity and constraint designed into the bearing couple. The wear data are determined and correlated with clinically retrieved glenoid components, as well as previously reported in-vitro studies, thus verifying use of the simulator in testing alternative materials and designs. The key design features, as well as the improvements proposed through this study, can be incorporated into the design of test fixtures for any other orthopaedic implant such as the hip, knee, spine, elbow, and finger.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21218692</pmid><doi>10.1243/09544119JEIM746</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0954-4119
ispartof Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine, 2010-11, Vol.224 (11), p.1297-1309
issn 0954-4119
2041-3033
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_837456593
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE
subjects Alignment
Arm
Automation
Axes (reference lines)
Bearing
Biomechanical Phenomena
Case studies
Constraint modelling
Correlation
Design
Design improvements
Elbow
Elbow (anatomy)
Equipment Failure Analysis - instrumentation
Finger
Fixtures
Glenoid components
Hip
Humans
Humerus
Implants
Joint Prosthesis
Joint replacement surgery
Kinematics
Knee
Materials Testing - instrumentation
Mechanical engineering
Medical equipment
Microscopy, Atomic Force
Models, Biological
Motion effects
Orthopaedic implants
Orthopedics
Prosthesis Design
Range of Motion, Articular
Reproducibility of Results
Shoulder
Shoulder Joint
Simulation
Spine
Surface Properties
Transplants & implants
Wear
title Automated In-Vitro Testing of Orthopaedic Implants: A Case Study in Shoulder Joint Replacement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T17%3A11%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20In-Vitro%20Testing%20of%20Orthopaedic%20Implants:%20A%20Case%20Study%20in%20Shoulder%20Joint%20Replacement&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Institution%20of%20Mechanical%20Engineers.%20Part%20H,%20Journal%20of%20engineering%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Geary,%20C&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.volume=224&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1297&rft.epage=1309&rft.pages=1297-1309&rft.issn=0954-4119&rft.eissn=2041-3033&rft_id=info:doi/10.1243/09544119JEIM746&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1904264263%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=863458428&rft_id=info:pmid/21218692&rft_sage_id=10.1243_09544119JEIM746&rfr_iscdi=true