The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain
A linear analogue for rating pain with 10, 15 and 20 cm lines is significantly less variable than a 5 cm line (mean error of 15 cm line is 0-19%, 95% confidence limits for the group +/- 2% and an inood correlation between repeated ratins of a recalled pain distant in time. The variance of the rating...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Anaesthesia 1976-11, Vol.31 (9), p.1191-1198 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1198 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1191 |
| container_title | Anaesthesia |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | REVILL, S. I. ROBINSON, J. O. ROSEN, M. HOGG, M. I. J. |
| description | A linear analogue for rating pain with 10, 15 and 20 cm lines is significantly less variable than a 5 cm line (mean error of 15 cm line is 0-19%, 95% confidence limits for the group +/- 2% and an inood correlation between repeated ratins of a recalled pain distant in time. The variance of the rating is significantly less than the repeated rating of a random mark. The linear analogue rating of a constant pain stimulus is reproducible and changes in rating are likely to be real changes of opinion. Pethidine 150 mg intramuscularly had no significant effect, tested 30 minutes after the administration, on the accuracy or reproducibility of the analogue rating. A linear analogue seems a suitable method of recording the patient's opion of a severe pain such as that of labour. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_83688562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>83688562</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-a772045b6d38e56295a4042278b8d8a5b28ddc469e377c17e9df1f223c63406f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EKqXwCUgWC3YJfsV2WFFV5SEh2JS15SROceUmxU6g_XscWiG2zOaOdGfujA4AVxilONbNKsWUZwlBjKU4FzztChwVp9sjMP61jsEYIUQTwlB-Cs5CWCGEicRyBEYY4YwjOgZy8W6gN87qwjrb7WBbQw2dbYz2UDfatcvewLr10Hxq1-vONku40bY5Bye1dsFcHHQC3u7ni9lj8vz68DSbPiclYwInWoj4S1bwikqTcZJnmiFGiJCFrKTOCiKrqmQ8N1SIEguTVzWuCaElpwzxmk7A9T5349uP3oROrW0ojXO6MW0flKRcyhgcB2_3g6VvQ_CmVhtv19rvFEZqwKZWamCjBjZqwKYO2NQ2Ll8ervTF2lR_Vn84Rf9u739ZZ3b_SFbTl-k89ph-Awhbe5k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>83688562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>REVILL, S. I. ; ROBINSON, J. O. ; ROSEN, M. ; HOGG, M. I. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>REVILL, S. I. ; ROBINSON, J. O. ; ROSEN, M. ; HOGG, M. I. J.</creatorcontrib><description>A linear analogue for rating pain with 10, 15 and 20 cm lines is significantly less variable than a 5 cm line (mean error of 15 cm line is 0-19%, 95% confidence limits for the group +/- 2% and an inood correlation between repeated ratins of a recalled pain distant in time. The variance of the rating is significantly less than the repeated rating of a random mark. The linear analogue rating of a constant pain stimulus is reproducible and changes in rating are likely to be real changes of opinion. Pethidine 150 mg intramuscularly had no significant effect, tested 30 minutes after the administration, on the accuracy or reproducibility of the analogue rating. A linear analogue seems a suitable method of recording the patient's opion of a severe pain such as that of labour.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1015603</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; Humans ; Labor, Obstetric ; Male ; Memory ; Meperidine - pharmacology ; Methods ; Pain - diagnosis ; Pregnancy ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia, 1976-11, Vol.31 (9), p.1191-1198</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-a772045b6d38e56295a4042278b8d8a5b28ddc469e377c17e9df1f223c63406f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-a772045b6d38e56295a4042278b8d8a5b28ddc469e377c17e9df1f223c63406f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1015603$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>REVILL, S. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, J. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSEN, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOGG, M. I. J.</creatorcontrib><title>The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain</title><title>Anaesthesia</title><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><description>A linear analogue for rating pain with 10, 15 and 20 cm lines is significantly less variable than a 5 cm line (mean error of 15 cm line is 0-19%, 95% confidence limits for the group +/- 2% and an inood correlation between repeated ratins of a recalled pain distant in time. The variance of the rating is significantly less than the repeated rating of a random mark. The linear analogue rating of a constant pain stimulus is reproducible and changes in rating are likely to be real changes of opinion. Pethidine 150 mg intramuscularly had no significant effect, tested 30 minutes after the administration, on the accuracy or reproducibility of the analogue rating. A linear analogue seems a suitable method of recording the patient's opion of a severe pain such as that of labour.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labor, Obstetric</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Meperidine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0003-2409</issn><issn>1365-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1976</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EKqXwCUgWC3YJfsV2WFFV5SEh2JS15SROceUmxU6g_XscWiG2zOaOdGfujA4AVxilONbNKsWUZwlBjKU4FzztChwVp9sjMP61jsEYIUQTwlB-Cs5CWCGEicRyBEYY4YwjOgZy8W6gN87qwjrb7WBbQw2dbYz2UDfatcvewLr10Hxq1-vONku40bY5Bye1dsFcHHQC3u7ni9lj8vz68DSbPiclYwInWoj4S1bwikqTcZJnmiFGiJCFrKTOCiKrqmQ8N1SIEguTVzWuCaElpwzxmk7A9T5349uP3oROrW0ojXO6MW0flKRcyhgcB2_3g6VvQ_CmVhtv19rvFEZqwKZWamCjBjZqwKYO2NQ2Ll8ervTF2lR_Vn84Rf9u739ZZ3b_SFbTl-k89ph-Awhbe5k</recordid><startdate>197611</startdate><enddate>197611</enddate><creator>REVILL, S. I.</creator><creator>ROBINSON, J. O.</creator><creator>ROSEN, M.</creator><creator>HOGG, M. I. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197611</creationdate><title>The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain</title><author>REVILL, S. I. ; ROBINSON, J. O. ; ROSEN, M. ; HOGG, M. I. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-a772045b6d38e56295a4042278b8d8a5b28ddc469e377c17e9df1f223c63406f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1976</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labor, Obstetric</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Meperidine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>REVILL, S. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, J. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSEN, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOGG, M. I. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>REVILL, S. I.</au><au>ROBINSON, J. O.</au><au>ROSEN, M.</au><au>HOGG, M. I. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><date>1976-11</date><risdate>1976</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1191</spage><epage>1198</epage><pages>1191-1198</pages><issn>0003-2409</issn><eissn>1365-2044</eissn><abstract>A linear analogue for rating pain with 10, 15 and 20 cm lines is significantly less variable than a 5 cm line (mean error of 15 cm line is 0-19%, 95% confidence limits for the group +/- 2% and an inood correlation between repeated ratins of a recalled pain distant in time. The variance of the rating is significantly less than the repeated rating of a random mark. The linear analogue rating of a constant pain stimulus is reproducible and changes in rating are likely to be real changes of opinion. Pethidine 150 mg intramuscularly had no significant effect, tested 30 minutes after the administration, on the accuracy or reproducibility of the analogue rating. A linear analogue seems a suitable method of recording the patient's opion of a severe pain such as that of labour.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>1015603</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-2409 |
| ispartof | Anaesthesia, 1976-11, Vol.31 (9), p.1191-1198 |
| issn | 0003-2409 1365-2044 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_83688562 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adult Analysis of Variance Evaluation Studies as Topic Female Humans Labor, Obstetric Male Memory Meperidine - pharmacology Methods Pain - diagnosis Pregnancy Time Factors |
| title | The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T03%3A37%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20reliability%20of%20a%20linear%20analogue%20for%20evaluating%20pain&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia&rft.au=REVILL,%20S.%20I.&rft.date=1976-11&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1191&rft.epage=1198&rft.pages=1191-1198&rft.issn=0003-2409&rft.eissn=1365-2044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E83688562%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=83688562&rft_id=info:pmid/1015603&rfr_iscdi=true |