A comparison of Sheldon's and Parnell's methods for quantifying morphological differences
Comparison of Sheldon's somatotype and Parnell's phenotype scores on 102 normal male university students showed significant differences between all three matched pairs of components. Shared variances were 35% for endomorphy and Fat, 44% for mesomorphy and Muscularity, and 74% for ectomorph...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physical anthropology 1965-06, Vol.23 (2), p.135-141 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 141 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 135 |
| container_title | American journal of physical anthropology |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Haronian, Frank Arthur Sugerman, A. |
| description | Comparison of Sheldon's somatotype and Parnell's phenotype scores on 102 normal male university students showed significant differences between all three matched pairs of components. Shared variances were 35% for endomorphy and Fat, 44% for mesomorphy and Muscularity, and 74% for ectomorphy and Linearity. Parnell's Muscularity scores averaged nearly one point less than Sheldon's mesomorphy scores. Although both systems exhibit redundancy, neither seems reduceable to two scores. Because both systems show twice as many correlations with a variety of psychological measures as would be expected by chance, it would be useful to include either or both systems routinely in psychological studies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ajpa.1330230213 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_83653060</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>83653060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-4b193ee0f593ecd74da2b9a2938aad38688552b5ef02cdc341148e38974aad3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkN9LHDEQx4NY9LQ-96kQEPRpNcnsZrOPInoWxApnsX0Kufzw9txN1mQX9L9vjjssFAaG4fuZ4TtfhL5RckEJYZdqPagLCkBYLgp7aEZJwwvBy3IfzUhGiqYUcIiOUlrnkec6QAeVYJzVdIb-XGEd-kHFNgWPg8OLle1M8OcJK2_wo4redl2eejuugknYhYjfJuXH1n20_gX3IQ6r0IWXVqsOm9Y5G63XNn1FX5zqkj3Z9WP06_bm6fquuP85_3F9dV9o4GQsyiVtwFriqty0qUuj2LJRrAGhlAHBhagqtqysI0wbDSWlpbAgmrrc6AqO0dn27hDD22TTKPs26WxaeRumJAXwCvLfGTz9D1yHKfrsTVLWcAoc6jpTl1tKx5BStE4Ose1V_JCUyE3kchO5_Bd53vi-uzste2s--V3GWS-2eptG-_4pq_gqeQ11JZ8f5vJh8fh09_x7LhfwF0ESjAc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296136377</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of Sheldon's and Parnell's methods for quantifying morphological differences</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Haronian, Frank ; Arthur Sugerman, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haronian, Frank ; Arthur Sugerman, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Comparison of Sheldon's somatotype and Parnell's phenotype scores on 102 normal male university students showed significant differences between all three matched pairs of components. Shared variances were 35% for endomorphy and Fat, 44% for mesomorphy and Muscularity, and 74% for ectomorphy and Linearity. Parnell's Muscularity scores averaged nearly one point less than Sheldon's mesomorphy scores. Although both systems exhibit redundancy, neither seems reduceable to two scores. Because both systems show twice as many correlations with a variety of psychological measures as would be expected by chance, it would be useful to include either or both systems routinely in psychological studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-8644</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330230213</identifier><identifier>PMID: 5826271</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anthropometry ; Body Constitution ; Humans ; Male ; Psychological Tests ; Somatotypes ; United States</subject><ispartof>American journal of physical anthropology, 1965-06, Vol.23 (2), p.135-141</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-4b193ee0f593ecd74da2b9a2938aad38688552b5ef02cdc341148e38974aad3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-4b193ee0f593ecd74da2b9a2938aad38688552b5ef02cdc341148e38974aad3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27874,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5826271$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haronian, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arthur Sugerman, A.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of Sheldon's and Parnell's methods for quantifying morphological differences</title><title>American journal of physical anthropology</title><addtitle>Am. J. Phys. Anthropol</addtitle><description>Comparison of Sheldon's somatotype and Parnell's phenotype scores on 102 normal male university students showed significant differences between all three matched pairs of components. Shared variances were 35% for endomorphy and Fat, 44% for mesomorphy and Muscularity, and 74% for ectomorphy and Linearity. Parnell's Muscularity scores averaged nearly one point less than Sheldon's mesomorphy scores. Although both systems exhibit redundancy, neither seems reduceable to two scores. Because both systems show twice as many correlations with a variety of psychological measures as would be expected by chance, it would be useful to include either or both systems routinely in psychological studies.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Body Constitution</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><subject>Somatotypes</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0002-9483</issn><issn>1096-8644</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1965</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkN9LHDEQx4NY9LQ-96kQEPRpNcnsZrOPInoWxApnsX0Kufzw9txN1mQX9L9vjjssFAaG4fuZ4TtfhL5RckEJYZdqPagLCkBYLgp7aEZJwwvBy3IfzUhGiqYUcIiOUlrnkec6QAeVYJzVdIb-XGEd-kHFNgWPg8OLle1M8OcJK2_wo4redl2eejuugknYhYjfJuXH1n20_gX3IQ6r0IWXVqsOm9Y5G63XNn1FX5zqkj3Z9WP06_bm6fquuP85_3F9dV9o4GQsyiVtwFriqty0qUuj2LJRrAGhlAHBhagqtqysI0wbDSWlpbAgmrrc6AqO0dn27hDD22TTKPs26WxaeRumJAXwCvLfGTz9D1yHKfrsTVLWcAoc6jpTl1tKx5BStE4Ose1V_JCUyE3kchO5_Bd53vi-uzste2s--V3GWS-2eptG-_4pq_gqeQ11JZ8f5vJh8fh09_x7LhfwF0ESjAc</recordid><startdate>196506</startdate><enddate>196506</enddate><creator>Haronian, Frank</creator><creator>Arthur Sugerman, A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196506</creationdate><title>A comparison of Sheldon's and Parnell's methods for quantifying morphological differences</title><author>Haronian, Frank ; Arthur Sugerman, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-4b193ee0f593ecd74da2b9a2938aad38688552b5ef02cdc341148e38974aad3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1965</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Body Constitution</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><topic>Somatotypes</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haronian, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arthur Sugerman, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of physical anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haronian, Frank</au><au>Arthur Sugerman, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of Sheldon's and Parnell's methods for quantifying morphological differences</atitle><jtitle>American journal of physical anthropology</jtitle><addtitle>Am. J. Phys. Anthropol</addtitle><date>1965-06</date><risdate>1965</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>135-141</pages><issn>0002-9483</issn><eissn>1096-8644</eissn><abstract>Comparison of Sheldon's somatotype and Parnell's phenotype scores on 102 normal male university students showed significant differences between all three matched pairs of components. Shared variances were 35% for endomorphy and Fat, 44% for mesomorphy and Muscularity, and 74% for ectomorphy and Linearity. Parnell's Muscularity scores averaged nearly one point less than Sheldon's mesomorphy scores. Although both systems exhibit redundancy, neither seems reduceable to two scores. Because both systems show twice as many correlations with a variety of psychological measures as would be expected by chance, it would be useful to include either or both systems routinely in psychological studies.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>5826271</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajpa.1330230213</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9483 |
| ispartof | American journal of physical anthropology, 1965-06, Vol.23 (2), p.135-141 |
| issn | 0002-9483 1096-8644 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_83653060 |
| source | MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Anthropometry Body Constitution Humans Male Psychological Tests Somatotypes United States |
| title | A comparison of Sheldon's and Parnell's methods for quantifying morphological differences |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T23%3A26%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20Sheldon's%20and%20Parnell's%20methods%20for%20quantifying%20morphological%20differences&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20physical%20anthropology&rft.au=Haronian,%20Frank&rft.date=1965-06&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=135-141&rft.issn=0002-9483&rft.eissn=1096-8644&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajpa.1330230213&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E83653060%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296136377&rft_id=info:pmid/5826271&rfr_iscdi=true |