A comparative study to evaluate three separate computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation

A comparative study to evaluate three separate computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation

To compare the efficiency and accuracy of three separate computer programs for interpreting electrocardiograms, 50 EKGs run on patients hospitalized in our institution were transmitted to each of the three participating computer programs. The EKGs were then inspected individually by three cardiologi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.) Ala.), 1976-08, Vol.69 (8), p.968-968
Hauptverfasser: Wilensky, A S, Finchum, R N, Martin, R G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted
Electrocardiography
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Humans
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 968
container_issue 8
container_start_page 968
container_title Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.)
container_volume 69
creator Wilensky, A S
Finchum, R N
Martin, R G
description To compare the efficiency and accuracy of three separate computer programs for interpreting electrocardiograms, 50 EKGs run on patients hospitalized in our institution were transmitted to each of the three participating computer programs. The EKGs were then inspected individually by three cardiologists who later correlated and compared their results with the interpretations provided by the computer. The computer program used by Telemed Corporation provided the greatest frequency of totally correct and clinically acceptable interpretations as well as the least number of unacceptable or incorrect interpretations. The Bonner program was an acceptable second. The Mayo-Smith program had a much larger number of disagreements with the clinical cardiologists, and was far less acceptable for clinical use in their opinion.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00007611-197608000-00003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_83555885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>83555885</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c169t-d1b0d621c907b3231a028c1a0f0e39c2e309fd4959820f2b987640c90d13283e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRb3gVQp_wMIrdgE_4sReVhUUpEpsYB059oQGJXWwnUr9e5y2dBYzmqszD12EMCVPlKjymaQoC0ozqsqCyNRlk8Qv0CxlmeU8lzfoNoSfCRSyuEZXpRQFZTO0WWDj-kF7Hdsd4BBHu8fRYdjpbtQRcNx4SDocEDjAYwSPB---ve4DbpzH0IGJ3hntbTvJw6Y1uN0mbvAQ02q3vUOXje4C3J_qHH29vnwu37L1x-p9uVhnhhYqZpbWxBaMGkXKmjNONWHSpNwQ4Mow4EQ1NldCSUYaVitZFjlJtKWcSQ58jh6Pe9ODvyOEWPVtMNB1egtuDJXkQggpRQLlETTeheChqQbf9trvK0qqydfq39fq7OtB4mn04XRjrHuw58GjqfwPcJ123Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>83555885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study to evaluate three separate computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Wilensky, A S ; Finchum, R N ; Martin, R G</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilensky, A S ; Finchum, R N ; Martin, R G</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the efficiency and accuracy of three separate computer programs for interpreting electrocardiograms, 50 EKGs run on patients hospitalized in our institution were transmitted to each of the three participating computer programs. The EKGs were then inspected individually by three cardiologists who later correlated and compared their results with the interpretations provided by the computer. The computer program used by Telemed Corporation provided the greatest frequency of totally correct and clinically acceptable interpretations as well as the least number of unacceptable or incorrect interpretations. The Bonner program was an acceptable second. The Mayo-Smith program had a much larger number of disagreements with the clinical cardiologists, and was far less acceptable for clinical use in their opinion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-4348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00007611-197608000-00003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 785612</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted ; Electrocardiography ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Humans</subject><ispartof>Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.), 1976-08, Vol.69 (8), p.968-968</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/785612$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilensky, A S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finchum, R N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, R G</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study to evaluate three separate computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation</title><title>Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.)</title><addtitle>South Med J</addtitle><description>To compare the efficiency and accuracy of three separate computer programs for interpreting electrocardiograms, 50 EKGs run on patients hospitalized in our institution were transmitted to each of the three participating computer programs. The EKGs were then inspected individually by three cardiologists who later correlated and compared their results with the interpretations provided by the computer. The computer program used by Telemed Corporation provided the greatest frequency of totally correct and clinically acceptable interpretations as well as the least number of unacceptable or incorrect interpretations. The Bonner program was an acceptable second. The Mayo-Smith program had a much larger number of disagreements with the clinical cardiologists, and was far less acceptable for clinical use in their opinion.</description><subject>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>0038-4348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1976</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRb3gVQp_wMIrdgE_4sReVhUUpEpsYB059oQGJXWwnUr9e5y2dBYzmqszD12EMCVPlKjymaQoC0ozqsqCyNRlk8Qv0CxlmeU8lzfoNoSfCRSyuEZXpRQFZTO0WWDj-kF7Hdsd4BBHu8fRYdjpbtQRcNx4SDocEDjAYwSPB---ve4DbpzH0IGJ3hntbTvJw6Y1uN0mbvAQ02q3vUOXje4C3J_qHH29vnwu37L1x-p9uVhnhhYqZpbWxBaMGkXKmjNONWHSpNwQ4Mow4EQ1NldCSUYaVitZFjlJtKWcSQ58jh6Pe9ODvyOEWPVtMNB1egtuDJXkQggpRQLlETTeheChqQbf9trvK0qqydfq39fq7OtB4mn04XRjrHuw58GjqfwPcJ123Q</recordid><startdate>197608</startdate><enddate>197608</enddate><creator>Wilensky, A S</creator><creator>Finchum, R N</creator><creator>Martin, R G</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197608</creationdate><title>A comparative study to evaluate three separate computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation</title><author>Wilensky, A S ; Finchum, R N ; Martin, R G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c169t-d1b0d621c907b3231a028c1a0f0e39c2e309fd4959820f2b987640c90d13283e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1976</creationdate><topic>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilensky, A S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finchum, R N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, R G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilensky, A S</au><au>Finchum, R N</au><au>Martin, R G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study to evaluate three separate computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation</atitle><jtitle>Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.)</jtitle><addtitle>South Med J</addtitle><date>1976-08</date><risdate>1976</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>968</spage><epage>968</epage><pages>968-968</pages><issn>0038-4348</issn><abstract>To compare the efficiency and accuracy of three separate computer programs for interpreting electrocardiograms, 50 EKGs run on patients hospitalized in our institution were transmitted to each of the three participating computer programs. The EKGs were then inspected individually by three cardiologists who later correlated and compared their results with the interpretations provided by the computer. The computer program used by Telemed Corporation provided the greatest frequency of totally correct and clinically acceptable interpretations as well as the least number of unacceptable or incorrect interpretations. The Bonner program was an acceptable second. The Mayo-Smith program had a much larger number of disagreements with the clinical cardiologists, and was far less acceptable for clinical use in their opinion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>785612</pmid><doi>10.1097/00007611-197608000-00003</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-4348
ispartof Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.), 1976-08, Vol.69 (8), p.968-968
issn 0038-4348
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_83555885
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted
Electrocardiography
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Humans
title A comparative study to evaluate three separate computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A24%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20to%20evaluate%20three%20separate%20computer%20programs%20for%20electrocardiographic%20interpretation&rft.jtitle=Southern%20medical%20journal%20(Birmingham,%20Ala.)&rft.au=Wilensky,%20A%20S&rft.date=1976-08&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=968&rft.epage=968&rft.pages=968-968&rft.issn=0038-4348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00007611-197608000-00003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E83555885%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=83555885&rft_id=info:pmid/785612&rfr_iscdi=true