In vivo response of strontium and zinc-based ionomeric cement implants in bone

In vivo response of strontium and zinc-based ionomeric cement implants in bone

In this study the osteoconductive properties of strontium based ionomeric cements (ICs) named, LG125 and LG119, as well as zinc-based ICs, designated by LG130 and LG132, were compared. Wet ICs were surgically implanted into the femora of weaned Wistar rats for 4 weeks. To assess the percentage osseo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine 2002-04, Vol.13 (4), p.375-379
Hauptverfasser: Johal, K K, Mendoza-Suárez, G, Escalante-García, J I, Hill, R G, Brook, I M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Biomedical materials
Cement
Materials science
Rodents
Transplants & implants
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 379
container_issue 4
container_start_page 375
container_title Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine
container_volume 13
creator Johal, K K
Mendoza-Suárez, G
Escalante-García, J I
Hill, R G
Brook, I M
description In this study the osteoconductive properties of strontium based ionomeric cements (ICs) named, LG125 and LG119, as well as zinc-based ICs, designated by LG130 and LG132, were compared. Wet ICs were surgically implanted into the femora of weaned Wistar rats for 4 weeks. To assess the percentage osseointegration the perimeter of the implant and the perimeter of bone in contact with the implant were measured using a pointer (the length of bone/implant interfacial contact). Osteoconduction was determined by taking six points at random around the perimeter of each ionomeric rod measuring the thickness of newly formed bone. The degree of osteoconduction was taken as the average thickness of new bone produced on the implant surface. It was found that osteoconduction was greatest in the strontium based IC implant LG125. From these studies it can be concluded that the composition LG125 might provide a useful purpose as a bone cement.
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1014336517741
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_831171011</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27632183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-c56a22a5034d87a3524b3a218f1bb9fc8b3d9957881f001ed20339b7583e242b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0T1PwzAQBmALgWgpzGzIYoAp4PPZscNWVXxUqmCBObITR3LV2CVOKsGvJxJlYYDplken994j5BzYDTCOt_M7YCAQcwlKCTggU5AKM6FRH5IpK6TKhEQ2IScprRljopDymExAotA58Cl5Xga687tIO5e2MSRHY0NT38XQ-6GlJtT004cqsya5mvoYYus6X9HKtS701LfbjQl9oj5QG4M7JUeN2SR3tp8z8vZw_7p4ylYvj8vFfJVVKLDPKpkbzo1kKGqtDEouLBoOugFri6bSFutiDK81NIyBqzlDLKySGh0X3OKMXH_v3XbxfXCpL1ufKrcZw7g4pFIjgBqrgVFe_SkVL7gAlv8LucpxTIgjvPwF13HownhuqWQu8lyMn5mRiz0abOvqctv51nQf5U_z-AWcAoLL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>756466402</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vivo response of strontium and zinc-based ionomeric cement implants in bone</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Johal, K K ; Mendoza-Suárez, G ; Escalante-García, J I ; Hill, R G ; Brook, I M</creator><creatorcontrib>Johal, K K ; Mendoza-Suárez, G ; Escalante-García, J I ; Hill, R G ; Brook, I M</creatorcontrib><description>In this study the osteoconductive properties of strontium based ionomeric cements (ICs) named, LG125 and LG119, as well as zinc-based ICs, designated by LG130 and LG132, were compared. Wet ICs were surgically implanted into the femora of weaned Wistar rats for 4 weeks. To assess the percentage osseointegration the perimeter of the implant and the perimeter of bone in contact with the implant were measured using a pointer (the length of bone/implant interfacial contact). Osteoconduction was determined by taking six points at random around the perimeter of each ionomeric rod measuring the thickness of newly formed bone. The degree of osteoconduction was taken as the average thickness of new bone produced on the implant surface. It was found that osteoconduction was greatest in the strontium based IC implant LG125. From these studies it can be concluded that the composition LG125 might provide a useful purpose as a bone cement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-4530</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-4838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1014336517741</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15348612</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Biomedical materials ; Cement ; Materials science ; Rodents ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2002-04, Vol.13 (4), p.375-379</ispartof><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-c56a22a5034d87a3524b3a218f1bb9fc8b3d9957881f001ed20339b7583e242b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15348612$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johal, K K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Suárez, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escalante-García, J I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, R G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brook, I M</creatorcontrib><title>In vivo response of strontium and zinc-based ionomeric cement implants in bone</title><title>Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine</title><addtitle>J Mater Sci Mater Med</addtitle><description>In this study the osteoconductive properties of strontium based ionomeric cements (ICs) named, LG125 and LG119, as well as zinc-based ICs, designated by LG130 and LG132, were compared. Wet ICs were surgically implanted into the femora of weaned Wistar rats for 4 weeks. To assess the percentage osseointegration the perimeter of the implant and the perimeter of bone in contact with the implant were measured using a pointer (the length of bone/implant interfacial contact). Osteoconduction was determined by taking six points at random around the perimeter of each ionomeric rod measuring the thickness of newly formed bone. The degree of osteoconduction was taken as the average thickness of new bone produced on the implant surface. It was found that osteoconduction was greatest in the strontium based IC implant LG125. From these studies it can be concluded that the composition LG125 might provide a useful purpose as a bone cement.</description><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>0957-4530</issn><issn>1573-4838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0T1PwzAQBmALgWgpzGzIYoAp4PPZscNWVXxUqmCBObITR3LV2CVOKsGvJxJlYYDplken994j5BzYDTCOt_M7YCAQcwlKCTggU5AKM6FRH5IpK6TKhEQ2IScprRljopDymExAotA58Cl5Xga687tIO5e2MSRHY0NT38XQ-6GlJtT004cqsya5mvoYYus6X9HKtS701LfbjQl9oj5QG4M7JUeN2SR3tp8z8vZw_7p4ylYvj8vFfJVVKLDPKpkbzo1kKGqtDEouLBoOugFri6bSFutiDK81NIyBqzlDLKySGh0X3OKMXH_v3XbxfXCpL1ufKrcZw7g4pFIjgBqrgVFe_SkVL7gAlv8LucpxTIgjvPwF13HownhuqWQu8lyMn5mRiz0abOvqctv51nQf5U_z-AWcAoLL</recordid><startdate>20020401</startdate><enddate>20020401</enddate><creator>Johal, K K</creator><creator>Mendoza-Suárez, G</creator><creator>Escalante-García, J I</creator><creator>Hill, R G</creator><creator>Brook, I M</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0W</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020401</creationdate><title>In vivo response of strontium and zinc-based ionomeric cement implants in bone</title><author>Johal, K K ; Mendoza-Suárez, G ; Escalante-García, J I ; Hill, R G ; Brook, I M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-c56a22a5034d87a3524b3a218f1bb9fc8b3d9957881f001ed20339b7583e242b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johal, K K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Suárez, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escalante-García, J I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, R G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brook, I M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering &amp; Technology Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johal, K K</au><au>Mendoza-Suárez, G</au><au>Escalante-García, J I</au><au>Hill, R G</au><au>Brook, I M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vivo response of strontium and zinc-based ionomeric cement implants in bone</atitle><jtitle>Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Mater Sci Mater Med</addtitle><date>2002-04-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>375</spage><epage>379</epage><pages>375-379</pages><issn>0957-4530</issn><eissn>1573-4838</eissn><abstract>In this study the osteoconductive properties of strontium based ionomeric cements (ICs) named, LG125 and LG119, as well as zinc-based ICs, designated by LG130 and LG132, were compared. Wet ICs were surgically implanted into the femora of weaned Wistar rats for 4 weeks. To assess the percentage osseointegration the perimeter of the implant and the perimeter of bone in contact with the implant were measured using a pointer (the length of bone/implant interfacial contact). Osteoconduction was determined by taking six points at random around the perimeter of each ionomeric rod measuring the thickness of newly formed bone. The degree of osteoconduction was taken as the average thickness of new bone produced on the implant surface. It was found that osteoconduction was greatest in the strontium based IC implant LG125. From these studies it can be concluded that the composition LG125 might provide a useful purpose as a bone cement.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>15348612</pmid><doi>10.1023/A:1014336517741</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0957-4530
ispartof Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2002-04, Vol.13 (4), p.375-379
issn 0957-4530
1573-4838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_831171011
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biomedical materials
Cement
Materials science
Rodents
Transplants & implants
title In vivo response of strontium and zinc-based ionomeric cement implants in bone
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T02%3A33%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vivo%20response%20of%20strontium%20and%20zinc-based%20ionomeric%20cement%20implants%20in%20bone&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20materials%20science.%20Materials%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Johal,%20K%20K&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=375&rft.epage=379&rft.pages=375-379&rft.issn=0957-4530&rft.eissn=1573-4838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1014336517741&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E27632183%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=756466402&rft_id=info:pmid/15348612&rfr_iscdi=true