PROBLEMS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BRAIN DAMAGE AND CHILDHOOD SCHIZOPHRENIA

This article discusses the problems encountered in the differential diagnosis of brain damage and childhood schizophrenia. Differential diagnosis is a task of complex discrimination among a mass of perceptions, according to a framework which organizes the perceptions into distinct classifiable categ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of orthopsychiatry 1961-10, Vol.31 (4), p.728-737
1. Verfasser: Baer, Paul E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 737
container_issue 4
container_start_page 728
container_title American journal of orthopsychiatry
container_volume 31
creator Baer, Paul E.
description This article discusses the problems encountered in the differential diagnosis of brain damage and childhood schizophrenia. Differential diagnosis is a task of complex discrimination among a mass of perceptions, according to a framework which organizes the perceptions into distinct classifiable categories. Patterns of perceptions come to have diagnostic identities which are distinguished from one another. Not only do these patterns appear different, consisting of different perceptual units, but they also contain different combinations of perceptions. If Pattern 1 includes A, B, C, and D, Pattern 2 may include A, B, F, and G, and Pattern 3, C, D, F, and G. While the different patterns may have some common elements, the relationship of the perceptions within the patterns is not duplicated, but overlap does exist. The patterns originate when a previously unrelated set of perceptions is organized, usually as an extension of an already accepted theory or system. New organization of perceptions may be considered as a reaction to problem situations requiring understanding for the sake of solution, and serve as a guide for a test of action or treatment. Diagnostic problems in the differentiation of brain damage and childhood schizophrenia exemplify these points. A consideration of the differential diagnostic problems between childhood schizophrenia and “brain damage” shows that the problem is not solely between the diagnoses, but also exists within them, especially in childhood schizophrenia. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1961.tb02172.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_82970289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>82970289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4662-46f2cee7361e28958f03f9330a40176084585a4d4fb4b9a74d4c9c0d7ef437933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkU-L2zAQxUVp2U139ysU00Ivxan-2ZJ6qjZ2Yi_eOCTppRehODIkOHEq2XTz7SuT0EIPheoyb9Bv3gw8AN4jOEb-fd6PkSAihBBHXsVo3G0gRgyPX16B0e-v12AEfQ0FJfgWvHVu71vCMbkBt4jwmHAGR2C5WJaPRfq8CvJ5sM7SIMmn03SZzte5LHwjZ_Nyla-Ccho8LqVnEvksZ2kg50kwyfIiycoyCVZefi8XmZ_L5T14U-vGmYdrvQPfpul6koVFOcsnsgg1jWMc0rjGlTGMxMhgLiJeQ1ILQqCmELEYchrxSNMtrTd0IzTzqhIV3DJTU8I8eAc-XnxPtv3RG9epw85Vpmn00bS9UxwLBr2zBz_8Be7b3h79bQpRgSNIIcb_pAj0F3MYQ099uVCVbZ2zplYnuztoe1YIqiEdtVdDBGqIQA3pqGs66sUPv7uu6DcHs_0zeo3DA18vwM9dY87_Ya3kU7kYpLf4dLHQJ61O7lxp2-2qxriqt9YcO9XaThGkqGKYk1_sVqRn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1492504022</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PROBLEMS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BRAIN DAMAGE AND CHILDHOOD SCHIZOPHRENIA</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Baer, Paul E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baer, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><description>This article discusses the problems encountered in the differential diagnosis of brain damage and childhood schizophrenia. Differential diagnosis is a task of complex discrimination among a mass of perceptions, according to a framework which organizes the perceptions into distinct classifiable categories. Patterns of perceptions come to have diagnostic identities which are distinguished from one another. Not only do these patterns appear different, consisting of different perceptual units, but they also contain different combinations of perceptions. If Pattern 1 includes A, B, C, and D, Pattern 2 may include A, B, F, and G, and Pattern 3, C, D, F, and G. While the different patterns may have some common elements, the relationship of the perceptions within the patterns is not duplicated, but overlap does exist. The patterns originate when a previously unrelated set of perceptions is organized, usually as an extension of an already accepted theory or system. New organization of perceptions may be considered as a reaction to problem situations requiring understanding for the sake of solution, and serve as a guide for a test of action or treatment. Diagnostic problems in the differentiation of brain damage and childhood schizophrenia exemplify these points. A consideration of the differential diagnostic problems between childhood schizophrenia and “brain damage” shows that the problem is not solely between the diagnoses, but also exists within them, especially in childhood schizophrenia. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9432</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-0025</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1961.tb02172.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 13863870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: American Orthopsychiatric Association, Inc</publisher><subject>Brain ; Brain Damage ; Brain Diseases ; Child ; Childhood Onset Schizophrenia ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Differential Diagnosis ; Human ; Humans ; Infant ; Old Medline ; Schizophrenia ; Schizophrenia, Childhood ; Treatment Outcomes</subject><ispartof>American journal of orthopsychiatry, 1961-10, Vol.31 (4), p.728-737</ispartof><rights>1961 American Orthopsychiatric Association, Inc.</rights><rights>1961 American Orthopsychiatric Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4662-46f2cee7361e28958f03f9330a40176084585a4d4fb4b9a74d4c9c0d7ef437933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4662-46f2cee7361e28958f03f9330a40176084585a4d4fb4b9a74d4c9c0d7ef437933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27848,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13863870$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baer, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><title>PROBLEMS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BRAIN DAMAGE AND CHILDHOOD SCHIZOPHRENIA</title><title>American journal of orthopsychiatry</title><addtitle>Am J Orthopsychiatry</addtitle><description>This article discusses the problems encountered in the differential diagnosis of brain damage and childhood schizophrenia. Differential diagnosis is a task of complex discrimination among a mass of perceptions, according to a framework which organizes the perceptions into distinct classifiable categories. Patterns of perceptions come to have diagnostic identities which are distinguished from one another. Not only do these patterns appear different, consisting of different perceptual units, but they also contain different combinations of perceptions. If Pattern 1 includes A, B, C, and D, Pattern 2 may include A, B, F, and G, and Pattern 3, C, D, F, and G. While the different patterns may have some common elements, the relationship of the perceptions within the patterns is not duplicated, but overlap does exist. The patterns originate when a previously unrelated set of perceptions is organized, usually as an extension of an already accepted theory or system. New organization of perceptions may be considered as a reaction to problem situations requiring understanding for the sake of solution, and serve as a guide for a test of action or treatment. Diagnostic problems in the differentiation of brain damage and childhood schizophrenia exemplify these points. A consideration of the differential diagnostic problems between childhood schizophrenia and “brain damage” shows that the problem is not solely between the diagnoses, but also exists within them, especially in childhood schizophrenia. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)</description><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain Damage</subject><subject>Brain Diseases</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Childhood Onset Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Differential Diagnosis</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Old Medline</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Schizophrenia, Childhood</subject><subject>Treatment Outcomes</subject><issn>0002-9432</issn><issn>1939-0025</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1961</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkU-L2zAQxUVp2U139ysU00Ivxan-2ZJ6qjZ2Yi_eOCTppRehODIkOHEq2XTz7SuT0EIPheoyb9Bv3gw8AN4jOEb-fd6PkSAihBBHXsVo3G0gRgyPX16B0e-v12AEfQ0FJfgWvHVu71vCMbkBt4jwmHAGR2C5WJaPRfq8CvJ5sM7SIMmn03SZzte5LHwjZ_Nyla-Ccho8LqVnEvksZ2kg50kwyfIiycoyCVZefi8XmZ_L5T14U-vGmYdrvQPfpul6koVFOcsnsgg1jWMc0rjGlTGMxMhgLiJeQ1ILQqCmELEYchrxSNMtrTd0IzTzqhIV3DJTU8I8eAc-XnxPtv3RG9epw85Vpmn00bS9UxwLBr2zBz_8Be7b3h79bQpRgSNIIcb_pAj0F3MYQ099uVCVbZ2zplYnuztoe1YIqiEdtVdDBGqIQA3pqGs66sUPv7uu6DcHs_0zeo3DA18vwM9dY87_Ya3kU7kYpLf4dLHQJ61O7lxp2-2qxriqt9YcO9XaThGkqGKYk1_sVqRn</recordid><startdate>196110</startdate><enddate>196110</enddate><creator>Baer, Paul E.</creator><general>American Orthopsychiatric Association, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Orthopsychiatric Association</general><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HVZBN</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196110</creationdate><title>PROBLEMS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BRAIN DAMAGE AND CHILDHOOD SCHIZOPHRENIA</title><author>Baer, Paul E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4662-46f2cee7361e28958f03f9330a40176084585a4d4fb4b9a74d4c9c0d7ef437933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1961</creationdate><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain Damage</topic><topic>Brain Diseases</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Childhood Onset Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Differential Diagnosis</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Old Medline</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Schizophrenia, Childhood</topic><topic>Treatment Outcomes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baer, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 24</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthopsychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baer, Paul E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PROBLEMS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BRAIN DAMAGE AND CHILDHOOD SCHIZOPHRENIA</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthopsychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Orthopsychiatry</addtitle><date>1961-10</date><risdate>1961</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>728</spage><epage>737</epage><pages>728-737</pages><issn>0002-9432</issn><eissn>1939-0025</eissn><abstract>This article discusses the problems encountered in the differential diagnosis of brain damage and childhood schizophrenia. Differential diagnosis is a task of complex discrimination among a mass of perceptions, according to a framework which organizes the perceptions into distinct classifiable categories. Patterns of perceptions come to have diagnostic identities which are distinguished from one another. Not only do these patterns appear different, consisting of different perceptual units, but they also contain different combinations of perceptions. If Pattern 1 includes A, B, C, and D, Pattern 2 may include A, B, F, and G, and Pattern 3, C, D, F, and G. While the different patterns may have some common elements, the relationship of the perceptions within the patterns is not duplicated, but overlap does exist. The patterns originate when a previously unrelated set of perceptions is organized, usually as an extension of an already accepted theory or system. New organization of perceptions may be considered as a reaction to problem situations requiring understanding for the sake of solution, and serve as a guide for a test of action or treatment. Diagnostic problems in the differentiation of brain damage and childhood schizophrenia exemplify these points. A consideration of the differential diagnostic problems between childhood schizophrenia and “brain damage” shows that the problem is not solely between the diagnoses, but also exists within them, especially in childhood schizophrenia. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>American Orthopsychiatric Association, Inc</pub><pmid>13863870</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1939-0025.1961.tb02172.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9432
ispartof American journal of orthopsychiatry, 1961-10, Vol.31 (4), p.728-737
issn 0002-9432
1939-0025
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_82970289
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Brain
Brain Damage
Brain Diseases
Child
Childhood Onset Schizophrenia
Diagnosis, Differential
Differential Diagnosis
Human
Humans
Infant
Old Medline
Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia, Childhood
Treatment Outcomes
title PROBLEMS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BRAIN DAMAGE AND CHILDHOOD SCHIZOPHRENIA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T11%3A36%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PROBLEMS%20IN%20THE%20DIFFERENTIAL%20DIAGNOSIS%20OF%20BRAIN%20DAMAGE%20AND%20CHILDHOOD%20SCHIZOPHRENIA&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthopsychiatry&rft.au=Baer,%20Paul%20E.&rft.date=1961-10&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=728&rft.epage=737&rft.pages=728-737&rft.issn=0002-9432&rft.eissn=1939-0025&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1961.tb02172.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E82970289%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1492504022&rft_id=info:pmid/13863870&rfr_iscdi=true