Differences in the excitability of two populations of trigeminal primary afferent central terminals

The excitability of lingual and inferior dental nerve terminals in the trigeminal main sensory nucleus was increased following a conditioning stimulus delivered to the same nerves of the contralateral side. The lingual nerve primary afferent depolarization (PAD) began at a shorter CS-TS interval (CS...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain research 1974-09, Vol.77 (2), p.195-209
Hauptverfasser: Goldberg, L.J., Browne, P.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 209
container_issue 2
container_start_page 195
container_title Brain research
container_volume 77
creator Goldberg, L.J.
Browne, P.A.
description The excitability of lingual and inferior dental nerve terminals in the trigeminal main sensory nucleus was increased following a conditioning stimulus delivered to the same nerves of the contralateral side. The lingual nerve primary afferent depolarization (PAD) began at a shorter CS-TS interval (CS, conditioning stimulus; TS, test stimulus), and reached a maximum level of depolarization sooner, than did the PAD evoked in the inferior dental nerve. This difference in the time course of the PAD was not dependent on the site of the CS; i.e., the same time course was observed for the lingual nerve terminals whether the CS was delivered to either the contralateral lingual, or inferior dental nerve. The effect of the contralateral CS was also tested on the ipsilateral lingual-digastric and inferior dental-digastric reflexes in order to determine if the PAD observed in the ipsilateral nerve terminals would be reflected in similar changes in reflexes mediated by those nerves. It was found that both digastric reflexes were inhibited by the CS. The time course of the inhibition showed similar characteristics to that of the previously discussed PAD; i.e., the onset of the lingual-digastric reflex inhibition began a shorter CS-TS interval and reached maximum effectiveness sooner than did the inhibition of the inferior dental-digastric reflex. The possible significance of the results in relation to the role of presynaptic inhibitory mechanisms in the reflex control of jaw movement is discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90784-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_82475929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0006899374907847</els_id><sourcerecordid>82475929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-c12d1cdd73e61e36f38e19c036d7fd69e60969b2e71c8570e9c9dae76031312d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwyAYx4nRzDn9BppwMnqoQumgXEzMfE2WeNEz6eCpYvoygar79tK12dELT-D_Qp4fQqeUXFFC-TUhhCe5lOxCZJeSiDxLxB6a0lykCU8zso-mO8shOvL-M14Zk2SCJlk-p0yIKdJ3tizBQaPBY9vg8AEYfrUNxcpWNmxwW-Lw0-J1u-6qIti28dsnZ9-htk1R4bWzdeE2uBh6AtbxcFEI4LYOf4wOyjjgZJwz9PZw_7p4SpYvj8-L22WiU5GGRNPUUG2MYMApMF6yHKjUhHEjSsMlcCK5XKUgqM7ngoDU0hQgOGGUxSybofOhd-3arw58ULX1GqqqaKDtvMrTTMxlKqMxG4zatd47KNW4hKJE9WxVD0714JTI1JatEjF2NvZ3qxrMLjTCjPrNoENc8tuCU17bnqyxDnRQprX_f_AHRkGKQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>82475929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in the excitability of two populations of trigeminal primary afferent central terminals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Goldberg, L.J. ; Browne, P.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, L.J. ; Browne, P.A.</creatorcontrib><description>The excitability of lingual and inferior dental nerve terminals in the trigeminal main sensory nucleus was increased following a conditioning stimulus delivered to the same nerves of the contralateral side. The lingual nerve primary afferent depolarization (PAD) began at a shorter CS-TS interval (CS, conditioning stimulus; TS, test stimulus), and reached a maximum level of depolarization sooner, than did the PAD evoked in the inferior dental nerve. This difference in the time course of the PAD was not dependent on the site of the CS; i.e., the same time course was observed for the lingual nerve terminals whether the CS was delivered to either the contralateral lingual, or inferior dental nerve. The effect of the contralateral CS was also tested on the ipsilateral lingual-digastric and inferior dental-digastric reflexes in order to determine if the PAD observed in the ipsilateral nerve terminals would be reflected in similar changes in reflexes mediated by those nerves. It was found that both digastric reflexes were inhibited by the CS. The time course of the inhibition showed similar characteristics to that of the previously discussed PAD; i.e., the onset of the lingual-digastric reflex inhibition began a shorter CS-TS interval and reached maximum effectiveness sooner than did the inhibition of the inferior dental-digastric reflex. The possible significance of the results in relation to the role of presynaptic inhibitory mechanisms in the reflex control of jaw movement is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90784-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4851377</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cats ; Conditioning (Psychology) ; Electric Stimulation ; Facial Nerve - physiology ; Nerve Fibers, Myelinated - physiology ; Neural Inhibition ; Neurons, Afferent - physiology ; Reaction Time ; Reflex ; Trigeminal Nerve - physiology</subject><ispartof>Brain research, 1974-09, Vol.77 (2), p.195-209</ispartof><rights>1974 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-c12d1cdd73e61e36f38e19c036d7fd69e60969b2e71c8570e9c9dae76031312d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-c12d1cdd73e61e36f38e19c036d7fd69e60969b2e71c8570e9c9dae76031312d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(74)90784-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4851377$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, L.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, P.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in the excitability of two populations of trigeminal primary afferent central terminals</title><title>Brain research</title><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><description>The excitability of lingual and inferior dental nerve terminals in the trigeminal main sensory nucleus was increased following a conditioning stimulus delivered to the same nerves of the contralateral side. The lingual nerve primary afferent depolarization (PAD) began at a shorter CS-TS interval (CS, conditioning stimulus; TS, test stimulus), and reached a maximum level of depolarization sooner, than did the PAD evoked in the inferior dental nerve. This difference in the time course of the PAD was not dependent on the site of the CS; i.e., the same time course was observed for the lingual nerve terminals whether the CS was delivered to either the contralateral lingual, or inferior dental nerve. The effect of the contralateral CS was also tested on the ipsilateral lingual-digastric and inferior dental-digastric reflexes in order to determine if the PAD observed in the ipsilateral nerve terminals would be reflected in similar changes in reflexes mediated by those nerves. It was found that both digastric reflexes were inhibited by the CS. The time course of the inhibition showed similar characteristics to that of the previously discussed PAD; i.e., the onset of the lingual-digastric reflex inhibition began a shorter CS-TS interval and reached maximum effectiveness sooner than did the inhibition of the inferior dental-digastric reflex. The possible significance of the results in relation to the role of presynaptic inhibitory mechanisms in the reflex control of jaw movement is discussed.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Conditioning (Psychology)</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Facial Nerve - physiology</subject><subject>Nerve Fibers, Myelinated - physiology</subject><subject>Neural Inhibition</subject><subject>Neurons, Afferent - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reflex</subject><subject>Trigeminal Nerve - physiology</subject><issn>0006-8993</issn><issn>1872-6240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1974</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PwyAYx4nRzDn9BppwMnqoQumgXEzMfE2WeNEz6eCpYvoygar79tK12dELT-D_Qp4fQqeUXFFC-TUhhCe5lOxCZJeSiDxLxB6a0lykCU8zso-mO8shOvL-M14Zk2SCJlk-p0yIKdJ3tizBQaPBY9vg8AEYfrUNxcpWNmxwW-Lw0-J1u-6qIti28dsnZ9-htk1R4bWzdeE2uBh6AtbxcFEI4LYOf4wOyjjgZJwz9PZw_7p4SpYvj8-L22WiU5GGRNPUUG2MYMApMF6yHKjUhHEjSsMlcCK5XKUgqM7ngoDU0hQgOGGUxSybofOhd-3arw58ULX1GqqqaKDtvMrTTMxlKqMxG4zatd47KNW4hKJE9WxVD0714JTI1JatEjF2NvZ3qxrMLjTCjPrNoENc8tuCU17bnqyxDnRQprX_f_AHRkGKQA</recordid><startdate>19740906</startdate><enddate>19740906</enddate><creator>Goldberg, L.J.</creator><creator>Browne, P.A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19740906</creationdate><title>Differences in the excitability of two populations of trigeminal primary afferent central terminals</title><author>Goldberg, L.J. ; Browne, P.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-c12d1cdd73e61e36f38e19c036d7fd69e60969b2e71c8570e9c9dae76031312d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1974</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Conditioning (Psychology)</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Facial Nerve - physiology</topic><topic>Nerve Fibers, Myelinated - physiology</topic><topic>Neural Inhibition</topic><topic>Neurons, Afferent - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reflex</topic><topic>Trigeminal Nerve - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, L.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, P.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldberg, L.J.</au><au>Browne, P.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in the excitability of two populations of trigeminal primary afferent central terminals</atitle><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><date>1974-09-06</date><risdate>1974</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>195</spage><epage>209</epage><pages>195-209</pages><issn>0006-8993</issn><eissn>1872-6240</eissn><abstract>The excitability of lingual and inferior dental nerve terminals in the trigeminal main sensory nucleus was increased following a conditioning stimulus delivered to the same nerves of the contralateral side. The lingual nerve primary afferent depolarization (PAD) began at a shorter CS-TS interval (CS, conditioning stimulus; TS, test stimulus), and reached a maximum level of depolarization sooner, than did the PAD evoked in the inferior dental nerve. This difference in the time course of the PAD was not dependent on the site of the CS; i.e., the same time course was observed for the lingual nerve terminals whether the CS was delivered to either the contralateral lingual, or inferior dental nerve. The effect of the contralateral CS was also tested on the ipsilateral lingual-digastric and inferior dental-digastric reflexes in order to determine if the PAD observed in the ipsilateral nerve terminals would be reflected in similar changes in reflexes mediated by those nerves. It was found that both digastric reflexes were inhibited by the CS. The time course of the inhibition showed similar characteristics to that of the previously discussed PAD; i.e., the onset of the lingual-digastric reflex inhibition began a shorter CS-TS interval and reached maximum effectiveness sooner than did the inhibition of the inferior dental-digastric reflex. The possible significance of the results in relation to the role of presynaptic inhibitory mechanisms in the reflex control of jaw movement is discussed.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>4851377</pmid><doi>10.1016/0006-8993(74)90784-7</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-8993
ispartof Brain research, 1974-09, Vol.77 (2), p.195-209
issn 0006-8993
1872-6240
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_82475929
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animals
Cats
Conditioning (Psychology)
Electric Stimulation
Facial Nerve - physiology
Nerve Fibers, Myelinated - physiology
Neural Inhibition
Neurons, Afferent - physiology
Reaction Time
Reflex
Trigeminal Nerve - physiology
title Differences in the excitability of two populations of trigeminal primary afferent central terminals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T10%3A24%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20the%20excitability%20of%20two%20populations%20of%20trigeminal%20primary%20afferent%20central%20terminals&rft.jtitle=Brain%20research&rft.au=Goldberg,%20L.J.&rft.date=1974-09-06&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=195&rft.epage=209&rft.pages=195-209&rft.issn=0006-8993&rft.eissn=1872-6240&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0006-8993(74)90784-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E82475929%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=82475929&rft_id=info:pmid/4851377&rft_els_id=0006899374907847&rfr_iscdi=true