Management of Bladder Drainage Following Vaginal Plastic Repairs
A controversy exists concerning the most appropriate method of bladder drainage after vaginal hysterectomy and anterior-posterior repair. The present study compares the use of the Foley catheter and the suprapubic tube following these operations. One hundred and fifty suitable candidates were select...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 1974-07, Vol.44 (1), p.65-71 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 71 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 65 |
container_title | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | WISER, W. L. MORRISON, J. C. LOVEDAY, G. L. McINTOSH, R. E. KENNEDY, B. S. SHAW, B. H. FISH, S. A. |
description | A controversy exists concerning the most appropriate method of bladder drainage after vaginal hysterectomy and anterior-posterior repair. The present study compares the use of the Foley catheter and the suprapubic tube following these operations. One hundred and fifty suitable candidates were selected, with 75 using each system. The results showed that the suprapubic group had one-third the rate {12% vs 38%) of significant bacteriuria when compared to the Foley group at the time the instruments were removed on the fourth postoperative day. In addition the Foley group also had a significant increase in the number of positive urine cultures 6 weeks after the operation (10% vs 2%), a higher incidence of prolonged hospitalization (greater than 6 days), and a more frequent use of bladder analgesics (69% vs 41%). Other advantages in the use of suprapubic tubes after vaginal surgery appeared to be ease of care by ward personnel, greater patient comfort, and a reduced incidence of severe complications. An additional finding of this study was related to the increase of significant bacteriuria in patients receiving cold knife conization prior to hysterectomy. This factor appeared to be constant regardless of the drainage system used although a greater number of cases were found in the Foley group. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_82431822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>82431822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2519-67ae6ce432b2830c482a3c20552fb21fb3ae38f7c9daa10e7d4cc424be28bdda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1Lw0AQhhdRaq3-BCEnb4Hd2U2yuanVqlBRRMVbmGwmbXTz4W5C8N-b0p6Ged6HgXmP2FzoRIYg5dcxm3MOaZhopU7ZmfffnHMRp3LGZirmPIZ4zq6fscEN1dT0QVsGtxaLglxw57Da8WDVWtuOVbMJPnEzIRu8WvR9ZYI36rBy_pydlGg9XRzmgn2s7t-Xj-H65eFpebMOO4hEGsYJUmxISchBS26UBpQGeBRBmYMoc4kkdZmYtEAUnJJCGaNA5QQ6LwqUC3a1v9u59ncg32d15Q1Ziw21g880KCk0wCReHsQhr6nIOlfV6P6yw8tTrvb52NqenP-xw0gu2xLafptNFU1WxEORJoon0xbuUCr_AakSYrk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>82431822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management of Bladder Drainage Following Vaginal Plastic Repairs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>WISER, W. L. ; MORRISON, J. C. ; LOVEDAY, G. L. ; McINTOSH, R. E. ; KENNEDY, B. S. ; SHAW, B. H. ; FISH, S. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>WISER, W. L. ; MORRISON, J. C. ; LOVEDAY, G. L. ; McINTOSH, R. E. ; KENNEDY, B. S. ; SHAW, B. H. ; FISH, S. A.</creatorcontrib><description>A controversy exists concerning the most appropriate method of bladder drainage after vaginal hysterectomy and anterior-posterior repair. The present study compares the use of the Foley catheter and the suprapubic tube following these operations. One hundred and fifty suitable candidates were selected, with 75 using each system. The results showed that the suprapubic group had one-third the rate {12% vs 38%) of significant bacteriuria when compared to the Foley group at the time the instruments were removed on the fourth postoperative day. In addition the Foley group also had a significant increase in the number of positive urine cultures 6 weeks after the operation (10% vs 2%), a higher incidence of prolonged hospitalization (greater than 6 days), and a more frequent use of bladder analgesics (69% vs 41%). Other advantages in the use of suprapubic tubes after vaginal surgery appeared to be ease of care by ward personnel, greater patient comfort, and a reduced incidence of severe complications. An additional finding of this study was related to the increase of significant bacteriuria in patients receiving cold knife conization prior to hysterectomy. This factor appeared to be constant regardless of the drainage system used although a greater number of cases were found in the Foley group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-7844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-233X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4600626</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</publisher><subject>Bacteriuria - diagnosis ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Drainage ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Methods ; Postoperative Care ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Preoperative Care ; Prospective Studies ; Urethra - surgery ; Urinary Bladder - surgery ; Urinary Catheterization ; Urinary Tract Infections - prevention & control ; Vagina - surgery</subject><ispartof>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 1974-07, Vol.44 (1), p.65-71</ispartof><rights>1974 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4600626$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WISER, W. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORRISON, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOVEDAY, G. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McINTOSH, R. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KENNEDY, B. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHAW, B. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISH, S. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Management of Bladder Drainage Following Vaginal Plastic Repairs</title><title>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</title><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>A controversy exists concerning the most appropriate method of bladder drainage after vaginal hysterectomy and anterior-posterior repair. The present study compares the use of the Foley catheter and the suprapubic tube following these operations. One hundred and fifty suitable candidates were selected, with 75 using each system. The results showed that the suprapubic group had one-third the rate {12% vs 38%) of significant bacteriuria when compared to the Foley group at the time the instruments were removed on the fourth postoperative day. In addition the Foley group also had a significant increase in the number of positive urine cultures 6 weeks after the operation (10% vs 2%), a higher incidence of prolonged hospitalization (greater than 6 days), and a more frequent use of bladder analgesics (69% vs 41%). Other advantages in the use of suprapubic tubes after vaginal surgery appeared to be ease of care by ward personnel, greater patient comfort, and a reduced incidence of severe complications. An additional finding of this study was related to the increase of significant bacteriuria in patients receiving cold knife conization prior to hysterectomy. This factor appeared to be constant regardless of the drainage system used although a greater number of cases were found in the Foley group.</description><subject>Bacteriuria - diagnosis</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Care</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Urethra - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Catheterization</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Vagina - surgery</subject><issn>0029-7844</issn><issn>1873-233X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1974</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1Lw0AQhhdRaq3-BCEnb4Hd2U2yuanVqlBRRMVbmGwmbXTz4W5C8N-b0p6Ged6HgXmP2FzoRIYg5dcxm3MOaZhopU7ZmfffnHMRp3LGZirmPIZ4zq6fscEN1dT0QVsGtxaLglxw57Da8WDVWtuOVbMJPnEzIRu8WvR9ZYI36rBy_pydlGg9XRzmgn2s7t-Xj-H65eFpebMOO4hEGsYJUmxISchBS26UBpQGeBRBmYMoc4kkdZmYtEAUnJJCGaNA5QQ6LwqUC3a1v9u59ncg32d15Q1Ziw21g880KCk0wCReHsQhr6nIOlfV6P6yw8tTrvb52NqenP-xw0gu2xLafptNFU1WxEORJoon0xbuUCr_AakSYrk</recordid><startdate>197407</startdate><enddate>197407</enddate><creator>WISER, W. L.</creator><creator>MORRISON, J. C.</creator><creator>LOVEDAY, G. L.</creator><creator>McINTOSH, R. E.</creator><creator>KENNEDY, B. S.</creator><creator>SHAW, B. H.</creator><creator>FISH, S. A.</creator><general>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197407</creationdate><title>Management of Bladder Drainage Following Vaginal Plastic Repairs</title><author>WISER, W. L. ; MORRISON, J. C. ; LOVEDAY, G. L. ; McINTOSH, R. E. ; KENNEDY, B. S. ; SHAW, B. H. ; FISH, S. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2519-67ae6ce432b2830c482a3c20552fb21fb3ae38f7c9daa10e7d4cc424be28bdda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1974</creationdate><topic>Bacteriuria - diagnosis</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Care</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Urethra - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Catheterization</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Vagina - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WISER, W. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORRISON, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOVEDAY, G. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McINTOSH, R. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KENNEDY, B. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHAW, B. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISH, S. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WISER, W. L.</au><au>MORRISON, J. C.</au><au>LOVEDAY, G. L.</au><au>McINTOSH, R. E.</au><au>KENNEDY, B. S.</au><au>SHAW, B. H.</au><au>FISH, S. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management of Bladder Drainage Following Vaginal Plastic Repairs</atitle><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1974-07</date><risdate>1974</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>65-71</pages><issn>0029-7844</issn><eissn>1873-233X</eissn><abstract>A controversy exists concerning the most appropriate method of bladder drainage after vaginal hysterectomy and anterior-posterior repair. The present study compares the use of the Foley catheter and the suprapubic tube following these operations. One hundred and fifty suitable candidates were selected, with 75 using each system. The results showed that the suprapubic group had one-third the rate {12% vs 38%) of significant bacteriuria when compared to the Foley group at the time the instruments were removed on the fourth postoperative day. In addition the Foley group also had a significant increase in the number of positive urine cultures 6 weeks after the operation (10% vs 2%), a higher incidence of prolonged hospitalization (greater than 6 days), and a more frequent use of bladder analgesics (69% vs 41%). Other advantages in the use of suprapubic tubes after vaginal surgery appeared to be ease of care by ward personnel, greater patient comfort, and a reduced incidence of severe complications. An additional finding of this study was related to the increase of significant bacteriuria in patients receiving cold knife conization prior to hysterectomy. This factor appeared to be constant regardless of the drainage system used although a greater number of cases were found in the Foley group.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</pub><pmid>4600626</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-7844 |
ispartof | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 1974-07, Vol.44 (1), p.65-71 |
issn | 0029-7844 1873-233X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_82431822 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Bacteriuria - diagnosis Clinical Trials as Topic Drainage Female Humans Hysterectomy Length of Stay Male Methods Postoperative Care Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Preoperative Care Prospective Studies Urethra - surgery Urinary Bladder - surgery Urinary Catheterization Urinary Tract Infections - prevention & control Vagina - surgery |
title | Management of Bladder Drainage Following Vaginal Plastic Repairs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T01%3A13%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20of%20Bladder%20Drainage%20Following%20Vaginal%20Plastic%20Repairs&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics%20and%20gynecology%20(New%20York.%201953)&rft.au=WISER,%20W.%20L.&rft.date=1974-07&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=65-71&rft.issn=0029-7844&rft.eissn=1873-233X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E82431822%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=82431822&rft_id=info:pmid/4600626&rfr_iscdi=true |