Management of Bladder Drainage Following Vaginal Plastic Repairs

A controversy exists concerning the most appropriate method of bladder drainage after vaginal hysterectomy and anterior-posterior repair. The present study compares the use of the Foley catheter and the suprapubic tube following these operations. One hundred and fifty suitable candidates were select...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 1974-07, Vol.44 (1), p.65-71
Hauptverfasser: WISER, W. L., MORRISON, J. C., LOVEDAY, G. L., McINTOSH, R. E., KENNEDY, B. S., SHAW, B. H., FISH, S. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 71
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)
container_volume 44
creator WISER, W. L.
MORRISON, J. C.
LOVEDAY, G. L.
McINTOSH, R. E.
KENNEDY, B. S.
SHAW, B. H.
FISH, S. A.
description A controversy exists concerning the most appropriate method of bladder drainage after vaginal hysterectomy and anterior-posterior repair. The present study compares the use of the Foley catheter and the suprapubic tube following these operations. One hundred and fifty suitable candidates were selected, with 75 using each system. The results showed that the suprapubic group had one-third the rate {12% vs 38%) of significant bacteriuria when compared to the Foley group at the time the instruments were removed on the fourth postoperative day. In addition the Foley group also had a significant increase in the number of positive urine cultures 6 weeks after the operation (10% vs 2%), a higher incidence of prolonged hospitalization (greater than 6 days), and a more frequent use of bladder analgesics (69% vs 41%). Other advantages in the use of suprapubic tubes after vaginal surgery appeared to be ease of care by ward personnel, greater patient comfort, and a reduced incidence of severe complications. An additional finding of this study was related to the increase of significant bacteriuria in patients receiving cold knife conization prior to hysterectomy. This factor appeared to be constant regardless of the drainage system used although a greater number of cases were found in the Foley group.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_82431822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>82431822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2519-67ae6ce432b2830c482a3c20552fb21fb3ae38f7c9daa10e7d4cc424be28bdda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1Lw0AQhhdRaq3-BCEnb4Hd2U2yuanVqlBRRMVbmGwmbXTz4W5C8N-b0p6Ged6HgXmP2FzoRIYg5dcxm3MOaZhopU7ZmfffnHMRp3LGZirmPIZ4zq6fscEN1dT0QVsGtxaLglxw57Da8WDVWtuOVbMJPnEzIRu8WvR9ZYI36rBy_pydlGg9XRzmgn2s7t-Xj-H65eFpebMOO4hEGsYJUmxISchBS26UBpQGeBRBmYMoc4kkdZmYtEAUnJJCGaNA5QQ6LwqUC3a1v9u59ncg32d15Q1Ziw21g880KCk0wCReHsQhr6nIOlfV6P6yw8tTrvb52NqenP-xw0gu2xLafptNFU1WxEORJoon0xbuUCr_AakSYrk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>82431822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management of Bladder Drainage Following Vaginal Plastic Repairs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>WISER, W. L. ; MORRISON, J. C. ; LOVEDAY, G. L. ; McINTOSH, R. E. ; KENNEDY, B. S. ; SHAW, B. H. ; FISH, S. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>WISER, W. L. ; MORRISON, J. C. ; LOVEDAY, G. L. ; McINTOSH, R. E. ; KENNEDY, B. S. ; SHAW, B. H. ; FISH, S. A.</creatorcontrib><description>A controversy exists concerning the most appropriate method of bladder drainage after vaginal hysterectomy and anterior-posterior repair. The present study compares the use of the Foley catheter and the suprapubic tube following these operations. One hundred and fifty suitable candidates were selected, with 75 using each system. The results showed that the suprapubic group had one-third the rate {12% vs 38%) of significant bacteriuria when compared to the Foley group at the time the instruments were removed on the fourth postoperative day. In addition the Foley group also had a significant increase in the number of positive urine cultures 6 weeks after the operation (10% vs 2%), a higher incidence of prolonged hospitalization (greater than 6 days), and a more frequent use of bladder analgesics (69% vs 41%). Other advantages in the use of suprapubic tubes after vaginal surgery appeared to be ease of care by ward personnel, greater patient comfort, and a reduced incidence of severe complications. An additional finding of this study was related to the increase of significant bacteriuria in patients receiving cold knife conization prior to hysterectomy. This factor appeared to be constant regardless of the drainage system used although a greater number of cases were found in the Foley group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-7844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-233X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4600626</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</publisher><subject>Bacteriuria - diagnosis ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Drainage ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Methods ; Postoperative Care ; Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Preoperative Care ; Prospective Studies ; Urethra - surgery ; Urinary Bladder - surgery ; Urinary Catheterization ; Urinary Tract Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Vagina - surgery</subject><ispartof>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 1974-07, Vol.44 (1), p.65-71</ispartof><rights>1974 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4600626$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WISER, W. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORRISON, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOVEDAY, G. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McINTOSH, R. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KENNEDY, B. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHAW, B. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISH, S. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Management of Bladder Drainage Following Vaginal Plastic Repairs</title><title>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</title><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>A controversy exists concerning the most appropriate method of bladder drainage after vaginal hysterectomy and anterior-posterior repair. The present study compares the use of the Foley catheter and the suprapubic tube following these operations. One hundred and fifty suitable candidates were selected, with 75 using each system. The results showed that the suprapubic group had one-third the rate {12% vs 38%) of significant bacteriuria when compared to the Foley group at the time the instruments were removed on the fourth postoperative day. In addition the Foley group also had a significant increase in the number of positive urine cultures 6 weeks after the operation (10% vs 2%), a higher incidence of prolonged hospitalization (greater than 6 days), and a more frequent use of bladder analgesics (69% vs 41%). Other advantages in the use of suprapubic tubes after vaginal surgery appeared to be ease of care by ward personnel, greater patient comfort, and a reduced incidence of severe complications. An additional finding of this study was related to the increase of significant bacteriuria in patients receiving cold knife conization prior to hysterectomy. This factor appeared to be constant regardless of the drainage system used although a greater number of cases were found in the Foley group.</description><subject>Bacteriuria - diagnosis</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Care</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Urethra - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Catheterization</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Vagina - surgery</subject><issn>0029-7844</issn><issn>1873-233X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1974</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1Lw0AQhhdRaq3-BCEnb4Hd2U2yuanVqlBRRMVbmGwmbXTz4W5C8N-b0p6Ged6HgXmP2FzoRIYg5dcxm3MOaZhopU7ZmfffnHMRp3LGZirmPIZ4zq6fscEN1dT0QVsGtxaLglxw57Da8WDVWtuOVbMJPnEzIRu8WvR9ZYI36rBy_pydlGg9XRzmgn2s7t-Xj-H65eFpebMOO4hEGsYJUmxISchBS26UBpQGeBRBmYMoc4kkdZmYtEAUnJJCGaNA5QQ6LwqUC3a1v9u59ncg32d15Q1Ziw21g880KCk0wCReHsQhr6nIOlfV6P6yw8tTrvb52NqenP-xw0gu2xLafptNFU1WxEORJoon0xbuUCr_AakSYrk</recordid><startdate>197407</startdate><enddate>197407</enddate><creator>WISER, W. L.</creator><creator>MORRISON, J. C.</creator><creator>LOVEDAY, G. L.</creator><creator>McINTOSH, R. E.</creator><creator>KENNEDY, B. S.</creator><creator>SHAW, B. H.</creator><creator>FISH, S. A.</creator><general>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197407</creationdate><title>Management of Bladder Drainage Following Vaginal Plastic Repairs</title><author>WISER, W. L. ; MORRISON, J. C. ; LOVEDAY, G. L. ; McINTOSH, R. E. ; KENNEDY, B. S. ; SHAW, B. H. ; FISH, S. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2519-67ae6ce432b2830c482a3c20552fb21fb3ae38f7c9daa10e7d4cc424be28bdda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1974</creationdate><topic>Bacteriuria - diagnosis</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Care</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Urethra - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Catheterization</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Vagina - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WISER, W. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORRISON, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOVEDAY, G. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McINTOSH, R. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KENNEDY, B. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHAW, B. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISH, S. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WISER, W. L.</au><au>MORRISON, J. C.</au><au>LOVEDAY, G. L.</au><au>McINTOSH, R. E.</au><au>KENNEDY, B. S.</au><au>SHAW, B. H.</au><au>FISH, S. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management of Bladder Drainage Following Vaginal Plastic Repairs</atitle><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1974-07</date><risdate>1974</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>65-71</pages><issn>0029-7844</issn><eissn>1873-233X</eissn><abstract>A controversy exists concerning the most appropriate method of bladder drainage after vaginal hysterectomy and anterior-posterior repair. The present study compares the use of the Foley catheter and the suprapubic tube following these operations. One hundred and fifty suitable candidates were selected, with 75 using each system. The results showed that the suprapubic group had one-third the rate {12% vs 38%) of significant bacteriuria when compared to the Foley group at the time the instruments were removed on the fourth postoperative day. In addition the Foley group also had a significant increase in the number of positive urine cultures 6 weeks after the operation (10% vs 2%), a higher incidence of prolonged hospitalization (greater than 6 days), and a more frequent use of bladder analgesics (69% vs 41%). Other advantages in the use of suprapubic tubes after vaginal surgery appeared to be ease of care by ward personnel, greater patient comfort, and a reduced incidence of severe complications. An additional finding of this study was related to the increase of significant bacteriuria in patients receiving cold knife conization prior to hysterectomy. This factor appeared to be constant regardless of the drainage system used although a greater number of cases were found in the Foley group.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</pub><pmid>4600626</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-7844
ispartof Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 1974-07, Vol.44 (1), p.65-71
issn 0029-7844
1873-233X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_82431822
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Bacteriuria - diagnosis
Clinical Trials as Topic
Drainage
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy
Length of Stay
Male
Methods
Postoperative Care
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Preoperative Care
Prospective Studies
Urethra - surgery
Urinary Bladder - surgery
Urinary Catheterization
Urinary Tract Infections - prevention & control
Vagina - surgery
title Management of Bladder Drainage Following Vaginal Plastic Repairs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T01%3A13%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20of%20Bladder%20Drainage%20Following%20Vaginal%20Plastic%20Repairs&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics%20and%20gynecology%20(New%20York.%201953)&rft.au=WISER,%20W.%20L.&rft.date=1974-07&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=65-71&rft.issn=0029-7844&rft.eissn=1873-233X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E82431822%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=82431822&rft_id=info:pmid/4600626&rfr_iscdi=true