Pulmonary formulations: what remains to be done?
Significant advances have been made in the last 50 years in developing safe and efficacious aerosol formulations for pulmonary delivery. The key to future innovation may lie at the interface between biology and particle engineering. Improved understanding of biological processes including particle c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of aerosol medicine 2010-12, Vol.23 Suppl 2 (S2), p.S5-S-23 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S-23 |
---|---|
container_issue | S2 |
container_start_page | S5 |
container_title | Journal of aerosol medicine |
container_volume | 23 Suppl 2 |
creator | Weers, Jeffry G Bell, John Chan, Hak-Kim Cipolla, David Dunbar, Craig Hickey, Anthony J Smith, Ian J |
description | Significant advances have been made in the last 50 years in developing safe and efficacious aerosol formulations for pulmonary delivery. The key to future innovation may lie at the interface between biology and particle engineering. Improved understanding of biological processes including particle clearance, cellular targeting, intracellular trafficking, and drug absorption are needed to better design formulations that deliver to the "target" with the optimal balance of pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and safety profiles. More specifically, continued advances are needed in the development of: (1) controlled release formulations; (2) formulations with improved regional targeting within the lungs (e.g., airway versus alveoli and vice versa); (3) formulations containing active targeting moieties; (4) formulation strategies for improving the systemic bioavailability of inhaled macromolecules; (5) formulation strategies for delivering macromolecules, including siRNA and DNA into cells; and (f) formulations with improved dose consistency. It is likely that such innovation will require the development of novel excipients and particle engineering strategies. Future innovation must also take into the account the changing marketplace and the diverse set of customers (patient, healthcare professional, heath authorities, payers, and politicians) who must be satisfied. The pharmacoeconomics of new delivery systems will be closely scrutinized, so it is imperative that cost factors be taken into account. Otherwise, the new technology option may overshoot the evolving inhalation marketplace. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1089/jamp.2010.0838 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_822544991</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>822544991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-ad9dca7a7c0796f96666160509532f3d9409d58ef57841d979bd1a3e1135daad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1PwzAMQCMEYmNw5YgqLpw67KRpGy5omviSJsEBzlHWpKJT04ykFeLfk2pjB3yxLT1b9iPkEmGOUIrbjbLbOYXYQsnKIzJFkWFKC2DHhxpxQs5C2ADkmOXslEwoImMlwJTA29Ba1yn_k9TO26FVfeO6cJd8f6o-8caqpgtJ75K1SbTrzP05OalVG8zFPs_Ix-PD-_I5Xb0-vSwXq7RiFPtUaaErVaiigkLktchjYA4cBGe0ZlpkIDQvTc2LMkMtCrHWqJiJh3GtlGYzcrPbu_XuazChl7YJlWlb1Rk3BFlSyrNMCIzk9T9y4wbfxeNGKKeCcxGh-Q6qvAvBm1pufWPj2xJBjiblaFKOJuVoMg5c7bcOa2v0Af9Tx34B_55s8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>822629559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pulmonary formulations: what remains to be done?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Weers, Jeffry G ; Bell, John ; Chan, Hak-Kim ; Cipolla, David ; Dunbar, Craig ; Hickey, Anthony J ; Smith, Ian J</creator><creatorcontrib>Weers, Jeffry G ; Bell, John ; Chan, Hak-Kim ; Cipolla, David ; Dunbar, Craig ; Hickey, Anthony J ; Smith, Ian J</creatorcontrib><description>Significant advances have been made in the last 50 years in developing safe and efficacious aerosol formulations for pulmonary delivery. The key to future innovation may lie at the interface between biology and particle engineering. Improved understanding of biological processes including particle clearance, cellular targeting, intracellular trafficking, and drug absorption are needed to better design formulations that deliver to the "target" with the optimal balance of pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and safety profiles. More specifically, continued advances are needed in the development of: (1) controlled release formulations; (2) formulations with improved regional targeting within the lungs (e.g., airway versus alveoli and vice versa); (3) formulations containing active targeting moieties; (4) formulation strategies for improving the systemic bioavailability of inhaled macromolecules; (5) formulation strategies for delivering macromolecules, including siRNA and DNA into cells; and (f) formulations with improved dose consistency. It is likely that such innovation will require the development of novel excipients and particle engineering strategies. Future innovation must also take into the account the changing marketplace and the diverse set of customers (patient, healthcare professional, heath authorities, payers, and politicians) who must be satisfied. The pharmacoeconomics of new delivery systems will be closely scrutinized, so it is imperative that cost factors be taken into account. Otherwise, the new technology option may overshoot the evolving inhalation marketplace.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1941-2711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-2703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2010.0838</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21133800</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Administration, Inhalation ; Aerosols ; Animals ; Delayed-Action Preparations ; Drug Delivery Systems ; Drug Design ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Excipients - chemistry ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Lung - metabolism ; Nebulizers and Vaporizers ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - administration & dosage ; Tissue Distribution</subject><ispartof>Journal of aerosol medicine, 2010-12, Vol.23 Suppl 2 (S2), p.S5-S-23</ispartof><rights>(©) Copyright 2010, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-ad9dca7a7c0796f96666160509532f3d9409d58ef57841d979bd1a3e1135daad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-ad9dca7a7c0796f96666160509532f3d9409d58ef57841d979bd1a3e1135daad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21133800$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weers, Jeffry G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Hak-Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cipolla, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunbar, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hickey, Anthony J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Ian J</creatorcontrib><title>Pulmonary formulations: what remains to be done?</title><title>Journal of aerosol medicine</title><addtitle>J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv</addtitle><description>Significant advances have been made in the last 50 years in developing safe and efficacious aerosol formulations for pulmonary delivery. The key to future innovation may lie at the interface between biology and particle engineering. Improved understanding of biological processes including particle clearance, cellular targeting, intracellular trafficking, and drug absorption are needed to better design formulations that deliver to the "target" with the optimal balance of pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and safety profiles. More specifically, continued advances are needed in the development of: (1) controlled release formulations; (2) formulations with improved regional targeting within the lungs (e.g., airway versus alveoli and vice versa); (3) formulations containing active targeting moieties; (4) formulation strategies for improving the systemic bioavailability of inhaled macromolecules; (5) formulation strategies for delivering macromolecules, including siRNA and DNA into cells; and (f) formulations with improved dose consistency. It is likely that such innovation will require the development of novel excipients and particle engineering strategies. Future innovation must also take into the account the changing marketplace and the diverse set of customers (patient, healthcare professional, heath authorities, payers, and politicians) who must be satisfied. The pharmacoeconomics of new delivery systems will be closely scrutinized, so it is imperative that cost factors be taken into account. Otherwise, the new technology option may overshoot the evolving inhalation marketplace.</description><subject>Administration, Inhalation</subject><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Delayed-Action Preparations</subject><subject>Drug Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Drug Design</subject><subject>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</subject><subject>Excipients - chemistry</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung - metabolism</subject><subject>Nebulizers and Vaporizers</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Tissue Distribution</subject><issn>1941-2711</issn><issn>1941-2703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1PwzAMQCMEYmNw5YgqLpw67KRpGy5omviSJsEBzlHWpKJT04ykFeLfk2pjB3yxLT1b9iPkEmGOUIrbjbLbOYXYQsnKIzJFkWFKC2DHhxpxQs5C2ADkmOXslEwoImMlwJTA29Ba1yn_k9TO26FVfeO6cJd8f6o-8caqpgtJ75K1SbTrzP05OalVG8zFPs_Ix-PD-_I5Xb0-vSwXq7RiFPtUaaErVaiigkLktchjYA4cBGe0ZlpkIDQvTc2LMkMtCrHWqJiJh3GtlGYzcrPbu_XuazChl7YJlWlb1Rk3BFlSyrNMCIzk9T9y4wbfxeNGKKeCcxGh-Q6qvAvBm1pufWPj2xJBjiblaFKOJuVoMg5c7bcOa2v0Af9Tx34B_55s8A</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Weers, Jeffry G</creator><creator>Bell, John</creator><creator>Chan, Hak-Kim</creator><creator>Cipolla, David</creator><creator>Dunbar, Craig</creator><creator>Hickey, Anthony J</creator><creator>Smith, Ian J</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>Pulmonary formulations: what remains to be done?</title><author>Weers, Jeffry G ; Bell, John ; Chan, Hak-Kim ; Cipolla, David ; Dunbar, Craig ; Hickey, Anthony J ; Smith, Ian J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-ad9dca7a7c0796f96666160509532f3d9409d58ef57841d979bd1a3e1135daad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Administration, Inhalation</topic><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Delayed-Action Preparations</topic><topic>Drug Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Drug Design</topic><topic>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</topic><topic>Excipients - chemistry</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung - metabolism</topic><topic>Nebulizers and Vaporizers</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Tissue Distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weers, Jeffry G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Hak-Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cipolla, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunbar, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hickey, Anthony J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Ian J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of aerosol medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weers, Jeffry G</au><au>Bell, John</au><au>Chan, Hak-Kim</au><au>Cipolla, David</au><au>Dunbar, Craig</au><au>Hickey, Anthony J</au><au>Smith, Ian J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pulmonary formulations: what remains to be done?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of aerosol medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv</addtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>23 Suppl 2</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>S5</spage><epage>S-23</epage><pages>S5-S-23</pages><issn>1941-2711</issn><eissn>1941-2703</eissn><abstract>Significant advances have been made in the last 50 years in developing safe and efficacious aerosol formulations for pulmonary delivery. The key to future innovation may lie at the interface between biology and particle engineering. Improved understanding of biological processes including particle clearance, cellular targeting, intracellular trafficking, and drug absorption are needed to better design formulations that deliver to the "target" with the optimal balance of pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and safety profiles. More specifically, continued advances are needed in the development of: (1) controlled release formulations; (2) formulations with improved regional targeting within the lungs (e.g., airway versus alveoli and vice versa); (3) formulations containing active targeting moieties; (4) formulation strategies for improving the systemic bioavailability of inhaled macromolecules; (5) formulation strategies for delivering macromolecules, including siRNA and DNA into cells; and (f) formulations with improved dose consistency. It is likely that such innovation will require the development of novel excipients and particle engineering strategies. Future innovation must also take into the account the changing marketplace and the diverse set of customers (patient, healthcare professional, heath authorities, payers, and politicians) who must be satisfied. The pharmacoeconomics of new delivery systems will be closely scrutinized, so it is imperative that cost factors be taken into account. Otherwise, the new technology option may overshoot the evolving inhalation marketplace.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>21133800</pmid><doi>10.1089/jamp.2010.0838</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1941-2711 |
ispartof | Journal of aerosol medicine, 2010-12, Vol.23 Suppl 2 (S2), p.S5-S-23 |
issn | 1941-2711 1941-2703 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_822544991 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Administration, Inhalation Aerosols Animals Delayed-Action Preparations Drug Delivery Systems Drug Design Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions Excipients - chemistry Health technology assessment Humans Lung - metabolism Nebulizers and Vaporizers Pharmaceutical Preparations - administration & dosage Tissue Distribution |
title | Pulmonary formulations: what remains to be done? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T00%3A06%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pulmonary%20formulations:%20what%20remains%20to%20be%20done?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20aerosol%20medicine&rft.au=Weers,%20Jeffry%20G&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=23%20Suppl%202&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=S5&rft.epage=S-23&rft.pages=S5-S-23&rft.issn=1941-2711&rft.eissn=1941-2703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/jamp.2010.0838&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E822544991%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=822629559&rft_id=info:pmid/21133800&rfr_iscdi=true |